Chennai Court January 2016 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Chandrasekar Vs. Eswari
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jan-04-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Revision filed under Section 397 r/w 401 of CrPC challenging the order passed by the Learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Dindigul in M.C.No.2 of 2012 dated 17.02.2014.) 1. The Revision Petitioner/Respondent has focussed the instant Criminal Revision Petition as against the order dated 17.02.2014 in M.C.No.2 of 2012 passed by the Learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Dindigul. 2. The Learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Dindigul, while passing the impugned order, on 17.02.2014 in M.C.No.2 of 2012, at paragraph No.13, had inter alia observed that the "... Respondent (Husband) has not proved the complaint of adultery between the petitioner/wife and one Mr.Suresh before this Court" and hence, negatived the contention of the Revision Petitioner/Husband in this regard. Further, the trial Court, has awarded a sum of Rs.3,000/- per month to the respondent/Husband as maintenance to be paid by the Revision Petitioner/Husband from the date of filing of M.C.No.2 of 2012 viz., 04.01.201...
M/s. ICMC Corporation Limited Vs. M/s. Electronics Corporation of Tami ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-04-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking for the relief of issuance of writ of mandamus to direct the respondent to pay the sum of Rs.25,63,00,055/- with interest @ 15% p.a. from the due date to the petitioner based on petitioner's representation dated 17.2.2015.) 1. The writ petition is filed seeking a writ of mandamus to direct the respondent to pay the sum of Rs.25,63,00,055/- with interest @ 15% p.a. from the due date to the petitioner based on petitioner's representation dated 17.2.2015. Background facts:- 2. The respondent herein floated a tender in tender ref. ELCOT/PID/ ICB/LTC/PII/2012-13 dated 22.2.2012 for supply of 7,84,000 Laptop Computers with Laptop Backpack. The petitioner is one of the tenderers giving its offer for 3,00,000 Laptop Computers. It became a successful tenderer and accordingly a letter of acceptance was issued by the respondent on 17.12.2012 for supply of 3,00,000 Laptop Computers by the petitioner. The total requ...
The Commissioner Thirupathur Municipality, Thirupathur, Vellore Distri ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-04-2016
(Prayer: Petition filed under section 5 of Limitation Act to condone the delay of 1641 days in filing the W.A.SR No.94919 of 2013 against the order, dated 12.3.2009 made in W.P.No.18805 of 2008 on the file of this Court.) P. Devadass, J. In this petition, the second respondent viz., the Commissioner, Thirupathur Municipality, Thirupathur, Vellore District in W.P.No.18805 of 2008 seeks condonation of delay caused in preferring the appeal against the order of the Writ Court passed on 12.3.2009. 2. The writ petitioner, the Vegetable Vendors Welfare Association, Thirupathur has sought for issuance of mandamus, forbearing the Thirupathur Municipality and the District Collector, Vellore District from taking coercive steps against the members of the association from carrying on vegetable business in the shopping complex belonging to the Municipality. The Municipality opposed it. 3. On 12.3.2009, the Writ Court disposed of the writ petition taking note of the stand of the Municipality that in ...
The Management, Tamil Nadu Khadi and Village Industries Board, Guindy ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-04-2016
(Prayers: Review Application filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 114 and Order XLVII Rule 1 of CPC to review the order, dated 17.12.2012, passed by this Court in M.P.No.1 of 2012 in W.P.No.1160 of 2009. Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to call for the records in I.D.No.489/2004 dated 25.07.2008 on the file of the 2nd respondent and quash the same as illegal.) Common Order 1. As the facts involved in both the Review Application and the Writ Petition are one and the same, both the Petitions are taken up for disposal by a common order. 2. The Management of the Tamil Nadu Khadi and Village Industries filed the above Writ Petition seeking to quash the Award dated 25.07.2008 passed by the Presiding Officer, Principal Labour Court, Chennai in I.D.No.489 of 2004. This Court, by an order dated 23.01.2009, granted an order of interim stay of the operation of the order passed in I.D.No.489 of 2004. While so, 13 members o...
State:rep.by The Inspector of Police, Salem District Vs. T.S. Mani @ K ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-04-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Appeal filed under Section 378 of Cr.P.C., against the judgment dated 6.12.2005 made in C.C.No.45 of 2004, on the file of the Judicial Magistrate No.I, Mettur Dam, Salem.) 1. The order of acquittal dated 6.12.2005, passed in Calendar Case No.45 of 2004, by the Judicial Magistrate No.I, Mettur, is being challenged in the present criminal appeal. 2. The case of the prosecution is that against Sandalwood brigand Veerappan and his associates, a case has been registered in Crime No.90 of 2000, in Thalavadi Police Station, under Sections 306, 307, 506(ii) IPC r/w.5(1)(a) and (b) of Indian Arms Act. Likewise, against them, another case has been registered in Crime No.438 of 1998, under Sections 397, 427, 332, 307 of the Indian Penal Code r/w.25(1)(a) of Indian Arms Act. The accused, knowing fully well that the said Veerappan and his associates have involved in unlawful activities and also committed so many crimes, has used to lend his assistance by way of giving shelter, foo...
V.O. Duraisamy Mudaliar [Deceased] and Others Vs. Parijathammal (died) ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-04-2016
(Prayer: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India to set aside the order dated 10.09.2009 made in I.A.No.790 of 2006 in O.S.No.27 of 2005 on the file of the learned District Munsif, Pallipattu. Prayer: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India to set aside the order dated 10.09.2009 made in I.A.No.791 of 2006 in O.S.No.27 of 2005 on the file of the learned District Munsif, Pallipattu.) Common Order: Heard the learned counsel appearing for the revision petitioners and the learned counsel appearing for the respondent. 2. These Civil Revision Petitions have been filed challenging the impugned orders dated 10.09.2009 made in I.A.No.790 of 2006 and I.A.No.791 of 2006 in O.S.No.27 of 2005, wherein the application filed under Order 1 Rule 10 r/w Order 22 Rule 5 CPC to implead the subsequent purchaser as party to the proceeding and the application filed under Order 9 Rule 9 CPC to set aside the exparte dismissal of the suit...
- ‹ Prev
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- Next ›