Chennai Court October 2015 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
The Divisional Manager, M/s. United India Insurance Co., Ltd., Vellore ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Oct-13-2015
(Prayer: Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act 1988 to set aside the decree and judgment passed in M.C.O.P.No.2 of 2014 dated 03.06.2014 on the file of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal (Special Subordinate Judge), Thiruvannamalai.) M. Venugopal, J. 1. The Appellant/Insurance Company has filed the present Civil Miscellaneous Appeal as against the Award dated 03.06.2014 in M.C.O.P.No.02 of 2014 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Special Subordinate Judge), Thiruvannamalai. 2. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Special Sub Court), Thiruvannamalai while passing the Impugned Award in M.C.O.P.No.2 of 2014 dated 03.06.2014 (on a Claim Petition filed by the Respondents/Claimants) had resultantly held that the Respondents are entitled to the total compensation of Rs.43,87,000/- together with interest at 7.5% per annum from the date of filing of the petition till the date of deposit with costs. 3. It transpires from the Award that the Claims ...
Dr. C. Subbaiah Vs. Sub-Inspector of Police, Kurumbur Police Station, ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Oct-12-2015
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. praying to direct the learned Judicial Magistrate, Sathankulam to consider the petitioner's surrender and recall the warrant under Section 70(2) of Cr.P.C., which was issued by learned Judicial Magistrate, Sathankulam in S.T.C.No.145 of 2005.) 1. On 09.10.2015, when the matter was called, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner, hence the matter was ordered to be posted today i.e., on 12.10.2015 under the caption 'for dismissal'. 2. Even today when the matter is called there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Hence, the Criminal Original Petition is dismissed for non prosecution....
K. Kanthasamy and Others Vs. The Superintendent of Police, Tuticorin a ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Oct-12-2015
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. praying to direct the respondents to register a case against the accused on the representation dated 11.08.2015.) 1. The petitioner has come forward with this petition seeking for a direction, to the respondents to register a case against the accused on the representation dated 11.08.2015. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has given a representation to the first respondent as early as on 11.08.2015, but, however, the first respondent police had not taken any steps to register a case and hence, the petitioner has come forward with this petition for the above stated relief. 3. At this juncture, the learned Government Advocate(Crl. Side), on instructions, would submit that based on the complaint given by the petitioner in Current Paper No.P4/36071/675/TVT/2015, petition enquiry is pending. 4. Considering the rival submission made on both sides, the respondents are directed to ex...
Karumalai and Others Vs. Kittu and Another
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Oct-12-2015
(Prayer: Second Appeal filed under section 100 of C.P.C against the judgment and decree made in A.S.No.26 of 2006 dated 04.07.2007 on the file of the Sub-Court, Mettur reversing the judgment and decree made in O.S.No.33 of 1998 dated 30.06.2006 on the file of the District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Omalur. Second Appeal filed under section 100 of C.P.C against the judgment and decree made in A.S.No.24 of 2006 dated 04.07.2007 on the file of the Sub-Court, Mettur reversing the judgment and decree made in O.S.No.106 of 1998 dated 30.06.2006 on the file of the District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Omalur.) Common Judgment: 1. S.A.No.371 of 2008 has been preferred against the decree of the lower appellate Court in A.S.No.26 of 2006 setting aside and reversing the decree of the trial Court made in O.S.No.33 of 1998. The said suit was filed by Kittu, the respondent herein against one Periya Gounder. 2. During the pendency of the suit, the said Periya Gounder died and 6 pe...
K. Rajkumar Vs. The District Collector, Thoothukudi District and Anoth ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Oct-12-2015
(Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Certiorari to call for the records relating to the proceedings of the first respondent made in U.Ni.5/1851/2013 dated 01.06.2015 and quash the same.) 1. The Writ Petition has been praying for a Writ of Certiorari to call for the records relating to the proceedings of the first respondent made in U.Ni.5/1851/2013 dated 01.06.2015 and quash the same. 2. The petitioner was elected as the President of Venkatramanjuapuram Village Panchayat. The Inspector of Panchayat / the District Collector, Thoothukudi, has initiated proceedings under Section 205(1)(a) of the Tamil Nadu Village Panchayats Act alleging that he has caused loss to the petitioner for which the impugned order came to be issued. Challenging the same, the petitioner has preferred the Writ Petition for the relief stated supra. 3. Be that as it may, a perusal of the impugned order would show that it is only a show cause notice cal...
Muthurakku and Another Vs. State rep. by the Inspector of Police, Madu ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Oct-12-2015
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. praying to direct the respondent to file the final report in Cr.No.103 of 2015 dated 03.04.2015 on the file of the respondent Police within time bound stipulated by this Hon'ble Court.) 1. The petitioner has come forward with this petition under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure, seeking a direction to the respondent to file the final report in Cr.No.103 of 2015 dated 03.04.2015 on the file of the respondent Police within time bound stipulated by this Hon'ble Court. 2. Heard the submissions made by the learned counsel appearing on either side. 3.The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that on the basis of the complaint given by the petitioner, a case has been registered in Crime No.103 of 2015 on 03.04.2015 for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 294(b), 448, 323 IPC r/w Section 4 of Tamil Nadu Women Harassment Act,. However, the respondent has not shown any interest to investigate the...
R. Visalakshi Vs. President, Kambanoor Panchayat, Tenkarai Village, Si ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Oct-12-2015
(Prayer: Writ Petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records of the respondent relating to resolution No.38 dated 3.7.2015 in respect of S.No.296/18 measuring 0.23.17 ares situated at Thenkarai Group and Village in Tirupattur Vattam and Taluk, Sivagangai District and to quash the same as illegal and void consequentially direct the respondent not to change the physical features of subject land.) 1. The writ petition has been filed praying for issuance of a writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records of the respondent-Panchayat relating to Resolution No.38 dated 3.7.2015 in respect of S.No.296/18 measuring 0.23.17 ares situated at Thenkarai Group and Village in Tirupattur Vattam and Taluk, Sivagangai District and to quash the same as illegal and void and consequentially to direct the respondent not to change the physical features of subject land. 2. The case of the petiti...
S. Jeeva Vs. The Director, Tamil Nadu Teacher Recruitment Board and An ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Oct-12-2015
(Prayer: This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the first respondent to issue Hall Ticket for the teacher's eligibility test scheduled on 12.7.2012.) 1. Heard the learned counsels appearing for the parties concerned. 2. This writ petition has been filed praying that this Court may be pleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the first respondent to issue a Hall Ticket for the Teacher's Eligibility Test, scheduled to be held on 12.7.2012. 3. At this stage of the hearing of the writ petition, the learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondents had submitted that the hall ticket for taking part in the Teacher's Eligibility Test had been issued to the petitioner and he had participated in the said test. Hence, the writ petition may be dismissed, as infructuous. 4. In view of the said submissions made by the learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondents, the writ petition s...
D. Renganayaki and Another Vs. State rep. by Inspector of Police, Madu ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Oct-12-2015
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. praying to direct the learned Judicial Magistrate, Tirumangalam to take on file the unnumbered C.C. in Crime No.20 of 2012 which is pending before the court and consequently direct the learned Judicial Magistrate, Tirumangalam to expedite the case within reasonable time period to be fixed by this Hon'ble Court.) 1. The petitioner has come forward with this petition under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure, seeking a direction to the learned Judicial Magistrate, Tirumangalam to take on file the unnumbered C.C. in Crime No.20 of 2012 which is pending before the court and consequently direct the learned Judicial Magistrate, Tirumangalam to expedite the case within reasonable time period to be fixed by this Hon'ble Court. 2. At this juncture, the learned Government Advocate (Criminal side) submits that the final report has already been filed before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Thirumangalam, in C.C.No.134 ...
K. Valli Vs. The Commissioner of Police, Madurai and Another
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Oct-12-2015
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. praying to direct the first respondent to instruct the second respondent to register a case against the proposed accused based on the petitioner's complaint dated 30.03.2015.) 1. The petitioner has come forward with this petition seeking for a direction, to the first respondent to instruct the second respondent to register a case against the proposed accused based on the petitioner's complaint dated 30.03.2015. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has given a complaint to the first respondent as early as on 30.03.2015, but, however, the second respondent police had not taken any steps to register a case and hence, the petitioner has come forward with this petition for the above stated relief. 3. At this juncture, the learned Government Advocate(Crl. Side), on instructions, would submit that based on the complaint given by the petitioner in Current paper No.156/PG/COP/Inspector/1...