Chennai Court April 2015 Judgments
S.Theivanai Vs. 1.The Commissioner,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-15-2015
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:15. 04.2015 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE V.M.VELUMANI W.P.(MD)No.8423 of 2012 and M.P.(MD) Nos.1 of 2012 and 1 of 2014 S.Theivanai .. Petitioner Vs. 1.The Commissioner, Corporation of Madurai, Madurai. 2.The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by the Secretary to Government, Energy Department, Fort St. George, Chennai - 600 009. 3.The Chairman-cum-Managing Director, Tamil Nadu Generation and Distribution Corporation Ltd., (TANGEDCO) 144, Anna Salai, Chennai - 600 022. 4.The Superintending Engineer, Tamil Nadu Generation and Distribution Corporation Ltd., (TANGEDCO) K.Pudur, Madurai - 7. 5.The Executive Engineer, Tamil Nadu Generation and Distribution Corporation Ltd., (TANGEDCO) Kovil (Subramaniyapuram), Madurai. 6.The Assistant Engineer, Tamil Nadu Generation and Distribution Corporation Ltd., (TANGEDCO) Mahalipatti, Madurai. .. Respondents Writ Petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ o...
Tag this Judgment!V.Palanivel Vs. 1.The Secretary to Government,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-15-2015
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:15. 04.2015 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE V.M.VELUMANI W.P.(MD)No.7846 of 2010 and M.P.(MD) No.1 of 2014 V.Palanivel .. Petitioner Vs. 1.The Secretary to Government, Higher Education Department, Fort St. George, Chennai - 600 009. 2.The Directorate of Collegiate Education, Chennai. 3.The Regional Director of Collegiate Education, Madurai. 4.M/s.Vellaisamy Nadar College, Rep. by its Secretary and Correspondent, Nagamalai, Madurai - 19. .. Respondents Writ Petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to pay a sum of Rs.15 Lakhs as compensation for the death of petitioner's son viz., Sudarsan, on 07.02.2010 during the N.S.S. Programme of the fourth respondent College with interest from the date of eligibility till realization. !For Petitioner : Mr.Veerakathiravan ^For R1 to R3 : Mr.M.Murugan Government Advocate For R4 : Mr.D.Nallathambi Date of res...
Tag this Judgment!S.Azhagaiah Vs. 1.The Director of Medical Education,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-15-2015
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED :15. 04.2015 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE V.M.VELUMANI W.P.(MD) No.861 of 2009 S.Azhagaiah .. Petitioner Vs. 1.The Director of Medical Education, O/o. Director of Medical Education, Kilpauk, Chennai - 600 010. 2.The Dean, Tirunelveli Medical College Hospital, Tirunelveli. 3.A.Senthilvel, Sergeant, Tirunelveli Medical College Hospital, Tirunelveli. .. Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records on the file of the second respondent in connection with the impugned order of appointment passed by him in his Ref.No.13270/E3/03, dated 25.01.2005, quash the same as illegal and consequently, direct the second respondent to appoint the petitioner in the post of Sergeant with all backwages from the date on which the third respondent was appointed, within the time limit that may be stipulated by this Court. !For Petitioner : M...
Tag this Judgment!A.Ravi Vs. 1.The District Collector,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-15-2015
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:15. 04.2015 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE V.M.VELUMANI W.P.(MD)No.2172 of 2008 and M.P.(MD) Nos.1 & 2 of 2008 A.Ravi .. Petitioner Vs. 1.The District Collector, Pudukkottai District. 2.The Authorised Officer-cum- District Revenue Officer, (Land Acquisition) Pudukkottai District. 3.The Authorised Officer-cum- Special District Revenue Officer, National Highways, (Land Acquisition) Karumandapam, Trichy. 4.The Tahsildar, Iluppur Taluk, Pudukkottai District. 5.The Secretary to Government, Union of India, National Highways Department, New Delhi. 6.The Project Director, National Highways Authority of India, (NHAI), Ponnagaram, Trichy. .. Respondents (R5 & R6 impleaded as per order of this Court, dated 16.12.2008 & 26.06.2009, made in M.P.(MD) Nos.3 & 4 of 2008 respectively) Writ Petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records pertaining to th...
Tag this Judgment!K.Madankumar Vs. 1.The Director of Legal Studies,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-15-2015
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:15. 04.2015 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.MANIKUMAR and THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.CHOCKALINGAM W.P.(MD)No.5507 of 2015 K.Madankumar ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Director of Legal Studies, Purasavakkam High Road, Keelpauk, Chennai ?.10. 2.The Principal, Government Law College, Dr.Thangaraj Road, Madurai. ... Respondents PRAYER: The Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records of the impugned proceedings of the 2nd respondent vide Rc.No.418/C/2015, dated 06.04.2015 and quash the same as illegal and consequently directing the respondents to grant permission to the petitioner to commemorate Dr.Ambedkar's Birthday, scheduled to be held on 17.04.2015 either in the Government Law College Auditorium, Madurai or any place within college premises. !For Petitioner : Ms.A.Rajini For Respondents : Mr.M.Govindan Spl.Govt.Pleader :ORDER (Order of this Co...
