Chennai Court October 2015 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
G. Vikaraman Vs. The State, rep. by the Inspector of Police, Virudhuna ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Oct-09-2015
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. praying to direct the respondent police to complete the investigation in Crime No.407/2012 and to file charge sheet in accordance with law within the period that may be stipulated by this Hon'ble Court.) 1. This petition is filed seeking for a prayer to direct the respondent police to complete the investigation in Crime No.407/2012 and to file charge sheet in accordance with law within the period that may be stipulated by this Hon'ble Court. 2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) submits that the charge sheet has already been filed in P.R.C.No.3 of 2013 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Virudhunagar. 3. Recording the submissions of the learned Government Advocate (Criminal side) this Criminal Original Petition is disposed of....
Krishnan and Others Vs. The Inspector of Police, Central Crime Branch, ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Oct-09-2015
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure with a prayer to call for the records of the FIR in Crime No. 174 of 2011 on the file of the Inspector of Police, Central Crime Branch, Land Grabbing Cell, Team No. 1, Egmore, Chennai and quash the same in view of the proceedings on the petitioners as accused 4 to 6. Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure with a prayer to direct the respondent police to enquire the matter and file a final report in the FIR bearing Crime No. 174 of 2011 pending on the file of the CCB-I, Chennai within time frame fixed by this Court. Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure with a prayer to call for the records and quash the FIR in Crime No.174 of 2011 pending on the file of the Central Crime Branch, Chennai against the petitioner.) Common Order: 1. It is the case of the defacto complainant that on 20.12.1992 she purchased the Plot No....
Neethidevan Vs. State rep. by the Inspector of Police, Kodaikanal Poli ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Oct-09-2015
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. praying to direct the respondent police to investigate and file a final report in Crime No.61 of 2015, dated 08.02.2015 on the file of the respondent under Section 173 of Cr.P.C before the appropriate court in accordance with law within a time stipulated by this Hon'ble Court.) 1. The petitioner has come forward with this petition under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure, seeking a direction to direct the respondent police to investigate and file a final report in Crime No.61 of 2015, dated 08.02.2015 on the file of the respondent under Section 173 of Cr.P.C before the appropriate court in accordance with law within a time stipulated by this Hon'ble Court. 2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned Government Advocate (Criminal side) submits that the final report has already been filed which was taken on file in C.C.No.61 of 2015 pending on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Ko...
S.P. Saravanan Vs. S. Jeyarani and Another
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Oct-09-2015
(Prayer: Petition filed under Section 397 r/w 401 of the Criminal Procedure Code, against the order in M.C.No.96 of 2014 dated 06.11.2014 on the file of the Family Court, Trichy.) 1. This Criminal Revision Case has been filed by the husband challenging the order dated 06.11.2014 by which the wife was awarded maintenance at Rs.4,000/- per month and the son was awarded maintenance at Rs.3,000/- per month, totalling Rs.7,000/- per month. 2. Originally in M.C.No.94 of 2010, the learned Magistrate had ordered a sum of Rs.2,000/- to each of the wife and the child, totalling a sum of Rs.4,000/-. On an application being filed for enhancement of the maintenance, the subsequent order dated 06.11.2014 has been passed. Challenging this order, this revision petition has been filed. 3. The contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the order of maintenance passed by the Court below is not supported by any evidence and it has been passed without looking into the reasonable wants of ...
Thangam Vs. The District Superintendent of Police, Virudhunagar and An ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Oct-09-2015
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. praying to direct the second respondent to register a case based on the petitioner's complaint dated 19.07.2015 and investigate the same in accordance with law.) 1. The petitioner approaches this Court with a prayer to direct the second respondent to register a case based on the petitioner's complaint dated 19.07.2015 and investigate the same in accordance with law. 2. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) submitted that on the basis of the complaint given by the petitioner dated 19.07.2015 a case was registered for the offence under Section 279 IPC in Crime No.530 of 2015 dated 09.09.2015. 3. In view of the submissions made by the learned Government Advocate (Crl.side), this petition is closed....
