Chennai Court March 2015 Judgments
United India Insurance Company Ltd., Vs. 1)mrs.R.Porkodi
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-30-2015
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 30.03.2015 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.HARIPARANTHAMAN CMA(MD)No.1250 of 2014 and MP(MD)No.1 of 2014 United India Insurance Company Ltd., No.16, Senitop Road, Thenampet, Chennai-18..Appellant versus 1)Mrs.R.Porkodi 2)Mrs.Rani 3)Mrs.Chitra 4)Thiru.Kovaithangam 5)M/s.Bharat & Co.No.16, Senitop Road, Thenampet, Chennai-18..Respondents Appeal filed under Section 30(1) of the Workmen Compensation Act, against the order passed in W.C.No.209 of 2006 dated 25.09.2014 on the file of the Deputy Commissioner of Labour, Dindigul. !For Appellant : Mr.C.Jawahar Ravindran ^For R1 to R3 : Mr.M.S.Jeyakarthik For R4 : Mr.V.Meenakshisundaram For R5 : No appearance :JUDGMENT The appellant is the insurance company which is the 3rd respondent in W.C.No.209 of 2006 on the file of the Deputy Commissioner of Labour, Dindigul. 2.W.C.No.209 of 2006 was preferred by the respondents 1 to 3 herein who are the claimants in W.C.No.209 of 2006. The 1st respon...
Tag this Judgment!1. Lakshmanan Servai Vs. Respondent
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-30-2015
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:30. 3.2015 CORAM THE HONOURABLE Mrs.JUSTICE PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA C.R.P.NPD (MD) No.1328 OF2013and 1329 of 2013 1. Lakshmanan Servai 2. Raman Servai 3. V. Subramaniyan ... Petitioners in both the petitions Vs #S.Karuppaiah ... Respondent in both the petitions Petition filed under 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure to set aside the order of District Munsif-cum-Judicial Magistrate, Thirumayam, Pudukottai District in E.P.No.16 of 2011 in O.S.No.28 of 1988 and E.A.No.7 of 2011 in E.P.No.16 of 2011 in O.S.No.28 of 1988 dated 5/6/2013. !For petitioners ... Mr.N.Balakrishnan ^For respondent ... Mr.A.Arumugam for M/s.Ajmal Associates :COMMON ORDER The judgment debtors in O.S.No.28 of 1988 are the revision petitioners.2. The revision petitions are filed against orders passed (i). in E.P.No.16 of 2011 in O.S.No.28 of 1988 on the file of the District Munsif, Thirumayam, allowing an application under Order 21 Rule 32 (1) of the Code of Civil Proc...
Tag this Judgment!The Branch Manager, Vs. 1)minor R.Eswari
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-30-2015
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 30.03.2015 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.HARIPARANTHAMAN CMA(MD)Nos.243 of 2004 , 246 to 248, 241 and 250 of 2004, and CMP(MD)Nos.1813, 1824 to 1826, 1811, 1813 and 1834 of 2004 CMA(MD)No.243 of 2004 The Branch Manager, M/s.National Insurance Company Ltd., 333/1, Sekkalai Road, Karaikudi..Appellant versus 1)Minor R.Eswari 2)Minor R.Uma (Minors are represented through their next friend and guardian Tmt.Susila) 3)M.K.Ramprabu ..Respondents Appeal filed under Section 30(1) of the Workmen Compensation Act, against the order dated 08.07.2004 passed in W.C.No.459 of 2001 on the file of Commissioner for Workmen Compensation, (Deputy Commissioner of Labour).Madurai. !For Appellant : Mr.S.Srinivasa Raghavan ^For R1 & R2 : Mr.P.Paranthaman :COMMON JUDGMENT On 22.08.2001, the deceased Mariammal in CMA.No.243/2004 and the 1st respondent/claimant in all other appeals were travelling in a Van bearing registration No.TN63B/6378 which involved ...