Tag this Judgment!Dr.Ambedkar Mandran-Thiruchuli, Vs. 1.The Superintendent of Police,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-13-2015
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 13.04.2015 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.MANIKUMAR and THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE G.CHOCKALINGAM W.P.(MD).No.5630 of 2015 & M.P.(MD).No.1 of 2015 Dr.Ambedkar Mandran-Thiruchuli, rep.by its President Mr.M.Murugan, East Street, Govt.Hospital Road, Thiruchuli, Virudhunagar District.Petitioners versus 1.The Superintendent of Police, Virudhunagar District, Virudhunagar. 2.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Aruppukkottai Sub-Division, (in-charge) Thiruchuli Sub-Division, Thiruchuli, Virudhunagar District. 3.The Inspector of Police, Tiruchuli Police Station, Thiruchuli, Virudhunagar District. . Respondents Prayer Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of certiorarified mandamus, to call for the records on the file of the 2nd respondent in pursuant to the impugned order passed by him in Na.Ka.No.70/Ka.Thu.Ka/ Thiruchuli/2015, dated 12.04.2015, quashing the same as illegal and arbitrary and con...
Tag this Judgment!K.K.Ramesh Vs. 1)the Government of Tamil Nadu,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-13-2015
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED :13.04.2015 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.MANIKUMAR AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.CHOCKALINGAM Writ Petition(MD)No.1274 of 2015 K.K.Ramesh ..Petitioner versus 1)The Government of Tamil Nadu, Rep.by Home Secretary, Ministry of Home AffaiRs.North Block, New Delhi-110 001. 2)The Government of Tamil Nadu, Rep.by its Chief Secretary, Fort St.George, Secretariat, Chennai-600 009. 3)The Principal Secretary to Government, Industries Department, Secretariat, Chennai-600 009. 4)The Additional Secretary to Government, Industries Department, Secretariat, Chennai-600 009. 5)The District Collector, Madurai District, Madurai. 6)The Deputy Director of Geology and Mining, Madurai District..Respondents Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 2nd respondent herein to initiate appropriate disciplinary proceedings against the respondents 3 to 6 as per the Service Rules by impos...
Tag this Judgment!1)the State of Tamil Nadu, Vs. R.Paulian
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-13-2015
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 13.04.2015 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.MANIKUMAR AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.CHOCKALINGAM Writ Appeals(MD)No.106 of 2015 to 110 of 2015 and 1398 to 1402 of 2013 and Connected Miscellaneous Petitions W.A.No.106 of 2015 1)The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep.by its Secretary, School Eduation Department, St.George Fort, Chennai. 2)The Director of School Education, Chennai-600 006. 3)The District Educational Officer, Kuzhithurai, Marthandam, Kanyakumari District. 4)The Chief Educational Officer, Nagercoil..Petitioners versus R.Paulian ..Respondent Appeal filed under Clause 15 of Letters Patent as against the order passed by Hon'ble Mr.Justice M.M.Sundresh dated 29.01.2014 in Rev.Appl.No.50 of 2013 in W.P(MD)No.5893 of 2012. !For Petitioner : Mr.K.Chellapandian, AAG assisted by Mr.V.R.Shanmuganathan, Spl.G.P ^For Respondent : Mr.G.Thalaimutharasu :COMMON JUDGMENT (Judgment of the Court was made by S.MANIKUMAR, J.) The issue involved in...
Tag this Judgment!Varadhan .. Rev Vs. Velraj
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-10-2015
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:10. 04.2015 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.NAGAMUTHU Crl.R.C.(MD)NO.916 of 2007 Varadhan .. Revision Petitioner Vs. Velraj .. Respondent/Complainant Prayer: Criminal Revision Petition filed under Section 401 Cr.P.C., against the conviction and sentence imposed upon him in C.C.No.266 of 2004 on the file of Judicial Magistrate No.II, Thoothukudi dated 22.06.2006, which was confirmed in C.A.No.100 of 2006 on the file of the Additional District Judge/Fast Track Court No.II, Thoothukudi dated 13.11.2007. !For Petitioner :: Mr.A.Thiruvadi Kumar ^For Respondent :: Mr.M.Subash Babu :ORDER The petitioner is the accused in C.C.No.266 of 2004 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate No.II, Thoothukudi, and the respondent is the Complainant in the case. The respondent filed the said case by way of private complaint alleging that the petitioner has committed an offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The trial Cour...
Tag this Judgment!Yoganathan Vs. State Represented By
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-10-2015
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:10. 04.2015 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.NAGAMUTHU Crl.A.(MD)NO.226 of 2007 Yoganathan .. Appellant Vs. State represented by Assistant Commissioner of Police, Cantonment All Women Police Station, Tiruchirappalli .. Respondent Prayer: Criminal Appeal filed under Section 374(2) Cr.P.C. against the judgment dated 26.04.2007 made in S.C.No.62 of 2006 on the file of the learned Sessions Judge, Mahila Court, Tiruchirappalli. !For Appellant :: Mr.C.Dhanaseelan ^For Respondent :: Mr.C.Mayilvahana Rajendran Addl.Public Prosecutor :JUDGMENT The appellant is the first accused in S.C.No.62 of 2006 on the file of the learned Sessions Judge (Mahila Court), Trichy. Including the appellant, there were six accused in the case. All the six accused stood charged for offences under Sections 498(A), 304B read with Section 34 IPC. The 2nd accused Mrs.Janagammal died during trial. Thus, the charge against her abated. The trial Court by judgment dated 2...
Tag this Judgment!- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 5
- 6
- 7
- Next ›
- Last »