Chennai Court January 2015 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
The Management Vs. The Presiding
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-12-2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 15.10.2009 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.CHANDRU W.P.NO.33879 OF2006(O.A.NO.5695 OF1998 Dr.T.Lakshmipathi .Petitioner versus 1.The State of Tamilnadu rep. By its Secretary, Health and Family Welfare, Fort St. George, Chennai-9. 2.The Secretary, Finance (Pension).Fort St. George, Chennai-9 .Respondents This writ petition is preferred under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issue of a writ of certiorarified mandamus to call for the records relating to Rule 27 of the Pension Rules, to quash the same insofar as the applicant is concerned has having force only prospectively i.e.1.1.79 and consequently extend revised pensionary benefits to the applicant applying Article 404 AA of the Pension Code and extend all benefits both arrears and prospective. For Petitioner : Mr.L.Chandrakumar For Respondents : Mr.R.Neelakandan, GA - - - - ORDER Heard both sides. 2.The petitioner was a retired Additional Professor of Surgery ...
Rural Development Vs. The Director General
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-12-2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 14.10.2009 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.CHANDRU W.P.NO.36264 OF2006(O.A.NO.7557 OF1998 S.Retna Bai .Petitioner versus 1.The Government of Tamil Nadu, represented by the Secretary to Government, Social Welfare Department, Fort St. George, Chennai-600 005. 2.The Director of Social Welfare and Nutritious Meal Programme, Chennai-600 005.Respondents This writ petition has been preferred under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issue of a writ of certiorari to call for the records relating to the impugned order of the second respondent in Roc No.12527/C2/93, dated 30.04.1997 and to quash the same and to grant all consequential benefits to the applicant. For Petitioners : Mr.P.Mohanraj For Respondents : Mr.R.Neelakantan, GA - - - - ORDER The petitioner was working as a Rural Welfare Officer (Women) in Agastheeswaram Panchayat Union. After her retirement, she filed O.A.No.7557 of 1998, challenging the order passed by ...
Devarajan Vs. 1.The State of Tamil Nadu,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-12-2015
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED :12. 01.2015 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.SATHYANARAYANAN Crl.R.C(MD)No.1563 of 2003 Devarajan ... Appellant/P.W.1/P.W.1 Vs. 1.The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by the Sub-Inspector of Police, Sri Rangam Police Station, Sri Rangam. (Crime No.203 of 2000) 2.Premkumari 3.Karuppannan 4.Ponnusamy 5.Selvam @ Kabadi Selvam 6.Selvam @ Avankur Selvam @ Selvaraj ... Respondents/Appellants/A.1 to A.5 Prayer:- Criminal Revision Case filed under Section 397 r/w 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, against the judgment, dated 09.09.2003 in C.A.No.80 of 2002 on the file of the Additional District cum Sessions Judge (Trichy), Fast Track Court No.2, Trichy, reversing the Judgment, dated 03.07.2002 in C.C.No.404 of 2000 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate No.3, Trichy. !For Appellant : Mr.M.Subash Babu ^For R ?. 1 : Mr.P.Kandasamy Government Advocate (Crl.Side) For RR2to 5 : Mr.M.Ajmal Khan for M/s.Ajmal Associates :JUDGMENT The revision petitio...
T.Mohan Vs. 1.The Superintendent of Police,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-09-2015
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:09. 01.2015 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.RAJENDRAN W.P.(MD)No.281 of 2015 T.Mohan : Petitioner Vs 1.The Superintendent of Police, Tirunelveli District, Tirunelveli. 2.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Alangulam Taluk, Tirunelveli District. 3.The Inspector of Police, Pavoorchathiram Police Station, Tirunelveli District. : Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issue of a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to grant permission to conduct the Kabadi competition in District Level scheduled on 17.01.2015 and 18.01.2015 at Chithiraiputhiranur, Pethanadarpatti, Alangulam Taluk, Thoothukudi District by considering the petitioner's representation dated 24.12.2014. !For Petitioner : M/s.G.K.Karnan For Respondents : Mr.R.Karthikeyan Additional Government Pleader :ORDER Mr.R.Karthikeyan, learned Additional Government Pleader, takes notice for the respondents. By consent, th...
A.Irudhayara Vs. 1.The Principal Secretary and Commissioner of
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-09-2015
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 09.01.2015 CORAM THE HONOURBLE MR.JUSTICE B.RAJENDRAN W.P(MD).Nos.295 of 2015 and W.P(MD).Nos.330 of 2015 and M.P.(MD).Nos.1 and 2 of 2015 **** A.Irudhayaraj ..Petitioner in W.P.(MD).No.295/2015 rep.by his Power of Attroney, A.Marimuthupillai, Sivagangai District. Balamurugan ..Petitioner in W.P.(MD).No.330/2015 versus 1.The Principal Secretary and Commissioner of Land Administration, Government of Tamil Nadu, Chepauk, Chennai. 2.The Inspector General of Registration, No.100, Santhome High Road, Chennai-28. 3.The District Collector, Sivaganga District, Sivaganga. 4.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Devakkottai, Karaikudi Taluk, Sivaganga District. 5.The District Registrar, Karaikudi, Sivagangai District. 6.The Sub-Registrar, Karaikudi, Sivagangai District..Respondents in both W.Ps W.P.(MD).No.295 of 2015 Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus ca...
