Chennai Court October 2015 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
R. Govindarajan and Others Vs. P. Saravanan rep by his POA Venkatavara ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Oct-29-2015
(Prayer: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the judgment and decree dated 24.11.2014 made in I.A.No.1202 of 2014 in O.S.No.487 of 2014 on the file of the Principal District Munsif Court, Alandur.) 1. The defendants in O.S.No.487 of 2014 on the file of learned Principal District Munsif, Alandur are the revision petitioners herein. The respondent herein is the plaintiff therein. The suit is for permanent injunction. 2. The respondent / plaintiff filed I.A.No.879 of 2014 under Order XXXIX Rule 1 and 2 of C.P.C. for interim injunction and the Trial Court has granted an order of interim injunction. Thereafter, the revision petitioners filed I.A.No.962/2014 under Order XXXIX Rule 4 of C.P.C. to vacate the said order of interim injunction. 3. A common order dated 23.07.2014 was passed in I.A.Nos.879 and 962 of 2014. It is relevant to extract hereunder paragraph No.6 of the order dated 23.07.2014 passed in I.A.Nos.879 and 962 of 2014:- TAMIL ? ...
Shaik Noorudeen Vs. A. Azizul Karim and Another
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Oct-29-2015
(Prayer: Civil revision petition has been filed against the fair and decretal order of the learned XII Assistant Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai made in I.A.No.4699 of 2014 in O.S.No.457 of 2011 dated 8.1.2015.) 1. The revision petitioner is the first defendant in O.S.No.457 of 2011 on the file of learned XII Assistant Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai. The first respondent herein is the plaintiff therein. The details of the suit are not necessary for the disposal of the present revision petition. 2. The grievance of the revision petitioner is that he was not served with suit summons. But, he was set exparte and an exparte decree was passed against him. Hence, he filed an application in I.A.No.4699 of 2014 in O.S.No.457 of 2011 to condone the delay of 678 days in filing the application to set aside the exparte decree. 3. Learned XII Assistant Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai rejected I.A.No.4699 of 2014 in O.S.No.457 of 2011 on 8.1.2015. The revision petitioner filed this revision peti...
G. Sakthivel and Another Vs. The Superintendent of Police, Theni and A ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Oct-29-2015
(Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records relating to the impugned proceedings in C.No.110/Mike/B2PS/2015 dated 25.10.2015 of the second respondent and to quash the same, consequently directing the 2nd respondent to grant permission and necessary protection to perform the cultural programme (i.e.,) Adal Padal on 4.11.2015 at 6.30 pm in the eve of Arulmighu Sri Kaliamman Kovil, 39th Years Thiruvizha at Allinagaram, Theni Taluk, Theni District.) 1. Mr.D.Muruganandam learned Additional Government Pleader, takes notice for the Respondents. By consent, the Writ Petition itself is taken up for final disposal. 2. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the Respondents. 3. The present Writ Petition has been filed for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records relating to ...
D. Honest Raj Vs. The Superintendent of Police, Trichy and Another
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Oct-29-2015
(Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents herein to accord necessary permission and give police protection to conduct the Kabadi tournament at Peruvalappur village, Lalgudi taluk, Trichy District on 31.10.2015 and 1.11.2015 respectively on the basis of the petitioner's representation dated 24.10.2015.) 1. This Writ Petition has been filed seeking for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the respondents herein to accord necessary permission and give police protection to conduct the Kabadi tournament at Peruvalappur village, Lalgudi taluk, Trichy District on 31.10.2015 and 1.11.2015 respectively on the basis of the petitioner's representation dated 24.10.2015. 2. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondents. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the villagers joint...
A. Nasira Begum Vs. V. Husain Ahmed and Another
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Oct-29-2015
(Prayer: Criminal Revision Cases filed under Section 397 read with 401 of Cr.P.C. against the order of the learned Additional District Munsif-cum-Judicial Magistrate, Ambur, Vellore District, in C.M.P.Nos.4162 and 3845 of 2014 in C.C.Nos.71 and 62 of 2014, dated 09.03.2015, thereby, dismissing the petitions filed by the petitioner seeking to send Exs.P.1-Cheque Nos.370633 and 370634 respectively, dated 05.06.2014, along with her admitted signature for Handwriting Expert Opinion and consequently send Ex.P.1-Cheques for an expert opinion along with the admitted signature of the petitioner even before the cross-examination of the respondents/complainants.) Common Order: 1. The petitioner is arrayed as accused in the cases in C.C.Nos.71 and 62 of 2014 for the offence under 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act. Alleging that the petitioner has not signed in the cheques and that she had already issued legal notices contending that the cheques were stolen from her, she had filed C.M.P.Nos.4162 a...
A.K.K.V. Arunadu and Another Matriculation Higher Secondary School Vs. ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Oct-29-2015
(Prayer: This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records of the first respondent in G.O.Ms.No.428, dated 17.12.2008 and quash the same and consequently direct the fourth respondent to collect rent as per G.O.Ms.No.456 dated 9.11.2007 with respect to the lands in survey No.33, Thamalavarupayan village, Trichy District, measuring an extent of 4.08 acres, being used as Play ground by the petitioner.) 1. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned counsels appearing for the respondents. 2. At this stage of the hearing of the writ petition, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner had submitted that it would suffice if the petitioner is permitted to make a representation to the first respondent, with regard to the reliefs prayed for in the writ petition and if the first respondent is directed to dispose of the same, on merits, within a specified...
M.N. Dinakaran Vs. S. Shanmugam and Others
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Oct-29-2015
(Prayer: Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, to set-aside the judgment and decree dated 16.06.2011 made in M.C.O.P.No.146 of 2009, on the file of Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Additional District (FTC) Judge, Dharmapuri.) 1. The short facts of the case are as follows:- On 28.06.2007, when the claimant was travelling in the bus bearing registration No.TN-29-AA-9999 on the Krishnagiri Main Road and while the bus was passing near the Krishnagiri Main Road, the driver of the bus, without noticing the red signal at the Traffic Spot, drove the bus in a rash and negligent manner and dashed against the lorry. As a result, the claimant had sustained injuries. Hence, the claim petition had been levelled against the owner and insurance company of bus and lorry respectively and compensation of a sum of Rs.15,00,000/- was claimed. 2. The National Insurance Company / second respondent had filed a counter statement and resisted the claim petition. It wa...
D. Manikandan Vs. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Tirunelveli and ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Oct-29-2015
(Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents particularly the 2nd respondent to grant permission for organizing a small function on 30.10.2015 at Uralvoimozhi Village, Radhapuram Village, Tirunelveli District for distributing Note books, pencil, pen and uniform to the school going children belonging to the all community and also allow the village people to conduct an orchestra in the evening between 6.00 pm to 10.00 pm.) 1. This Writ Petition has been filed seeking for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the respondents particularly the second respondent to grant permission for organizing a small function on 30.10.2015 at Uralvoimozhi Village, Radhapuram Village, Tirunelveli District for distributing Note books, pencil, pen and uniform to the school going children belonging to all community and also allow the village people to conduct an orchestra in the evening between ...
K.J. Saravanan Vs. The Chief Secretary to Government of Tamil Nadu and ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Oct-29-2015
(Prayer:- This Writ Petition is filed to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records in Circular No.14/2014 Acts Cell IV/13086/2014, dated 6.5.2014 issued by the 4th Respondent and to quash the same and to direct the 2nd Respondent to fix the rate of tickets for admission in each class in each Theatre within the State of Tamil Nadu such that the admission rate prescribed is inclusive of Entertainment Tax and consequently when the tax is exempted, the reduced price of admission after giving the benefit of the tax exemption to the viewer should be printed on the tickets and used by Theatre owners only after getting them sealed by the entertainment tax officer so as to ensure that the Theatre owners reduce the price charged on the consumers proportionate to the exempted tax amount and consequently direct the 5th Respondent to refund the excess sum of Rs.107/- collected from the Petitioner in ticket numbers 034389, 03490, 03491 purchased from the 5th Respondent for the ...
Kandasamy and Another Vs. Thiagarajan and Others
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Oct-29-2015
(Prayer: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the order made in I.A.No.404 of 2015 in O.S.No.85 of 2012 on the file of the Principal District Munsif Court, Tiruchengode dated 13.07.2015.) 1. The revision petitioners are the plaintiffs in O.S.No.85 of 2012 on the file of Principal District Munsif, Tiruchengode and the respondents herein are the defendants therein. The details of the suit are not relevant for disposal of this revision petition. 2. The revision petitioners filed I.A.No.404 of 2015 in O.S.No.85 of 2012 seeking to amend the plaint under Order 6 Rule 17 CPC. The Trial Court passed an order dated 13.07.2015 rejecting the said application. Hence, this revision petition. 3. Taking into account the nature of amendment sought for, this Court ordered notice of motion on 14.09.2015 and granted interim stay. 4. After notice, the respondents entered appearance through counsel. 5. Heard both sides. 6. While the learned counsel for the pe...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »