Chennai Court March 2015 Judgments
The Branch Manager, Vs. 1.Tmt.Thangammal
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-27-2015
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 27.03.2015 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.HARIPARANTHAMAN C.M.A.(MD)No.778 of 2006 and M.P.(MD)No.1 of 2006 The Branch Manager, New India Assurance Co.Ltd., Trichy.Appellant Vs 1.Tmt.Thangammal 2.Karthigai Vani 3.Uma Maheswari 4.Balakrishnan 5.Ramesh Kumar (4th and 5th respondents are minors represented by their mother and next friend, the fiRs.respondent herein).6.Ameer Bai 7.The Branch Manager, Indian Oil Corporation, Trichy.Respondents Appeal filed under Section 30 of the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923, against the award dated 24.04.2006 made in W.C.No.4 of 2004 on the file of Commissioner for Workmen's Compensation, Deputy Commissioner of Labour, Dindigul. !For Appellant : Mr.D.Senthil For Respondents : Mr.C.K.M.Appaji for R1 to R5 Mr.R.Vijayakumar for R6 No appearance for R7 :JUDGMENT The appellant is the Insurance Company. A petrol tanker lorry of the sixth respondent was insured with the appellant. According to the sixth...
Tag this Judgment!K.S.Thirunavukkarasu Vs. 1.The State of Tamil Nadu,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-27-2015
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED :27. 03.2015 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE V.M.VELUMANI W.P.(MD) No.7676 of 2008 K.S.Thirunavukkarasu .. Petitioner Vs. 1.The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by its Secretary to Government, Education Department, Fort St. George, Chennai - 600 009. 2.The District Elementary Education Officer, Karur. 3.The Director of Elementary Education, Chennai. 4.The District Employment Exchange Officer, Karur. 5.K.S.Senthilkumar 6.S.Kavitha .. Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the first respondent herein to appoint the petitioner as Secondary Grade Teacher either in the existing vacancies or by removing the respondents 5 and 6 herein, by following the registration seniority of the District Employment Exchange Officer, Karur. !For Petitioner : Mr.S.S.Sundar ^For R1 to R4 : Mr.T.S.Mohamed Mohideen Addl. Government Pleader For R5 & R6 : No Appearance :ORDER...
Tag this Judgment!R.Subbiah Vs. 1.The Superintendent of Police,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-27-2015
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 27.03.2015 CORAM THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE C.T.SELVAM CRL.O.P.(Md.No.5217 of 2015 R.Subbiah .Petitioner versus 1.The Superintendent of Police, Tirunelveli District Palayamkottai, Tirunelveli. 2.The Inspector of Police, Vickramasingapuram Police Station, Tirunelveli District.Respondents Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C.praying to direct the 2nd respondent to register case on the petitioner's complaint dated 04.03.2015, investigate the same and file a final report within a stipulated period. !For Petitioner : Mr.P.Subbiah For Respondents : Mr.K.V.Rajarajan Government Advocate,(Crl. Side) ****** :ORDER Pursuant to the complaint of the petitioner dated 04.03.2015, neither has any case been registered nor an investigation conducted. Hence, the petitioner has preferred the present petition, seeking a direction to register the case. 2.Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) f...
Tag this Judgment!K.Gopalakrishnan Vs. 1.The Commissioner of Police,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-27-2015
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 27.03.2015 CORAM THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE C.T.SELVAM CRL.O.P.(Md.No.13954 of 2014 K.Gopalakrishnan .Petitioner versus 1.The Commissioner of Police, Madurai District, Madurai. 2.The Inspector of Police, Crime Branch, Karimedu Police Station, Karimedu, Madurai.Respondents Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C.praying to direct the 2nd Respondent to register case on the Petitioner's complaint dated 12.06.2014. !For Petitioner : Mr.V.Maharajan For Respondents : Mr.K.V.Rajarajan Government Advocate,(Crl. Side) ****** :ORDER Pursuant to the complaint of the petitioner dated 12.06.2014, neither has any case been registered nor an investigation conducted. Hence, the petitioner has preferred the present petition, seeking a direction to register the case. 2.Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) for respondents. 3.For the past two and a half months, this Court has been passing the ...
Tag this Judgment!Saravanan Vs. 1.The Superintendent of Police,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-27-2015
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 27.03.2015 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.T.SELVAM Crl.O.P.(MD)No.5664 of 2015 Saravanan ..Petitioner versus 1.The Superintendent of Police, Pudukottai District, Pudukottai. 2.The Inspector of Police, District Crime Branch, Pudukottai District..Respondents PRAYER Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure to direct the 2nd respondent herein not to harass the petitioner in any manner except due process of law. !For Petitioner : Mr.G.Mariappan For Respondents : Mr.K.V.Rajarajan Government Advocate (Crl.side) :C O M M O N ORDER The petitioner seeks directions to the second respondent not to harass petitioner. 2. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) for respondents. 3. The petitioner in this petition alleged harassment at the hands of the second respondent. Given the guidelines of the Apex Court in Lalita Kumari versus Government of U.P.and others ...