Tag this Judgment!Icici Lombard Gic Ltd Vs. M/S.N.S.K.Builders
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-30-2015
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:30. 3.2015 CORAM THE HONOURABLE Mrs.JUSTICE PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA C.R.P.NPD (MD) No.192 of 2015 ICICI Lombard GIC Ltd rep. By its Manager Legal Tiruchirapalli (Insurer of crime vehicle). ... Petitioner Vs M/s.N.S.K.Builders ... Respondent Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India seeking direction to the Honourable Motor Accident Claim Tribunal (Additional District Judge), Pudukottai dated 27/10/2014 to number the E.A.S.R.No.116 of 2014 in M.C.O.P.No.453 of 2007. !For petitioner ... Mr.V.Bharathidasan ^For respondent ... No appearance :ORDER The petitioner is the second respondent in M.C.O.P.No.453 of 2007.2. M.C.O.P.No.453 of 2007 was filed by the petitioner therein under Sections 140, 141, 142 and 166 r/w. 3 of the Motor Vehicles Act to pass an award of Rs.50,000/- as compensation with interest and costs.3. By an order dated 21/4/2011, the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Pudukottai had passed the decreetal order...
Tag this Judgment!S. Muthukumar Vs. M. Pari
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-30-2015
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:30. 3.2015 CORAM THE HONOURABLE Mrs.JUSTICE PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA C.R.P.NPD (MD) Nos.858 of 2013 and 898 of 2013 S. Muthukumar ... Petitioner in both the petitions Vs M. Pari ... Respondent in both the petitions. Prayer in C.R.P.NPD (MD) No.858 of 2013:- Petition filed under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure against the order dated 8/4/2013 passed in E.A.No.26 of 2011 in E.P.No.10 of 2010 in O.S.No.142 of 2001 on the file of the Sub-Court, Paramakudi. Prayer in C.R.P.NPD (MD) No.858 of 2013:- Petition filed under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure against the order dated 8/4/2013 passed in I.A.No.114 of 2011 in O.S.No.142 of 2001 on the file of the Sub-Court, Paramakudi. !For petitioner ... Mr.AR.L.Sundaresan Senior Counsel for Mr.G.Gomathi Shankar For respondent ... Mr.G.R.Swaminathan :COMMON ORDER Civil Revision Petition (MD) No.898 of 2013 is filed by the defendant against the order passed in I.A.No.114 of 2011 ref...
Tag this Judgment!The Branch Manager, Vs. 1)thiru P.Paulsamy
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-30-2015
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 30.03.2015 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.HARIPARANTHAMAN CMA(MD)Nos.900 of 2006 and 912 of 2006 The Branch Manager, United India Insurance Company Ltd., City Branch No.II, 254, Goods Shed Street, Madurai..Appellant in both CMA versus 1)Thiru P.Paulsamy 2)Minor Raja 3)Minor Lakshmanan 4)Minor Raman (Minor is represented through their father and guardian 1st respondent herein/Thiru P.Paulsamy) ..Respondents 1 to 4 in CMA.900/06 5)Mrs.Veeraye 6)Minor Kalaichelvi (Minor is represented through her mother and guardian 1st respondent herein/Mrs.Veeraye) ..Respondents 1 & 2 in CMA.912/06 7)A.Maharajan ..3rd respondent in both CMA Appeals filed under Section 30 of the Workmen Compensation Act, against the order dated 28.12.2005 made in W.C.Nos.83 and 82 of 2004 on the file of Commissioner for Workmen Compensation, (Deputy Commissioner of Labour).Madurai. !For Appellant : Mr.N.Murugesan ^For R1 to R4 in CMA.900/06 & For R1 & R2 in CMA.912...
