Chennai Court April 2015 Judgments
Padmavat Vs. 1.R.Shyam Sai Sundar
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-17-2015
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:17.04.2015 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.R.SHIVAKUMAR S.A(MD)NO.309 of 2015 and M.P.(MD)NO.2 of 2015 Padmavathi ...Appellant/2nd Appellant/3rd Defendant .versus 1.R.Shyam Sai sundar 2.R.R.Sathiyanarayanan 3.R.R.Ganesh Rajkumar ...Respondents 1 to 3/Respondents 1 to 3/Plaintiffs 4.P.Palaniyandi ...4th Respondent/4th Respondent/ Second defendants Ponniah(died) ...5th Respondent/Ist Appellant/ Ist Defendants 5.Pandiammal 6.Kalyani 7.Alagulakshmi 8.Manikandan 9.Pandian ..Respondents 6 to 10/LRS of the fiRs.appellant/L.Rs of the Ist defendant/Ponniah PRAYER : Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of the Civil Procedure Code against the judgement and decree dated 25.08.2010 made in A.S.No.160 of 2008 on the file of the Subordinate Judge, Theni confirming the judgement and decree, dated 21.09.2007 made in O.S.No.368 of 2006, on the file of the District Munsif Court, Theni. !For Appellant :M/s.D.Rajkumar For Respondents :M/s.S.Sivathilaka...
Tag this Judgment!Ganesan Vs. 1.Ilango
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-16-2015
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED :16. 04.2015 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.R.SHIVAKUMAR S.A(MD)No.307 of 2015 and M.P(MD)No.1 of 2015 Ganesan S/o Ramasubbiah Nadar ... Appellant/ Appellant/Plaintiff Vs. 1.Ilango 2.Rajalakshmi 3.Leela Alagusundaram 4.Thirumalaiyandi 5.Krishnammal 6.Sankaralingam 7.Shamugathai 8.Pitchaimani @ Durai 9.Ramasubbiah 10.Selvaraj 11.Kamaraj 12.Mariselvam 13.Sendu @ Malathi 14.Senthil 15.Sankarlal 16.Padmavathi ...Respondents/Respondents /Defendants PRAYER: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure Code against the decree and judgment passed in A.S.NO.45 of 2012 by the Principal Sub Court, Sankarankoil on 30.09.2013 confirming the decree and judgment passed in O.S.No.96 of 2008 dated 26.09.2011 by the District Munsif Court, Shencottah. !For Appellant : Mr.Ramesh Alias Ramiah :JUDGMENT The plaintiff, who lost the legal battle in both the courts below, is the appellant before this Court in the present Second Appe...
Tag this Judgment!1.V.Maheswari Vs. 1.M/S.Tamil Nadu Mercantile Bank Ltd.,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-16-2015
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:16. 04.2015 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.K.SASIDHARAN C.R.P.(PD)(MD)Nos.738 OF2015and 739 of 2015 and M.P.(MD)No.1 of 2015 1.V.Maheswari 2.V.Venkatraj : Petitioners in both C.R.Ps. Vs. 1.M/s.Tamil Nadu Mercantile Bank Ltd., Sivakasi Branch rep. through its Chief Manager and Power of Attorney Holder, Mr.Samidoss 2.V.Baskaran 3.R.A.Palaniappan 4.B.Sankareswari 5.A.S.Rajasekaran 6.S.R.Balaji 7.B.Lalithambigai Balaji 8.A.S.Rajasekaran (HUF), Represented through its Kartha A.S.Rajasekaran 9.J.Dhanalakshmi 10.S.Maheswari [Respondents 2 to 10 herein are remained exparte before the lower Court and therefore, they are given up in this C.R.P.]. : Respondents in both C.R.Ps. Common Prayer: Civil Revision Petitions are filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India praying to set aside the orders and decrees made in I.A.Nos.523 and 524 of 2014 in O.S.No.177 of 2004, respectively, dated 29.01.2015 on the file of the learned Principal Di...
Tag this Judgment!A.P.Arun Jude Vs. 1.The District Collector,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-16-2015
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 16.04.2015 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.NAGAMUTHU Criminal Revision Case (Md.No.498 of 2014 and M.P.(MD).Nos.1 and 2 of 2014 A.P.Arun Jude .Petitioner Vs 1.The District Collector, Tirunelveli. 2.The Deputy Inspector General of Police, Tirunelveli. 3.The Sub Divisional Executive Magistrate/ Divisional Officer, Tirunelveli. 4.Selvi.B.Fermi Vidhya, Sub Divisional Executive Magistrate/ Divisional Officer, Tirunelveli. 5.The Commissioner of Police, Tirunelveli District. 6.The Tahsildar, Palayamkottai, Tirunelveli District. 7.Dr.Durai Pandian, Meena Clinic, Kayathar, Thoothukudi District. 8.Suriya Vijayakumar, Sub Inspector of Police, Traffic Wing, Tirunelveli..Respondents This petition is preferred under Section 397 and 401 Cr.P.C to call for the records relating to the order passed by the 3rd respondent in M.C.No.4 of 2014 (133) dated 27.11.2014 and to set aside the same. !For Petitioner : Mr.D.Saravanan ^For Respondents : Mr.P.Kann...
Tag this Judgment!Jothimurugan @ Vs. 1.The Secretary to Government,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-16-2015
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 16.04.2015 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.SELVAM and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.S.RAVI HABEAS CORPUS PETITION(MD)No.1443 of 2014 Jothimurugan @ Murugesan .Petitioner versus 1.The Secretary to Government, Home, Prohibition and Excise Department, State of Tamil Nadu, Secretariat, Fort St. George/ Chennai ?. 600 009. 2.The Commissioner of Police, Office of the Commissioner of Police, Madurai City, Madurai. 3.The Superintendent of Prison, Madurai Central Prison, Madurai District.Respondents Habeas Corpus Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Habeas Corpus to call for the entire records connected with the detention order of the second respondent in No.83/BCDFGISSSV/2014, dated 28.11.2014 and quash the same and direct the respondents to produce the body or person of the detenu namely Jothimurugan @ Murugesan, Son of Soundarapandi, aged about 23 yeaRs.detained in Madurai Central Prison, bef...
Tag this Judgment!Kundumani @ Vs. 1.The Secretary to Government,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-16-2015
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 16.04.2015 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.SELVAM and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.S.RAVI HABEAS CORPUS PETITION(MD)No.1446 of 2014 Kundumani @ Muthuramalaingam .Petitioner versus 1.The Secretary to Government, Home, Prohibition and Excise Department, State of Tamil Nadu, Secretariat, Fort St. George/ Chennai ?. 600 009. 2.The Commissioner of Police, Office of the Commissioner of Police, Madurai City, Madurai. 3.The Superintendent of Prison, Madurai Central Prison, Madurai District.Respondents Habeas Corpus Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Habeas Corpus to call for the entire records connected with the detention order of the second respondent in No.78/BCDFGISSSV/2014, dated 27.11.2014 and quash the same and direct the respondents to produce the body or person of the detenu namely Kundumani @ Muthuramalaingam, Son of Uchimahali, aged about 35 yeaRs.detained in Madurai Central Prison...
Tag this Judgment!Manikandan @ Vs. 1.The Secretary to Government,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-16-2015
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 16.04.2015 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.SELVAM and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.S.RAVI HABEAS CORPUS PETITION(MD)No.1448 of 2014 Manikandan @ Mottai Mani .Petitioner versus 1.The Secretary to Government, Home, Prohibition and Excise Department, State of Tamil Nadu, Secretariat, Fort St. George/ Chennai ?. 600 009. 2.The Commissioner of Police, Office of the Commissioner of Police, Madurai City, Madurai. 3.The Superintendent of Prison, Madurai Central Prison, Madurai District.Respondents Habeas Corpus Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Habeas Corpus to call for the entire records connected with the detention order of the second respondent in No.81/BCDFGISSSV/2014, dated 28.11.2014 and quash the same and direct the respondents to produce the body or person of the detenu namely Manikandan @ Mottai Mani, Son of Kalyana Sundaram, aged about 22 yeaRs.detained in Madurai Central Prison, ...
Tag this Judgment!Sounder @ Vs. 1.The Secretary to Government,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-16-2015
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 16.04.2015 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.SELVAM and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.S.RAVI HABEAS CORPUS PETITION(MD)No.1447 of 2014 Sounder @ Soundrapandian .Petitioner versus 1.The Secretary to Government, Home, Prohibition and Excise Department, State of Tamil Nadu, Secretariat, Fort St. George/ Chennai ?. 600 009. 2.The Commissioner of Police, Office of the Commissioner of Police, Madurai City, Madurai. 3.The Superintendent of Prison, Madurai Central Prison, Madurai District.Respondents Habeas Corpus Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Habeas Corpus to call for the entire records connected with the detention order of the second respondent in No.79/BCDFGISSSV/2014, dated 27.11.2014 and quash the same and direct the respondents to produce the body or person of the detenu namely Sounder @ Soundrapandian, Son of Ramaiah, aged about 38 yeaRs.detained in Madurai Central Prison, before th...
Tag this Judgment!Premkumar Vs. 1.The Secretary to Government,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-16-2015
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 16.04.2015 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.SELVAM and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.S.RAVI HABEAS CORPUS PETITION(MD)No.1444 of 2014 Premkumar .Petitioner versus 1.The Secretary to Government, Home, Prohibition and Excise Department, State of Tamil Nadu, Secretariat, Fort St. George/ Chennai ?. 600 009. 2.The Commissioner of Police, Office of the Commissioner of Police, Madurai City, Madurai. 3.The Superintendent of Prison, Madurai Central Prison, Madurai District.Respondents Habeas Corpus Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Habeas Corpus to call for the entire records connected with the detention order of the second respondent in No.82/BCDFGISSSV/2014, dated 28.11.2014 and quash the same and direct the respondents to produce the body or person of the detenu namely Premkumar, Son of Hari, aged about 39 yeaRs.detained in Madurai Central Prison, before this Court and set him at liberty f...
Tag this Judgment!G.Ravindran Vs. 1.The State of Tamil Nadu,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-15-2015
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:15. 04.2015 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE V.M.VELUMANI W.P.(MD)No.10045 of 2009 G.Ravindran .. Petitioner Vs. 1.The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by its Secretary, Education, Science and Technology Department, Fort St. George, Chennai - 600 009. 2.The Secretary, Tamil Nadu Sports Development Corporation, Chennai. 3.The Director of School Education, College Road, Nungambakkam, Chennai - 600 006. 4.The District Collector, Madurai District, Madurai. 5.The Commissioner, Corporation of Madurai, Madurai. 6.The Revenue Divsional Officer, Madurai North, Madurai. 7.The Tahsildar, Madurai North, Madurai. 8.The Correspondent, Seventh Day Adventist Matriculation School, Ellis Nagar, Madurai. 9.The Principal, Seventh Day Adventist Matriculation School, Ellis Nagar, Madurai. .. Respondents Writ Petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to pay compensation to t...
Tag this Judgment!- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- Next ›
- Last »