Chennai Court July 2015 Judgments
K.Velu Vs. State Through the Intelligence officer,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-31-2015
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:31. 07.2015 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.NAGAMUTHU CRIMINAL APPEAL (MD).Nos.118 to 122 of 2014 K.Velu .. Appellant(A-1) in Crl.A(MD)No.118 of 2014 S.Dassan .. Appellant(A-2)in Crl.A(MD)No.119 of 2014 N.Mahalingam .. Appellant(A-3) in Crl.A(MD)No.120 of 2014 M.John Berkmans .. Appellant(A-4) in Crl.A(MD)No.121 of 2014 P.Antony Merchant ..Appellant(A-5) in Crl.A(MD)No.122 of 2014 Vs. State through the Intelligence Officer, Narcotics Control Bureau, Regional Intelligence Unit, Trivandrum. ... Respondent in all Criminal Appeals COMMON PRAYER: Criminal Appeals filed under Section 374(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure against the judgment in C.C.No.240 of 2009, dated 05.03.2014 passed by the Principal Special Court for EC and NDPS Act Cases, Madurai. !For Appellant (In Crl.A(MD)Nos.118 of 2014):Mr.S.R.Rajarathinam for :Mr.G.Anbusaravanan ^For Appellant (In Crl.A(MD)No.119 of 2014):Mr.R.Rajarathinam for :Mr.N.A.Ajmal Sheik For Appell...
Tag this Judgment!Sami Nadar (Died) Vs. Johnson Moses
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-31-2015
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:31. 07.2015 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.K.SASIDHARAN C.R.P.(NPD)(MD)No.1303 of 2015 Sami Nadar (Died) Thenkaraimuthu : Petitioner Vs. Johnson Moses : Respondent Prayer Civil Revision Petition is filed under Section 115 of Code of Civil Procedure to call for the records of the fair and decreetal order passed in I.A.No.113 of 2014 in O.S.No.261 of 2008 on the file of Principal District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate Court, Nanguneri, dated 05.03.2015 and set aside the same. !For Petitioner : Mr.Ananth C.Rajesh ^For Respondent : Mr.H.Arumugam :ORDER The petitioner and his father filed a suit in O.S.No.261 of 2008. The suit was dismissed for non-prosecution. The petitioner filed an application to restore the suit after condoning the delay of 1045 days. The application was dismissed by the learned Trial Judge. Feeling aggrieved, the petitioner is before this Court.2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned coun...
Tag this Judgment!The Secretary-Cum-Principal Vs. The Manonmaniam Sundaranar University,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-31-2015
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:31. 07.2015 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE S.VAIDYANATHAN W.P.(MD) No.8864 of 2015 The Secretary-cum-Principal Holy Cross Home Science College, 52, New Colony, Tuticorin-628 003. Tuticorin District. ... Petitioner -vs- The Manonmaniam Sundaranar University, Rep. by its Registrar, Abhisekapatti, Tirunelveli-627 012. ... Respondent PRAYER Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records relating to the impugned proceedings issued by the respondent University in MSU/R/CD/C.T.A./HCHSC/B.Sc FDAM/2015 dated 29.04.2015 and the consequential proceedings in MSU/R/CD/C.T.A./HCHSC/B.Sc FDAM/2015 dated 25.05.2015 and quash the same. !For Petitioner : Mr.Isaac Mohanlal For Respondents : Mr.Mahaboob Athiff For M/s.Ajmal Associates Orders Reserved on :23. 07.2015 Orders Pronounced on :31. 07.2015 :ORDER The petitioner has filed this writ petition, seeking to quash t...
Tag this Judgment!1.Paraman Vs. Kumarayee Ammal
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-31-2015
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:31. 07.2015 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.K.SASIDHARAN C.R.P.(NPD)(MD)No.559 of 2015 1.Paraman 2.Marimuthu : Petitioners Vs. Kumarayee Ammal : Respondent Prayer Civil Revision Petition is filed under Section 115 of Civil Procedure Code to set aside and reverse the order passed in I.A.No.98 of 2013 in unnumbered A.S.No.. of 2013 on the file of Principal Subordinate Court, Dindigul, dated 23.01.2015. !For Petitioners : Mr.S.A.Ajmal Khan ^For Respondent : Mr.V.Maria Selvaraj :ORDER The first Appellate Court dismissed the application filed by the petitioners to condone the delay in preferring the appeal. Feeling aggrieved by the said order, the petitioners are before this Court.2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent.3. The respondent filed a suit in O.S.No.33 of 2006 against the petitioners. It was a suit for specific performance. The Trial Court decreed the suit, not...
Tag this Judgment!Padmini Vs. 1.The Superintendent of Police,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-31-2015
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:31. 07.2015 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.NAGAMUTHU Crl.OP.(MD)NO.13811 of 2015 Padmini .. Petitioner Vs. 1.The Superintendent of Police, Tirunelveli. 2.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Ambasamudram Sub Division, Ambasamudram, Tirunelveli District. 3.The Inspector of Police, Vickaramasingapuram Police Station, Vickaramasingapuram, Tirunelveli District. 4.M.Muthu Sankaralingam Deputy Superintendent of Police, Ambasamudram 5.R.Boominathan Inspector of Police, Vickaramasingapuram 6.The Director, Central Bureau of Investigation, Shastri Bhawan, Nungambakkam, Chennai. .. Respondents Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure to transfer the case in Crime No.109 of 2012 from the file of the 3rd respondent (pending in S.C.No.122 of 2013 on the file of the II Additional District and Sessions Court, Tirunelveli) to 6th respondent CBI or any other appropriate agency for further investiga...