Tag this Judgment!1. Santhirakani Vs. 1. Vijaya @ Viji
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-30-2015
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED :30. 03.2015 CORAM THE HONBLE SMT. JUSTICE PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA CRP (PD) (MD) Nos. 2557 OF2014and CRP (PD) (MD) Nos.2558 to 2559 of 2014 1. Santhirakani 2. Maragatham 3. Vanidevi 4. Lakshmi Devi 5. Santhana Muthukumari .. Petitioners Vs.1. Vijaya @ Viji 2. Ambika 3. Arasi .. Respondents PRAYER Petitions under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the common order dated 17.7.2014 passed in I.A. Nos. 72 to 74 of 2014 respectively in O.S. No.61 of 2012 on the file of the III Additional District Judge, Thoothukudi. !For Petitioners : Mr. M.M. Manivelpandian ^For Respondents : Mr. K. Chengizkhan for Mr. G. Prabhu Rajadurai :COMMON ORDER Aggrieved by the common order dated 17.7.2014 passed by the III Additional District Judge, Thoothukudi, in I.A. Nos. 72 to 74 of 2014 wherein and by which the petitions filed to reopen, recall D.W.1 and to receive document respectively, were dismissed, the defendants 1 to 5 in O.S. No.61 of 2012...
Tag this Judgment!1.Mohammed Rafi Vs. 1.The Superintendent of Police,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-27-2015
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 27.03.2015 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.T.SELVAM Crl.O.P.(MD)No.80 of 2015 1.Mohammed Rafi 2.Madar Beevi 3.Waheeda Banu 4.Jil Jila Banu ..Petitioners versus 1.The Superintendent of Police, Anti Land Grabbing Special Cell, District Revenue Office, Trichy - 20. 2.The Inspector of Police, Anti Land Grabbing Special Cell, District Revenue Office, Trichy - 20. 3.The Sub Inspector of Police, Anti Land Grabbing Special Cell, District Revenue Office, Trichy - 20..Respondents PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure to direct the respondents not to interfere in civil dispute and consequently not to harass the petitioners and summoning them for enquiry and coercing them to execute documents under threat of arrest. !For Petitioners : Ms.J.Maria Roseline For Respondents : Mr.K.V.Rajarajan Government Advocate (Crl.side) :COMMON ORDER The petitioners seek directions to respondents not to ...
Tag this Judgment!N.Thangarani Vs. 1.The Superintendent of Police,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-27-2015
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 27.03.2015 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE C.T.SELVAM CRL.O.P.(Md.No.18958 of 2014 N.Thangarani .Petitioner versus 1.The Superintendent of Police, Kanyakumari District at Nagercoil. 2.The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by the Inspector of Police, Thiruvattar Police Station, Kanyakumari District.Respondents Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C.praying to direct the respondents to register a case against the proposed accused based on the Petitioner's complaints dated 15.09.2014 and 01.10.2014 and to conduct investigation in accordance with law. !For Petitioner : Mr.S.Ramakrishnan For Respondents : Mr.K.V.Rajarajan Government Advocate,(Crl. Side) ****** :ORDER Pursuant to the complaints of the petitioner dated 15.09.2014 and 01.10.2014, neither has any case been registered nor an investigation conducted. Hence, the petitioner has preferred the present petition, seeking a direction to register the case. 2.Heard learned c...
Tag this Judgment!M/S.Mohamad Hassan Vs. Mrs.S.Zeenath Pareetha
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-27-2015
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:27. 3/2015 CORAM THE HONOURABLE Mrs.JUSTICE PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA C.R.P.NPD (MD) No.642 of 2015 M/s.Mohamad Hassan rep. Through its Partner Mr.A.H.Dawood Khan ... Petitioner Vs Mrs.S.Zeenath Pareetha ... Respondent Petition filed under Section 25 of the Lease and Rent Control Act to set aside the fair and decreetal order in R.C.A.No.23 of 2014 on the file of the Rent Control Appellate Authority, Madurai (Principal Sub-Judge), Madurai dated 28/1/2015 in confirming the fair and decreetal order in R.C.O.P.No.134 of 2011 on the file of the Rent Control Authority, Madurai (Principal District Munsif Court, Madurai) dated 14/2/2014. !For petitioner ... Mr.S.Ramesh ^For respondent ... Mr.S.Sitharthan :ORDER The tenant in the Rent Control Proceeding is the revision petitioner herein.2. The landlady had filed an eviction petition on the ground of owners occupation for non-residential purpose. The landlady is the owner of the property and the te...
Tag this Judgment!- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »