Chennai Court July 2015 Judgments
M.Vinoth Vs. The Regional Manager / Disciplinary Authority,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-24-2015
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:24. 07.2015 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE S.VAIDYANATHAN W.P.(MD)No.10240 of 2015 M.Vinoth ... Petitioner -vs- The Regional Manager / Disciplinary Authority, Regional Office, Syndicate Bank, Velmurugan Nagar, Bye-Pass Road, Madurai-625 010. ... Respondent PRAYER: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records relating to the impugned charge memo issued by the respondent in Ref.No.CGS/MRO/01/2014 dated 03.07.2014 and quash the same. !For Petitioner : Mr.V.Meenakshi Sundaram For Mr.S.Rajeshkanna For Respondent : Mr.K.R.Laxman :ORDER The petitioner has filed this writ petition, seeking to quash the impugned charge memo dated 03.07.2014, passed by the respondent in Ref.No.CGS/MRO/01/2014, in and by which, explanation was sought from the petitioner within 7 days.2. The facts leading to filing of this writ petition are that the petitioner joined the Synd...
Tag this Judgment!1)r.Lakshmi Vs. 1)the District Collector,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-24-2015
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 24.07.2015 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.MANIKUMAR AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.CHOCKALINGAM Writ Appeal(MD)No.1310 of 2011 and M.P(MD)No.1 of 2011 1)R.Lakshmi 2)R.Prakasam ..Appellants versus 1)The District Collector, Madurai District, Madurai. 2)The Tahsildar, Madurai North Taluk, Madurai. 3)The Head Surveyor, Madurai North Taluk, Madurai..Respondents Appeal filed under Clause 15 of Letters Patent, against the order made in W.P(MD)No.9223 of 2010 dated 14.10.2011. !For Appellants : Mr.R.Prakasam/Party-in-person ^For Respondents : Mr.A.K.Bhaskara Pandian, Spl.G.P :JUDGMENT (Judgment of the Court was delivered by S.MANIKUMAR, J.) Challenge in this appeal is to the order made in W.P(MD)No.9223 of 2010 dated 14.10.2011, by which, the prayer for issuance of a Mandamus, directing the respondents 1 to 3 therein, to issue fair copy of the land records, after correcting the mistakes in the Survey Land Register, has been negatived. 2...
Tag this Judgment!1. D.Jeyaraman Vs. 1. the Tamil Nadu State Transport
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-24-2015
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:24. 07.2015 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE S.VAIDYANATHAN W.P.(MD) No.10560 of 2015, W.P.(MD) No.10561 and 10582 of 2015 1. D.Jeyaraman ... Petitioner in W.P.(MD) No.10560/2015 2. S.Deenadayalan ... Petitioner in W.P.(MD) No.10561/2015 3. P.Dhanapal ... Petitioner in W.P.(MD) No.10582/2015 -vs- 1. THE TAMIL NADU STATE TRANSPORT CORPORATION (KUMBAKONAM) LTD., REP. BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, KUMBAKONAM, THANJAVUR DISTRICT.2. THE GENERAL MANAGER THE TAMIL NADU STATE TRANSPORT CORPORATION (KUMBAKONAM) LTD., TRICHY REGION, PERIYAMILAGUPARAI, TRICHY-1.3. THE ADMINISTRATOR THE TAMIL NADU TRANSPORT CORPORATION PENSION FUND TRUST, THRIUVALLUVAR HOUSE, PALLAVAN SALAI, CHENNAI600002. ... Respondents Prayer in W.P.(MD) 10560/2015: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records pertaining to the impugned order passed by the 1st respondent in Ref: TNS...
Tag this Judgment!1.T.Vaithilingam (Kartha) of Vs. 1.S.Selvaraj
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-24-2015
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED :24. 07.2015 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE V.M.VELUMANI C.M.A.(MD)No.492 of 2015 & M.P.(MD) Nos.1 & 2 of 2015 1.T.Vaithilingam (Kartha) of T.Vaithilingam (HUF) 2.V.Ravindran 3.A.S.R.M.Subbiah Pillai Firm, Rep. by its Managing Partner, T.Vaithilingam, Having its place of business at No.6, South Gate, Mailam, Trichy ?.8. ... Appellants Vs. 1.S.Selvaraj 2.S.Chenthilkumar (Kartha) of S.Chenthilkumar (HUF) 3.S.Balamurugan 4.P.Vijayaraghavan 5.A.Jeyanthi 6.V.Nalini 7.C.Sujatha 8.P.Chandrambal ... Respondents Appeal filed under Section 37(1) and (2) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, against the fair and decreetal order, dated 19.03.2015, made in Arbitration O.P.No.27 of 2014, on the file of the Principal District Court, Tiruchirappalli. !For Appellants : Mrs.Hema Sampath Senior Counsel for R.Subramanian ^For R1, R2, R4 and R5 : Mr.V.Raghavachari For R6 : Mr.R.V.Rajkumar For R7 : Mr.M.Thiruvasan For R3 and R8 : No Appearance :J...
Tag this Judgment!A.Kuttralingam Vs. 1.The District Collector,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-23-2015
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:23. 07.2015 Coram THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE S.MANIKUMAR and THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE G.CHOCKALINGAM Writ Petition (MD)No.12730 of 2015 A.Kuttralingam ... Petitioner vs. 1.The District Collector, O/o.the District Collector, Madurai. 2.The Superintendent of Police, Madurai District, Madurai. 3.The Superintending Engineer, Public Works Department, Sarugani River North-Sub Division, Manamadujrai, Sivagangai District. 4.The Assistant Superintending Engineer, Public Works Department, Virahanoor Dam Regulator Section Office, Virahanoor, Madurai District. 5.The Assistant Engineer, Public Works Department, Virahanoor Dam Regulator Section Office, Virahanoor, Madurai District. 6.The Inspector of Police, Silaiman Police Station, Madurai District. ... Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of a writ of mandamus, directing the respondents 3 to 6 to enquire into the matter, regarding co...