Tag this Judgment!1.V.Chelliah Vs. R.Thilagavathi
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-31-2015
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:31. 07.2015 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.K.SASIDHARAN C.R.P.(PD)(MD)No.1357 of 2015 and M.P.(MD)No.1 of 2015 1.V.Chelliah 2.S.Murugan : Petitioners Vs. R.Thilagavathi : Respondent Prayer Civil Revision Petition is filed under Section 115 of Code of Civil Procedure to set aside the fair and decreetal order dated 27.09.2011 made in I.A.No.469 of 2011 in O.S.No.226 of 2008 on the file of District Munsif Court, Theni. !For Petitioners : Mr.K.Appadurai ^For Respondent : Mr.V.K.Saravanan :ORDER The learned Trial Judge wanted the petitioners to explain each day's delay in filing the application to set aside the exparte decree. The application to condone the delay was dismissed solely on the said ground. Feeling aggrieved, the petitioners are before this Court.2. The respondent filed a suit against the petitioners on the basis of a promissory note. The petitioners failed to appear before the Trial Court and the same resulted in passing a...
Tag this Judgment!Capt.Paul Nadar Bennet Singh Vs. 1. the Chairman,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-31-2015
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:31. 07.2015 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE S.VAIDYANATHAN W.P.(MD) No.12823 of 2012 Capt.Paul Nadar Bennet Singh ... Petitioner -vs- 1. The Chairman, V.O.Chidambarnar Port Trust, Tuticorin, Tuticorin District.2. V.O.Chidambarnar Port Trust, Rep. by its Secretary, Tuticorin, Tuticorin District.3. Deputy Conservator, V.O.Chidambarnar Port Trust, Tuticorin, Tuticorin District. ...Respondents PRAYER Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records relating to the order passed by the respondents dated 02.04.2012 and 30.04.2012, quash the same and consequently direct the respondents to reinstate the petitioner in the post of Pilot Officer in V.O.Chidambarnar Port Trust, Tuticorin with consequential benefits including continuity of service, backwages and all other consequential and monetary benefits. !For Petitioner : Mr.N.Dilip Kumar ^For R1 to...
Tag this Judgment!V.Jobin David Vs. 1. the Principal,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-31-2015
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:31. 07.2015 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE S.VAIDYANATHAN W.P.(MD) No.18218 of 2014 V.Jobin David ... Petitioner -vs- 1. The Principal, Subbalakshmi Lakshmipathy Science College, T.V.R.Nagar, Aruppukkottai Road, Madurai.2. The Registrar, Madurai Kamaraj University, Madurai.3. The Controller of Examinations, Madurai Kamaraj University, Madurai. ... Respondents PRAYER Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records pertaining to the impugned order dated 15.10.2014 passed by the 1st respondent and quash the same as illegal. !For Petitioner : Mrs.S.Vijayashanthi ^For R1 : Mr.Isaac Mohanlal For R2 & R3 : Mr.S.Chandrasekar Orders Reserved on :23. 07.2015 Orders Pronounced on :31. 07.2015 :ORDER The petitioner has filed this writ petition, seeking to quash the impugned order dated 15.10.2014 issued by the 1st respondent, in and by which, the petitioner was ...
Tag this Judgment!Thomas Kuruvilla Vs. 1.Canara Bank,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-31-2015
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:31. 07.2015 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.K.SASIDHARAN Review Application (MD)No.122 of 2010 and M.P.(MD)Nos.1,2/2010,1,2/2011 and 1/2013 Thomas Kuruvilla ...Petitioner Vs 1.Canara Bank, Rep. by its Manager, Dindigul Main Branch, Dindigul. 2.The Recovery Officer, Debt Recovery, Kalyani Tower, Madurai. 3.Sasikumar ...Respondents Prayer Review Application is filed under Section 114 of Code of Civil Procedure to set aside the order of this Court dated 31.08.2010 in C.R.P.(PD)(MD)No.2488 of 2008. !For Petitioner : Mr.K.V.Subramaniam, Senior Counsel, For Mr.M.A.Abdul Wahab ^For Respondent No.3 : Mr.M.V.Venkataseshan, For Mr.A.Haja Mohideen Reserved on 06 July, 2015 Delivered on 31 July, 2015 :ORDER This is an application to review the order dated 31 August, 2010 in C.R.P.(PD)(MD)No.2488 of 2008, whereby and whereunder, this Court dismissed the Civil Revision Petition filed by the applicant. SUMMARY OF FACTS:2. The applicant availed fin...
Tag this Judgment!S.Seemaichamy Vs. 1.The Tahsildar,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-31-2015
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED :31. 07.2015 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.MANIKUMAR and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.CHOCKALINGAM W.P.(MD).No.10856 of 2015 S.Seemaichamy .. Petitioner versus 1.The Tahsildar, Madurai North Taluk, Madurai. 2.The Commissioner of Madurai West Panchayat Union/ The Block Development Officer, Madurai West Panchayat Union, Madurai. 3.The District Collector, Madurai District, Madurai. 4.P.N.C.Raman, . . Respondents Prayer Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents 1 and 2 to take immediate action to remove the 4th respondent from encroached portion of the Velichanatham Panchayat Middle School in Survey No.52/16A1 by invoking the provisions of the Tamil Nadu Land Encroachment Act, 1905 in exercise of their power under Section 131(2) of the Tamil Nadu Panchayat Act 1994. !For Petitioner : Mr.G.Prabhu Raja Durai For respondents : Mr.N.Manoharan for R1 to R3 Specia...
Tag this Judgment!- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »