Chennai Court November 2015 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
S. Kamaraj and Others Vs. The District Collector, Tirunelveli District ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Nov-24-2015
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to allot shops in the Pavoorchathiram Perunthalaivar Kamarajar Memorial Bus Stand maintained by the third respondent insofar as this petitioner is concerned on priority basis without any public auction based on the petitioner's representation dated 04.04.2013 and 08.04.2013 within the stipulated time.) 1. The petitioner seeks for a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to allot shops on priority basis. 2. After filing the Writ Petition, the respondents 4 to 26 were impleaded as parties respondents and the respondents are said to be the allotees of the shops. 3. The learned Counsel for the respondents 1 to 3 submitted that the shops were already auctioned and the respondents 4 to 26 were given allotment and therefore, nothing survives to be adjudicated upon further in this Writ Petition. 4. As the very prayer in the Writ Petition is only for a Mandamus d...
The Managing Director Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Villupur ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Nov-24-2015
(Prayer: Memorandum of Grounds of Civil Miscellaneous Appeals under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 against the common judgment and decree dated 28.3.2014 made in M.C.O.P.Nos.1313, 1314, 1315, 1316, 1317, 1336, 1337, 1365, 1366, 1367, 1368, 1369, 1370, 1371, 1372, 1373, 1374, 1375, 1542, 1600, 1601, 1677, 1678, 1679, 1680, 1681, 1919, 1921, 1922, 2204, 2205, 2212, 2213, 2257, 2260, 2378, 2420, 2423 and 2463 of 2012 on the file of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, V Court of Small Causes, Chennai.) Common Judgment: 1. Totally39 appeals have been filed by the Managing Director of Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Villupuram) Limited, Villupuram challenging the impugned common award of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, V Court of Small Causes, Chennai dated 28.3.2014 made in M.C.O.P.Nos.1313, 1314, 1315, 1316, 1317, 1336, 1337, 1365, 1366, 1367, 1368, 1369, 1370, 1371, 1372, 1373, 1374, 1375, 1542, 1600, 1601, 1677, 1678, 1679, 1680, 1681, 1919, 1921, 1922, 2204, 2...
V. Manoharan and Another Vs. The Government of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by its ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Nov-24-2015
(Prayer: Writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Certiorari, to call for the records of the respondent pertaining to 4(1) notification issued by Housing and Urban Development Department under the Land Acquisition Act 1894 in G.O.Ms.No.978 dated 17.08.1990 and the consequential declaration under Section 6 of the Act in G.O.Ms.No.1306 dated 28.09.1991 and quash the same.) 1. The short facts of the case are as follows: The petitioner submits that he is a co-owner of the property bearing Survey Nos.298/10A2, 301/2, 300/8, 300/5, 300/6, 300/7, 300/9, 300/10, 300/11, 303/11, 299/8, 299/9, 306/2, 301/7A-1 and 304/2 in Keelkattalai Village, Kanchipuram District. He submits that he is filing this writ petition seeking for a writ of Certiorari to call for the records of the respondent pertaining to 4(1) Notification issued by Housing and Urban Development Department under the Land Acquisition Act 1894 in G.O.Ms.No.978 dated 17.08.1990 and t...
V. Jeyaraj Vs. The Assistant Director of Fisheries, Fisheries Departme ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Nov-24-2015
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Certiorari to call for the recordsrelating with the auction notice issued by the respondent in Na.Ka.No.629/A/2013 dated 27.11.2014 and quash the same as it is against Rule 11(8) of the Tamil NaduTransparency in Tender Rules, so far it is relating with the auctioning of fishing lease in Marimoor Kanmoi, situated at Bodinayakkanur in Theni District, for three years period from 2014-2015 to 2016-2017.) 1. The petitioner is aggrieved against the auction notice issued by the first respondent dated 27.11.2014. 2. The main contention of the petitioner is that even though the period of lease of fishing right is for three years, on the date of auction notification itself, already six months have lapsed and therefore, the auction is illegal. It is the further contention of the petitioner that the upset price fixed by the first respondent is very high. 3. The first respondent has filed a counter affida...
V. Senthil Kumar Vs. J. Swarnalatha, The District Educational Officer, ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Nov-24-2015
(Prayers: in C.P.No.1464 of 2015: Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 to punish the respondents herein for their wilful disobedience of the order passed by this Court in M.P.(MD) No.1 of 2015 in W.P.(MD) No.17364 of 2015 dated 28.09.2015. W.P.No.17364 of 2015: Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution if India, praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records pertaining to the impugned transfer order passed by the 1st respondent in Na.Ka.No.5336/A1/2015, dated 14.09.2015 and the consequential relieving order passed by the 2nd respondent in Na.Ka.No.162/15, dated 16.09.2015, quash the same and direct the respondents 1 and 2 to retain the petitioner in the 2nd respondent school.) Common Order 1. The learned counsel for the petitioner states that the interim order passed in W.P.(MD) No.17364 of 2015 was complied with and hence, the contempt petition may be closed. 2. Recording the submission made by the learned counsel for ...
A. Tholkappiyan Vs. The District Collector, Villupuram District, Villu ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Nov-23-2015
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, forbearing the respondents from interfering with the land and school building in Survey No.621/5 (old Survey No.277), Kalamaruthur Village, Ulundurpet Taluk, Villupuram District except by due process of law and to direct the second respondent to consider the representation for grant of patta in favour of the petitioner. Dr. P. Devadass, J. The petitioner came forward with this writ petition for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus restraining the respondents from interfering with the land and school building comprised in Survey No.621/5 (old Survey No.277) situate in Kalamaruthur Village, Ulundurpet Taluk, Villupuram District except by due process of law and also to direct the second respondent to consider his representation for grant of patta. 2. In nutshell, the factual allegations culled out from the affidavit of the writ petitioner runs as under : The writ petit...
M. Bruce Milton Vs. The General Manager, Reserve Bank of India, Chenna ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Nov-23-2015
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the entire records pertaining to the impugned letter dated 22.09.2015 issued by the second respondent herein and quash the same and consequently direct the second respondent to sanction educational loan Rs.2,81,400/- to the petitioner within a time frame.) 1. This Writ Petition is filed challenging the order of the second respondent rejecting the request of the petitioner for grant of education loan. 2. The petitioner is pursuing law degree. The petitioner sought for educational loan to the tune of Rs.2,81,400/- from the second respondent. The said claim was rejected by the second respondent by passing the impugned order stating that the petitioner has not complied with the specified norms in respect of cut off marks. However, after notice in the Writ Petition, today, when the matter is taken up for further hearing, the learned Standing Counsel appearing fo...
Minor A. Kishore and Another Vs. The Director of School Education, Col ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Nov-23-2015
(Prayers: W.P.(MD)No.19336 of 2015 filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records pertaining to the impugned order passed by the second respondent dated 15.10.2015 and quash the same and consequently forbear the 4th and 5th respondents from any way participating in the proposed District level Kabadi Competition to be held at third respondent. W.P.(MD)No.20702 of 2015 filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records relating to the impugned proceedings issued by the fourth respondent President, District Sports Committee cum District Educational Officer in Na.Ka.No.3081/A5/2015 dated 18.11.2015 and the consequential proceedings issued by the fifth respondent in Na.Ka.No.58/2015 dated 18.11.2015, quash the same and further direct the respondents 3 to 5 to redo the District Level Kabadi Competition held on 19.11.2015...
M/s. Wood 'n' Kraft represented by Proprietrix Coimbatore Vs. The Assi ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Nov-23-2015
(Prayer:- This Writ Petition is filed to issue a Writ of Mandamus to direct the 1st Respondent to return the cheques Nos.657933 to 657935 and 657937 to 657939 for a sum of Rs.10 lakhs, drawn on Indian Bank, Coimbatore, forcibly collected during the inspection conducted on 23.9.2015 by the 1st Respondent.) By consent of the learned counsel on either side, this Writ Petition is taken up for final disposal. 2. In this Writ Petition, the Petitioner seeks for a direction to the 1st Respondent to return the Cheque Nos.657933 to 657935 and 657937 to 657939 for a sum of Rs.10 lakhs, drawn on Indian Bank, Coimbatore, forcibly collected by the 1st Respondent from the Petitioner at the time of inspection on 23.09.2015. 3. The Petitioner is engaged in the business of wooden furniture and goods and a registered dealer on the file of the 3rd Respondent under the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006 and Central Sales Tax Act, 1956. The 1st Respondent Officials conducted an inspection on 23.9.2015 in ...
The Secretary to Government, Revenue Department, Chennai and Others Vs ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Nov-23-2015
(Prayer: This petition is filed under Order IV Rules 9 (4) of Appellate Side Rules, to condone the delay of 1,424 days in representing the W.A.SR No.74646 of 2011 filed against the order dated 5.2.2009 made in W.P.No.31386 of 2006.) Dr. P. Devadass, J. This petition has been filed by the petitioners/Government Officials to condone the delay of 1,424 days caused in representing the Writ Appeal in W.A.SR.No.74646 of 2011. 2. The sole respondent's father, one Shankar, was an Office Assistant in the Department of Survey and Land Records of the State Government. He died in harness on 6.1.1985. In the same year, on compassionate ground, his widow, namely, Saraswathy was appointed as Office Assistant. Subsequently, since the Certificate produced by her was found to be fake, her services were terminated. During which time, the respondent was a minor. Later, on attaining majority, he sought for appointment on compassionate ground. 3. On 5.4.1999, on compassionate ground, the third petitioner ap...
- ‹ Prev
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- Next ›
- Last »