Tag this Judgment!1.The Government of Tamilnadu, Vs. S.Thiyagarajan
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-23-2015
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 23.07.2015 Coram THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE S.MANIKUMAR and THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE G.CHOCKALINGAM Writ Appeal (Md.No.832 of 2015 and M.P.(MD)No.2 of 2015 1.The Government of Tamilnadu, rep.by its Secretary, Municipal Administration and Water Supply Department, Fort St.George, Chennai-600 009. 2.The Commissioner of Employment and Training, Guindy, Chennai-600 034. 3.The Enquiry Officer/Assistant Director of Town Panchayats, O/o.Assistant Director of Town Panchayats, Trichy Region, Trichy..Appellants/ Respondents versus S.Thiyagarajan ..Respondent/ Petitioner Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of Letters Patent, against the order, dated 26.03.2014, made in W.P.(MD)No.11771 of 2009. !For Appellants : Mr.A.K.Baskarapandian Spl.Govt.Pleader. ^For Respondent : Mr.M.Saravanan :JUDGMENT (Judgment of the Court was delivered by S.MANIKUMAR,J.Case of the respondent is that he was appointed as a Junior Assistant in the District Employment Offic...
Tag this Judgment!Raja @ Sethu Raja Vs. State Rep. by The
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-23-2015
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:23. 07.2015 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.NAGAMUTHU Crl.R.C.(MD).No.631 of 2006 Raja @ Sethu Raja .. Petitioner/ Appellant/Accused No.1 Vs. State rep. by the Inspector of Police, F1, S.S. Colony Police Station, Madurai. (Crime No.2206 of 1998) .. Respondent / Respondent/Complainant PRAYER Criminal revision filed under Sections 397(i) r/w 401 of Cr.P.C. against the judgment, dated 28.07.2005, made in C.A.No.246 of 2004 by the learned Additional District and Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court No.III, Madurai, confirming the conviction and sentence, dated 25.10.2004, made in S.C.No.155 of 2003 by the learned Assistant Sessions cum Chief Judicial Magistrate, Madurai. !For Petitioner : Mr.J.Sulthan Basha Legal Aid Counsel ^For respondent : Mr.P.Kannithevan, Government Advocate :ORDER The appellant is the first accused in S.C.No.155 of 2003 on the file of the learned Assistant Sessions Judge cum Chief Judicial Magistrate, Madurai. Includi...
Tag this Judgment!Seethalakshmi Vs. 1.The Principal Secretary and Commissioner of
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-23-2015
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:23. 07.2015 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.MAHADEVAN W.P(MD)No.12740 of 2015 and M.P.(MD).Nos.1 and 2 of 2015 Seethalakshmi ..Petitioner Vs 1.The Principal Secretary and Commissioner of Land Administration, Government of Tamil Nadu, Chepauk, Chennai. 2.The Inspector General of Registration, No.100, Santhome High Road, Chennai-28. 3.The District Collector, Sivaganga District, Sivaganga. 4.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Devakkottai, Karaikudi Taluk, Sivaganga District. 5.The District Registrar, Karaikudi, Sivagangai District. 6.The Sub-Registrar, Karaikudi, Sivagangai District. 7.The Assistant Land Tax cum Settlement Officer, Karaikudi Division, Madurai. ..Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records relating to the Impugned order passed by the 4th respondent in his Proceeding sin Na.Ka. A1/1357/09 dated 2...
Tag this Judgment!Ilm Matriculation School, Vs. 1.The Director of Matriculation Schools,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-23-2015
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:23. 07.2015 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.VAIDYANATHAN Writ Petition (MD)No.12065 of 2015 and Miscellaneous Petition(MD)Nos.1 and 2 of 2015 Ilm Matriculation School, Narippaiyur Post, Kadaladi, Ramanathapuram District, Rep. by its Correspondent, Noorul Ameen, S/o.S.Jamal. .. Petitioner Vs. 1.The Director of Matriculation Schools, DPI Campus, College Road, Chennai ?. 600 006. 2.The Inspector of Matriculation Schools, Puthukotttai Region, Puthukottai District. .. Respondents Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records relating to the impugned proceedings issued by the first respondent in Na.Ka.No.195/A3/2015, dated 11.03.2015 and to quash the same and consequently directing the respondents to grant permission to run the petitioner school with LKG to VIII Standard without insisting for plan approval from the Department of Town and ...
Tag this Judgment!M.Patties Vs. The State, By
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-22-2015
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 22.07.2015 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.R.SHIVAKUMAR Criminal Appeal(Md.No.240 of 2006 M.Patties ..Appellant/Sole Accused versus The State, by The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Vigilance and Anti-corruption Department, Ramanathapuram, Ramanathapuram District..Respondent/Complainant PRAYER Criminal Appeal filed under Section 374 of Criminal Procedure Code against the Judgement made in Special C.C.No.9/01, dated 23.05.2006 on the file of the learned Special Judge-cum-Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ramanathapuram. Reserved on : 23.09.2014 For Appellant :Mr.R.Singaravelan for M/s.J.Nisha Banu For Respondent :Mr.T.Mohan Additional Government Pleader :JUDGMENT M.Patties, the sole accused in Special C.C.No.9 of 2001 on the file of the Special Judge under the provisions of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988(Chief Judicial Magistrate).Ramanathapuram is the appellant in the present appeal. He was prosecuted in the said case for offence...
Tag this Judgment!- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- Next ›
- Last »