R.G.Raj Vs. 1.Meenakshi
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-09-2015
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 09.01.2015 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.SATHYANARAYANAN Crl.R.C.(MD)No.495 of 2014 and M.P.(MD)No.1 of 2014 R.G.Raj ..Petitioner versus 1.Meenakshi 2.Minor Gokul Nandhan 3.Minor Rahul Nandhan (Respondents 2 and 3 are minORS.represented by their mother and natural guardian, the fiRs.respondent herein)..Respondents Petition filed under Section 397 r/w 401 of the Criminal Procedure Code, to call for the records and set aside the order passed by the Judicial Magistrate Court, Sivakasi in M.C.No.13 of 2013 dated 11.03.2014. !For Petitioner : Mr.G.Marimuthu ^For Respondents : Mr.S.Selvakumar :ORDER By consent, the Criminal Revision Case itself is taken up for final disposal. 2.The petitioner is the husband of the fiRs.respondent and father of respondents 2 and 3, minor children. The fiRs.respondent herein has filed M.C.No.13 of 2013 under Section 125 Cr.P.C., claiming maintenance of Rs.30,000/- per month. 3.The trial Court, after con...
Mahesh .. Rev Vs. State
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-09-2015
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:09. 01.2015 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.SATHYANARAYANAN Crl.R.C.(MD)NO.581 of 2008 Mahesh .. Revision Petitioner Vs. State Inspector of Police Kayathar Police Station Crime No.110 of 2006 Tuticorin District. .. Respondent Prayer: Criminal Revision Petition filed under Section 397 r/w 401 Cr.P.C., against the judgment passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court, No.11, Tuticorin District in C.A.No.131 of 2007 dated 10.04.2008, confirming the conviction of the Judicial Magistrate, No.II, Kovilpatti, in C.C.No.134 of 2006 dated 16.10.2007. !For Petitioner :: Mr.V.Kathirvelu Senior counsel for Mr.K.Prabhu ^For Respondent :: Mr.P.Kandasamy Govt. Advocate (Crl. side) :ORDER The Revision Petitioner is the accused in C.C.No.134 of 2006 on the file of the Court of Judicial Magistrate No.II, Kovilpatti and he stood charged and tried for the commission of the offence under Section 304A of IPC. The trial Court vide judgment da...
1. Sorattaiyan Vs. The State
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-09-2015
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED :09. 01.2015 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.SATHYANARAYANAN Criminal Appeal (MD)No.227 of 2007 1. Sorattaiyan 2. Selvam 3. Veeran 4. Manthaiyan 5. Thiraviyam ... Appellants/ Accused No.1 to 5 Vs. The State through the Inspector of Police, Oomatchikulam Police Station, Madurai District. Crime No.423 of 1997. ... Respondent/ Complainant Prayer : Appeal filed under Section 374 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, against the judgment and conviction passed by the learned Additional District and Sessions Judge, F.T.C. No.II, Madurai in S.C.No.573 of 2006, dated 07.03.2007. !For Appellants : Mr.M.Subash Babu ^For Respondent/State : Mrs.S.Prabha Government Advocate (Crl.Side) :JUDGMENT The appellants are arrayed as A.1 to A.5 in S.C.No.573 of 2006 on the file of the Court of Additional District and Sessions Judge/ Fast Track Court No.II, Madurai. They are stood charged, tried and convicted as follows: Accused Charges A.1 to A.5 147, 148, 34...
1.Sakthivel Vs. State Rep. By
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-09-2015
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 09.01.2015 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.SELVAM and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.MATHIVANAN CRIMINAL APPEAL(MD)No.282 of 2014 and MISCELLANEOUS PETITION(MD)No.1 of 2014 1.Sakthivel 2.Sivakumar .Appellants/ Accused 1 & 2 versus State rep. by The Inspector of Police, Ganesh Nagar Police Station, Pudukkottai, Pudukkottai District. (Crime No.399 of 2013).Respondent/ Complainant Criminal appeal is filed under Section 374(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, against the Judgment dated 20.08.2014 passed in Sessions Case No.134 of 2013 by the District and Sessions Judge, Mahila Court, Pudukkottai. !For Appellants : Mr.R.P.Ramachanthiran ^For Respondent : Mr.C.Ramesh, Addl. Public Prosecutor. :JUDGMENT (Judgment of the Court was made by A.SELVAM, J.This Criminal Appeal has been directed against the convictions and sentences passed in Sessions Case No.134 of 2013 by the Mahila Court, Pudukkottai. 2.The schema of the case of the pros...
Prathaba K.Govindaraj Naicker Vs. 1.The Joint Commissioner, Hr and Ce
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-09-2015
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED :09.01.2015 CORAM THE HON'BLE Ms.JUSTICE K.B.K.VASUKI WP.(Md.No.5144 of 2012 and MP.Nos.2 and 3 of 2012 and 2 of 2014 Prathaba K.Govindaraj Naicker ..Petitioner versus 1.The Joint Commissioner, HR & CE Office of the Joint Commissioner, HR& CE, Thanjavur District. 2.The Executive Officer, Arulmighu Keerthieswaraswami Temple, Sodamangalam, Papanasam Taluk, Tanjore District. 3.The Fit Person (Thakkar) Arulmighu Azhakiya Nachiamman Thirukoil, Manojiyappa Chavadi, Ayyampettai (Post) Papanasam Taluk, Tanjore District. 4.Ayyampettai Manojiappa Chavadi Sr.Alagia Nachiamman Temple by Hereditary Trustee, Purushothaman Poosari, Manojiappa Chavadi, Ayyampettai Post, Papanasam Taluk, Thanjavur District. R4 impleaded as per the order of this court dated 14.11.2014 in MP.No.1/2014 ..Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of The Constitution of India praying this Court to issue a Writ of certiorari, to call for the records relating to the ...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »