Chennai Court June 2015 Judgments
1.M/S.Jeevan Emu Care Indian (P) Ltd., Vs. The State of Tamil Nadu
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-18-2015
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:18. 06.2015 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.NAGAMUTHU Crl.R.C.(MD)NO.186 of 2015 1.M/s.Jeevan Emu Care Indian (P) Ltd., Rep. By its Managing Director, V.Rajapandi 18 Society Street, Near Vani Vilas Signal Dindigul 2.V.Rajapandi 3.V.Senthil Murugan 4.Banu 5.R.Mohan 6.S.Balakrishnan 7.Premalatha 8.K.Suresh .. Revision Petitioners/ Accused Vs. The State of Tamil Nadu Rep. By its Deputy Superintendent of Police Economic Offence Wing II Dindigul .. Respondent/ Complainant Prayer Criminal Revision Petition filed under Section 397 r/w 401 Cr.P.C., to call for the records in C.C.No.3 of 2015 on the file of Special Court for TNPID Cases, Madurai, dated 06.02.2015 and set aside the same. For Petitioners :: Mr.I.Subramaniam Senior counsel for Mr.K.P.S.Palanivelrajan For Respondent :: Mr.C.Mayil Vahana Rajendran Addl. Public Prosecutor :ORDER The petitioners are the accused in C.C.No.3 of 2015 on the file of the Special Court for Tamil Nadu Pro...
Tag this Judgment!S.Christ Adaikala Sagaya Louisa Vs. 1.The Principal Accountant General ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-18-2015
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:18. 06.2015 Coram THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.VAIDYANATHAN W.P.(MD).No.9928 of 2015 & M.P(MD)No.1 of 2015 S.Christ Adaikala Sagaya Louisa ... Petitioner -vs- 1.The Principal Accountant General, Office of the Accountant General, No.361, Anna Salai, Teynampet, Chennai-600 018. 2.The Assistant Elementary Educational Officer, Tiruchirappalli West Division, Tiruchirappalli. ... Respondents Prayer: Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issue of a Writ of Mandamus to direct the second respondent to forward the pension proposal of the petitioner's deceased husband to the first respondent to sanction family pension to the petitioner. !For Petitioner : Ms.J.Maria Roseline ^For R2 : Mr.Aayiram K.Selvakumar Govt.Advocate For R1 : Mr.P.Gunasekaran :ORDER The prayer in the Writ Petition is for a Writ of Mandamus to direct the second respondent to forward the pension proposal of the petitioner's deceased husband to...
Tag this Judgment!Senthil andavar .. Rev Vs. 1.Muthumari
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-17-2015
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:17. 06.2015 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.NAGAMUTHU Crl.R.C.(MD)NO.111 of 2015 Senthil Andavar .. Revision Petitioner Vs. 1.Muthumari 2.Minor Sakthivel (Represented by his natural guardian/mother the 1st respondent, Muthumari) Meenakshi Colony Sivakasi East, Sivakasi Taluk Virudhunagar District. 3.Maris (Represented by his natural guardian/mother the 1st respondent, Muthumari) Meenakshi Colony Sivakasi East, Sivakasi Taluk Virudhunagar District. .. Respondents Prayer Criminal Revision Petition filed under Section 397 r/w 401 Cr.P.C., against the order passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate, Sivakasi in Cr.M.P.No.12729 of 2014 in M.C.No.40 of 2014 dated 06.02.2015. !For Petitioner :: Mr.S.M.Anantha Murugan ^For Respondent :: Mr.B.Muthukannan :ORDER The first respondent claims to be the wife of the petitioner. According to her, the respondents 2 and 3 were born to her through the petitioner. On the allegation that the petitioner ...
Tag this Judgment!K.Subramanian Vs. 1.The Managing Director,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-17-2015
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED :17. 06.2015 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE V.M.VELUMANI W.P.(MD) No.6851 of 2012 & M.P.(MD) No.1 of 2012 K.Subramanian .. Petitioner Vs. 1.The Managing Director, TWAD Board, Chennai - 600 005. 2.The Joint Chief Engineer (GL), TWAD Board, Head Office, Chepauk, Chennai - 600 005. 3.The Executive Engineer, R.W.S. Division, TWAD Board, Tanjore. .. Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records relating to the third respondent's Proc.No.146/2012-2-EA/EE/RWS- TNJ/dt. 03.04.2012, quash the same and direct the first respondent to implement the pay fixed by the third respondent in Proc. No.411/EA/F.6/2010, dated 27.10.2010 and disburse the terminal benefits including pensionary benefits forthwith together with interest. !For Petitioner : Mr.K.Venkataramani Senior Counsel for Mr.M.Muthappan For Respondents : Ms.Porkodi Karnan :O...
Tag this Judgment!Mirunalini Devi Vs. 1)the District Collector,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-17-2015
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 17.06.2015 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.MANIKUMAR AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.CHOCKALINGAM Writ Petition(MD)No.7469 of 2015 and M.P(MD)No.1 of 2015 Mirunalini Devi ..Petitioner versus 1)The District Collector, Theni District, Theni. 2)The Senior Regional Manager, Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation (TASMAC).Madurai. 3)The District Manager, Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation (TASMAC).Theni District..Respondents Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to remove the TASMAC shop No.8573 in the petitioner's residential area at Muthalamman Kovil Street, Chinnamanur, Theni District. !For Petitioner : Mr.S.Ramesh Babu ^For R1 : Mr.M.Govindan, Spl.G.P For R2 : Mr.M.Muniyasamy :ORDER (Order of the Court was made by S.MANIKUMAR, J.) Claiming himself to be a public interest litigant, petitioner, a resident of Muthalamman Kovil Street, Ch...
