Chennai Court October 2016 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
S. Manikandan Vs. The Secretary, Tamilnadu Bar Council, Chennai and Ot ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Oct-21-2016
(Prayer:Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of mandamus, directing the 1st respondent to enroll the petitioner as Advocate in the roll of the Bar Council of Tamilnadu) Order: Huluvadi G. Ramesh, J. 1. This writ petition is filed praying to issue a writ of mandamus, directing the 1st respondent to enroll the petitioner as Advocate in the roll of the Bar Council of Tamilnadu 2. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties. 3. It appears that the petitioner made an application for enrolment as an Advocate along with necessary documents on 30.03.2015. It appears that the police having apprehended a student, was taken to the police station, where petitioner shown to have went there to rescue the student to get him released, for which, the police were not agreeable. In this regard, a commotion took place. For having went there to the police station with a group of people, FIR has been registered against the petitioner and others, ...
P. Sathyakala Vs. K. Ganesh Kumar
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Oct-21-2016
(Prayer: Petition filed under Section 24 of Civil Procedure Code to withdraw and transfer I.A.No.807 of 2015 in H.M.O.P(SR)No.4189 of 2015 pending on the file of the learned Family Court Judge, Chennai to try along with H.M.O.P.No.57 of 2015 on the file of the learned Subordinate Judge, Ramanathapuram.) 1. The present petition is filed seeking for transfer of I.A.No.807 of 2015 in H.M.O.P(SR)No.4189 of 2015 pending before the Family Court, Chennai to the Subordinate Court, Ramanathapuram, to be tried along with H.M.O.P.No.57 of 2015. 2. The marriage between the petitioner and respondent was solemnized on 30.10.2014 at Rameswaram Temple, Ramanathapuram District, as per Hindu Rites and Customs and due to the strained relationship between the parties, they lived separately. The petitioner filed a petition in H.M.O.P.No.57 of 2015 before the Sub Court, Ramanathapuram for restitution of conjugal rights and the respondent filed I.A.No.807 of 2015 in H.M.O.P(SR)No.4189 of 2015 before the Fami...
A. Sumithira Vs. H. Harikrishnan
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Oct-21-2016
(Prayer: Petition filed under Section 24 of the Civil Procedure Code, to withdraw the case in HMOP.No.951 of 2016 on the file of the Family Court, Chennai and transfer the same to the file of Family Court, Tirunelveli.) 1. The marriage between the petitioner and the respondent was solemnized on 23.01.2015 at Arulmigu Vadapalani Aandavar Thirukovil, Vadapalani, as per the Hindu rites and customs and the respondent was working as Music Teacher at Chennai. Due to strained relationship between the parties, the respondent filed HMOP No.951 of 2016 seeking divorce, which is pending before the Family Court, Chennai. 2. The contention of the petitioner is that after their separation from the matrimonial home, the petitioner left Chennai and came to Tirunelveli and now she is residing with her parents at Tirunelveli. The petitioner is unemployed and not having income of her own and at this point time, she is unable to travel from Tirunelveli to Chennai to defend the case effectively. 3. The lea...
P. Jeyakavitha Vs. The United India Insurance Company Limited
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Oct-21-2016
(Prayer: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, against the fair and decretal order made in I.A.No.227 of 2016 in M.C.O.p.No.24 of 2013, dated 28.7.2016, on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal(Chief Judicial Magistrate), Nagercoil.) 1. This revision has been filed seeking for a direction to set aside the fair and decretal order made in I.A.No.227 of 2016 in M.C.O.P.No.24 of 2013, dated 28.7.2016, on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal(Chief Judicial Magistrate), Nagercoil. 2. According to the Petitioner, the Petitioner has filed the above application to permit her to get her part of compensation of Rs.12,02.289/- with accrued interest and costs, by relaxing the condition imposed in the decree. The said application filed by the Petitioner was dismissed. Aggrieved by the same, the revision petitioner has filed the present revision petition before this Court. 3. The learned counsel for the respondent/Insurance Company would subm...
S. Settu and Others Vs. Krishnan and Others
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Oct-21-2016
(Prayer: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the Fair and Final Orders dated 22.12.2011 passed in I.A.No.679 of 2011 in O.S.No.322 of 2006 on the file of the 1st Additional Subordinate Judge, Salem. 1. The Civil Revision Petition has been filed against the Fair and Final Orders dated 22.12.2011 passed in I.A.No.679 of 2011 in O.S.No.322 of 2006 on the file of the 1st Additional Subordinate Judge, Salem. 2. The case of the petitioners is that the petitioners are the defendants 1 to 3 in O.S.No.322 of 2006 on the file of the 1st Additional Subordinate Judge, Salem. 3. Originally, the suit was filed by the 1st respondent / plaintiff against this petitioners/ defendants for declaration and permanent injunction in respect of the 1st Item of the suit property and also for declaration and possession in respect of the 2nd Item of the suit property and for injunction and damages. 4. These petitioners / defendants 1 to 3 also filed their written s...
