Chennai Court November 2015 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
N. Borolingaiah and Others Vs. M/s. Essor Hotel (P) Ltd and Others
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Nov-25-2015
(Prayer: This Application praying that this Hon'ble Court be pleased to order for amendment of the decree dt. 22.12.1995 in C.S.No.852/1387 as Suit decreed for Rs.59,09,000/- and there after interest at 6% p.a. on Rs.38,00,000/- (Rupees Thirty Eight Lakhs only) from the date of decree till the date of realization instead of decreeing the suit with further interest @ 18% per annum on the sum of Rs.59,09,000/- (Rupees Fifty Nine Lakshs and Nine thousand only) from this date till the date of realization.) The applicants are the defendants 1 to 3 and judgment debtors 5, 6, 8 and 10 and they case forward to file this application under Section 152 of the Code of Civil Procedure, praying for amendment of the decree dated 22.12.1995 in C.S.No.852 of 1987. 2. The affidavit filed in support of this application has been sworn to by the 6th applicant/8th respondent in E.P.No.59 of 2000 in C.S.No.852 of 1987. It is averred among other things in the said petition that C.S.No.852 of 1987 was filed by...
Shevvapet Sowrashtra Sangam Vs. Saroja
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Nov-25-2015
(Prayer: Civil Revision Petition filed under Section 25 of Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1960 to set aside the order dated 26.4.2005 passed by the Rent Control Appellate Authority in RCA No.7/2004 (Principal Sub Judge, Salem) and restore the order passed by the Rent Controller in RCOP No.26/97 (First Additional District Munsif, Salem) dated 6.1.2004.) 1. Challenging the judgment and decree passed in RCA No.7/2004 on the file of Rent Control Appellate Authority (Principal Sub Judge, Salem), reversing the order passed in RCOP No.26/97 (First Additional District Munsif, Salem), the Shevvapet Sowrashtra Sangam, who claim to be the land lord of the premises, have filed the above Civil Revision Petition. 2. The petitioner Sangam has filed a petition in RCOP No.26/97 for fixation of fair rent. According to the petitioner, the contractual rent was Rs.125/-. The building was leased out for residential purpose. The petitioner claimed a sum of Rs.3,000/- as fair rent. 3. The ...
V. Kumaravel Vs. The Home Secretary, Chennai and Others
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Nov-25-2015
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to quash the impugned letter No.5577/Po1/1A/2015-3, dated 13.06.2015 on the file of the first respondent as illegal and consequently direct the first respondent to take action against the 6th and 7th respondent as per the judgmentof this Court in W.P.(MD).No.7210 of 2006.) 1. The petitioner is serving the Sub-Inspector of Police. He made a complaint against the another person, namely, one John Rose, who was the seventh respondent herein. Subsequently, the first respondent passed the impugned order in his letter No. 5577/po.1.1A/2015-3 dated 13.06.2015 stating that the petitioner did not provide any material evidence to substantiate the allegation made against the said John Rose, who is already retired from service. Hence, no departmental action need be taken against the said A.Johnrose. Aggrieved over the same, the petitioner has filed this writ petition challenging th...
K. Parvathi Vs. The District Collector, Ramanathapuram and Others
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Nov-25-2015
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing therespondents to take necessary action against the respondents 4 and 5 from illegally transporting the sand from the petitioner's property comprised in S.Nos.244 and 260 situated at Oorivayal Village, Kadaladi Taluk, Ramanathapuram District.) 1. The petitioner alleges that the fourth and the fifth respondents are illegally transporting sand from the property of the petitioner in S.Nos.244 and 260 situated at Oorivayal Village, Kadaladi Taluk, Ramanathapuram District. 2. The allegation of the petitioner cannot be entertained in this writ petition for the simple reason that the Government has nothing to do with the alleged illegal mining done by the fourth and the fifth respondents, who are the private parties herein. If the private parties are illegally encroaching upon the land of the petitioner and taking sand or soil from his land of the petitioner , the remedy available...
Dr. V.P.R. Varadharajan and Another Vs. The State of Tamil Nadu rep. b ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Nov-25-2015
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records of the first respondent's letter No.Na.Ka.B/364/13, dated 27.09.2013, issued by the first respondent against the property comprised in Survey No.227/6E, measuring an extent of 46 Cents, situated in Kottivakkam Village, Saidapet Taluk, Kanchepuram District and to quash the same as the Urban Land Ceiling Proceedings initiated by the first respondent are ceased to exist in view of the repeal of Act 15 of 1999, dated 16.06.1999 and accordingly to direct the first respondent duly communicate the same to the second respondent to cancel the entries forwarded by the first respondent relating to the property of the petitioner to the second petitioner by order, dated 27.09.2013.) 1. The prayer in the writ petition is for issuance of a writ of certiorarified mandamus to quash letter No.Na.Ka.B/364/13, dated 27.09.2013, issued by the first respondent against th...
