Chennai Court October 2015 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Sakthivel Vs. Govindammal and Another
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Oct-28-2015
(Prayer: Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, against the fair and decreetal order dated 08.07.2015 in I.A.No.838 of 2014 in O.S.No.105 of 2014, on the file of District Munsif Court, Kulithalai.) 1. As only a short point is involved, we shall dispose of this revision today in the admission stage itself. 2. The respondents filed the suit in O.S.No.105 of 2014 in the District Munsif's Court, Kulithalai, Karur District. In the suit, they sought for injunction with respect to the property compromised in S.No.541/11 bearing door No.7/15, Service Connection, namely 050-024-377. The defendants filed written statement resisting the suit stating that they are in the suit property and in the written statement description of the suit property has been furnished. In the written statement Survey Number, Door Number and Service Connection are also given. 3. It is pertinent to note the description of property given in the suit schedule and in the description of property give...
S.M. Loganathan Vs. S. Govindaraj
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Oct-28-2015
(Prayer: Civil Revision Petition has been filed against the order dated 20.08.2015 passed in MP.No.271 of 2015 in RCA No.434 of 2015 on the file of the learned Rent Control Appellate Authority, VIII Judge, Court of Small Causes, Chennai refusing to grant stay of the order dated 03.07.2015 made in RCOP.No.121 of 2014 on the file of the learned Rent Controller, XV Judge, Court of Small Causes, Chennai.) 1. The revision petitioner is the tenant, who suffered a decree dated 03.07.2015 made in RCOP.No.121 of 2014 on the file of the learned Rent Controller, XV Judge, Court of Small Causes, Chennai, for eviction. He filed RCA.No.434 of 2015 against the aforesaid judgment and decree made in RCOP.No.121 of 2014. 2. The grievance of the revision petitioner is that pending appeal, stay was not granted. In the docket order made in MP.No.271 of 2015 in RCA.434 of 2015, only notice was ordered. Hence, the revision petitioner apprehends that the respondent would proceed with the execution proceedings...
Saradha and Others Vs. State of Tamil Nadu rep. by the Inspector of Po ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Oct-28-2015
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. praying to call for the records in Crime No.141 of 2009 dated 26.3.2009 pending on the file of the Kanyakumari Police Station, Kanyakumari District and quash the same.) 1. The petitioners have come forward with this petition seeking for a direction, to call for the records in Crime No.141 of 2009 dated 26.3.2009 pending on the file of the Kanyakumari Police Station, Kanyakumari District and quash the same. 2. The report which shows that final report has been filed on 11.01.2010 and the same was taken on file in C.C.No.14 of 2014 and the case was posted to 17.11.2015. 3. Recording the same, this Criminal Original Petition ia dismissed. Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous petitions are also dismissed....
Sundar @ Sundaravel and Another Vs. State rep. by The Inspector of Pol ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Oct-28-2015
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. praying to direct the III Additional District and Sessions Judge (PCR Act), Madurai to consider the bail application to be filed by the petitioner on the same day of his surrender in Cr.No.311 of 2015 on the file of the respondent police.) 1. Heard both sides. 2. The petitioner, who apprehends arrest for the offences punishable under Sections 323, 324 and 506(ii) IPC r/w Section 3(1)(x) SC/ST in Crime No.311 of 2015 on the file of the respondent police, move this petition seeking a direction to the learned III Additional District and Sessions Judge (PCR Act), Madurai, to accept the surrender of the petitioner and consider his bail application on the same day on merits, in relating to Crime No.311 of 2015. 3. Perused the records. 4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) submits that the injured has been discharged from the hospital. 5. The offences complained of, other than the offence under the Special enac...
