Chennai Court December 2015 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
R. Thomas Jeeva Vs. The District Collector, Trichirapalli District and ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Dec-01-2015
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records of the second respondent in Na.Ka.No.A1-121-2014 dated 05.04.2015 and quash the same and thereby permit the petitioners to conduct the festivals.) 1. Both sides submitted that in respect of the very same issue a Public Interest Litigation was filed before this Court in W.P.(MD).No.18517 of 2014 wherein, an order came to be passed on 20.11.2015 and therefore, nothing survives in this writ petition to be adjudicated upon further. At paragraph Nos.25 and 26, the Division Bench of this Court has observed as follows:- 25. In the light of the above, the writ petition is allowed directing the official machinery, namely, the Revenue and the Police, to ensure that the flag as well as the car are also taken through the streets namely, North Sebastiyar Street, South Sebastiyar Street and Theradi Streets on the days on which the festivals scheduled to be he...
P. Dhandayuthapani Vs. The Registrar of Co-operative Societies, Chenna ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Dec-01-2015
(Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records relating to the order passed by the fourth respondent dated nil, quash the same and consequently direct the 4th respondent to revoke suspension order and reinstate the petitioner in service within the time limit that may be stipulated by this Court.) 1. The petitioner is an employee of the fourth respondent Co-operative Society. He was placed under suspension by the fourth respondent. 2. The writ petition is questioning the order of suspension. I am of the view that the writ petition against Co-operative Societies cannot be entertained in view of the Full Bench decision of this Court in Marappan Vs. State of Tamil Nadu reported in2006(4) CTC 686. Further, the petitioner has an effective remedy of questioning the suspension by preferring revision under Section 153 of Tamil Nadu Co-operative Societies Act. Hence, I am not inclined to e...
R. Packiam Vs. The District Collector, Madurai and Others
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Dec-01-2015
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Mandamus forbearing the respondents 2 to 4, their officials, subordinates and servants to disturb and interfere into the petitioner's petty shop business at 0/6, Madurai “ Alagar kovil Road (Saranya Sweet Stall near), Madurai.) 1. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this writ petition and he has also made an endorsement to that effect. 2. In view of the endorsement made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is also dismissed....
P. Govindasamy Vs. Manickam and Others
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Dec-01-2015
(Prayer: Original Side Appeal filed under Order XXXVI Rule 9 of the Original Side r/w.Clause 15 of Letters Patent against the order dated 21.09.2012 in A.No.2589 of 2012 in C.S.14 of 2012.) M. Venugopal, J. 1. The Appellant/Plaintiff has filed the present Original Side Appeal as against the order dated 21.09.2012 in A.No.2589 of 2012 in C.S.No.14 of 2012 passed by the Learned Single Judge. 2. The Learned Single Judge while passing the common order on 21.09.2012 in C.S.No.14 of 2012 and A.No.2589 of 2012 and A.No.288 of 2012 at paragraph 13 had observed the following: ... it is a fit case where no trial is contemplated without there being any disclosure of cause of action for trying the suit. Besides, the suit itself is barred by limitation. Under these circumstances, A.No.2589 of 2012 will stand allowed. The plaint in C.S.No.14 of 2012 stands rejected. In view of the rejection of the plaint, the question of issuing direction to furnish security in A.No.228 of 2012 does not arise. Hence...
P. Thangavel Vs. The Deputy Registrar, Central Co-operative Society, D ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Dec-01-2015
(Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records pertaining to the suspension order dated 16.06.2015 issued by the second respondent herein and quash the same as illegal and also consequently direct the 2nd respondent to reinstate the petitioner into service and pay all the monetary benefits to the petitioner.) 1. The petitioner is an employee of the second respondent Co-operative Society. He was placed under suspension by order dated 16.06.2015. A charge memo dated 07.09.2015 was also issued. 2. The writ petition is questioning the order of suspension. I am of the view that the writ petition against Co-operative Societies cannot be entertained in view of the Full Bench decision of this Court in Marappan Vs. State of Tamil Nadu reported in2006(4) CTC 686. Further, the petitioner has an effective remedy of questioning the suspension by preferring revision under Section 153 of Tamil ...
N. Duraisamy Vs. Sarojini
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Dec-01-2015
(Prayer:- Criminal Appeal filed under Section 378 of Cr.P.C. to call for the records pertaining to the order dated 19.4.2005, in Criminal Appeal No.517 of 2004, on the file of the Additional District and Sessions cum Fast Track Court-I, Coimbatore, in reversing the order dated 23.11.2004 hin C.C.No.777 of 2003, on the file of the Judicial Magistrate No.2, Coimbatore and set aside the same.) 1. The order of acquittal passed in Criminal Appeal No.517 of 2004, by the Additional District and Sessions-cum-Fast Track Court, No.I, Coimbatore, is being challenged in the present criminal appeal. 2. The appellant herein, as complainant, has filed the complaint in question under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, on the file of the Judicial Magistrate No.2, Coimbatore and the same has been taken on file in Calendar Case No.777 of 2003, wherein, the present respondent has been shown as sole accused. 3. It is averred in the complaint that on 11.06.2001, the accused has received a ...
P. Latha Vs. The Dean, (Under Graduate Studies) Tamil Nadu Agricultura ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Dec-01-2015
(Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 2nd respondent to issue the original certificates viz. 10th and 12th Standard Mark Sheets, Transfer Certificate and Community Certificate of the petitioner's daughter M.B.Krishnameena, who is the student of I Year B.Sc., (Agri) Course in the 2nd respondent College.) The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the writ petition. He has made an endorsement to that effect. Recording the same, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed....
S. Brahdeeswaran Vs. The Management, Tamilnadu State Transport Corpora ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Dec-01-2015
(Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent to select the petitioner for the post of Junior Assistant based on the petitioner's representation dated 24.08.2015 within the time limit that may be stipulated by this Court.) 1. The prayer lies in a narrow compass. The petitioner attended interview for the post of Junior Assistant in the respondent Corporation. Though the interview took place on 10.12.2014, till dated, the result is not known. Therefore, he made a representation dated 24.08.2015 to inform him the result of the interview for the post of Junior Assistant. Since, no order is passed, he is before this Court. 2. In these circumstances, the General Manager of the respondent Corporation is directed to pass orders on the representation dated 24.08.2015 of the petitioner informing him about the result of the interview that took place on 10.12.2014 for the post of Junior Assistant, within...
S. Rajagopala Gowda Vs. The Motor Vehicles Inspector and Others
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Dec-01-2015
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of mandamus directing the 2nd and 3rd respondents herein to release the petitioner Stage Carriage Bus-KA-08/ 6876 (seized by the 1st respondent now in the custody of the 3rd respondent) forthwith.) 1. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr.R.M.Muthukumar, learned Government Advocate, who took notice for the respondents and with their consent, the main writ petition is taken up for disposal at the admission stage itself. 2. This writ petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking direction to the 2nd and 3rd respondents herein to release the petitioner Stage Carriage Bus-KA-08/ 6876 (seized by the 1st respondent now in the custody of the 3rd respondent) forthwith 3. The petitioner is holding a stage carriage interstate enclave route permit issued by the State Transport Authority, Bangalore for the route Tarahunase to Hoskote via Masthi, Beraki...
V. Vaiyanan Vs. The District Collector, Tuticorin District and Others
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Dec-01-2015
(Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to fix the Housing Rental Allowance to the petitioner at the rate of Rs.1,400/- instead of Rs.1,000/- as per G.O.Ms.No.234, Finance (Pay Cell) dated 01.06.2009 from 23.07.2014 within a time frame as fixed by this Court.) 1. The petitioner is working as P.G.Assistant Teacher in Arulmighu Senthil Andavar Boys Higher Secondary School, Thiruchendur, Tuticorin District. His grievance is that he is entitled to Rs.1,400/- as H.R.A. as per G.O.Ms.No.234, Finance (Pay Cell) dated 01.06.2009. But, he is paid only Rs.1,000/- per month as H.R.A.. He made representation dated 05.05.2015. Since the same is not yet considered, he has approached this Court by filing the writ petition. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner brought to my notice the proceedings dated 23.10.2015 issued by the Assistant Treasury Officer at Tiruchendur stating as follows: ( Tamil ...
- ‹ Prev
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- Next ›