Chennai Court October 2015 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
P. Murughaiya Vs. The Inspector of Police, Uthumalai Police Station, U ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Oct-29-2015
(Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent to give permission and protection to the "Musical programme" in the event of festival of Erathamudaiyarkulam Sree Senpagavalli Eskkiyamman Kovil at 4/18 North Street, Erathamudaiyarkulam, V.K.Pudhur Taluk, Tirunelveli District on 04.11.2015.) 1. This Writ Petition has been filed seeking for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the respondent to give permission and protection to the "Musical programme" in the event of festival of Erathamudaiyarkulam Sree Senpagavalli Eskkiyamman Kovil at 4/18 North Street, Erathamudaiyarkulam, V.K.Pudhur Taluk, Tirunelveli District on 04.11.2015. 2. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondent. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the villagers jointly decided to conduct the said festival of Eratham...
Ramasamy Vs. The District Employment Officer, O/o The District Employm ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Oct-29-2015
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Mandamus to direct the first respondent to sponsor the petitioner herein for the post of either Junior Assistant cum Typist or Heavy Vehicle Driver under the 2nd respondent and consequently direct the 2nd respondent to consider the petitioner for the appointment to the post of Junior Assistant cum Typist or Heavy Vehicle Driver which is vacant on 20.06.2014 (date of call letter). Common Order: 1. The petitioners/Ramasamy, Subramani and Dhanapal have filed the writ petitions in W.P(MD)Nos.11321, 11761 and 11762 of 2014 respectively seeking for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the first respondent to sponsor their names for the post of either Junior Assistant cum Typist or Heavy Vehicle Driver under the 2nd respondent and consequently direct the 2nd respondent to consider them for appointment to the post of Junior Assistant cum Typist or Heavy Vehicle Driver which is vacant on 20.06.201...
S. Punniyakotti and Others Vs. The Registrar, Anna University, Chennai ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Oct-29-2015
(Prayer: This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the Principal Arignar Anna Institute of Science and Technology, Pennular, Sriperumpudur Taluk, the 2nd respondent herein, to return the original S.S.L.C. Mark Sheet, Higher Secondary Mark Sheet and the 1 to 4 Semester B.E (Electronics and Communication Engineering) Mark Sheets, to the petitioner.) Common Order The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners had submitted that the writ petitions may be dismissed as infructous. He had also made an endorsement to that effect. In view of the endorsement made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners, the writ petitions stand dismissed as infructuous. No costs....
The New India Assurance Company Limited Vs. Gopal and Others
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Oct-29-2015
(Prayer: Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, to set-aside the decree and judgment dated 20.02.2015 passed in M.C.O.P.No.76 of 2014, on the file of Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Additional District Judge, Namakkal.) 1. The short facts of the case are as follows:- On 28.11.2013, at about 12.15 p.m., while the petitioner was walking on the left side of the road towards Namakkal to Paramathi, near Udayamoorthi School, the hero honda splendor bike bearing registration No.TN-28-AK-1734 coming from behind him was driven in a rash and negligent manner and dashed against the petitioner and caused injuries. Hence, the petitioner has filed the claim against the owner and insurer of the hero honda splendor bike. 2. The second respondent in his counter has submitted that the petitioner, without seeing the oncoming vehicle on the road side, suddenly crossed the road, due to which, the accident had happened. It was submitted that as per the terms of the...
Tvl.T. Gurunathan and Brothers, represented through its Prop. T. Gurun ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Oct-29-2015
(Prayer in W.P.(MD).No.33 of 2011:-Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of declaration declaring that Section 19(1), 19(10) and 19(11) of the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006 and Rule 10(2) of the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Rules, 2007 are inconsistent with the charging Section 3 and the General Scheme of annual assessment under Sections 20,21,22 of the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006 and void as being arbitrary, irrational and infringing the rights of the petitioner guaranteed under Articles 14 and 19(1)(g) of the Constitution of India and the resultant reversal of the Input Tax Credit invoking Section 19(11) of the Tamil Nadu Value added Tax Act 2006 as illegal, invalid and therefore unenforceable.) Common Order: Since the issue involved in all these Writ Petitions are one and the same, they are all taken up together and decided by a common order. 2. These Writ Petitions have been filed under Article 226 of the Con...
Selvi Vs. The State represented by its Inspector of Police, Karumalaik ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Oct-29-2015
(Prayer: Criminal Appeal filed under Section 374(2) of Criminal Procedure Code against the judgment dated 17.12.2002 in S.C.No.260 of 2002 on the file of learned Additional District and Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court I, Salem, Salem District.) C.T. Selvam, J. 1. Appellant and three others faced trial in S.C.No.260 of 2002 on the file of learned Additional District and Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court I, Salem, Salem District. The trial Court, under judgment dated 17.12.2002, convicted appellant/A1 for offences under Sections 302 and 201 r/w 302 IPC and sentenced her to life imprisonment and fine of Rs.1,000/- i/d 1 year R.I. for offence u/s.302 IPC, 7 years R.I. and fine of Rs.1,000/- i/d. 1 year R.I. for offence u/s.201 r/w 302 IPC. Against such finding, the present appeal has been filed. 2. The case of the prosecution is that A2, A3 and A4 respectively are husband, brother and mother of A1 and they are residing at Raman Nagar, Karumalaikoodal. PW-1 was also residing at such place. ...
S. Subbiah Vs. State by P. Paulsingh Sub-Divisional Magistrate and Per ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Oct-29-2015
(Prayer: Criminal Revision Case filed under Sections 397 and 401 of Cr.P.C. against the order dated 02.02.2010 made in Crl.M.P.No.132 of 2009 in S.C.No.251 of 2009 on the file of the Additional District and Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court No.V, Chennai.) 1. The petitioner/1st accused was incriminated for the charges under Sections 342, 302, 202 read with 34 IPC alleging that between 15.12.1991 to 17.12.1991, accused Nos.1 to 3 with commen intention wrongfully confined the deceased Prakasam at P.4, Basin Bridge Police Station and inflicted 67 injuries on him, thereby, caused his death. A special report along with the death report was sent by the respondent on 18.12.1991 and on the basis of which, a case was registered. In that connection, the Collector of Chennai, ordered to conduct enquiry under Police Standing Order 145 (for short, PSO 145 ?). By virtue of the enquiry, the then Additional District Magistrate and Personal Assistant (Urban Land Tax) to the Collector has examined the re...
S. Santhi Vs. The Principal, KSR Mat. Hr. Sec. School, Namakkal Distri ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Oct-29-2015
(Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a writ of mandamus directing the respondent to consider the petitioners representation dated 26.10.2015 on merits in accordance with the judgment of this Honorable Court reported in 2015(2) CTC 503 within a time frame fixed by this Honorable High Court.) 1. There was a decree for divorce granted by the jurisdictional Court in H.M.O.P.No.24 of 2004 as confirmed in C.M.A.No.72/2006 dated 08.4.2008. Thereafter, the petitioner got remarried. 2. According to the petitioner, her ex-husband lost contact for quite number of years with the child. There is a child born out of their wedlock. The child is studying in XII standard. Therefore, the petitioner made representations on 10.09.2015 and 26.10.2015 seeking inclusion of the name of her husband instead of the natural father of the child. Thus, such a request has been made for inclusion in the Transfer Certificate and in all other related documents. Seeking...
S. Soundarrajan Vs. The Director General of Police, State of Tamil Nad ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Oct-29-2015
(Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of a Writ ofCertiorarified Mandamus to call for the records of the impugned order dated 20.10.2015 in CPO No.804/2015, C.No.H1/21611/2009, on the file of the 2nd respondent and quash the same as arbitrary, illegal and without jurisdiction and further direct the respondents to permit the petitioner to retire with effect from 31.10.2015 and pass such other suitable order and thereby render justice.) 1. This Writ Petition has been filed by S.Sounderrajan challenging the order of suspension passed on 20.10.2015 placing him under suspension on the ground that there were grave charges in TDP case No.13/2009 pending enquiry before the Commissioner for Disciplinary Proceedings, Tiruchirappalli. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that when the charge was issued on 25.08.2009 against the petitioner with baseless and false allegations, the disciplinary proceedings cannot be allowed to...
Shanmugam and Another Vs. The Superintendent of Police, Ramnad Distric ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Oct-29-2015
(Prayer:- Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. praying to direct the 1st respondent police to direct the 2nd respondent to file a final report in Crime No.81 of 2015 on the file of the 2nd respondent within the stipulated time as fixed by this Hon'ble Court.) 1. The petitioner has come forward with this petition under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure, seeking a direction to the first respondent police to direct the second respondent to file a final report in Crime No.81 of 2015 on the file of the second respondent within the stipulated time as fixed by this Hon'ble Court. 2. Heard the submissions made by the learned counsel appearing on either side. 3.The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that on the basis of the complaint given by the petitioner, a case has been registered in Crime No.81 of 2015 on 15.06.2015 for the offences punishable under Sections 294(b), 324 and 506(ii) IPC r/w Section 4 of Women Harassment Act,. However, the sec...
- ‹ Prev
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- Next ›
- Last »