Chennai Court October 2015 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Shanmugathai and Another Vs. The State of Tamil Nadu, rep. by Secretar ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Oct-09-2015
(Prayer: Writ Petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Certiorari to call for the records relating to the impugned proceedings of the second respondent bearing OO.Ni.No.5/3556/2012 and OO.Ni.No.5/2459/2012 dated 26.07.2013 and the consequential impugned Gazette notification dated 01.08.2013 of the second respondent and quash the same.) 1. The Writ Petitions have been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Certiorari to call for the records relating to the impugned proceedings of the second respondent bearing OO.Ni.No.5/3556/2012 and OO.Ni.No.5/2459/2012 dated 26.07.2013 and the consequential impugned Gazette notification dated 01.08.2013 of the second respondent and quash the same. By the said order, the Inspector of Panchayat has removed the petitioners from the post of Panchayat President in respect of Asoor and Kattankulam Village Panchayat, respectively. 2. When the matters are t...
The Union of India rep. by The Chief Commissioner of Customs and Anoth ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Oct-09-2015
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for a writ of Certiorari, calling for the records relating to the Second Respondent/Tribunal comprised in O.A.No.374 of 2012 culminating in order dated 26.03.2015 and to quash the same.) M. Venugopal, J. 1. The Petitioners/Respondents have preferred the present Writ Petition as against the order dated 26.03.2015 in O.A.No.374 of 2012 (filed by the First Respondent/Petitioner) passed by the Second Respondent/Central Administrative Tribunal, Chennai. 2. The Second Respondent/Central Administrative Tribunal while passing the impugned order on 26.03.2015 in O.A.No.374 of 2012 filed by the First Respondent/Petitioner at paragraphs 10 and 11 had observed the following: 10. In the instant case, though the post of Tindal is the next avenue of promotion to the post of Sukhani and when the applicant was promoted from Seaman to Sukhani, he was given the scale of pay of Rs.4000-6000. Incidentally, the post of Tindal also c...
Vairava Meenakshi Vs. The State, rep. by its Home Secretary, Chennai a ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Oct-09-2015
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. praying to transfer the investigation in Crime No.127 of 2014 pending before the 4th respondent to C.B.C.I.D or any other investigating agency.) 1. The petitioner has come forward with this petition seeking to transfer the investigation in Crime No.127 of 2014 pending before the 4th respondent to C.B.C.I.D or any other investigating agency, stating that the petitioner's husband was murdered by her brother-in-law. 2. The learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the alleged occurrence took place on 05.05.2014 at 17.45 Hours. The petitioner is the wife of the deceased Velayutham. The sister of the first accused, namely, Kalaiselvi, was given in marriage to one Balasubramanian, the elder brother of deceased Velayutham. The said Kalaiselvi committed suicide after three years of her marriage. The first accused has developed enmity with the deceased Velayutham, as though he was responsible for the death...
M. Periasamy Vs. State, rep by Inspector of Police, Pudukkottai Distri ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Oct-08-2015
(Prayer:Appeal is filed under Section 374 of the Code of Criminal Procedure against the Judgment and conviction dated 07.03.2012 made in S.C.No.154 of 2010, on the file of the learned Principal District Special and Sessions Judge, Pudukkottai.) S. Nagamuthu, J. The appellant is the sole accused in S.C.No.154 of 2010, on the file of the learned Principal District Special and Sessions Judge, Pudukkottai. He stood charged for the offence punishable under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code. By Judgment dated 07.03.2012, the Trial Court has convicted the appellant under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced him to undergo imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of Rs.1,000/- in default to undergo rigorous imprisonment for six months. Challenging the said conviction and sentence, the appellant has come up with this Criminal Appeal. 2. The case of the prosecution, in brief, is as follows:- The deceased, in this case, was one Mr.Adaikalasamy @ Chinnasamay. He was residing at Kod...
Petchimuthu Vs. State rep. by The Inspector of Police, Uthumalai Polic ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Oct-08-2015
(Prayer: Appeal is filed under Section 374 of the Code of Criminal Procedure against the Judgment and conviction passed by the learned Principal Sessions Judge, Tirunelveli, in S.C.No.349 of 2009, dated 22.01.2011.) S. Nagamuthu, J 1. The appellant is the sole accused in S.C.No.349 of 2009, on the file of the learned Principal Sessions Judge, Tirunelveli. He stood charged for the offence under Sections 294(b) and 302 I.P.C. By Judgment, dated 22.01.2011, the Trial Court convicted him under Section 302 I.P.C. and sentenced him to undergo imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of Rs.5,000/- in default to undergo rigorous imprisonment for three months. The Trial Court acquitted him from the charge under Section 294(b) I.P.C. Challenging the said conviction and sentence, the appellant is before this Court, with this Criminal Appeal. 2. The case of the prosecution, in brief, is as follows: (i) The deceased in this case was one Mr.Ramaiah @ Ramaraj. He was residing at Yesu Street, Solaicher...