Chinappappa alias Muniammal and Others Vs. Rajendran and Others
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Nov-25-2015
(Prayer: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the fair and decreetal order dated 16.11.2011 made in I.A.No.57 of 2011 in A.S.No.59 of 2010 on the file of the Principal Subordinate Court, Krishnagiri.) 1. Challenging the fair and decreetal order passed in I.A.No.57 of 2011 in A.S.No.59 of 2010 on the file of the Principal Subordinate Court, Krishnagiri, the plaintiffs in O.S.No.330 of 2007 have filed the above Civil Revision Petition. 2. The plaintiffs filed the suit in O.S.No.330 of 2007 for declaration, permanent injunction or in the alternative for recovery of possession. The defendants filed their written statement and contested the suit. 3. In the written statement, in paragraph no.6, the 1st defendant has stated that the father of the 1st defendant died about 33 years ago. Further, in paragraph no.7, the 1st defendant has stated that the defendants 1 to 3 are in possession of the lands in Survey No.268/1 measuring an extent of 2 acre...
H. Sherbudeen Vs. The Director General of Highways, Chennai and Others
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Nov-25-2015
(Prayer: Writ Petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing thesecond respondentto appoint the petitioner on compassionate ground in furtherance of the death of petitioner father namely S.Hidayathullah within a specified period of time.) 1. The father of the petitioner was working as a Road Inspector in the Highways Department. He died on 31.01.2012. The petitioner made an application for compassionate appointment. He was kept in the waiting list for the post of junior assistant and the waiting list number is 731. Since he has been without employment for the past 14 years, now he is willing to work in the lower post also, if the same is available. Seeking such request, he has sent a representation dated 09.09.2015 to the respondents. Since the said representation is said to be pending, he has come forward with the present Writ Petitions. 2. In the light of the above, the second respondent is directed to consider the representation ...
Jeyasealan Vs. The Director General of Police, Chennai and Others
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Nov-25-2015
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing therespondents to sanction and disburse the eligible pension by including the period of Border Security Force from 09.02.1970 to 20.07.1979 along with civil service in police department from the date of retirement on 25.08.2003 within the time stipulated by this Courtfor the purpose of repayment of all terminal benefits including the computation of the pension, pension arrears and monthly pension with 18% interest per annum.) 1. The petitioner worked in the Border Security Force from 09.02.1970 to 20.02.1979. Thereafter, he joined in the Police Department from 17.06.1986. The grievance of the petitioner is that the service rendered in the Border Security Force has not been taken into account for granting pension and other terminal benefits. Stating all these facts, the petitioner has made a representation dated 30.08.2015. Since the said representation is said to be pending...
M. Ramasamy Vs. The Principal Secretary to the Government, School Educ ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Nov-25-2015
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing therespondents to consider the petitioner's representation dated17.07.2015 and to grant the notional promotion as Inspector of Librarian / 1st Grade Librarian right from the year 1992 as per the proceedings of the second respondentin Na.Ka.No.14283/A1/2010-4 dated 10.02.2011 and consequently to grant notional promotion as District Library Officer with all consequential monetary benefits and pensionary benefits.) 1. The prayer in this writ petition is in a narrow compass. The petitioner has made a representation dated 17.07.2015 to grant notional promotion as Inspector of Librarian / 1st Grade Librarian since 1992 as per the proceedings of the second respondent in Na.Ka.No.14283/A1/2010-4 dated 10.02.2011 and consequently to grant notional promotion as District Library Officer with all consequential monetary benefits and pensionary benefits. Now, he has filed this writ petit...
M/s. Bishop Heber College, Trichy rep. by its Principal Vs. The State ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Nov-25-2015
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Certiorari to call for the recordsof the first respondent herein in G.O.(Ms).No.237, Labour and Employment (K1) Department, dated 26.11.2010 and consequential notice No.63000933740001303/MEC/SRO/SLM/C-18 (Adhoc)/57/15 issued by the third respondentdated 28.10.2015, quash the same.) 1. When the matter is taken up for hearing, both the parties fairly submitted that the prayer in this writ petition is covered by the Division Bench of this Court made in W.A.No.1233 of 2011 etc., dated 09.06.2015. The said order is usefully extracted below:- Learned Counsel for the parties stated that as recorded in the order dated 05.05.2005 reported in 2005 (5) SCC 1 (State of U.P. Vs. Jaj Bir Singh), the question of law has been referred to the Larger Bench of the Honourable Supreme Court, i.e.whether the Employees' State Insurance Act,1948, would apply to educational institutions. Interim orders have been oper...
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- Next ›
- Last »