The Union of India Represented by the Secretary to Government and Othe ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Oct-21-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issuance of a writ of certiorari, calling for the records of the 1st respondent Tribunal in its order in Original Application No.310/01155/2014 dated 20.3.2015 and to quash the same.) S. Manikumar, J. 1. Challenge in this writ petition is to an order dated 06.11.2012 made in Original Application No.553/2011, by which, the Central Administrative Tribunal, Madras Bench, has directed the writ petitioners to grant Assured Career Progression (in short ACP) to the first respondent in the pay scale of 4500 - 7000 with effect from 09.08.1999 with all consequential benefits and the writ petitioners are further directed to pass an appropriate order on the above fact within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of the order of the Tribunal.include the name of the second respondent at the appropriate place, in the list of Casual Labourers prepared as per Puducherry Casual Labourers (Enga...
The General Manager, State Express Transport Corporation Vs. The Presi ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Oct-21-2016
(Prayer: Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorari calling for the records pertaining to the award dated 12.05.2008 in I.D.No.144 of 2001 on the file of the first respondent and quash the same.) 1. This writ petition has been filed challenging the order of the first respondent/Labour Court, Madurai, passed in I.D.No.144 of 2001 dated 12.05.2008, wherein the first respondent/Labour Court has passed an order reinstating the second respondent with continuity of service. 2. The case of the petitioner is that the petitioner is the General Manager, State Express Transport Corporation, Pallavan salai, Chennai 2 and the second respondent, namely, M.Vanagamu has worked as Conductor in the petitioner Corporation. When the second respondent was on duty in the route No.846 from Bangalore to Madurai, at the point of checking at Andhipalli, the Checking Inspector while making his checking, he found that though the second respondent collected Rs.8...
Thamizh Ezhil Arasi Vs. Markandan
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Oct-21-2016
(Prayer: Petition filed under Section 24 of the Civil Procedure Code, to withdraw and transfer the case in H.M.O.P.No.53 of 2016 pending on the file of Family Court, Sivagangai to any other competent Court at Madurai pending disposal of the above Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition.) 1. It is represented by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the transfer civil miscellaneous petition has become infructuous, as the respondent husband died. He has also made an endorsement to that effect. 2. In view of the endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this transfer civil miscellaneous petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is also dismissed....
Venkitusamy and Others Vs. Murugesan and Others
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Oct-21-2016
(Prayer: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, to set aside the Judgement and Decree of the learned Additional Subordinate Judge, Dindigul, in A.S.No.192 of 2007 dated 29.04.2010 in reversing the judgment and decree of the District Munsif -cm-Judicial Magistrate, Vedasandhu, in O.S.No.110 of 1996 dated 27.02.2007.) This second appeal has been filed by the plaintiffs 2,3,5,6 and 9 in the suit in O.S.No.110 on the file of the District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate, Vedasandur. 2. The brief facts as set out in the plaint in O.S.No.110 of 1996 are summarised as follows:- One Thagapillai is the original owner of the property. He had three sons, by names, (1) Thiruvapillai (2) Pazhaniyappapillai and (3)Kuppapillai. One Azhagapillai was the only son of Thiruvapillai and the second defendant is the son of the said Azhagapillai. One Ramasamy Pillai and Periyanna Pillai are two son of Pazhaniappapillai and the defendants 3 and 4 are the sons of Ramasamy. The de...
Cadila Healthcare Ltd., Ahmedabad and Another Vs. Sun Pharmaceutical I ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Oct-21-2016
(Prayer: Original Side Appeal preferred under Clause 15 of Letters Patent read with Order XXXVI Rule 1 of Original Side Rules against the order of this Court dated 03-06-2016 made in C.S.No.985 of 2009.) A. Selvam, J. 1. This Original Side Appeal has been directed against the judgment and decree dated 03-06-2016 passed in C.S.No.985 of 2009 by the learned Single Judge of this Court. 2. The respondents herein, as plaintiffs, have instituted C.S.No.985 of 2009 on the file of this Court praying to grant the reliefs of perpetual injunctions, liquidated damages, delivery-up for destruction of all preparations, dies, blocks, labels etc., and also for passing the preliminary decree for rendition of accounts wherein the present appellants have been shown as defendants. 3. It is averred in the plaint that the plaintiff is carrying on business as manufacturer of medicinal preparation for human consumption. The plaintiff is an International Specialty Pharma Company with presence in over 30 market...
- ‹ Prev
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- Next ›
- Last »