Tag this Judgment!M.Sivagnanam Pillai Vs. 1.The Special Secretary to Government,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-17-2015
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:17. 06.2015 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.MAHADEVAN W.P(MD)No.18265 of 2014 M.Sivagnanam Pillai ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Special Secretary to Government, Finance (Salaries) Department, Government of Tamil Nadu, Chennai. 2.The District Collector, Kanyakumari District, Nagercoil. 3.The Joint Director, The Medical and Rural Health Services Department, Kanyakumari District, Nagercoil. 4.Star Health and Allied Insurance Co. Ltd., represented by its Project Officer, Tamil Nadu Government Employees New Health Insurance Scheme, Old No.64-A, New No.2-A, Ganga Nagar Road, Opp. to BSNL Office, Kodambakkam, Chennai - 600 024. ... Respondents Prayer Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records relating to I.D.KKM/01/RE460/69534, dated 01.04.2014 on the file of the fourth respondent and quash the same and consequently, direct the respondents to reimburse the am...
Tag this Judgment!1.Sridhar Vs. Chandra Priya
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-17-2015
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 17.06.2015 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.NAGAMUTHU Crl.R.C.(MD).No.487 of 2014 and M.P.(MD).No.1 of 2014 1.Sridhar 2.Rajagopalan 3.Prabavathi 4.Poongodi 5.Shanmugasundaram .Petitioners/Accused 1 to 5 versus Chandra Priya .Respondent/Complainant PRAYER Criminal revision filed under Section 397 r/w 401 of Cr.P.C.against the order, dated 29.01.2014, made in Cr.M.P.No.1124 of 2013 in C.C.No.24 of 2012 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Karur. !For Petitioners : Mr.M.Ajmal Khan, Senior Counsel for M/s.Ajmal Associates ^For respondent : Mr.D.Selvaraj :ORDER The petitioners are the accused in C.C.No.24 of 2012 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Karur. The respondent is the complainant in the case. Originally, on the complaint made by the respondent, the Sub Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station, Karur, registered a case in Crime No.3 of 2010, on 30.06.2010, under Sections 498-A and 506(i) IPC ...
Tag this Judgment!The Branch Manager, Vs. 1.Pappathi
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-17-2015
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 17.06.2015 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE V.M.VELUMANI C.M.A(Md.No.1698 of 2013 and M.P(MD)No.2 of 2013 The Branch Manager, M/s.Oriental Insurance Company Limited, No.1, Layola Building, FiRs.Floor, Salai Road, Dindigul. Chennai.Appellant/Respondent No.2 versus 1.Pappathi ..Respondent No.1/Petitioner No.1 2.Kumaran @ Pandi ..Respondent No.2/Petitioner No.2 3.Vasanthi ..Respondent No.3/Petitioner No.3 Prayer This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed under Section 30 of the Workmen Compensation Act, 1923 against the order made in W.C.No.171 of 2009, dated 30.4.2013 on the file of the Deputy Commissioner of Labour for workmen Compensation, Dindigul. !For Appellant :M/s.C.Jawahar Ravindran ^For Respondents :M/s.J.Gunaseelan Muthiah 1 and 2 For Respondent-3 :No appearance :JUDGEMENT This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal has been filed against the order made in W.C.No.171 of 2009, dated 30.4.2013 on the file of the Deputy Commissioner of Labour ...
Tag this Judgment!P.Joseph Raj Vs. 1.The District Collector,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-16-2015
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 16.06.2015 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.MANIKUMAR and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.CHOCKALINGAM W.P(MD)No.8723 of 2015 and M.P(MD)No.1 of 2015 P.Joseph Raj .Petitioner versus 1.The District Collector, Dindugal District, Dindugal. 2.The District Revenue Officer, Dindugal District, Dindugal. 3.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Dindugal, Dindugal District. 4.The Tahsildar, The Taluk Office, Dindugal East Taluk, Dindugal District. 5.The Inspector of Police, Ambathurai Police Station, Ambathurai, Dindugal Taluk and District.Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of Writ of Mandamus forbearing the respondents herein from allowing the burial of dead bodies into the Pommachi Kanmai (Tank) situated in S.No.39 of A.Vellodu Village, Dindigul Taluk and District and consequently direct the respondents herein to exhume the two dead bodies, namely, Justin Thiraviyam and Thomaiy...
Tag this Judgment!1.Nainar(Died) Vs. 1.P.Krishnasamy
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-15-2015
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 15.06.2015 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE V.M.VELUMANI C.M.A(MD)No.186 Of 2005 and M.P(MD)No.1 and 2 of 2009 1.Nainar(died) 2.Ranjitham 3.N.Sathyamoorthy 4.M.Kavitha 5.S.Saratha 6.N.Sathyaraj (Appellants 2 to 6 are brought on records as Legal Representatives of the deceased sole appellant vide order of this Court dated 17.6.2014 made in M.P(MD)No.1 to 3 of 2014 in C.M.A(MD)No.186 of 2005) .Claimants/Appellants versus 1.P.Krishnasamy 2.The Divisional Manager, United India Insurance Company Limited, Post Office Road, Palayamkottai, Tirunelveli ?. 627 002. (R1 remained ex-parte in the trial Court) ..Respondents/ Respondents PRAYER Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicle Act, 1988, against the Judgement and decree made in M.C.O.P.No.1341 of 2002, dated 18.12.2003 on the file of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal(Fast Track Court No.II).Tirunelveli. For Appellants : M/s.T.Selvakumaran For Respondent-2 : M...
Tag this Judgment!- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 3
- 4
- 5
- Next ›
- Last »