Chennai Court October 2016 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
A. Shajahan Vs. The Secretary to Government, Handlooms, Handicrafts, T ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Oct-03-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ of Mandamus directing the third respondent i.e. the Deputy Director of Handlooms and Textiles, Salem to implement the orders of the Government passed in G.O.Ms.No.84 Handlooms Handicrafts Textiles and Khadi (E2) Department dated 31.03.2016 and as per the further directions issued by the Director of Handlooms and Textiles, Chennai in his letter No. RC. 9347/2016/E1 dated 26.05.2016 regarding payment of duty salary for the period from 17.08.1999 to 10.12.2000 to the petitioner within a specified time frame.) 1. The writ petition has been filed, seeking to direct the third respondent to implement the orders of the Government passed in G.O.Ms.No.84 Handlooms Handicrafts Textiles and Khadi (E2) Department dated 31.03.2016 and the directions issued by the Director of Handlooms and Textiles, Chennai in his letter No.RC.9347/2016/E1 dated 26.05.2016, regarding payment of duty salary for the pe...
Chinnasamy and Another Vs. State represented by The Deputy Superintend ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Oct-03-2016
(Prayers in Crl.O.P.No.1024/2016: Petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. praying to call for the records in C.C.No.2 of 2015 on the file of the Special Judge for Prevention of Corrupt Cases Act Court, Salem and quash the same as illegal. Crl.O.P.No.5589/2016: Petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. praying to call for the connected records in impugned Supplementary Charge Sheet based on the Second Sanction Order dated 27.01.2016 passed by the District Collector, Salem made in ROC.No.48144/2010/A2, pending on the file of Special Judge for Prevention of Corruption Act, Spl.C.C.No.2 of 2015 and quash the same as illegal.) Common Order 1. The Petitioner/Accused has preferred the instant Crl.O.P.No. 1024 of 2016 praying for passing of an order by this Court to call for the records in C.C.No.2 of 2015 on the file of the Special Judge for Prevention of Corrupt Cases Act, Salem and to quash the same. 2. The Petitioner/Accused has focussed the present Crl.O.P.No.5589 of 2016 praying for pass...
R. Jayarathina Gandhi Vs. The Principal Secretary to Government, Schoo ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Oct-03-2016
(Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the second respondent herein to include the name of the petitioner in the panel for recruitment by transfer from Ministerial service to PG Assistant (Tamil) for the year 2013 2014, in accordance with G.O.Ms.No.21, dated 02.11.2011, by taking into consideration the date of the examination for post graduation in Tamil and not the date of the declaration of the result as per Fundamental Rule 26.) 1. By consent, the writ petition is taken up for final disposal. 2. The present writ petition has been filed seeking a Mandamus directing the second respondent herein to include the name of the petitioner in the panel for recruitment by transfer from Ministerial service to PG Assistant (Tamil) for the year 2013 2014, in accordance with G.O.Ms.No.21, dated 02.11.2011, by taking into consideration the date of the examination for post graduation in Tamil and not the date of the declaration of...
Dindigul District Siddha, Unani Homeopathic, Ayurvedic, Experience All ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Oct-03-2016
(Prayer:Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus, forbearing the Respondents from interfering with the profession and occupation of the members of the petitioner Association mentioned in Paragraph No.3 of the petitioner Affidavit for practicing alternative medicine.) 1. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus,forbearing the Respondents from interfering with the profession and occupation of the members of the petitioner Association mentioned in Paragraph No.3 of the petitioner Affidavit for practicing alternative medicine. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondents. 3. After some elaborate arguments, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that it would be suffice if the representation of the petitioner Association is disposed of, by the respondents, on merits and in accordanc...
Thangasamy Vs. Sundari and Another
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Oct-03-2016
(Prayer: Civil Revision Petition filed under Section 115 of the Civil Procedure Code praying this Court to set aside the fair and decretal order made in E.A.No.219 of 2016 in E.P.No.106 of 1008 in O.S.No.138 of 2005, dated 18.8.2016 on the file of Sub-Court, Thoothukudi.) 1. This Civil Revision Petition arises against the order passed in E.A.No.219 of 2016 in E.P.No.106 of 1008 in O.S.No.138 of 2005, dated 18.8.2016 on the file of Sub-Court, Thoothukudi. 2. According to the Petitioner, the Petitioner has purchased the suit property from the second respondent, subsequent to the decree passed in the afore-said suit. Aggrieved by the same, the Petitioner has filed an Appeal Suit before the Sub-Court, Thoothukudi. In the aforesaid appeal suit, the petitioner has filed I.A.No.17 of 2016 and the same is pending before the same Court. In the mean time, by order, dated 18.08.2016, the Sub-Court, Thoothukudi had dismissed the E.A.No.219 of 2016 in E.P.No.106 of 2008 in O.S.No.138 of 2005. Again...
Samiyappan Vs. S. Sarmila Banu
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Oct-03-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Appeal filed under Section 378(4) of Cr.P.C., to call for the records and set aside the order of acquitting the Respondent / Accused passed in S.T.C.No.1633 of 2008 dated 16.07.2009 on the file of the Learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Mayiladuthurai and allow the Criminal Appeal.) 1. The Appellant / Complainant has filed the present Criminal Appeal before this Court as against the Judgment dated 16.07.2009 in STC No.1633 of 2008 passed by the Learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Mayiladuthurai. 2. The Learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Mayiladuthurai while passing the impugned Judgment in STC No.1633 of 2008 (filed by the Appellant / Complainant) at Paragraph No.17 had interalia observed the following: ...17....... It is well established that where the burden of an issue lies upon the accused, she is not required to discharge that burden by leading evidence to prove her case beyond a reasonable doubt. The evidences adduced by the parties before this court lead to one conc...
P. Rajappa Vs. K. Elumalai, Special Officer/Managing Director, Chennai
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Oct-03-2016
(Prayer: Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, praying to punish the respondent for Contempt for disobeying the order of this Court dated 26.07.2013, made in W.P.No.9353 of 2005.) 1. Mr.M.Arunkumar, Learned Counsel for the Petitioner and Mrs.P.Kavitha, Learned Standing Counsel for the Respondent are present. 2. It is represented on behalf of the Respondent that the Petitioner was so far paid with a total sum of Rs.2,26,343/-. 3. Today, on the side of the Respondent, a Cheque bearing No.272065 dated 30.09.2016 for a sum of Rs.1,14,369/- drawn in favour of the Petitioner is produced and the same is accepted by the Learned Counsel for the Petitioner. The receipt of aforesaid Cheque dated 30.09.2016 for Rs.1,14,369/- is hereby recorded. 4. According to the Learned Counsel for the Petitioner, still there appears to be a sum of Rs.47,661/- is due from the Respondent/Contemnor. 5. At this stage, the Learned Standing Counsel for the Respondent/Contemnor informs t...
M. Pandian Vs. The Chief Secretary, State of Tamil Nadu, Fort St. Geor ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Oct-03-2016
(Prayer:Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents not to consider the candidates having an additional degree in B.A. English Literature through one year correspondence course for the recruitment of English teachers considering the petitioner's representation, dated 05.08.2010.) 1. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus,directing the respondents not to consider the candidates having an additional degree in B.A. English Literature through one year correspondence course for the recruitment of English teachers, by considering the petitioner's representation, dated 05.08.2010. 2. There is no representation for the petitioner. 3. The Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondents agreed to consider the representation of the petitioner, dated 05.08.2010. 4. Recording the submission of the learned Additional Government Pleader, this Writ Petition is di...
Krishnakumar Vs. The Chief Electoral Officer, The Tamil Nadu State Ele ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Oct-03-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records pertaining to the 2nd respondent in Roc.No.12318/2016/C2 published in Tamil Nadu Gazette Extraordinary No.220 dated 18.09.2016 in respect of Kanniyakumari Town Panchayat, Kanniyakumari district, quash the same and consequently directing the respondents to reserve then declare either the Ward No.12 or 13 of the Kanniyakumari Town Panchayat, Kanniyakumari District to the Scheduled Caste or Scheduled Caste Women under the Tamil Nadu Municipal Councils (Reservation of Wards for the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes and Co-option of Women in the Councils) Rules, 1991.) 1. The writ petition has been filed, seeking to quash the impugned order dated 18.09.2016 passed by the 2nd respondent in Roc.No.12318/2016/C2 published in Tamil Nadu Gazette Extraordinary No.220 dated 18.09.2016 in respect of Kanniyakumari Town Panchayat, Kanniyakum...
Tvl. Metalica Metals, rep.by its Partner Kailash Bhandari Vs. The Comm ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Oct-03-2016
(Prayer: Petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of Writs of Certiorari to call for the records of the second respondent respectively in TIN No.33190021230/2007-08, TIN No. 33190021230/2008-09, TIN No.33190021230/2009-10, TIN No. 33190021230/2010-11, TIN No.33190021230/2011-12, TIN No. 33190021230/2012-13, TIN No.33190021230/2013-14 and TIN No. 33190021230/2014-15 dated 24.8.2016 and quash the same.) Common Order 1. Mr.K.Venkatesh, learned Government Advocate accepts notice for the respondents. Heard both. By consent, the writ petitions are taken up for joint disposal. 2. The petitioner is a registered dealer on the file of the second respondent under the provisions of the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006 (hereinafter called the TNVAT Act) and the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956, in ferrous and non ferrous metals and mainly in stainless steel. In these writ petitions, the petitioner has challenged the orders of assessment under the TNVAT Act fo...
- ‹ Prev
- 32
- 33
- 34
- 35
- 36
- 37
- 38
- 39
- 40
- 42
- Next ›
- Last »