Tag this Judgment!Cma(Md)no.1319 of 2013 Vs. 1)muthukrishnan
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-27-2015
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 27.03.2015 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.HARIPARANTHAMAN CMA(MD)Nos.1319 of 2013 and 110 of 2014 and M.P(MD)Nos.1 and 2 of 2013 and 1 of 2015 CMA(MD)No.1319 of 2013 The Branch Manager, The Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Co.Ltd., 12G, Ram Nagar, Bye pass road, Madurai..Appellant versus 1)Muthukrishnan 2)Mr.Selvakumar 3)The Managing Director, Tamilnadu State Transport Corporation, (Madurai Division) Rani thottam, Nesamani Nagar, Nagercoil..Respondents Appeal filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, against the judgment and decree passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Principal Sub Judge, Tirunelveli, dated 21.02.2013 in MCOP.No.697 of 2010. !For Appellant : Mr.G.Maruthiah ^For R1 : No appearance For R2 : Mr.T.Selvakumaran For R3 : Mr.P.Prabhakaran CMA(MD)No.110 of 2014 Muthukrishnan ..Appellant versus 1)Mr.Selvakumar 2)The Branch Manager, The Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Co.Ltd., 12G, Ram Nagar, Bye pass road...
Tag this Judgment!The Manager, Vs. 1.Asaithambi
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-27-2015
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 27.03.2015 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.HARIPARANTHAMAN C.M.A.(MD)No.1082 of 2006 and M.P.(MD)No.2 of 2006 The Manager, The Oriental Insurance Company Limited, Broadway, Chennai.Appellant Vs 1.Asaithambi 2.The Administration, Sankaranarayana Construction Co., Bangalore, Karnataka State. 3.The Scheme Manager, Chennai Railway Transport Scheme, Tharamani, Chennai-600 113. 4.The Administration, Irkkan International Ltd., T.Nagar, Chennai. 5.A.V.Doss .Respondents Appeal under Section 30 of the Workmen Compensation Act, 1923, against the order passed in W.C.No.165/2000 dated 30.01.2005 on the file of the Deputy Commissioner for Workmen's Compensation, Trichy. !For Appellant : Mr.C.Jawahar Ravindran ^For Respondents : Mr.T.A.Ebenezer for R1 Mr.G.Bhagavath Singh for R2 No appearance for R5 :JUDGMENT The appellant is the Insurance Company. The fiRs.respondent was a casual labourer employed by the second respondent. There was a Central S...
Tag this Judgment!The Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Co. Ltd., Vs. 1.M.Maranadu
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-27-2015
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 27.03.2015 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.HARIPARANTHAMAN C.M.A.(MD)No.40 of 2013 The Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Co.Ltd., Represented by its Branch Manager, K.M.A.Complex, 1st Floor 12-G, Ram Nagar, Bye Pass Road, Madurai ?. 12..Appellant versus 1.M.Maranadu 2.M/s.Oriental Insurance Co.LTD.Represented by its Divisional Mager, No.16, North Veli Street, Madurai ?. 1. 3.Muthukumaresan 4.M.Parameswari 5.P.Maharajan 6.M.Suresh ..Respondents Prayer: Appeal filed under Section 173 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, against the decree and judgment passed by the VI Additional District Court, Madurai dated 09.07.2012 in M.C.O.P.No.2 of 2010. !For Appellant : Mr.G.Marimuthu ^For Respondent : Mr.K.Bhaskaran for R2 Mr.M.P.Senthil for R4 to R6 No Appearance for R1 & R3s :JUDGMENT The fiRs.respondent in the appeal is the owner of the tractor bearing Registration No.TN67Z3598and Trailor bearing registration No.TNW3598that involved in the accident...
Tag this Judgment!M.Sehujalahudeen Vs. 1.The District Collector,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-26-2015
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED :26.03.2015 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.RAJENDRAN W.P(MD).No.2882 of 2015 M.Sehujalahudeen Through Power Agent, A.R.Dulkieph Khan, Ramanathapuram District ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The District Collector, Ramanathapuram District, Ramanathapuram. 2.The District Revenue Officer, Ramanathapuram District. ... Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus to direct the second respondent to pass orders on the representation of the petitioner dated 08.10.2014 by deleting the classification as Government surplus with respect to Survey No.74/3 of Enmanamkondan Village of Ramanathapuram Taluk measuring an extent of 5.33.5 hectares in respect of the land measuring 1.16 acre is concerned. !For petitioner : Mr.A.S.Mujibur Rahman ^For Respondents : Mr.S.Chandrasekar Government Advocate :ORDER This Writ Petition is filed praying for a Mandamus to direct the second respondent to...
Tag this Judgment!New India Assurance Co.Ltd., Vs. 1)p.Pandi
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-26-2015
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 26.03.2015 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.HARIPARANTHAMAN CMA(MD)No.601 of 2006 and CMP(MD)No.3436 of 2006 New India Assurance Co.Ltd., Through its Branch Manager, Dr.Thirumalai Plaza Complex, 82, Pudu Tharapuram Road, Palani Town, Palani Taluk, Dindigul District..Appellant versus 1)P.Pandi 2)K.Nallakumar ..Respondents Appeal filed under Section 30 of the Workmen Compensation Act, against the order dated 15.02.2006 passed in W.C.No.109 of 2005 on the file of Commissioner for Workmen Compensation, (Deputy Commissioner of Labour).Dindigul. !For Appellant : Mr.G.Prabhu Rajadurai ^For R1 : Mr.C.K.M.Appaji For R2 : No appearance :JUDGMENT The 1st respondent was working as a cleaner in the lorry bearing registration No.TN-57-J-4999 owned by the 2nd respondent herein insured with the appellant insurance company. On 27.03.2005, the lorry was loaded with vegetables at Ottachathiram Gandhi Market and proceeded towards Kerala. While so, abo...
Tag this Judgment!- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »