Chennai Court March 2015 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Sasikala Vs. 1.The District Collector,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-17-2015
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 17.03.2015 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.RAJENDRAN W.P.(MD).No.12011 of 2013 and M.P.(Md.Nos.2 and 3 of 2013 Sasikala : Petitioner versus 1.The District Collector, Thanjavur. 2.The Block Development Officer, Sethupavachathiram, Pookollai Post, Peravaurani Taluk, Thanjavur District. 3.The President, Kuruvikarambai Village Panchayat, Kuruvikarambai Post, Peravaurani Taluk, Thanjavur District. 4.Sasireka : Respondents PRAYER Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records of the 1st respondents in Na.Ka.No.2606/2013/A3, dated 11.07.2013 and quash the same as illegal and in consequence thereof confer the cheque signing power with the petitioner and pass such further or other orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case and thus render justice. !For Petitioner : Mr.P.Ganapathi Subramanian ...
Raj Vs. The State
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-17-2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:26. 11.2009 CORAM: THE HONBLE MR.JUSTICE K.CHANDRU W.P.No.15573 of 2009 and M.P.No.1 of 2009 Tamil Nadu Co-operative Marketing Federation Ltd., Represented by its Secretary, M.Natarajan ...Petitioner Vs 1.State of Tamilnadu, Rep. By its Principal Secretary to Government, Labour and Employment Department, Fort St.George, Chennai 600 009. 2.The Regional Director, Employees State Insurance Corporation, Chennai 600 034. 3.The Registrar of Co-operative Societies, Chennai 600 010. .. Respondents Prayer :Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for a Writ of certiorarified mandamus, calling for the records of the order in Letter No.16959/L1/2006-1 dated 25.5.2009 on the file of the first respondent, quash the same and direct the first respondent to grant exemption under Section 90 of Employees State Insurance Act, 1948 for the period from 01.08.1985. For Petitioner : Mr.R.Subramanian, Senior Counsel for Ms.S.Hemalatha F...
M/S.Kalpataru Power Transmission Ltd, Vs. The Assistant Commissioner ( ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-17-2015
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:17.03.2015 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.RAJENDRAN W.P.(MD)No.2121 of 2015 and M.P.(MD).No.1 of 2015 M/s.Kalpataru Power Transmission Ltd, rep.by its Authorised Signatory, Mr.T.Nagendran, 2nd Floor, Bawa Building, Kailasapuram North Street, Tirunelveli Junction : Petitioner Vs The Assistant Commissioner (CT), Tirunelveli Junction Assessment Circle, Tirunelveli. : Respondent Writ Petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of Writ of Certiorarfied Mandamus to call for the records of the respondent in his proceedings in TIN No.33305563701/2012-13 and quash the order dated 07.01.2015 and further direct the respondent to consider the letter dated 12.02.2015 along with relevant records and thereafter to pass order afresh insofar as the reversal of ITC for the difference of turnover as per web report in terms of the decision of this Court reported in 50 VST179& 60 VST283 !For Petitioner : Mr.R.D.Ganes...
1.Yasothai Vs. 1.Cyros
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-17-2015
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 17.03.2015 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.HARIPARANTHAMAN C.M.A.(MD)No.302 of 2015 1.Yasothai 2.Petchimuthu 3.Minor Meenakshi Minor 3rd petitioner represented by her Friend and next guardian the 1st petitioner herein..Appellants versus 1.Cyros 2.Manoj 3.United India Insurance Co.Ltd., through its Branch Manager, Post Box No.37, Vaniyapurackal Building, Kollam..Respondents Prayer : Appeal filed under Section 173 of Motor Vehicle Act 1988, to allow the appeal and enhance the award amount in M.C.O.P.No.297 of 2010 on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (II Additional District Judge).Tirunelveli, dated 20.03.2013. For Appellants : Mr.T.Selvakumaran For Respondents : Mr.V.J.Kumaravel for R3 :JUDGMENT The appellants are the claimants in M.C.O.P.No.297 of 2010 on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (II Additional District Judge).Tirunelveli. The fiRs.appellant is the wife of the deceased Mariappan, who died in the ...
Sadasivan @ Mookandi Vs. State Through
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-17-2015
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:17. 03.2015 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.SATHYANARAYANAN Crl.A.(MD)NO.408 of 2007 Sadasivan @ Mookandi S/o.Perumal Nadar Residing at 46/76 North Street, Ranimaharajapuram Tuticorin District. .. Appellant Vs. State through the Inspector of Police Tiruchendur Police Station, Tuticorin District. .. Respondent Prayer: Criminal Revision Petition filed under Section 374 Cr.P.C., against the judgment dated 09.02.2005 made in S.C.No.284 of 2005 on the file of the Additional District and Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court, No.2, Tuticorin. !For Petitioner :: Mr.S.Ramasamy ^For Respondent :: Mrs.S.Prabha Government Advocate (Crl. side) :JUDGMENT The sole accused, in S.C.No.284 of 2005 on the file of Additional District and Sessions Court cum Fast Track Court, No.2, Tuticorin stood charged and tried for the commission of offence under Section 302 IPC. The trial Court vide impugned judgment dated 09.02.2005 has convicted him and found the appe...