D. Thangapandi and Others Vs. State rep. by The Inspector of Police, A ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Oct-08-2015
(Prayer: Petition is filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure praying to direct the District and Sessions Judge (PCR Court), Theni, Theni District to consider the petitioner's bail application on the day of surrender on the same day in Crime No.541 of 2015 on the file of the respondent police for the offences under Sections 341, 323, 355, 294(b) IPC and Section 3(1)(x) SC/ST Act, 1989.) 1. Heard both sides. 2. The petitioner, who apprehends arrest for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 355, 294(b) IPC and Section 3(1)(x) SC/ST Act, 1989 in Crime No.541 of 2015 on the file of the respondent police, move this petition seeking a direction to the learned District and Sessions Judge (PCR Court), Theni, Theni District, to accept the surrender of the petitioner and consider his bail application on the same day on merits, in relating to Crime No.541 of 2015. 3. Perused the records. 4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) submits that the injured has been d...
Gurunathan Vs. S. Venkatesh, The Revenue Divisional Officer, Tirunelve ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Oct-08-2015
(Prayer:Contempt Petition is filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, praying to punish the respondents herein for their willful disobedience of the order passed by this Hon'ble Court in Crl.O.P.(MD).No.11228 of 2015, dated 22.6.2015.) 1. The petitioner has come forward with this contempt petition stating that this Court passed an order dated 22.06.2015 wherein a specific direction was issued to the respondents to look into the complaint of the petitioner and take appropriate action in accordance with law within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Since the respondents have not disposed of the complaint within the stipulated time as fixed by this Court, the act of the respondents will amount to willful disobedience of the Court order and hence the petitioner is before this Court. 2. Today, the contemnor is present and submits that on receipt of the order from this Court, the records have been perused. The revenue records would show that ...
Echanatham Mohanraj @ Mohanraj and Another Vs. The Deputy Superintende ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Oct-08-2015
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C, praying to direct the learned Principal Sessions Judge, Karur, to consider the bail application of the petitioners on the same day on their surrender in Crime No.494 of 2015 on the file of the respondent police.) 1. Heard both sides. 2. The petitioners, who apprehend arrest for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 294(b) and 506 (ii) IPC r/w Section 3(1)(x) of SC/ST Act, in Crime No.494 of 2015 on the file of the respondents police, move this petition seeking a direction to the learned Principal Sessions Judge, Karur, to accept the surrender of the petitioners and consider their bail application on the same day on merits, in relating to Crime No.494 of 2015. 3. Perused the records. 4. The offences complained of, other than the offence under the Special enactment, may not be serious in nature warranting initial detention in jail, even before considering the bail application. 5. Therefore, the learned P...
C. Arockiyasamy Vs. The State of Tamil Nadu, rep. by the Inspector of ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Oct-08-2015
(Prayer:Criminal Appeal filed under Section 374(2) of Cr.P.C. against the conviction and sentence, dated 11.10.2006, made in S.C.No.2 of 2006, by the learned Sessions Judge, Sivagangai.) S. Nagamuthu, J. 1. The appellant is the sole accused in S.C.No.2 of 2006 on the file of the learned Sessions Judge, Sivagangai. He stood charged for the offence under Sections 302 and 307 IPC. By judgment dated 11.10.2006, the trial Court convicted him under both the charges and sentenced him to undergo imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of Rs.1,000/-, in default to undergo rigorous imprisonment for one year for the offence under Section 302 IPC and to undergo rigorous imprisonment for seven years and to pay a fine of Rs.1,000/-, in default to undergo rigorous imprisonment for one year for the offence under Section 307 IPC. Challenging the said conviction and sentence, the appellant is before this Court with this appeal. 2. The case of the prosecution in brief is as follows; (a) The deceased in t...
Chotima Bibi Vs. Abdul Munab
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Oct-08-2015
(Prayer: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India to set aside the order dated 30.09.2013 made in I.A.No.154 of 2013 in O.S.No.28 of 2013 on the file of the learned Principal District Munsif, Vandavasi, Thiruvannamalai District and consequently permit the petitioner to amend the plaint schedule as prayed for in the above said I.A.No.154 of 2013 in O.S.No.28 of 2013.) 1. The revision petitioner is the plaintiff in O.S.No.28 of 2013 on the file of the learned Principal District Munsif, Vandavasi. The respondent herein is the defendant therein. 2. The respondent herein as plaintiff had filed a suit in O.S.No.89 of 2013 on the file of the learned District Munsif, Vandavasi, wherein the revision petitioner herein is the first defendant. 3. While so, the revision petitioner has filed an application in I.A.No.154 of 2013 in O.S.No.28 of 2013 under Order 6 Rule 17 CPC for amendment of the plaint. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the revision petiti...
- ‹ Prev
- 32
- 33
- 34
- 35
- 36
- 37
- 38
- 39
- 40
- 42
- Next ›
- Last »