Chennai Court July 2015 Judgments
B.Prakash Vs. 1.Deepa
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-28-2015
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:28. 07.2015 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.NAGAMUTHU CRL.RC.(MD)No.453 of 2014 and M.P.No.1 of 2014 B.Prakash : Petitioner Vs. 1.Deepa 2.Minor Harini : Respondents PRAYER: Petition is filed under Section 397 r/w 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, to call for the records in Crl.A.No.17 of 2012, dated 31.01.2014, on the file of the Second Additional District and Sessions Judge, Trichy, modifying the order passed in M.C.No.158 of 2009, on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Trichy and revise the same. [Date of reserving the Judgment - 01.07.2015]. [Date of pronouncing the Judgment - ....]. !For Petitioner : Mr.N.Mohideen Basha ^For Respondents : Mr.M.Karunanithi : Mr.T.Lajapathi Roy Amicus Curiae :ORDER The petitioner is the husband of the first respondent and the father of the second respondent. The respondent filed M.C.No.107 of 2008, before the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Thiruchirappalli, claiming mainten...
Tag this Judgment!Pandi Vs. The State of Tamil Nadu,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-28-2015
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 28.07.2015 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.NAGAMUTHU Crl.A(MD)No.42 of 2013 Pandi .Appellant/ Sole accused versus The State of Tamil Nadu, rep. by the Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station Town, Madurai City. (Crime No.13 of 2009) .Respondent/ Complainant PRAYER Criminal Appeal filed under Section 374 of Cr.P.C.against the conviction and sentence made in S.C.No.158 of 2010, dated 07.06.2012, by the Sessions cum Mahila Court, Madurai. For appellant : Mr.Lingarasu, Legal Aid Counsel For respondent : Mr.C.Mayilvahana Rajendran, Additional Public Prosecutor :JUDGMENT The appellant is the sole accused in S.C.No.158 of 2010 on the file of the Sessions cum Mahila Court, Madurai. He stood charged for the offence under Sections 450 and 376(1) IPC. The trial Court, by judgment dated 07.06.2012, convicted him under both the charges and sentenced him to undergo rigorous imprisonment for three years and to pay a fine of Rs.500/-, in def...
Tag this Judgment!G.Balasundaram Vs. 1)the Secretary,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-28-2015
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 28.07.2015 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.MANIKUMAR AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.CHOCKALINGAM Writ Appeal(MD)No.836 of 2011 and Writ Appeal(MD)No.727 of 2015 and M.P(MD)No.1 of 2015 G.Balasundaram ..Appellant in W.A.836/11 & Respondent in W.A.727/15 versus 1)The Secretary, Commercial Taxes and Registration Department, Secretariat, Chennai-9. 2)The Inspector General of Registration, Santhome High Road, Chennai-28..Respondents in W.A.836/11 & Appellants in W.A.727/15 Appeals filed under Clause 15 of Letters Patent, against the order dated 26.07.2011 made in W.P.No.9703 of 2006. !For Appellant in W.A.836/11 & Respondent in W.A.727/15 : Mr.G.Balasundaram ^For Respondents in W.A.836/11 & Appellants in W.A.727/15 : Mr.B.Pugalenthi, Spl.G.P :C O M M O N JUDGMENT (Order of the Court was made by S.MANIKUMAR, J.) Being aggrieved by the order, dated 26.07.2011, made in W.P.No.9703 of 2006, in so far as, denying pay for the period between...
Tag this Judgment!Sethuraman Vs. 1.Ramaraj
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-28-2015
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 28.07.2015 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE V.M.VELUMANI C.M.A(Md.No.98 of 2013 and M.P(MD)No.1 of 2013 Sethuraman .Appellant/Respondent No.2 versus 1.Ramaraj ..Respondent/Petitioner 2.Tamilselvi 3.Saraswathi ..Respondents 2 and 3/ Respondents 1 and 3 PRAYER This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal has been filed under Section 76 of the Mental Health Act against the order made in M.H.O.P.No.1 of 2010, dated 31.10.2012 on the file of the Principal District Court, Virudhunagar District at Srivilliputhur. !For Appellant :Mr.M.Sivathilakar for M/s.A.Sivaji ^For Respondent-1 :M/s.H.Arumugam For Respondent-2 :No appearance :JUDGEMENT This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal has been filed against the M.H.O.P No.1 of 2010, on the file of the Principal District Judge, Virudhunagar at Srivilliputhur. 2.The appellant is the second respondent in M.H.O.P.No.1 of 2010, on the file of the Principal District Court, Virudhunagar District at Srivilliputhur. The fiRs.re...
Tag this Judgment!Dr.Elizabeth Rajaram Vs. 1. the Principal Secretary,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-27-2015
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:27. 07.2015 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE S.VAIDYANATHAN W.P.(MD) No.10198 of 2015 Dr.Elizabeth Rajaram ... Petitioner vs 1. The Principal Secretary, Health and Family Welfare Department, Government of Tamil Nadu, Secretariat, Chennai-600 009.2. The Director, Director of Medical Health and Rural Services, Chennai-600 006.3. The Joint Director Medical and Rural Health Services, Virudhunagar.4. Regional Medical Board, Government Rajaji Hospital, Madurai-625 020. ... Respondents PRAYER Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records of the 1st respondent dated 08.06.2015 in Ref.No.16175/E3/2/2015, rejecting petitioner's Voluntary Retirement, quash the same as illegal and non application of mind and consequently, direct the 1st respondent to grant all monetary benefits by accepting petitioner's Voluntary Retirement dated 06.03.2015. !For Pe...
