Chennai Court August 2015 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
T.Manikandan Vs. The State, Rep By
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-10-2015
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:10. 08.2015 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.NAGAMUTHU AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.S.RAVI CRL.A(MD).No.260 of 2012 T.Manikandan : Appellant Vs. The State, rep by The Inspector of Police, Vadasery Police Station, Kanyakumari District, [Crime No.390 of 2009].. : Respondent PRAYER Appeal is filed under Section 374 of the Code of Criminal Procedure to set aside the Judgment and conviction of the appellant/accused in S.C.No.19 of 2010, on the file of the District and Sessions Judge, Kanyakumari at Nagercoil, dated 09.07.2012, acquit the appellant and thus render justice. !For Appellant : Mr.V.Kathirvelu Senior Counsel For Mr.K.Prabhu ^For Respondent : Mr.A.Ramar Additional Public Prosecutor :JUDGMENT [JUDGMENT of the Court was delivered by S.NAGAMUTHU, J]. The appellant is the sole accused in S.C.No.19 of 2010, on the file of the learned District and Sessions Judge, Kanyakumari at Nagercoil. He stood charged for the offence punishable...
B.Ashok Vs. 1. the Secretary,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-07-2015
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED :07. 08.2015 CORAM THE HON'BLE Mr. JUSTICE S.MANIKUMAR AND THE HON'BLE Ms. JUSTICE V.M.VELUMANI W.P.(MD)No.9533 of 2015 M.P(MD)Nos.1 to 3 of 2015 B.Ashok .. Petitioner vs.1. The Secretary, Ministry of Union Law and Justice, Government of India, New Delhi.2. The Secretary, Ministry of Law and Justice, Government of Tamil Nadu, Chennai.3. National Legal Knowledge Council, New Delhi.4. The Secretary, Bar Council of India, 21, Rouse Avenue Institutional Area, Near Bal Bhavan, New Delhi.5. The Chairman, Legal Education Committee, Bar Council of India, 21, Rouse Avenue Institutional Area, Near Bal Bhavan, New Delhi.6. The Chairman, Bar Council of Tamil Nadu and Pondicherry, High Court Campus, Chennai - 600 104.7. The Secretary, Union Grants Commission, Bagadur Shah Zafar Marg, New Delhi - 110 002.8. Dr.Ambedkar Law University, Rep. by its Registrar, Greames Road, Chennai.9. Thiru S.Prabakaran, A Hon'ble Member of One Man Committee, constitu...
M.Dhanakumar Vs. 1.C.Vivekanandan
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-07-2015
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED :07. 08.2015 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE V.M.VELUMANI C.M.A.(MD)No.448 of 2013 & M.P.(MD) No.1 of 2013 M.Dhanakumar ... Appellant Vs. 1.C.Vivekanandan 2.Sundaralingam ... Respondents Appeal filed under Order 43 Rule 1 of Civil Procedure Code, against the Judgment and Decree of the lower appellate Court, dated 27.11.2012, made in A.S.No.112 of 2012 on the file of Principal Districtr Judge, Thiruchirappalli, remanding the suit in O.S.No.259 of 2004, on the file of Principal Subordinate Judge, Thiruchirappalli, for fresh disposal. !For Appellant : Mr.S.Veeranasamy ^For R1 : Mrs.J.Anandhavalli For R2 : Mr.P.Balan :JUDGMENT This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal has been filed by the appellant against the Judgment and Decree of the lower appellate Court, dated 27.11.2012, made in A.S.No.112 of 2012 on the file of Principal District Judge, Tiruchirapalli, remanding the suit in O.S.No.259 of 2004, on the file of Principal Subordinate Judge, Tir...
A.Thangaraj Vs. 1.The District Collector,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-06-2015
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 06.08.2015 Coram THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE R.SUDHAKAR and THE HONOURABLE Ms.JUSTICE V.M.VELUMANI Writ Petition (Md.No.14014 of 2015 and M.P.(MD)No.1 of 2015 A.Thangaraj ..Petitioner versus 1.The District Collector, Pudukkottai District, Pudukkottai. 2.The District Educational Officer, Pudukkottai, Pudukkottai District. 3.The President, Sangamviduthi Panchayat, Kandharvakottai Taluk, Pudukkottai District. 4.The Principal, Government Middle School, Sangamviduthi, Pudukkottai District..Respondents Writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of a writ of mandamus, directing the respondents 1 to 3 to take steps to remove the encroachment put-up by the 4th respondent in a public pathway, situated between S.No.159/19, 159/20 and 159/13 at Sangamviduthi, Pudukkottai District, within a time frame that be fixed by this Court. !For Petitioner : Ms.A.Banumathy For Respondents : Mr.M.Alagathevan, 1, 2 & 4 Sp...
M.A.Kareemkani Vs. 1.The District Collector,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-06-2015
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 06.08.2015 Coram THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE R.SUDHAKAR and THE HONOURABLE Ms.JUSTICE V.M.VELUMANI Writ Petition (Md.No.14012 of 2015 M.A.Kareemkani ..Petitioner versus 1.The District Collector, Ramanathapuram. 2.Revenue Divisional Officer, Ramanathapuram. 3.The Tahsildar, Kadaladi Circle, Ramanathapuram District. 4.The Management Committee, rep.by its President, Kuthbu Sullan Syed Ibrahim Sayeed Oliyulla Darka Hakthar Administrative Sabai, Earwadi, Ramanathapuram District..Respondents Writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of a writ of mandamus, directing the respondents to remove the encroachments under Survey No.407, Earwadi Village, Kadaladi Circle, Ramanathapuram District, by considering his representation, dated 29.07.2014. !For Petitioner : Mr.K.R.Laxman For Respondents : Mr.M.Alagathevan, 1 to 3 Spl.Govt.Pleader. :ORDER (Order of the Court was made by R.SUDHAKAR,J.The petitioner has c...
1.Gurusamy Vs. The Food Inspector,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-06-2015
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 06.08.2015 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE R.MALA Criminal Original Petition(Md.No.3848 of 2009 and M.P.(Md.No1 of 2009 1.Gurusamy 2.Rajakumar .Petitioners/A1 and 2 versus The Food Inspector, Sattur Municipality, Virudhunagar District.Respondent Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C.to call for records pending in C.C.No.201 of 2008 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate No.II, Sattur, Virudhunagar District and quash the complaint as against the petitioners/Accused. For petitioners : Mr.Michael Bharathi For Respondent :Mr.K.Anbarasan, Govt. Advocate (Crl. Side) :ORDER The petitioner has approached this Court with a prayer to call for records pending in C.C.No.201 of 2008 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate No.II, Sattur, Virudhunagar District and quash the complaint as against the petitioners/Accused. 2.The learned co0unsel for the petitioners would submit that the respondent herein has filed a complaint agai...
1.Madathi Vs. 1.Rajammal
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-06-2015
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 06.08.2015 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.DEVADASS C.M.A.NO.266 of 2004 and C.M.A(MD)No.869 of 2005 C.M.A.NO.266 of 2004 1.Madathi 2.Murugan ...claimants/appellants .versus 1.Rajammal 2.The United India Insurance Company Limited, through its Divisional Manager, Post Office Road, Palayamkottai. 3.Daniel Kirubakaran 4.The National Insurance Company Limited, through its Branch Manager, Arul Buildings, S.N.High Road, Tirunelveli..Respondents C.M.A(MD)NO.869 of 2005 The National Insurance Company Limited, Arul Building, S.N.High Road, Tirunelveli..4th respondent/appellant .versus 1.Madathi 2.Murugan ..Petitioners 1 and 2/Respondents 1 &2 3.Rajamani ..Ist respondent/3rd respondent 4.The United India Insurance Company, through its Divisional Manager, Post Office Road, Palayamkottai, Tirunelveli..2nd respondent/4th respondent 5. Daniel ..3rd respondent/5th respondent PRAYER in C.M.A.NO.266 of 2004 Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Se...
M.Kanagasundaram Vs. 1.The State of Tamil Nadu,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-06-2015
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:06. 08.2015 CORAM THE HON'BLE Mr. JUSTICE R.SUDHAKAR AND THE HON'BLE Ms. JUSTICE V.M.VELUMANI W.A.(MD)No.1395 of 2013 M.Kanagasundaram .. Appellant vs. 1.The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by the Secretary to Government, Transport Department, Fort St. George, Chennai ?.2. 2.The Administrator, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation, Employees Pension Trust, SETC Head Office, Thiruvalluvar House, Chennai ?. 600 002. 3.The Managing Director, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation, Virudhunagar Region, 6/377, Madurai Road, Virudhunagar. 4.The Administrative Manager, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation, Virudhunagar Region, 6/377, Madurai Road, Virudhunagar. ... Respondents Appeal filed under under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the Order dated 05.03.2013, made in W.P.(MD)No.322 of 2012. !For Appellant ... Mr.C.M.Arumugam ^For Respondent No.1 ... No Appearance For Respondent Nos.2 to 4 ... Mr.A.Jeyaram :JUDGMENT (Judgment of the Cou...
A.Manikandan Vs. 1.The District Collector,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-06-2015
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 06.08.2015 Coram THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE R.SUDHAKAR and THE HONOURABLE Ms.JUSTICE V.M.VELUMANI Writ Petition (Md.No.16237 of 2013 and M.P.(MD)No.1 of 2013 A.Manikandan ..Petitioner versus 1.The District Collector, Dindigul District, Dindigul. 2.The Superintendent of Police, Dindigul District, Dindigul. 3.The District Environmental Engineer, Tamilnadu Pollution Control Board, Plot No.44, Jeyaraj Bhavan, 9th Cross Street, Thiruvalluvar Salai, Dindigul. 4.The Executive Engineer, Public Works Department, Buildings (Construction and Maintenance).Dindigul Division, Dindigul. 5.The Station Incharge Officer, Taluka Fire Station, Battalakundu Main Road, Nilakottai, Dindigul District. 6.S.S.Chinnasamy Pillai ..Respondents Writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of a writ of mandamus, directing the respondents 1 to 5 to take action against the marriage hall, named as S.S.Chinnasamy Pillai Mandapam, r...
Muthupandi Vs. State Rep. By
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-06-2015
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:06. 08.2015 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.NAGAMUTHU AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.S.RAVI CRIMINAL APPEAL (MD).No.354 of 2010 Muthupandi : Appellant Vs. State rep. By the Inspector of Police Kayathar Police Station, Crime No.342/2008 Tuticorin District : Respondent PRAYER Appeal is filed under Section 378 of the Code of Criminal Procedure against the judgment passed in S.C.No.108 of 2009 dated 02.08.2010 by the learned Additional Sessions Judge (Fast Track Court No.II) Tuticorin Division, Tuticorin. !For Appellant : Mr.S.Durairaj ^For Respondent : Mr.A.Ramar Additional Public Prosecutor :JUDGMENT (Judgment of the Court was delivered by S.NAGAMUTHU, J.) The appellant is the sole accused in S.C.No.108 of 2009 on the file of the Additional District and Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court, No.II, Thoothukudi District. He stood charged for offences under Sections 302 IPC and 307 IPC (2 counts). By judgment dated 22.07.2010, the trial Cou...
- ‹ Prev
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- Next ›
- Last »