Chennai Court October 2016 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Sorimuthu Vs. K.S. Mohamed Ribai
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Oct-04-2016
(Prayer: Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of Constitution of India, to set aside the fair and decreetal order dated 16.06.2016 in I.A.No.9 of 2016 in O.S.No.55 of 2015 on the file of III Additional District Court, Tirunelveli.) 1. This civil revision petition has been filed by the petitioner/defendant, to set aside the fair and decreetal order dated 16.06.2016 in I.A.No.9 of 2016 in O.S.No.55 of 2015 on the file of III Additional District Court, Tirunelveli. 2. The respondent herein, as plaintiff, filed a suit in O.S.No.409 of 2012 before the learned II Additional District Judge, Tirunelveli, praying for the relief of permanent injunction against the revision petitioner/defendant. The aforesaid suit was dismissed on 26.03.2015, wherein, the II Additional District Munsif has observed that the respondent herein is not in possession of the suit property. After the dismissal of the aforesaid suit, the respondent herein filed another suit in O.S.No.55 of 2015 before the II...
S. Diwakar Vs. The Commissioner of Police, Chennai
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Oct-03-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to direct the respondent herein to perform his duty by taking action on the petitioner's complaint cum representation dated 28.12.2015 in accordance with law and in the verge of doing so also to take actions as against the officials stated in it and to provide him a security cover as there prevails a grave threat to his life and limb in the hands of the persons as stated in his complaint cum representation dated 28.12.2015 and also to pass orders permitting him to have and carry a device to protect himself against any acts caused harming him until the providence of the security cover.) 1. When this matter came up for hearing before R.Mala, J., on 21.03.2016, the following order was passed: "Heard the party-in-person. 2. Registry is directed to call for explanation from the staff concerned, as to how the present petition came to be numbered when the same is not in a proper format and the said explanation is dire...
Narayanappa Vs. The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep by Deputy Superintendent ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Oct-03-2016
Prayer: Criminal Revision Petitions are filed under Section 397 r/w 401 of Cr.P.C. to set aside the orders dated 28.03.2016 made in Crl.MP.No.3311 and 3312 of 2015 in SC.No.95 of 2013 passed by the learned Principal Sessions Judge, Salem. Common Order 1. Both the criminal revisions are filed against the order passed by the learned Principal Sessions Judge, Salem dated 28.03.2016 made in Crl.MP.Nos.3311 and 3312 of 2015 in STC.No.95 of 2013. 2. The petition in Crl.MP.No.3311 of 2015 is filed by the prosecution under Section 319 Cr.PC to pass an order to arrest or summon Naryanappa so/.Venkatagriappa/proposed party to subject him to face criminal trial in Cr.No.184 of 2003 along with the respondent/accused. The trial Court after hearing the arguments of both sides, allowed the petition and arrayed the proposed respondent as A19 and directed to issue summons. Aggrieved against the order of the trial Court, the present revision petitioner/proposed party/Narayanappa s/o.Venkatagiriappa pref...
S. Abdul Rahman Vs. The Sub-Registrar, Triplicane
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Oct-03-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the respondent to waive 7 days from the time limit of 30 days mentioned under Section 16 of the Special Marriage Act, 1954 and consequently, direct him to register the marriage held between the petitioner and the petitioner's wife N.Jurina Bau on 30.05.2010 at 'Sammuthya nala koodam, Mirbakshi ali Street, Royapettah, Chennai - 14.) 1. This writ petition has been filed seeking a writ of mandamus directing the respondent to waive 7 days from the time limit of 30 days mentioned under Section 16 of the Special Marriage Act, 1954 and consequently, direct him to register the marriage held between the petitioner and the petitioner's wife. 2. The petitioner has got married to one N.Jarina Banu on 30.05.2010, in 'Sammuthya nala koodam, Mirbakshi ali Street, Royapettah, Chennai - 14. The said marriage was solemnized by one S.K.Mohideen, and a Certificate from the S...
N. Murugesan Executive Officer Vs. The Divisional Railway Manager, Sou ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Oct-03-2016
(Prayer:Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the respondents to pay arrears of Professional Tax for 1st half year 2010-11 of Rs.79,280/- within a time limit that may be fixed by this Court.) 1. The petitioner/N.Murugesan, who is the Executive Officer of Lalgudi Selection Grade Town Panchayt, Tiruchirappalli District, has filed the present writ petition seeking for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to pay arrears of Professional Tax for 1st half year 2010-11 of Rs.79,280/-. 2. The petitioner is the Executive Officer of Lalgudi Selection Grade Town Panchayat, Tiruchirappalli District and the respondents are the Railway Officials. The petitioner in exercise of powers conferred under Rule 16 of the Tamil Nadu Tax on Professions, Trades, Callings and Employments Act, 1992, issued demand notice, dated 31.08.2010, to the first respondent demanding the payment of Rs.79,280/- towards Profession Tax fo...
