Chennai Court October 2016 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
A. Mohan Petitioner Vs. The Inspector General of Police West Zone Coim ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Oct-21-2016
(Prayer:- Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a writ of mandamus directing the respondents 1 and 2 to prevent the respondents 3 and 4 from interfering with the civil dispute by misusing their official position to help the 5th respondent to take forcible possession of the property measuring 10.22 acres bearing R.S.No.62/2, Padaval Kalvai Village, Bhavani Taluk, Erode District, in violation of the order dated 28.01.2015 made in W.P.No.34022 of 2014 by considering the petitioner's representation dated 17.07.2015.) 1. This petition has been filed seeking a writ of mandamus, directing the respondents 1 and 2 to prevent the respondents 3 and 4 from interfering with the civil dispute by misusing their official position to help the 5th respondent to take forcible possession of the property measuring 10.22 acres bearing R.S.No.62/2, Padaval Kalvai Village, Bhavani Taluk, Erode District, in violation of the order dated 28.01.2015 made in W.P.No.34022 of 20...
C. Sagayaraj Vs. The District Educational Officer, Krishnagiri and Oth ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Oct-21-2016
(Prayer: W.P.No.17585 of 20156 has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of a writ of Certiorari, to call for the records relating to the impugned proceedings issued by the 2nd respondent in Ref.D.O.S.No.09 of 2015 dated 29.05.2015 and to quash the same. W.P.No.30872 of 2015 has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of a writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records relating to the impugned proceedings issued by the 1st respondent in O.Mu.No.1040/Aa3/15 of 2015 dated 01.09.2015 and to quash the same and consequently, to direct the respondents 1 to 3 to restore the petitioner to the post of Headmaster.) Common Order: 1. It is stated that in the year 2005, the petitioner was appointed as the In-charge Headmaster of R.C.Fathima Boys High School, Bangalore Road, Krishnagiri. Now, by the impugned proceedings of the 2nd respondent in Ref.D.O.S.No.09 of 2015, dated 29.05.2015, the petitioner has bee...
Laila Banu Vs. Devadoss and Others
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Oct-21-2016
(Prayer: Petition filed under Section 24 of Civil Procedure Code to withdraw the appeal suit in A.S.No.97 of 2010 pending before the Principal Sub Court, Tirunelveli and the same has to be transferred and tried along with the second appeal in S.A.No.737 of 2010 on the file of the Madurai Bench of Madras High Court.) 1. The present petition is filed with a prayer to transfer the appeal suit in A.S.No.97 of 2010 pending before the Principal Sub Court, Tirunelveli, to the Madurai Bench of Madras High Court and to be tried along with S.A.No.737 of 2010. 2. The contention of the petitioner is that the appeal suit in A.S.No.97 of 2010 filed by the first respondent against the Judgment and Decree passed in O.S.No.333 of 2006 is posted for hearing in the list and the case was posted before the Principal Sub Court, Tirunelveli, which decided the appeal in A.S.No.13 of 2010 arising out of its Judgment in O.S.No.321 of 2006. Further, the petitioner pleaded that in the interest of both the parties...
M/s. Shapoorji Pallonji and Company Private Ltd., represented by Autho ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Oct-21-2016
(Prayer in W.P(MD)No.16871 of 2016: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records pertaining to the impugned order of the 2nd Respondent in the Letter No. NPCIL/KKNPP/CTC/2016/S/936 dated 2.6.2016 wherein the Respondent have illegally and arbitrarily issued a corrigendum at clause 5 of the Annexure I barring the participation of Joint Venture Association (JVA) and quash the same and direct the Respondents to accept the bid of the Petitioner along with its Joint Venture Association (JVA) and quash the same and direct the respondents to accept the bid of the petitioner along with its Joint Venture Association in subsidiary company, Afcons Infrastructure Limited for award of contract of construction of building at Koodankulam Phase III and IV. Prayer in W.P(MD)No.16872 of 2016: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mand...
Anwar Sheriff and Others Vs. S.E. Mohammed Rizwanullah, Advocates.
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Oct-21-2016
(Prayer: Civil Revision Petition No.1827 of 2016 filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India directing the 8 th Small Causes Judge, Chennai to dispose of M.P.No.307 of 2015 in RCA No.483 of 2015 forthwith. Civil Revision Petition No.2302 of 2016 filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the fair and decretal order passed by 10 th Small Causes Judge, Chennai in E.A.o.34 of 2016 in EP No.168 of 2016 in RCOP No.1856 of 2013 dated 21.06.2016.) 1. Heard Both sides. 2. The respondents in R.C.O.P.No.1856 of 2013, on the file of X Judge, Court of Small Causes, Chennai, have filed the Civil Revision Petition in CRP (NPD) No.1827 of 2016 to direct the Rent Control Appellate Authority, VII Judge, Court of Small Causes, Chennai to dispose of the Stay Petition in M.P.No.307 of 2015 in R.C.A No.483 of 2015 within a time frame. 3. Pursuant to the order of eviction, passed in RCOP No.1856 of 2013, the alleged tenants filed an appeal in R.C.A.No.483 of 2015 on the file of VI...
S. Manimegalai Vs. Medical Council of India rep. by its Secretary and ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Oct-21-2016
(Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the second and third respondents to forward the name of Ms. Mathuri, S, having A.R. No. 17610 to be admitted to any of the Private Medical Colleges under the second respondent in the State of Tamil Nadu, including the fifth respondent college by following the admission process contemplated under the proviso to Section 10 (d) of the Indian Medical Council (Amendment) Act, 2016.) 1. The petitioner is the mother of Minor S. Mathuri. The petitioner belonged to Backward Class community. The petitioner's daughter has got admission in Government quota for pursuing Bachelor of Dental Science (B.D.S.) course for the academic year 2016-2017. Her grievance is that she has originally applied for getting admitted in M.B.B.S. course. The application submitted by her is a common application meant for admission to both B.D.S. as well as M.B.B.S. course. On the basis of such application submitte...
S. Jacob Rajan Babu, Law Officer, Corporation of Chennai Vs. Governmen ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Oct-21-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking for a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the concerned records from the respondents, quash G.O.(Nilai) No.33, Municipal Administration and Water Supply (Ma.Na.3) Department, dated 12.02.2016, issued by the first respondent in so far approving to fill up the post of Senior Law Officer in the second respondent / Corporation, only by deputation and the Resolution No.236 of 2015, dated 27.05.2015, bearing Po.Thu.Na.Ka.No.E2/21762/2013 of the second respondent resolving to fill up the post of Senior Law Officer only by deputation, as illegal, arbitrary and contrary to law and quash the same and consequently, direct the respondents to frame the rules creating avenue of promotion from the post of Law Officer to the Post of Senior Law Officer and consider the petitioner for promotion to the post of Senior Law Officer.) 1. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking for the issuance of...
Ponirulandi Vs. Vellaiammal and Another
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Oct-21-2016
(Prayer: Civil Revision Petition filed under Section 115 of the Civil Procedure Code praying this Court to set aside the fair and decretal order made in E.A.No.71 of 2016 in E.P.No.86 of 2015 in O.S.No.27 of 2010, dated 15.09.2016 on the file of the Principal District Munsif Court, Thoothukudi.) 1. This revision has been filed seeking for a direction to set aside the fair and decretal order made in E.A.No.71 of 2016 in E.P.No.86 of 2015 in O.S.No.27 of 2010, dated 15.09.2016 on the file of the Principal District Munsif Court, Thoothukudi. 2. According to the Petitioner, the second respondent herein has filed a suit in O.S.No.27 of 2010 against the Petitioner and first respondent for declaration and consequential injunction. The aforesaid suit was contested by the Petitioner and first respondent herein. A counter claim relief is sought for by the first respondent .By judgement and decree, dated 28.02.2012, the suit filed by the second respondent was dismissed and the counter-claim filed...
M. Viashnavi Vs. C. Sathish Kumar
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Oct-21-2016
(Prayer: Petition filed under Section 24 of Civil Procedure Code to withdraw the case in H.M.O.P.No.142 of 2015 on the file of the Subordinate Judge, Aruppukkottai and transfer the same to the file of the Subordinate Court, Theni for disposal of the same on merits and in accordance with law.) Order: S.M. Subramaniam, J. 1. The present petition is filed seeking to withdraw the case from the file of the Subordinate Court, Aruppukkottai in H.M.O.P.No.142 of 2015 and transfer the same to the file of the Subordinate Court, Theni. 2. The marriage between the petitioner and respondent was solemnized on 03.03.2014, as per the Hindu Rites and Customs. 3. The contention of the petitioner is that misunderstanding arose between them and she was forcibly made to leave the matrimonial home and now she is residing with her parents. The petitioner filed H.M.O.P.No.114 of 2015 before the Subordinate Court, Theni for restitution of conjugal rights and on receipt of notice, the respondent filed H.M.O.P.N...
P. Suresh Vs. The District Collector, Madurai District and Others
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Oct-21-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 1 to 4 to take action to shift the fifth respondent - Bottle Company, from the residential area at Singarayar Colony 1st Street, Narimedu, Madurai-2, within a time limit to be fixed by this Court and thereby, prevent the health hazard and injury being caused to the residents and passers of the area.) S. Nagamuthu, J. 1. This is a Public Interest Litigation. The petitioner is a resident of Singarayar Colony in Narimedu, Madurai. The fifth respondent is presently running a business establishment at 28/2A, Singarayar Colony, South Street, Narimedu, Madurai, wherein, according to the petitioner, the fifth respondent brings huge quantity of broken bottles, crushed the same and then, transported the same to various destinations. As a result, according to the petitioner, lot of nuisance is caused as the said processing causes great health hazard to the people l...
- ‹ Prev
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- Next ›
- Last »