Tvl.R.S. Enterprises, Rep. by its Partner Thiru.S.Dinakaran, Tuticorin ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Oct-28-2015
(Prayer: Writ Petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified mandamus to call for the records relating to the proceedings of the third respondent issued in TIN:33375862859/2011-12, dated 25.05.2015, and quash the same and to direct the third respondent to consider the objections filed by the petitioner on 17.06.2015 and further objections on 29.09.2015 accord a personal hearing after issuing notice and then to pass such fresh order if any for the assessment year 2011-2012.) 1. The writ petition has been filed praying for a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the impugned proceedings of the third respondent in TIN:33375862859/2011-12, dated 25.09.2015, and quash the same and further to direct the third respondent to consider the objections filed by the petitioner on 17.06.2015 and further objections on 29.09.2015 and accord a personal hearing, after issuing notice and then to pass such fresh order, if any, for the ...
A. Yesappan Vs. The Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Madurai) L ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Oct-28-2015
(Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to settle retirement benefits of the petitioner including gratuity, the commuted value of pension, leave salary and all other attendant benefits with interest at the rate of 18% per annum within the time that may be stipulated by this Court and further directing the respondents to pay interest at the rate of 18% per annum for the belated payment of the provident fund and social security scheme arrears within the time limit that may be fixed by this Court.) Common Order: 1. The prayer in these Writ Petitions are for issuance of a Mandamus to direct the respondents to pay retirement benefits with interest to the petitioners in view of their respective representations. 2. Mr.A.P.Muthupandian, learned Standing Counsel takes notice for the respondents. 3. It is stated that though the petitioners was allowed to retire from the service of the respond...
C.N. Kumar Vs. The Director General of Police, Chennai and Others
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Oct-28-2015
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. praying to direct the third respondent to complete the investigation by way of register a case on the basis of the order issued by this Court dated 13.04.2013 in Crl.O.P. (MD) No. 3754 of 2013.) 1. The petitioner has come forward with this petition seeking for a direction, to the third respondent to complete the investigation by way of register a case on the basis of the order issued by this Court dated 13.04.2013 in Crl.O.P. (MD)No.3754 of 2013. 2. When the matter is taken up for hearing the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side), appearing for the respondents 1 to 3 submits that as per the order of this Court dated 13.04.2013 an enquiry has been conducted and the same has been closed on 09.09.2014. 3. Recording the submission of the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side), this Criminal Original Petition is closed....
A. Perumal and Another Vs. State of Tamil Nadu and Others
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Oct-28-2015
(Prayer: Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to pass an order of regularization by considering the petitioner's representation, dated 09.05.2015.) 1. The Writ Petitions have been filed by Mr.A.Perumal and Ms..Petchiammal, respectively in W.P.(MD)Nos.19245 and 19399 of 2015, seeking a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to pass an order of regularization of their services, by considering their representations, dated 09.05.2015, since both of them have rendered more than 25 years of service. 2. Mr.T.S.Mohammed Mohideen, learned Additional Government Pleader takes notice for the respondents. 3. Tmt.A.Petchiammal, the petitioner in W.P.(MD)No.19399 of 2015 was appointed as a Sweeper / Sanitary Worker on 11.07.1990, by order of appointment, dated 09.07.1990, through the Employment Exchange, on daily wages basis. At the time of appointment, she was given Rs.18/- on daily rated basis. 4. Mr....
G.D. Nataraja Prabhu Vs. The Employees' State Insurance Corporation, R ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Oct-28-2015
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. praying to quash the private complaint preferred by the first respondent/complainant in S.T.C.No.1150 of 2009 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.VI, Madurai, as against the petitioner.) 1. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition. He has also made an endorsement to that effect. 2. In view of the endorsement, made by the learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner, this petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous petitions are also dismissed....
Basherulla Kuk Vs. State by the Inspector of Police, Thanjavur Distric ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Oct-28-2015
(Prayer:Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. praying to call for the records connected to S.C.No.151 of 2006 on the file of the Sessions Court, Thanjavur and quash the same.) 1. On 27.10.2015, when the matter was called, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner, hence the matter was ordered to be posted today i.e., on 28.10.2015 under the caption 'for dismissal'. 2. Even today when the matter is called there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Hence, the Criminal Original Petition is dismissed for non prosecution....
- ‹ Prev
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- Next ›
- Last »