Chennai Court February 2015 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Jebakumar Vs. Robert Solomon
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-09-2015
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 09.02.2015 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.HARIPARANTHAMAN C.M.A.(MD)Nos.129 of 2013 and 433 of 2013 and M.P.(MD)Nos.1 and 1 of 2013 Jebakumar .Appellant in CMA(MD)No.129/2013 & Respondent in CMA(MD)No.433/2013 Vs Robert Solomon .Respondent in CMA(MD)No.129/2013 & Appellant in CMA(MD)No.433/2013 Appeals filed under Order 43 Rule 1(U) of the Code of Civil Procedure, against the judgment and decree dated 11.12.2012 in A.S.No.6 of 2012 on the file of the Principal District Judge, Tirunelveli, setting aside the judgment and decree dated 05.07.2011 made in O.S.No.188 of 2010 on the file of the Additional Subordinate Judge, Tirunelveli. !For Appellant in CMA(MD)No.129/2013 & Respondent in CMA(MD)No.433 of 2013 : Mr.G.R.Swaminathan ^For Respondent in CMA(MD)No.129/2013 & Appellant in CMA(MD)No.433 of 2013 : Mr.H.Arumugam :COMMON JUDGMENT With the consent of both the parties, CMA(MD)Nos.129 of 2013 and 433 of 2013 are taken up together fo...
T.Antony Jeyanthi Vs. 1.The Director,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-09-2015
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 09.02.2015 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAVICHANDRABAABU W.P.(MD)No.202 of 2014 T.Antony Jeyanthi ..Petitioner versus 1.The Director, Directorate of School Education, College Road, Chennai-6. 2.The District Elementary Educational Officer, Primary and Middle Schools, Thoothukudi District, Thoothukudi. 3.The Additional Assistant Elementary Educational Officer, Primary and Middle Schools, Thoothukudi Union, Pudhukottai, Thoothukudi District. 4.The Correspondent, R.C.Primary Schools, T.Saveriyarpuram, Thoothukudi District...Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issue of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records relating to the proceedings of the second respondent in Na.Ka.No.26/A3/2013 dated 04.2013 and quash the same and further directing the second respondent to approve the appointment of the petitioner dated 30.06.2009 as Secondary Grade Assistant in R.C....
1.Amaldoss Vs. State,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-05-2015
Before the Madurai Bench of Madras High Court Date:05. 02-2015 Coram The Hon?.ble Mr.Justice S.Vaidyanathan Crl.O.P.(MD)Nos.19196 of 2014 & Crl.O.P.(MD)Nos.19197 of 2014 & M.P(MD)No.1 of 2014 in Crl.OP.(MD)No.19196 of 2014 1.Amaldoss 2.Kannan 3.Meganathan 4.Saminathan 5.Santhana Raju .. Petitioners in Crl.O.P.(MD)No.19196 of 2014 1.Mathialagan 2.Tamilalagan 3.Karunanithi 4.Tamilarasan 5.Kalaiyarasan .. Petitioners in Crl.O.P.(MD)No.19197 of 2014 Versus State, Rep. by the Inspector of Police, Patteeswaram Police Station, Thanjavur District. .. Respondent in both petitions Prayer These Criminal Original Petitions are filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to set aside the second condition imposed by the learned Principal Sessions Judge, Thanjavur in his order, dated 14.10.2014 in Crl.M.P.No.3779 and 3827 of 2014. !For Petitioners : Mr.M.Karunanithi ^For Respondents : Mr.P.Kandasamy Government Advocate (Crl. Side) for R1 Mr.B.Jameel Arasu for Intervenor :COMMON ORDER By order, dated ...
Chandramohan Vs. S.Shanmugasundaram
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-05-2015
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 05.02.2015 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.SATHYANARAYANAN Crl.R.C.(MD)No.40 of 2015 and M.P.(MD)Nos.1 and 2 of 2015 and Crl.R.C.(MD)No.41 of 2015 and M.P.(MD)No.1 of 2015 Chandramohan ..Petitioner in both the Crl.RCs. versus S.Shanmugasundaram ..Respondent in both the Crl.RCs. Crl.R.C.(MD)No.40 of 2015 filed under Section 397 r/w 401 of the Criminal Procedure Code, to call for the records pertaining to the case in C.A.No.122 of 2014 on the file of the Sessions Court, Tiruchirappalli and S.T.C.No.227 of 2011 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate Court No.IV, Tiruchirappalli and set aside the conviction and sentence passed in C.A.No.122 of 2014 on the file of the Sessions Court, Tiruchirappalli dated 17.12.2014 in confirming the judgment made in S.T.C.No.227 of 2011 dated 01.07.2014 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate Court No.IV, Tiruchirappalli. Crl.R.C.(MD)No.41 of 2015 filed under Section 397 r/w 401 of the Criminal Procedu...
N.Murugan Vs. 1.The State of Tamil Nadu,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-05-2015
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:05. 02.2015 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE V.M.VELUMANI W.P.(MD)Nos.6775 of 2011 and W.P.(MD)Nos.6776 & 6785 of 2011 and M.P.(MD) Nos.1, 1 & 1 of 2011 N.Murugan .. Petitioner in W.P.(MD) No.6775 of 2011 A.Vashni Jeganesh .. Petitioner in W.P.(MD) No.6776 of 2011 T.Ravichandran .. Petitioner in W.P.(MD) No.6785 of 2011 Vs. 1.The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by its Secretary, Public Works Department, Fort St. George, Chennai ?. 600 009. 2.The Engineer in Chief (WRO) and Chief Engineer (General), Public Works Department, Chepauk, Chennai ?. 600 005. 3.The Chief Engineer, Water Resources Organization (PWD), Madurai Region, Madurai ?. 625 002. 4.The Superintending Engineer, Thamaraparani Basin Circle, (PWD/WRO) Tirunelveli ?. 627 002. 5.The Executive Engineer, Water Resources Organization (PWD), Kodayar Basin Division, Nagercoil ?. 629 001, Kanyakumari District. 6.The Assistant Executive Engineer, (WRO/PWD) Pazhayar Basin Sub Division, Nager...
Ramkumar Vs. The State Represented By
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-05-2015
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED :05. 02.2015 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.SATHYANARAYANAN Criminal Appeal (MD)No.322 of 2007 Ramkumar ... Appellant/ Accused Vs. The State represented by The Inspector of Police, Thandigudi Police Station, Dindigul. (Cr.No.127 of 2005) ... Respondent/ Complainant Prayer : Appeal filed under Section 374(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, against the judgment passed in S.C.No.88 of 2006 dated 21.04.2007, by the Principal Sessions Judge, Dindigul. !For Appellant : Mr.A.P.Muthupandian ^For Respondent : Mrs.S.Prabha, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) :JUDGMENT The sole accused in S.C.No.88 of 2006, stood charged and tried for the commission of the offences under Section 302 and 323 I.P.C. The Court of the Principal Sessions Judge, Dindigul, vide judgment dated 21.04.2007, has convicted the appellant/accused under Section 304-II I.P.C and sentenced him to undergo rigorous imprisonment for ten years and to pay a fine of Rs.5,000/- with ...
1.Duraipandi Vs. State Rep. By
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-05-2015
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 05.02.2015 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.SELVAM and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.MATHIVANAN CRIMINAL APPEAL(MD)No.171 of 2009 1.Duraipandi 2.Ramakkaran 3.Veerannasamy .Appellants/ Accused 1 to 3 versus State rep. by The Inspector of Police, Melur Police Station, Madurai District. (Crime No.455 of 2007).Respondent/ Complainant Criminal appeal is filed under Section 374(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, against the Judgment dated 12.06.2009 passed in Sessions Case No.24 of 2008 by the Sessions Judge/ Mahalir Neethimandram, Madurai. !For Appellants : Mr.R.Paul Sukumar ^For Respondent : Mr.C.Mayilvahana Rajendran, Additional Public Prosecutor. :JUDGMENT (Judgment of the Court was made by A.SELVAM, J.This Criminal Appeal has been directed against the conviction and sentence dated 12.06.2009 passed in Sessions Case No.24 of 2008 by the District and Sessions Court/Mahalir Neethimandram, Madurai. 2.The case of the prosecution i...
1.Sr.Philomina Mary Vs. 1.State Rep. By
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-05-2015
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 05.02.2015 CORAM THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE V.S.RAVI Crl.O.P.(MD)No.7044 of 2009 and M.P.(MD)No.1 of 2009 1.Sr.Philomina Mary 2.Sr.Lourdhu samy Adaikalasamy 3.Sr.Eugine D'Souza ..Petitioners/Accused 3 to 5 versus 1.State rep. By The Inspector of Police, Ponmalai Police Station, Trichy City..Respondent/Complainant 2.Easu Julia Rani ..Respondent/Defacto Complainant PRAYER Petition is filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, to call for the records in Cr.No.342/09 on the file of the Inspector of Police, Ponmalai Police Station, Tiruchirapalli and to quash the same. !For Petitioner : Mr.N.Mohideen Basha For Respondent : Mr.P.Kannithevan for R-1 Government Advocate (Crl.Side) Mr.A.Chandra Kumar for R-2 :ORDER This Criminal Original Petition has been filed by the petitioner to quash the proceedings in Cr.No.342/09, pending on the file of the Inspector of Police, Ponmalai Police Station, Tiruchirapalli. 2.The petitioners h...
M/S.Sesa Sterlite Ltd., Vs. 1.The Union of India,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-05-2015
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:05. 02.2015 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAVICHANDRABAABU W.P.(MD)No.1409 of 2015 & M.P(MD)No.1 of 2015 M/s.Sesa Sterlite Ltd., SIPCOT Industrial Complex, Madurai By-Pass Road, Tuticorin-628 008, Rep.by its General Manager Indirect Taxation, Mukul Agarwal. ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Union of India, Rep.by the Revenue Secretary, Department of Revenue, Ministry of Finance, North Block, New Delhi-110 001. 2.The Member(Central Excise) Central Board of Excise & Customs, North Block, New Delhi-110 001. 3.The Commissioner of Central Excise, Tirunelveli Commissionerate, Central Revenue Building, NGO "A' Colony, Tirunelveli-627 007. ...Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issue of a Writ of Certiorari to call for the records connected with Order in Original No.03/CE/COMMR/2014 dated 21.11.2014 passed by the third respondent herein and quash the same for want of jurisdiction and fo...
G.Thirumal Vs. 1.The Deputy General Manager and
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-05-2015
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED :05. 02.2015 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE V.M.VELUMANI W.P.(MD)No.15311 of 2012 G.Thirumal .. Petitioner Vs. 1.The Deputy General Manager & Appointing Authority (Personnel), The Oriental Insurance Company Ltd., Head Office, A25/22, Asaf Ali Road, New Delhi - 110 002. 2.The Chief Regional Manager, The Oriental Insurance Company, Regional Office, Coimbatore. 3.The Regional Manager, The Oriental Insurance Company, T.P.Hub, 16, North Veli Street, Madurai. .. Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to treat the petitioner as Scale-II Officer (Assistant Manager) with effect from 08.07.2010. !For Petitioner : Mr.T.Antony Arulraj For Respondents : Mr.K.Bhaskaran :ORDER This Writ Petition has been filed to direct the respondents to treat the petitioner as Scale-II Officer (Assistant Manager) with effect from 08.07.2010.2. The petiti...
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 11
- 12
- Next ›
- Last »