Chennai Court April 2015 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Kaliyamma Vs. Ganapath
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-08-2015
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED :08. 04.2015 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.R.SHIVAKUMAR SECOND APPEAL(MD)No.629 of 2014 Kaliyammal ... Appellant/Respondent/Plaintiff Vs. Ganapathi ... Respondent/Appellant/Defendant Prayer:- Second Appeal is filed under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 against the Judgment and decree dated 27.02.2013 passed in Appeal Suit No.122 of 2011 by the Sub Court, Pudukottai, reversing the Judgment and decree dated 31.03.2011 passed in Original Suit No.399 of 2006 by the District Munsif Court, Pudukkottai. !For Appellant : Mr.N.Balakrishnan ^For Respondent : Mrs.N.Krishnaveni :JUDGMENT The respondent entered appearance through counsel in the SR stage itself. The submissions made by Mr.N.Balakrishnan, learned counsel for the appellant and Mrs.N.Krishnaveni, learned counsel for the respondent are heard.2. The Judgments of the trial Court and lower Appellate Court and the connected records produced in the form of typed-set of ...
P.Ganapathi Vs. S.Balasaraswathi
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-08-2015
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:08. 04.2015 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.K.SASIDHARAN C.R.P.(PD) (MD) No.525 of 2012 and M.P.(MD) No.1 of 2012 and C.R.P.(PD) (MD) No.774 of 2011 and M.P.(MD) No.1 of 2011 P.Ganapathi ... Petitioner/Respondent/Respondent/Plaintiff in C.R.P.(PD) (MD) No.525 of 2012 Balasaraswathi ... Petitioner/Petitioner/7th Respondent/ 7th Defendant in C.R.P.(PD) (MD) No.774 of 2011 -vs- S.Balasaraswathi ... Respondent/Appellant/Petitioner/7th Defendant in C.R.P.(PD) (MD) No.525 of 2012 Ganapathi ... Respondent/Respondent/Petitioner/Plaintiff in C.R.P.(PD) (MD) No.774 of 2011 PRAYER (C.R.P.(PD) (MD) No.525 of 2012): Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, against the fair and decreetal order, dated 15.09.2011, in C.M.A.No.1 of 2011, on the file of the Subordinate Court, Kovilpatti, against I.A.No.277 of 2010 in O.S.No.98 of 1996, on the file of the District Munsif Court, Kovilpatti. PRAYER (C.R.P.(PD) (MD...
K.Gnana Sambandan Vs. 1. the Government of Tamil Nadu,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-08-2015
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:08. 04.2015 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE S.VAIDYANATHAN WRIT PETITION (MD) No.605 of 2015 and M.P.(MD)Nos.1 & 2 of 2015 K.Gnana Sambandan ... PETITIONER -vs- 1. The Government of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by its Secretary to Government, Law Department, Fort St.George, Chennai-9.2. The Chairman, Teachers Recruitment Board, 4th Floor, EVK Sampath Maaligai DPI Compound, College Road, Chennai-600 006.3. R.Raja ... Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ in the nature of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records on the file of 2nd respondent with regard to release of Provisional Mark LIst of candidates after oral interview No.Nil dated 12.01.2015 published in the website, pursuant to the advertisement No.04/2014 dated 22.07.2014, quash the same with regard to 3rd respondent and consequenty direct the 2nd Respondent to consider the petitioner for appointment to the post ...
K.Gopalram Vs. A.Muthumari
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-08-2015
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:08. 04.2015 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.NAGAMUTHU Crl.A.(MD)NO.97 of 2015 K.Gopalram .. Appellant Vs. A.Muthumari .. Respondent Prayer: Criminal Appeal filed under Section 341 of Cr.P.C. against the order dated 30.04.2014 passed in I.A.No.55 of 2014 in I.A.No.96 of 2010 on the file of the Principal Subordinate Judge, Karur. !For Appellant :: Mr.K.Gopalram Party-in-person ^For Respondent :: Mr.K.Gokul :JUDGMENT Challenging the order of the Principle Subordinate Judge, Karur, made in I.A.No.55 of 2014 in I.A.No.96 of 2010 in HMOP No.131 of 2009, the appellant has come up with this appeal. 2.The facts of the case in brief would be as follows: The appellant has filed HMOP No.131 of 2009 before the learned Subordinate Judge, Karur for divorce. One Mrs.A.Muthumari is the respondent in the HMOP. In that petition, Mrs.Muthumari had filed I.A.No.96 of 2010 for interim alimony. During the said proceedings, it is alleged that Mrs.Muthumari...
State By: Vs. R.Parthasarathy
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-07-2015
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 07.04.2015 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.NAGAMUTHU Criminal Appeal (MD)No.260 of 2004 State by: Deputy Superintendent of Police, Vigilance & Anti Corruption, Dindigul. Rep. by Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras ..Appellant/ Complainant versus R.Parthasarathy ..Respondent/ Accused Prayer : Appeal filed under Section 378 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, against the judgment dated 16.02.2001 passed in Spl.C.C..No.1 of 1999 on the file of the FiRs.Additional District and Sessions Court cum Chief Judicial Magistrate-Special Judge, Vigilance & Anti Corruption, Madurai. !For Appellant : Mr.C.Mayil Vahana Rajendran, Additional Public Prosecutor. ^For Respondent : Mr.R.Maheswaran :JUDGMENT This is an appeal against acquittal, filed by the State. The respondent is the sole accused in Spl.C.C.No.1 of 1999, on the file of the FiRs.Additional District and Sessions Court cum Chief Judicial Magistrate- Special Judge under the Prevention o...
J.Stephen Raja .. Vs. 1.The State of Tamilnadu
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-07-2015
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:07. 04.2015 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.MANIKUMAR and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.CHOCKALINGAM W.A.(MD).No.232 of 2015 & M.P.(MD).No.1 of 2015 J.Stephen Raja .. Appellant versus 1.The State of Tamilnadu Rep by its Secretary, Department of School Education, Fort St. George, Chennai. 2.The Teachers Recruitment Board, Rep. by its Chairman, 4th Floor, E.V.K.Sampath Salai, College Road, Chennai. . . Respondents Appeal filed under Clause 15 of Letters Patent against the order made in W.P.(MD).No.2441 of 2015 dated 25.02.2015. !For Appellant : Mr.M.Patturajan ^For respondents : Mr.VR.Shanmuganathan Special Government Pleader :JUDGMENT (Judgment of the Court was made by S.MANIKUMAR ,J.) Being aggrieved by the order made in W.P.(MD).No.2441 of 2015 dated 25.02.2015, dismissing the writ petition prayed for issuance of writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records of the provisional list of candidates called for verification in r...
S.Arul Dhas Vs. 1.F.Hubert
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-07-2015
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:07. 04.2015 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.K.SASIDHARAN C.R.P.(NPD)(MD)Nos.2497 of 2012 and 262 of 2013 and M.P.(MD)Nos.1 of 2012 and 1 of 2013 S.Arul Dhas : Petitioner in both C.R.Ps. Vs. 1.F.Hubert 2.Lilly Stella Bai : Respondents in both C.R.Ps. Prayer in C.R.P.(NPD)(MD)No.2497 of 2012: Civil Revision Petition is filed under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, praying to set aside the fair and final order dated 02.08.2012 passed in E.A.No.50 of 2011 in E.P.No.150 of 2006 in O.S.No.349 of 2004, on the file of the Principal District Munsif Court, Nagercoil. Prayer in C.R.P.(NPD)(MD)No.262 of 2013: Civil Revision Petition is filed under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, praying to set aside the fair and final order dated 21.12.2012 passed in I.A.No.172 of 2011 in O.S.No.349 of 2004, on the file of the Principal District Munsif Court, Nagercoil. !For Petitioner : Mr.M.Thilagar ^For Respondent No.1 : Mr.R.Murugan :C...
S.Thiagarajan . Vs. 1.Tamilselvi
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-07-2015
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 07.04.2015 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.K.SASIDHARAN C.R.P.PD.(MD).No.996 of 2013 and M.P.(Md.No.1 of 2013 S.Thiagarajan ..Petitioner versus 1.Tamilselvi 2.Prema represented by next friend, guardian, mother Tamilselvi ..Respondents Prayer : Civil Revision Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, against the fair and decretal order dated 09.04.2013 made in I.A.No.204 of 2013 in O.S.No.235 of 2009 on the file of the Principal Subordinate Judge, Karur. !For Petitioner : Mr.V.Meenakshi Sundaram ^For Respondents : Mr.K.Govindarajan :ORDER This Civil Revision Petition is directed against the order dated 09.04.2013 in I.A.No.204 of 2013 in O.S.No.235 of 2009, whereby and whereunder, the learned Principal Subordinate Judge, Karur was pleased to dismiss the application filed by the petitioner for the purpose of re-opening the case on the side of the defendant and to examine the attesting witnesses to the document in Ex.B...
M.Sankaran .. Vs. 1.The Secretary,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-07-2015
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:07. 04.2015 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.MANIKUMAR and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.CHOCKALINGAM W.A.(MD).No.230 of 2015 M.Sankaran .. Appellant versus 1.The Secretary, Department of Municipal Administration Water Supply, Government of Tamilnadu, Secretariat, Chennai. 2.The Commissioner Municipal Administration, Ezhilagam, Chepauk, Chennai-5. 3.The Regional Director of Municipal Administration, Tirunelveli Region, Tirunelveli-2. 4.The Commissioner, Tenkasi Municipality, Tenkasi, Tirunelveli District. 5.The Commissioner, Virudhunagar Municipality, Virudhunagar. . . Respondents Appeal filed under Clause 15 of Letters Patent to call for the records in W.P.(MD)No.18410 of 2014 and set aside the order dated 14.11.2014. !For Appellant : Mr.A.Haja Mohideen ^For respondents : Mr.A.K.Bhaskara Pandian Government Advocate :JUDGMENT (Judgment of the Court was made by S.MANIKUMAR ,J.) Being aggrieved by the order made in W.P.(MD).No.18410 of 2...
C.Rajendran Vs. S.Nirmala
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-07-2015
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 07.04.2015 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.R.SHIVAKUMAR Second Appeal (Md.No.835 of 2011 C.Rajendran ..Appellant versus S.Nirmala ..Respondent Second Appeal is filed under Section 100 C.P.C against the judgment and decree of the lower Appellate Court dated 11.11.2010 passed in A.S.No.176 of 2008 on the file of the Principal Subordinate Judge, Thiruchirappalli, confirming the judgment and decree of the trial Court dated 27.03.2007 passed in O.S.No.2019 of 2005 on the file of the II Additional District Munsif Court, Thiruchirappalli. !For Appellant : Mr.H.Lakshmi Shankar for Mr.T.V.Sivakumar ^For Respondent : Mr.G.S.Asok Adhithyan for Mr.M.Subash Banu :JUDGMENT The fiRs.defendant in the Original Suit is the appellant in the Second Appeal. The fight between the sister and brother over the property bequeathed by their mother on them has made them climb the steps of the trial Court, lower Appellate Court and now this Court being the Sec...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 7
- Next ›
- Last »