Chennai Court October 2015 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Kosamattam Finance Limited rep.by its Assistant Regional Manager, Madu ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Oct-09-2015
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. praying to direct the second respondent to register FIR and initiate necessary action in accordance with law on the basis of the complaint dated 24.07.2015 preferred by the petitioner.) 1. The petitioner has come forward with this petition seeking for a direction, to the second respondent to register FIR and initiate necessary action in accordance with law on the basis of the complaint dated 24.07.2015 preferred by the petitioner. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has given a complaint to the second respondent as early as on 24.07.2015, but, however, the second respondent police has not taken any steps to register a case and hence, the petitioner has come forward with this petition for the above stated relief. 3. At this juncture, the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side), on instructions, would submit that on the basis of the complaint given by the petitioner, petition enq...
M. Ragarooban Vs. The Secretary, Selection Committee, Director of Medi ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Oct-09-2015
(Prayer:- The Writ Petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the 1st respondent to give priority and accommodate the petitioner with a seat for M.B.B.S Course against left over 15% All India Quota Seat in any of the Medical Colleges in the State of Tamil Nadu for the year 2001-2016.) 1. This Writ Petition has been filed by M.Ragarooban, seeking for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the 1st respondent to give priority and accommodate his with a seat for M.B.B.S Course against left over 15% All India Quota Seat in any of the Medical Colleges in the State of Tamil Nadu for the year 2001-2016. 2. The prayer is unenforceable in the light of the repeated order passed by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Priya Gupta vs. State of Chhatishgarh reported in (2012)7 SCC 433 holding that any admission to M.B.B.S Course after 30th of September is not proper. Therefore, the Writ Petition fails and the same is...
C. Rajavel Vs. State, rep. by the Inspector of Police, Civil Supplies ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Oct-09-2015
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. praying to direct the Principal District and Sessions Judge, Theni to number the appeal dated 4.8.2015 preferred by the petitioner u/s.6(c) of the Essential Commodities Act, 1955 and hear the same in accordance with law.) 1. The petitioner has come forward with this petition under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure, seeking a direction to the Principal District and Sessions Judge, Theni to number the appeal dated 4.8.2015 preferred by the petitioner u/s.6(c) of the Essential Commodities Act, 1955 and hear the same in accordance with law. 2. The learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the learned Sessions Judge returned the papers, directing the petitioner to produce the relevant G.O. with regard to the jurisdiction of the Principal District Judge to hear the appeal under Sction 6(c) of the Essential Commodities Act, 1955. Hence, the petitioner is before this Court. To substantiate his arg...
P. Sureshkumar Vs. The Commissioner of Municipal Administration, Chenn ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Oct-09-2015
(Prayer: Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records pertaining to the impugned order passed by the respondent in Roc.No.34859/2014/V2, dated 31.10.2014, and quash the same and consequently direct the respondent to reinstate the petitioner in service.) 1. The petitioner was placed under suspension by the Commissioner of Municipal Administration, Chennai, in Roc.No.34859/2014/V2, dated 31.10.2014, under rule 8(2) of the Tamil Nadu Municipal Public Health Services (Discipline and Appeal) Regulation, 1973, with effect from 28.10.2014, until further orders. The relevant portion of the suspension order, reads as under:- During the period of suspension, the said Thiru.P.Suresh Kumar, Sanitary Inspector, Srivilliputhur Municipality will be paid subsistence allowance and dearness allowance as admissible under Rule 53(1) of Fundamental Rules. The Headquarters of the said Thiru.P.Suresh Kumar, San...
Jyothy Laboratories Ltd. Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax, Chenna ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Oct-09-2015
V. Ramasubramanian, J. 1. This appeal arises out of the dismissal of a writ petition filed by the appellant herein seeking a Mandamus to direct the Original and Appellate Authorities of the Department of Income Tax to stay the disputed outstanding demand of Rs.10 crores pursuant to an order dated 28.1.2015 passed under Section 220(6) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. 2. Heard Mr.R.Venkataraman, learned Senior Counsel for the appellant. Mr.T.Pramod Kumar Chopda, learned Standing Counsel takes notice for the respondents. 3. The assessment in the case of a company by name Henkel India Limited relating to the assessment year 2010-11 was completed under Section 143(3) read with Section 144C(3) on 28.5.2014. Certain disallowances were made on account of transfer pricing adjustments, loss on sale of assets and amortized claim of VRS. The assessee accepted the disallowances and did not file any appeal. Thereafter, penalty proceedings under Section 271(1)(c) were initiated and a demand of Rs.10 cror...
P. Jebakumar and Others Vs. The Inspector of Police, Tirunelveli City ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Oct-09-2015
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. praying to call for the records pertaining to the final report/charge sheet in C.C.No.86 of 2013 pending before the Judicial Magistrate Court No.I, Tirunelveli District, in Crime No.24 of 2009 on the file of the first respondent dated 13.11.2009 and quash the same as illegal.) Common Order 1. The petitioners have come forward with these petitions to quash the C.C.No.86 of 2013 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate Court No.I, Tirunelveli, for the offences under Sections 420, 423 and 120(b) r/w 34 IPC. 2. The learned Counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are arrayed as A3, A2 and A1 respectively. He further submits that the A1 is none other than the own brother of the de-facto complainant. While availing loan from A2/Bank Manager, A1 has given collateral mortgage and deposited the title deed on execution of the deed dated 08.01.2007. At that time inadvertently, he has included the pro...
Maria Loyis Vs. State, rep. by Sub Inspector of Police, Batlagundu Pol ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Oct-09-2015
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. praying to direct the Judicial Magistrate, Nilakottai to dispose C.C.No.151 of 2011 within a stipulated time.) 1. This petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C, seeking a direction to the learned Judicial Magistrate, Nilakottai to dispose C.C.No.151 of 2011 within a stipulated time. 2. Heard the learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner and the perused the material available on records. 3. It is seen from the status report called for in which it was stated that sofar eight witnesses have been examined and the witness warrant is pending against LW.1 and the case was posted on 01.10.2015 for examination of LW. 4. The learned Government Advocate (Criminal side) appearing for the respondent submitted that the case was posted on 09.11.2015 on that day the respondent police is ready to produce the witnesses. 5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the learned Judicial Magistrate, Nilakottai, ...
Madura Coats (P) Ltd., Madurai Rep. by its Manager-Excise and Legal, R ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Oct-09-2015
(Prayer in Application 1850/2015: Application filed under Order XIV Rule 8 of O.S.Rules, read with Section 9 II (a) (e) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 to pass a Pro-order, prohibiting the Garnishee/2nd respondent from paying any money to the first respondent and to direct the Garnishee to deposit into this Court a sum of Rs.60,00,000/- or such other sum payable by the Garnishee to the first respondent, month after month, until the satisfaction of the sum of Rs.22,30,13,716/- being the sum awarded to the applicant under the award dated 22.12.2014. in Application 1851/2015: Application filed under Order XIV Rule 8 of O.S.Rules, read with Section 9 II (a) (e) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 to direct the respondent to furnish security for a sum of Rs.22,30,13,716/-, being the sum awarded to the applicant under the arbitration award dated 22.12.2014.) 1. Application No.1850 of 2015 is filed seeking to pass a Pro-order, prohibiting the Garnishee/2nd respondent from paying...
M. Veeramuthu Vs. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Pudukkottai and ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Oct-09-2015
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. praying to direct the 1st Respondent police to complete the investigation and file a final report in Crime No.40 of 2015 pending on the file of the 1st respondent within a time frame as fixed by this Hon'ble Court.) 1. The petitioner has come forward with this petition under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure, seeking a direction to the first Respondent police to complete the investigation and file a final report in Crime No.40 of 2015 pending on the file of the first respondent within a time frame as fixed by this Hon'ble Court. 2. Heard the submissions made by the learned counsel appearing on either side. 3.The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that on the basis of the complaint given by the petitioner, a case has been registered in Crime No.40 of 2015 on 05.03.2015 for the offence punishable under Sections 147, 294(b), 341, 323 IPC r/w Section 3(1)(r)3(s), 3(2)(v)(a) SC/ST Act. However, th...
Murugadoss Vs. The District Forest Officer, Thanjavur and Another
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Oct-09-2015
(Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records on the file of the 1st Respondent relating to impugned order issued in S.O.No.15/2015/E1 dated 28.09.2015 and quash the same and to direct the Respondents to retain the petitioner in the present post and place in accordance with the Transfer Policy of the Government.) 1. This Writ Petition has been filed by Murugadoss challenging the correctness of the impugned transfer order dated 28.09.2015 issued by the District Forest Officer, Thanjavur Division, Thanjavur, the first respondent herein in S.O.No.15/2015/E1 dated 28.09.2015, in and by which, the petitioner has been transferred from Kumbakonam to Thanjavur. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, taking support from G.O.Ms.No.10, Personnel and Administrative Reforms (S) Department, dated 07.01.1994, would submit that in the case of Junior Officials like Junior Assistants, Typist,...
- ‹ Prev
- 32
- 33
- 34
- 35
- 36
- 37
- 38
- 40
- 41
- 42
- Next ›
- Last »