Chennai Court February 2015 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
M/S.Kaesav Saw Mill Vs. 1.The Assistant Commissioner (Ct),
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-02-2015
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 02.02.2015 CORAM THE HONOURBLE MR.JUSTICE B.RAJENDRAN W.P(MD).Nos.977 to 980 of 2015 and M.P.(MD).Nos.1 of 2015 **** M/s.Kaesav Saw Mill rep.by its Partner Jagadish D.Patel, No.122/3, Chennai Bye Pass Road, Ariyamangalam, Trichy District..Petitioner in all WPs versus 1.The Assistant Commissioner (CT).Thiruverumbur Assessment Circle, Trichy-20. 2.The Deputy Commissioner (CT) Trichy Town, Commercial Tax Buildings, Court Campus, Trichy. 3.The Deputy Commissioner (CT).Enforcement Wing, Trichy Division, Commercial Tax Buildings, Court Campus, Trichy ..Respondents in all WPs W.P.(MD).No.977 of 2015:- Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records in TIN3365361994/2007-2008 dated 29.12.2014 issued by the FiRs.Respondent and quash the same as arbitrary and illegal and direct the respondent to pass a fresh assessment order after taking into cons...
R.Chellapandian Vs. 1.State Through
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-02-2015
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:02. 02.2015 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.SATHYANARAYANAN CRL.R.C.(MD)No.733 of 2013 R.Chellapandian : Petitioner Vs. 1.State through The Inspector of Police, CCIW, Theni, (In Crime No.3 of 2006) 2.The Secretary, MD Special 188, Ramakrishnapuram Primary Agricultural Co-operative Bank, Ramakrishnapuram, Uthamapalayam Taluk, Theni District. 3.S.P.Dinakaran 4.Mythili 5.Manikandan (Died) 6.Muthoot Finance Corporation Private Limited, Bodinayakannur Branch, Bodi. [R-6 impleaded as per the order of this Court dated 18.12.2014 made in M.P.(MD)No.1 of 2014 in Crl.R.C.(MD)No.733 of 2013]. : Respondents Prayer Criminal Revision Case is filed under Section 397 r/w 401 of Code of Criminal Procedure praying to call for the records relating to the order dated 06.08.2013 made in Cr.M.P.No.6467 of 2012 in C.C.No.134 of 2008 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.III, Madurai and set aside the same as illegal and entrust the custody of the...
Chinnagurusamy Alias Kutti Vs. The State Represented by Its
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-02-2015
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED :02. 02.2015 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.SATHYANARAYANAN Criminal Revision Case (MD)No.525 of 2014 Chinnagurusamy alias Kutti ... Petitioner Vs. The State represented by its Inspector of Police, Karivalamvanthanallur Police Station. ... Respondent Prayer : Revision filed under Section 397 read with Section 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, to call for the records relating to the impugned order passed in Crl.M.P.No.6845 of 2014 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate, Sankarankovil, dated 27.10.2014 and set aside the same and consequently, direct the respondent police to release the petitioner's vehicle namely TRACTOR No.TN-76-Y-6215 with TRAILOR No.TN-76-Y-0321 within the time frame as may be fixed by this Court. !For Petitioner : Mr.V.Muthuvelan ^For Respondent : Mrs.S.Prabha, Govt. Advocate (Crl.Side) :ORDER The petitioner claims to be the owner of the ESCORTS Tractor bearing Registration No.TN-76-Y-6215 [Chasis No.B-30592...
The Panchayat Vs. The District Collector
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-02-2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Dated :21. 10.2009 Coram : THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAVIRAJA PANDIAN and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.M.SUNDRESH CMPs. Nos.35 to 38 of 2009 in Review Applications Nos.78 to 80 of 2004 in Appeal Suits Nos.132 & 133 of 2001 and Cross Objections Nos.14 and 15 of 2003 1. Narendra Dairy Farms P. Ltd., Papampatti village, Palani Taluk, Dindigul District, represented by its Director R.Jagadishkumar 2.Santhanalakshmi 3.Devika 4.Rajesh 5.Satheeshkumar 6.Pankajavalli 7.Yamini Mahalakshmi Petitioners v.1. The Land Acquisition Officer, Revenue Divisional Officer, Palani.2. The Chief Engineer, PWD Pollachi Region, Office at Coimbatore.3. The Superintending Engineer, PWD, Palani.4. The Executive Engineer, PWD, Nangachiyar Reservoir Project, Palani. Respondents CMPs filed praying to clarify the order passed in Review Applications Nos.78 to 80 of 2004, in Appeal Suits Nos.132 & 133 of 2001 and Cross Objections Nos.14 and 15 of 2003 dated 08.12.2005 to the ef...
Mohan Vs. 1)meenakshisundaram
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-02-2015
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 02.02.2015 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.SATHYANARAYANAN Criminal Appeal(MD)No.343 of 2009 Mohan ..Appellant/Complainant versus 1)Meenakshisundaram 2)Duraisamy @ Senthil 3)Shankar 4)M/s.India Tyre Retreading Company, 45/1, Raja Street, Mayiladuthurai Taluk, Nagapattinam District..Respondents/Accused Appeal filed under Section 378 of the Criminal Procedure Code, to call for the records pertaining to the judgment in C.C.No.300 of 2006 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate No.II, Thanjavur, dated 30.09.2009 and set aside the same. !For Appellant : Mr.R.Sivasubramanian ^For R1 : Mr.G.Karnan For R2 to R4 : No appearance :JUDGMENT The private complainant in C.C.No.300 of 2006 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate No.II, Thanjavur, is the appellant and aggrieved by the order of acquittal passed by the said Court, he has filed this appeal. 2.It is the case of the appellant/private complainant, the fiRs.accused in his capacity as the M...
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›