Janaki Ravindaran Vs. Tamil Nadu State Information Commission, Rep. th ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Oct-03-2016
(Prayer:Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorari calling for the records relating to the order of the first respondent dated 03.12.2008 in Case No.8418/Enquiry/2008 and the consequential order passed by the second respondent dated 07.04.2010 in Na.ka.No.20643/2009/C2 and quash the same.) 1. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner challenging the impugned order passed by the first respondent, dated 03.12.2008, in Case No.8418/Enquiry/2008 and the consequential order passed by the second respondent, dated 07.04.2010, in Na.ka.No.20643/2009/C2 and quash the same. 2. The main contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the first respondent has passed the impugned order, dated 03.12.2008, without giving an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and therefore, it is illegal and void in the eye of law. 3. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that it would suffice if the imp...
The Managing Director, Tamil Nadu State Transportation Corporation Tir ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Oct-03-2016
(Prayer: Appeal filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, against the judgment and decree dated 21.11.2011 passed in M.C.O.P.No. 389 of 2011 on the file of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Fast Track Court No.2, Tirunelveli.) V.M. Velumani, J. 1. This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal has been filed against the judgment and decree dated 21.11.2011 passed in M.C.O.P.No.389 of 2011 on the file of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Fast Track Court No.2, Tirunelveli. 2. The facts in brief leading to the filing of this Civil Miscellaneous Appeal, are as follows: (i) The appellant is the respondent and the respondents are the claimants in M.C.O.P.No.389 of 2011 on the file of the Court of Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Fast Track Court No.II), Tirunelveli. The respondents filed a claim petition in M.C.O.P.No.389 of 2011 against the appellant claiming a sum of Rs.1,00,00,000/- as compensation. (ii) According to the respondents/claimants, on 29.10.2010 at 12.30 hours, one S.P.M...
A. Subramani Vs. Inspector of Police Vigilance and Anti-Corruption, Sa ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Oct-03-2016
(Prayer: Petition filed under Section 397 r/w 401 of Cr.P.C., to set aside the order dated 05.11.2015 made in C.M.P.No.116 of 2014 in Spl.C.C.No.102 of 2014 on the file of the Learned Special Judge (Special Court for Trial of Cases, under Prevention of Corruption Act), Salem, by allowing this Petition.) 1. Heard the Learned Counsel appearing for the Petitioner / A.2 and the Learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the Respondent. 2. The Petitioner / A.2 has preferred the present Criminal Revision Petition before this Court, (as an aggrieved person) as against the Order dated 05.11.2015 in Crl.M.P.No.116 of 2014 in Spl.C.CNo.102 of 2014 on the file of Learned Special Judge, (Special Court for Trial Cases, under Prevention of Corruption Act) Salem. 3. The Learned Special Judge, (Special Court for Trial of Cases under the Prevention of Corruption Act) Salem on 05.11.2015 in Crl.M.P.No.116 of 2014 in Spl.C.C. No.102 of 2014 at Paragraph No.18 had observed the following:- 18. In t...
Association of Self Finance Agriculture Colleges Vs. The State of Tami ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Oct-03-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to permit the Member Colleges of the petitioner's Association (Members list annexed) to fill up the Seats lying vacant as 'Lapsed Seats; on account of non sponsoring of candidates by the second respondent University under the Government Quota for academic year 2016-17 and to approve the admission of such of those students under the 'Lapsed Seats category'.) 1. This writ petition has been filed seeking a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to permit the Member Colleges of the petitioner's Association (Members list annexed), to fill up the Seats lying vacant as 'Lapsed Seats' on account of non sponsoring of candidates by the second respondent University, under the Government Quota for academic year 2016-17 and to approve the admission of such of those students under the 'Lapsed Seats category'. 2. Though a larger relief has been sough...
A. Udhumanshah Vs. The District Collector, Pudukottai District, Puduko ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Oct-03-2016
(Prayer:Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the Respondents herein to forthwith restore and strengthen the Public Pathway measuring a width of 25 feet and a length of 150 meters in the land comprised in Survey No.300 connecting the National Highway NH-45 between Trichy and Pudukottai at Dawood Mill near SIPCOT Industrial Estate to the Petitioner's lands comprised in Survey Nos.301/1A, 301/1B, 301/1C, 301/1D and 301/2A in Vellanur Village, Kolathur Taluk, Pudukottai district and maintain the same without causing any damage whatsoever.) 1. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus,directing the Respondents to forthwith restore and strengthen the Public Pathway measuring a width of 25 feet and a length of 150 meters in the land comprised in Survey No.300 connecting the National Highway NH-45 between Trichy and Pudukottai at Dawood Mill near SIPCOT Industrial Estate to the ...
- ‹ Prev
- 32
- 33
- 34
- 35
- 36
- 37
- 38
- 40
- 41
- 42
- Next ›
- Last »