Pl.Padikkasu Vs. The Inspector of Police,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-17-2015
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:17. 03.2015 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.T.SELVAM CRL.O.P.(MD)No.3988 of 2015 PL.Padikkasu .. Petitioner .. Vs .. The Inspector of Police, District Crime Branch, Madurai. .. Respondents Criminal Original Petition filed under section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, praying to set aside the onerous condition No.1 to pay cash security of Rs.2,00,00,000/- (Rupees Two Crores) and for the balance Rs.2,38,00,000/- (Rupees Two Crores Thirty Eight Lakhs) as bank guarantee to the Judicial Magistrate No.1, Madurai in the order dated 16.02.2015 passed in Crl.M.P.No.1050 of 2015 on the file of the I Additional Sessions Judge, Madurai. !For Petitioner : Mr.PL.Narayanan ^For Respondents : Mr.S.Shanmuga Velayutham Public Prosecutor Assisted by Mr.K.Anbarasan Government Advocate (Crl. Side) - - - - - :ORDER This petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C., praying to set aside the onerous condition No.1 to pay cash security of Rs.2,00,0...
N. Ramasamy Vs. Bharat Heavy Electricals Ltd
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-16-2015
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:16. 3.2015 CORAM THE HONOURABLE Mrs.JUSTICE PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA C.R.P.NPD (MD) No.1768 of 2003 N. Ramasamy ... Petitioner Vs Bharat Heavy Electricals Ltd rep. By its Executive Director Trichy. ... Respondent Petition filed under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure against the order and decreetal order passed in I.A.No.829 of 1999 in O.S.No.106 of 1997 dated 24/7/2002 on the file of the Principal District Munsif, Trichy. !For petitioner ... Mr.D.Rajkumar ^For respondents ... Mr.A.V.Arun :ORDER The plaintiff in O.S.No.106 of 1997 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Tiruchirapalli is the petitioner herein.2. The suit is filed by the plaintiff against his employer for a declaration that the proceedings against him that culminated into a penalty advice dated 9/6/1984 is void and nonest and for consequential relief of mandatory injunction, directing the defendant to restore all the benefits.3. The plaintiff was working as a M...
1. Jeelani Begum Vs. 1. Subbanna Gounder (Died)
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-16-2015
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:16. 3.2015 CORAM THE HONOURABLE Mrs.JUSTICE PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA S.A.(MD) No.330 of 1996 1. Jeelani Begum 2. Subani Begum 3. Rabani Begum ... Petitioners Vs 1. Subbanna Gounder (died) 2. S. Ramalingam 3. S. Palanisamy 4. S. Rasammal 5. S. Jeyammal 6. S. Punshpa 7. S. Ponni ... Respondents (R.R.2 to 7 are brought on record as Lrs of the deceased sole respondent vide order dated 3/9/2011 made in M.P.(MD) Nos. 1 to 3 of 2010 in S.A.(MD) No.330/96 by MMSJ) Appeal filed under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure against the judgment and decree dated 11/12/1995 made in A.S.No.210 of 1991 on the file of the Sub-Judge, Karur, reversing the judgment and decree dated 25/9/1991 made in O.S.No.566 of 1989 on the file of the Principal District Munsif, Karur. !For appellants ... Mr.D.Rajkumar ^For respondents ... Mr.S.Anand Chandrasekar for M/s.Sarvabhauman Associates for R.R.2 to 7 R.1 (died). :JUDGMENT The plaintiffs are the appellants, wh...
1. Alagarsamy Vs. 1. andianandam (Died)
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-16-2015
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:16. 3.2015 CORAM THE HONOURABLE Mrs.JUSTICE PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA S.A.(MD) No.1571 of 1993 1. Alagarsamy 2. Petchikalai ... Appellants Vs 1. Andianandam (died) 2. Arunachalam 3. Gurusamy 4. Rakkammal (died) 5. Janaki 6. Minor Karthigai Deepa 7. Minor Muthumani (died) ... Respondents (R.R.4 to 7 brought on record as Lrs of the deceased first respondent vide order dated 2/9/2003 made in C.M.P.Nos.15059 and 15060 of 1996 by ZHJ) (R.7 deceased recorded and R.6 declared as major and discharged from her guardianship vide order dated 9/3/2012 made in M.P.(MD) NO.2/11 in S.A.No.1571/93 by KRCBJ). R.4 died.R.R2 and 3 as the legal representatives of the deceased R.4) R.7 died, R.5 as the legal representatives of the deceased R.7. Memo recorded USR No.400,401/30.1.2015 vide order dated 3/2/2015 made in S.A.No.1571 of 1993 by PSNJ). Appeal filed under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure against the judgment and decree dated 10/8/1993 made ...
Diwangani @ M.S.Gani Vs. 1. Saharvan Beevi
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-16-2015
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:16. 3.2015 CORAM THE HONOURABLE Mrs.JUSTICE PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA C.R.P.NPD (MD) No.91 of 2004 Diwangani @ M.S.Gani ... Petitioner Vs 1. Saharvan Beevi 2. Minor Gadafi 3. Minor Akram (R.R.2 and 3 rep. Through their grandmother and next friend Saharvan Beevi/R.1) 4. Begum Hara Habib 5. Seema 6. M. Habib 7. Aneez Meeran Babu 8. Babu Siraj 9. Beema Mariam Sagar ... Respondents Petition filed under Section 25 of the Tamil Nadu Building (Lease & Rent Control) Act, 1960 as amended by Act 23/73 and Act 1/80 against the judgment and decree made in RCA No.43/2001 dated 23/6/2004 by the learned Rent Control Appellate Authority (Prl.Sub-Judge), Tirunelveli, reversing the judgment and decree made in R.C.O.P.No.121 of 1999 dated 18/8/2001 by the learned Principal Rent Controller (Principal District Munsif), Tirunelveli. !For petitioner ... Mr.G.R.Swaminathan ^For respondents ... Mr.G.Sridharan for R.R.1 to 3 and 5. R. 4 -died R.R.6 to 9 ?. No appe...
- ‹ Prev
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- Next ›
- Last »