Thirumavalavan and Others Vs. State, rep. by the Inspector of Police, ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Oct-09-2015
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. praying to direct the learned Principal District and Sessions Judge, P.C.R.Court, Pudukkottai under the SC/ST Act to consider the Warrant Recall petition of the petitioners in connection with S.C.No.47 of 2015, pending trial on merits, on the same day.) 1. The petitioners have come forward with this petition under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure, seeking a direction to the learned Principal District and Sessions Judge, P.C.R.Court, Pudukkottai under the SC/ST Act to consider the Warrant Recall petition of the petitioners in connection with S.C.No.47 of 2015, pending trial on merits, on the same day. 2. Heard the learned Counsel appearing for the petitioners and the learned Government Advocate (Criminal side) appearing for the respondent. 3. The learned Counsel appearing for the petitioners submitted that since the petitioners are suffering from illness they did not appear before the trial Court on 14.09...
A. Balamurugan and Others Vs. State rep. by its the Inspector of Polic ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Oct-09-2015
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C, praying to direct the learned Third Additional and Sessions Judge(PCR), Madurai, to accept the surrender of the petitioners in Crime No.408 of 2015 on the file of the respondent police and to consider their bail application on the same day.) 1. Heard both sides. 2. The petitioners, who apprehend arrest for the offences punishable under Sections 294(b), 323 IPC and Section 3(1)(X) SC/ST Act 1989, in Crime No.408 of 2015 on the file of the respondent police, move this petition seeking a direction to the learned Third Additional and Sessions Judge(PCR), Madurai, to accept the surrender of the petitioners and consider their bail application on the same day on merits, in relating to Crime No.408 of 2015. 3. Perused the records. 4. The offences complained of, other than the offence under the Special enactment, may not be serious in nature warranting initial detention in jail, even before considering the bail applicatio...
Dr. S. Amalan Sevraj Vs. The State, rep. by the Inspector of Police, T ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Oct-09-2015
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. praying to direct the respondent or his men to not to harass the petitioner without following the due process of law.) Common Order: 1. Heard both sides. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the respondent is harassing the petitioner under the guise of enquiry and hence, the petitioner has come forward with this petition for the above stated relief. 3. The learned Government Advocate (Criminal side), on instructions, would submit that the case has been registered in Crime No.274 of 2015 against the petitioners. 4. Considering the rival submissions made on both sides, the respondent is directed not to harass the petitioner under the guise of enquiry, but let the police investigate into the matter in accordance with law and the mandates as found set out in D.K.Basu Vs. State of West Bengal reported in AIR (1997) SC 610. If really, the police want to interrogate, it is open for the police to i...
Andal Ammal and Another Vs. S. Ramalingam and Others
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Oct-09-2015
(Prayer: This Review Application has been filed to allow the review petition and set aside the judgment and decree dated 26.8.2010.) 1. Heard the learned counsels appearing for the parties concerned. 2. This review application has been filed against the Judgment and decree of this Court, dated 26.8.2010, made in S.A.No.755 of 2008. 3. The petitioners have stated that this Court does not have the jurisdiction to pass a Judgment and decree for recovery of the possession of the property in question, upon payment of Rs.7,000/-, by the respondents, as the said amount is less than Rs.10,000/- . 4. It has also been stated that this Court had overlooked the fact that the promissory note had not been placed before the Court and that Varthamanam is an unregistered document and therefore, it is inadmissible in evidence. 5. It has also been stated that the promissory note is barred by time and therefore, the relief granted by this Court is inconsistent in nature. Further, there is no substantial q...
Asir Raja Singh Vs. The State, rep. by its Inspector of Police, Tutico ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Oct-09-2015
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. praying to call for the records in Cr.No.71 of 2010 on the file of the respondent police and quash the same with respect to the petitioner.) 1. This petition is filed seeking for a prayer to call for the records in Crime No.71 of 2010 on the file of the respondent police and quash the same with respect to the petitioner. 2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) submits that the investigation has been conducted and the action was dropped. 3. Recording the submissions of the learned Government Advocate (Criminal side) this Criminal Original Petition is disposed of....
- ‹ Prev
- 32
- 33
- 34
- 35
- 36
- 37
- 39
- 40
- 41
- 42
- Next ›
- Last »