Chennai Court December 2015 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
UPS Jetair Express Private Limited Vs. The Chief Commissioner of Custo ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Dec-08-2015
(Prayer:- This Writ Petition is filed to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records on the file of the 1st Respondent in No.S2/157/2014-CCO (Precv Legal), dated 23.7.2014, confirming the order of the 2nd Respondent vide Order-in-Original No.289/2014-AIR, dated 28.4.2014 and quash the said orders and to restore the Petitioner's courier licence bearing No.25/2001, which was valid till August 1, 2017.) 1. This Writ Petition is filed to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records on the file of the 1st Respondent in No.S2/157/2014-CCO (Precv Legal), dated 23.7.2014, confirming the order of the 2nd Respondent vide Order-in-Original No.289/2014-AIR, dated 28.4.2014 and quash the said orders and to restore the Petitioner's courier licence bearing No.25/2001, which was valid till August 1, 2017. 2. The case of the Petitioner is as follows:- a. The Petitioner Company is a subsidiary Company of M/s.UPS International Forwarding Inc. and is carrying on busi...
Commissioner of Income-tax, Tamil Nadu-VII, Madras Vs. Textile Dye Che ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Dec-07-2015
S. Vimala, J. 1. This Tax Case Appeal has been filed by the Revenue, as against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, 'C' Bench, Chennai, dated 24.08.2007, made in I.T.A.No.740/Mds/2007. Brief facts:- 2. The assessee is a business concern dealing in chemicals. In respect of the assessment year 2003-2004, return of income was filed by the Assessee disclosing taxable income of Rs.26,57,330/- while claimaing deduction towards payment of commission. It was taken up for scrutiny and during finalization, under Section 143 (3) of The Income Tax Act, 1961, (hereinafter will be referred to as "the Act") the claim for commission was disallowed to the extent of Rs.65,27,747/-, which are allegedly paid to: (i) M/s. Auto India Group - Rs.47,38,406/-; (ii) TCS and Co., - Rs.12,57,380/-; (iii) M/s. O.P.Steels Limited - Rs.5,31,961/-. 2.1 While processing the claim, the Assessing Officer, on enquiry, found that the business concerns belonging to Auto India Group were not traceable and in the...
Mose Ministries, rep.by its Administrator Jeyam Abraham and Another Vs ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Dec-07-2015
(Prayers: Writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution, praying for issuance of a writ of certiorarified mandamus, calling for the records on the file of the 3rd respondent pertaining to the order passed by him vide his proceedings in Se.Mu.No.821/A1/1025, dated 03.09.2015, quashing the same as illegal and consequently directing the respondents 1 to 3 to register the petitioner Mission under Juvenile Justice Act and Tamilnadu Hostels and Homes for Women and Children (Regulation) Act, 2014, in accordance with law, based on the relevant records submitted by them, within a time frame that may be stipulated by this Court., W.P.(MD)No.20895 of 2015: Writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution, praying for issuance of a writ of mandamus, directing the 7th respondent Central Bureau of Investigation to investigate into the trafficking and illegal confinement of 89 girl children by the 9th respondent and consequently to direct the 1st respondent to restore the children living in ...
R.T. Ramesh Vs. The Secretary, Housing and Urban Development Departmen ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Dec-07-2015
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for a Writ of Mandamus, to forbear the respondents in any manner dealing with the 13 cents of land in S.No.32/2 in Periyeri Village, Salem Taluk, either by interfering with petitioner's possession or by affecting petitioner's ingress and egress or by subjecting the property to any lay out approval procedures of the second respondent as the said lands do not form part of the Land Acquisition Proceedings initiated by the State of Tamil Nadu in G.O.Ms.No.715/80, dated 03.06.1980 (6 declaration) or by any other proceedings.) 1. The petitioner has submitted that the issue involved in this writ petition relates to 13 cents of land in Survey No.32/2 in Periyeri Village, Salem Taluk. The said 13 cents of land falls besides the extent of 2 Acres and 33 cents in Survey Numbers, which is covered by the Land Acquisition Proceedings initiated by the State of Tamil Nadu, but unfortunately the respondents are also trying to m...
Dr. A.P. Shanthini Vs. The Registrar, Manonmaniam Sundaranar Universit ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Dec-07-2015
(Prayer:Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the respondent to settle petitioner's terminal benefits and to process the petitioner's pension papers within a time frame to be fixed by this Court.) The petitioner joined as System Programmer in 1992 in the respondent University. She made an application on 03.10.2002 to the University seeking to retire voluntarily. According to her, no order is passed on her application referred to above. Hence, as per the relevant statutory provisions, the petitioner is deemed to have been voluntarily retired from service and she is entitled to terminal benefits accordingly. Therefore, this writ petition is filed seeking for direction to respondent to settle the terminal benefits and also to process the pension papers within a time frame as fixed by this Court. 2. Since the issued involved lies in a narrow compass, it was taken up for final disposal, with the consent of both p...
M/s. Abu Construction, rep.by its Proprietor Vs. The Commissioner, Att ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Dec-07-2015
(Prayer: Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of a writ of mandamus, to direct the first and second respondents to accept the financial bid of the petitioner, for providing BT surface from Kottai Anna Statue to NH By-pass Link Road towards Forest Road in Ward Nos.1 and 2.) 1. Heard Ms.M.J.Prabhavathy, learned counsel for the petitioner; Mr.P.Srinivas, learned Standing Counsel for respondents 1 and 2; and Mr.M.Santhana Kumar, learned counsel for respondent 3. 2. With the consent of the learned counsel for the parties, the Writ Petition is taken up for final disposal. 3. The petitioner, stating to be a registered contractor of the first respondent Municipality, has sought for issuance of a writ of mandamus, to direct the first and second respondents to accept his financial bid, for providing BT surface from Kottai Anna Statue to NH By-pass Link Road towards Forest Road in Ward Nos.1 and 2. 4. The facts of the case are, that the first responde...
M. Pachaiyappan Vs. Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Kumbakonam ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Dec-07-2015
(Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the Respondents to settle the Petitioner's retirement benefits including gratuity, earned leave salary, surrender and encashment of unearned leave salary on private affairs for 90 days, 'pending in-service leave salary of the year 2011-2012' for 15 days and all other attendant benefits with interest at the rate of 18% per annum within the time that may be stipulated by this Hon'ble Court and further directing the respondents to settle interest at the rate of 18% per annum for the belated payment of the commuted value of pension of Rs.4,45,806/- payable from 30.06.2013 to 25.10.2013.) 1. The petitioner was employed as Assistant Manager in the respondents transport corporation and he retired from service on 30.06.2013 on reaching the age of superannuation. 2. He has filed this writ petition seeking for a direction to the respondents to pay the retirement benefits....
R.T. Suresh and Another Vs. The Secretary, Housing and Urban Developme ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Dec-07-2015
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for a Writ of Mandamus to forbear the respondents in any manner dealing with the 13 cents of land in T.S.No.32/2 in Periyeri Village, Salem Taluk, either by interfering with the petitioner's possession or by affecting the petitioner's ingress and egress or by subjecting the property to any lay out approval procedures of the second respondent as the said lands do not form part of the land acquisition proceedings initiated by the state of Tamil Nadu in G.O.Ms.No.715/80, dated 03.06.1980 (6 declaration) or by any other proceedings.) 1. The petitioner has submitted that the issue involved in this writ petition relates to 13 cents of land in Survey No.32/2 in Periyeri Village, Salem Taluk. The said 13 cents of land falls besides the extent of 2 Acres and 33 cents in Survey Number.2/11, which is covered by the Land Acquisition Proceedings initiated by the State of Tamil Nadu, but unfortunately the respondents are als...
T.G. Navaneetha Krishnan (Died) and Others Vs. T.G.R. Vasanthakumar
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Dec-07-2015
(Prayer: Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against an unnumbered I.A.No....... of 2015 in O.S.No.129 of 2004 on the file of the learned I Additional District Judge, Tiruchirappalli.) 1. This memorandum of Civil Revision Petition has been directed against the order of return of the petition under Order 9 Rule 9 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, dated 02.12.2015 in an unnumbered application in I.A.No..... of 2015 in O.S.No.129 of 2004 on the file of the learned I Additional District Judge, Tiruchirappalli. 2. Heard Mr.G.Prabhu Rajadurai, learned counsel appearing for the revision petitioners and perused the grounds of revision. 3. Having been taken into consideration of the relevant facts and circumstances of the case, particularly, on perusal of the impugned order of return, dated 02.12.2015, this Court finds that it may be expedient to dispose of this revision at the admission stage itself. 4. The respondent herein had obtained an ex-pa...
S. Sankar Ganesh Vs. The Superintendent of Police, Dindigul District a ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Dec-04-2015
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to look into the grievance of the petitioner expressed in the representation dated 26.11.2015 and thereby accord permission to conduct the agitation and using the sound speakers and to provide police protection on 06.12.2015 around 5.30 p.m.) 1. This writ petition has been filed, seeking a direction the respondents to look into the grievance of the petitioner expressed in the representation dated 26.11.2015 and thereby accord permission to conduct the agitation by using sound speakers and to provide police protection on 06.12.2015 around 5.30 p.m. 2. The case of the petitioner is that he is the District Secretary of Hindu Munnani, which is a non political party, fighting for the betterment of the Hindu people of the lower level. Since his Munnani has decided to insist upon the construction of Sri Ramapiran Temple at Ayothi by way of agitation at Mani...
- ‹ Prev
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- Next ›
- Last »