Tag this Judgment!The Oriental Insurance Company Limited, Vs. P.Rajkumar
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-27-2015
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:27. 07.2015 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.K.SASIDHARAN C.R.P.(PD)(MD)No.1795 of 2013 and M.P.(MD)No.1 of 2013 The Oriental Insurance Company Limited, Rep. through its Divisional Manager, 74, West Veli Street, Madurai. : Petitioner Vs. P.Rajkumar : Respondent Prayer Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India to call for the records relating to the order passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal -cum- Chief Judicial Magistrate, Madurai, in I.A.No.820 of 2013 in M.C.O.P.No.2035 of 2010, dated 12.09.2013 and set aside the same. !For Petitioner : Mr.K.Bhaskaran ^For Respondent : Mr.K.Chengiz Khan :ORDER This Civil Revision Petition is directed against the order dated 12 September, 2013, in I.A.No.820 of 2013 in M.C.O.P.No.2035 of 2010, whereby and whereunder, the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal -cum- Chief Judicial Magistrate, Madurai, was pleased to dismiss the application filed by the petitioner...
Tag this Judgment!A.Thangaraj Vs. 1.Jeenath Paritha
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-27-2015
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED :27. 07.2015 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE V.M.VELUMANI C.M.A.(MD)No.234 of 2005 & M.P.(MD) No.1 of 2014 A.Thangaraj ... Appellant Vs. 1.Jeenath Paritha 2.Sekar ... Respondents Appeal filed under Section 30 of the Workmen's Compensation Act, against the award, dated 10.01.2005, made in W.C.No.418 of 2002, on the file of Commissioner for Workmen Compensation, Madurai, set aside the same and allow this appeal. For Appellant : Mr.M.Subash Babu ^For R1 : Dismissed For R2 : Mr.C.Godwin :JUDGMENT This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal has been filed by the appellant, against the award, dated 10.01.2005, made in W.C.No.418 of 2002, on the file of Commissioner for Workmen Compensation, Madurai.2. The appellant has filed W.C.No.418 of 2002 against the respondents claiming a sum of Rs.4,76,527.50, as compensation. The said petition was dismissed, on 10.01.2005, by the Commissioner for Workmen Compensation, Madurai. Against the said order, the presen...
Tag this Judgment!Joseph Selvara Vs. 1.Vasantha Rani
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-27-2015
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:27. 07.2015 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.K.SASIDHARAN C.R.P.(NPD)(MD)No.1066 of 2015 and M.P.(MD)Nos.1 and 2 of 2015 and Crl.O.P.(MD)No.13121 of 2015 and M.P.(MD)No.1 of 2015 C.R.P.(NPD)(MD)No.1066 of 2015: Joseph Selvaraj : Petitioner Vs. 1.Vasantha Rani 2.Vathana Inigo 3.Mary Manohari Respondents 1 and 3 represented through their power of attorney agent 2nd respondent : Respondents Prayer: Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India to strike off the present suit filed by the respondents in O.S.No.216 of 2015 on the file of District Munsif Court, Tuticorin. !For Petitioner : Mr.S.Ramesh For Respondent : Mr.R.R.Kannan Crl.O.P.(MD)No.13121 of 2015: Joseph Selvaraj : Petitioner Vs. 1.The Tahsildar, Tuticorin. 2.The Inspector of Police, South Police Station, Tuticorin. 3.Vadhana Inigo 4.Vasantha Rani 5.Mary Manohari : Respondents Prayer: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of Co...
Tag this Judgment!Rajesh Traders, Vs. 1.The State of Tamil Nadu By
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-27-2015
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:27. 07.2015 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.K.SASIDHARAN C.R.P.(NPD)(MD)No.1400 of 2015 Rajesh Traders, Trichy rep. by its Proprietor T.Rajeshkannan : Petitioner Vs. 1.The State of Tamil Nadu by District Collector, Collector's Office, Tiruchirappalli. 2.The Commercial Tax Officer, Gandhi Market Assessment Circle, District Court Compound, Trichy. : Respondents Prayer Civil Revision Petition is filed under Section 115 of Code of Civil Procedure to set aside the fair and decreetal order dated 04.03.2015 in C.M.A.No.5 of 2014 on the file of learned Principal District Judge, Tiruchirappalli, confirming the fair and decreetal order dated 19.03.2014 passed in I.A.No.246 of 2013 in O.S.No.448 of 2007, on the file of learned Principal Subordinate Judge, Tiruchirappalli. !For Petitioner : Mr.AL.Kannan ^For Respondent : No Appearance :ORDER This Civil Revision Petition is directed against the order dated 04 March, 2015 in C.M.A.No.5 of 2014, w...
Tag this Judgment!1.S.Murugan Vs. 1.Malaichamy
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-27-2015
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:27. 07.2015 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.K.SASIDHARAN C.R.P.(NPD)(MD)No.1001 of 2010 1.S.Murugan 2.M.Lakshmi ...Petitioners Vs 1.Malaichamy 2.Pandiaraj 3.Nagamuthu 4.Vellaichamy 5.Saminathan ...Respondents Prayer Civil Revision Petition is filed under Section 115 of Code of Civil Procedure to set aside the fair and decreetal order dated 15.04.2010 made in I.A.No.65 of 2010 in O.S.No.177 of 2008, on the file of learned Additional District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate, Manamadurai. !For Petitioners : Mr.K.Guhan ^For Respondents : Mr.S.Natarajan :ORDER This Civil Revision Petition is directed against the order dated 15 April, 2010 in I.A.No.65 of 2010 in O.S.No.177 of 2008, whereby and whereunder, the learned Additional District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate, Manamadurai, was pleased to dismiss the application filed by the petitioners to condone the delay in filing the application to set aside the exparte decree.2. The respon...
Tag this Judgment!- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »