Skip to content

Chennai Court January 2015 Judgments

Browse smarter

Open an 18-section brief on any judgment

Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.

  • AI Brief & Ask
  • Semantic AI Search
  • Devil's Bench

Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.

Jan 19 2015

E.Jeya Sekar Elisha Vs. 1.The Director of Elementary Education,

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Jan-19-2015

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 19.01.2015 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAVICHANDRABAABU W.P.(MD)No.57 of 2013 E.Jeya Sekar Elisha ..Petitioner versus 1.The Director of Elementary Education, Chennai-6. 2.The District Elementary Educational Officer, Tirunelveli, Tirunelveli District. 3.The Assistant Elementary Educational Officer, Cheranmahadevi, Tirunelveli District. 4.The Correspondent, C.M.S.Evangelical Schools, Idayankulam & Kandithankulam Pastorates at Pannankulam, Nanguneri Taluk, Tirunelveli District..Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records pertaining to the order passed by the second respondent in his Proceedings in Mu.Mu.No.3221/A3/2008 dated 27.07.2012 and quash the same, and direct the respondents to approve the appointment of the petitioner as a Headmaster of Elementary School from 03.10.2001 to 31.03.2003 in the scale of pay of ...


Jan 19 2015

Jayaraj Vs. The State Represented By

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Jan-19-2015

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED :19. 01.2015 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.SATHYANARAYANAN Criminal Revision Case (MD)No.431 of 2012 Jayaraj ... Petitioner/ Accused Vs. The State represented by The Sub Inspector of Police, Aruppukkottai Town Police Station, Aruppukkottai. ... Respondent/ Complainant Prayer : Revision filed under Section 397 read with Section 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, to set aside the order passed by the learned Principal Sessions Judge, Virudhunagar District at Srivilliputtur, in Crl.A.No.192 of 2008, dated 15.09.2012, confirming the order passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate, Aruppukkottai, in C.C.No.45 of 2007, dated 23.09.2008. !For Petitioner : Mr.S.I.A.Bagadur Sha ^For Respondent : Mr.P.Kandasamy, Government Advocate (Criminal Side) :ORDER The revision petitioner is the sole accused in C.C.No.45 of 2007 on the file of the Court of Judicial Magistrate, Aruppukkottai and he stood, charged, tried and convicted by the Court of...


Jan 19 2015

R.M.Regitha Vs. Ligori Valan

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Jan-19-2015

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED :19. 01.2015 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.SATHYANARAYANAN. Crl.R.C(MD)No.473 of 2014 and M.P(MD)No.1 of 2014 R.M.Regitha ... Petitioner Vs Ligori Valan ... Respondent Prayer: Civil Revision Case filed under Section 397 read with 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, to call for the records relating to the order dated 10.09.2013 made in Crl.M.P.No.5285 of 2014 in C.C.No.215 of 2013 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate, Fast Track No.1, Nagercoil and set aside the same and consequently, allow the Crl.M.P.No.5285 of 2014 in C.C.No.215 of 2013 on the file of Judicial Magistrate, Fast Track No.1, Nagercoil. !For Petitioner : Mr.E.V.N.Siva ^For Respondent : Mr.B.Tamil Nidhi :ORDER By consent the revision itself is taken up for final disposal.2. The accused in C.C.No.215 of 2013 pending on the file of the Court of Judicial Magistrate, Fast Trac No.I, at Nagercoil, Kanyakumari District, is the petitioner herein and he is arrayed as an...


Jan 19 2015

1.R.Royal Mary (Died) Vs. 1.The State of Tamil Nadu,

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Jan-19-2015

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:19. 01.2015 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE V.M.VELUMANI W.P.(MD)No.697 of 2009 & M.P.(MD) No.1 of 2009 1.R.Royal Mary (Died) 2.Rev.C.Gnanadhasan 3.G.R.Gnanaraja 4.G.R.Gnanaking .. Petitioners (Petitioners 2 to 4 substituted as LRs. of the deceased first petitioner as per the order of this Court, dated 17.11.2014, made in M.P.(MD) No.1 of 2014) Vs. 1.The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by its Secretary, Department of School Education, Fort St. George, Chennai - 600 009. 2.The Director of School Education, College Road, Chennai - 600 006. 3.The Chief Educational Officer, Nagercoil - 629 001, Kanyakumari District. 4.The District Educational Officer, Kuzhithurai at Marthandam, Kanyakumari District. 5.The Corporate Manager, CSI Diocese Schools, CSI Diocese of Kanyakumari District, Nagercoil, Kanyakumari District. 6.The Correspondent, L.M.S. Girls Higher Secondary School, Marthandam, Kanyakumari District. 7.The Correspondent, L.M.S. Higher Secon...


Jan 13 2015

Sankarapandian Vs. The State Represented By

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Jan-13-2015

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED :13. 01.2015 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.SATHYANARAYANAN Criminal Appeal (MD)No.434 of 2007 Sankarapandian ... Appellant/ Accused Vs. The State represented by The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Tuticorin Rural. (Cr.No.95 of 2004) of Murappanadu Police Station, Tuticorin District. ... Respondent/ Complainant Prayer : Appeal filed under Section 374 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, against the judgment passed in S.C.No.10 of 2005, dated 16.07.2007, by the II Additional Sessions Judge, Tirunelveli, Tirunelveli District. !For Appellant : Mr.V.Kathirvelu, Senior Counsel for Mr.K.Prabhu ^For Respondent : Mrs.S.Prabha, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) :JUDGMENT The sole accused in S.C.No.10 of 2005 on the file of the Court of II Additional Sessions Judge, Tirunelveli, Tirunelveli District, stood, charged and tried for the commission of the offences under Sections 341 and 326 I.P.C. and also under Sections 3(1)(x) and 3(2)(v) of the Sc...


Jan 13 2015

Murugan Vs. 1.The Superintendent of Police,

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Jan-13-2015

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:13. 01.2015 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.RAJENDRAN W.P.(MD)No.424 of 2015 Murugan : Petitioner Vs 1.The Superintendent of Police, Tirunelveli District, Tirunelveli. 2.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Tenkasi, Tirunelveli District. 3.The Inspector of Police, Puliyarai Police Station, Puliyarai Tirunelveli District. 4.The Sub-Inspector of Police, Puliyarai Police Station, Puliyarai Tirunelveli District. : Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issue of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records pertaining to the impugned order dated 31.12.2014 in C.NO.6/F30/Pro/2014 on the file of the 3rd respondent and quash the same as illegal and consequently for a direction directing the respondents to grant permission to conduct the "Kabaadi Match" on 24.01.2015 at Poolankudieruppu Puliyarai Post, Senkottai Taluk Tirunelveli District and to provide sufficient protect...


Jan 13 2015

Tamil Nadu Electricity Board Vs. The Tamill Nadu Electricity Board

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Jan-13-2015

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:13. 10.2009 C O R A M THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.CHANDRU Writ Petition Nos.37254 and 34110 of 2006 (O.A.Nos.5052 and 5420 of 1998) V.D.Singaravelu .. PETITIONER in both the Writ Petitions. Vs 1.The Superintendent of Police, Chengai (East) District, ST.Thomas Mount, Chennai-16. 2.The Deputy Inspector-General of Police, Chengai Range, Teynampet, Chennai-18. .. Respondents in W.P.No.37254/2006 3.The State of Tamil Nadu rep. By its Secretary to Government, Home (Police II) Department, Fort St. George, Chennai 600 009. 4.The Director General of Police, Admirality House, Chennai 600 002 ..Respondents in W.P.34110/2006 ------ Prayer in W.P.No.37254/2006:-This writ petition has been originally filed before the Tamil Nadu Administrative Tribunal s O.A.No.5052 of 1998 and transferred to this Court and renumbered as W.P.No.37254 of 2006 under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a writ of Certiorari to call for the records on the file ...


Jan 13 2015

S.Karunanidhi Vs. 1. the Cabinet Secretary,

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Jan-13-2015

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED :13. 01.2015 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.DHANAPALAN AND THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE V. M. VELUMANI W.P.(MD) No.17924 OF2014S.Karunanidhi ...Petitioner vs.1. The Cabinet Secretary, Union of India, Cabinet Secretariat, Rashtrapathi Bhavan, New Delhi ?. 110 001.2. The Chief Secretary, Govt. of Tamilnadu, Chief Secretariat, Tamil Nadu State Assembly Complex, Chennai ?.2.3. The Secretary, Public (Gen) Department, Govt. of Tamilnadu, Chief Secretariat, Tamil Nadu State Assembly Complex, Chennai ?.2.4. The Secretary, Public (General I) Department, Govt. of Tamilnadu, Chief Secretariat, Tamil Nadu State Assembly Complex, Chennai ?.2. 5. The Secretary, Tamil Nadu Public Information Department, Tamilarasu Office (Tamil Nadu Film Division), Chennai ?.2.6. The Secretary/President, Tamil Nadu Govt. Cable Corporation, Dugar Towers, 34, 123 (6th Floor) Marshalls Road, Egmore, Chennai 600 009.7. Selvi J.Jayalalitha, D/o. (Late) Jayaram, General S...


Jan 13 2015

Manimuthu Vs. 1.The Inspector of Police,2.Kaliammal

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Jan-13-2015

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 13.01.2015 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.T.SELVAM CRL.O.P.(MD)No.478 of 2015 and M.P.(Md.No.1 of 2015 Manimuthu .Petitioner .Vs .1.The Inspector of Police, Vattathikottai Police Station, Pattukottai Taluk, Thanjavur District. 2.Kaliammal .Respondents Criminal Original Petition filed under section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, praying to call for the records in Crime No.105 of 2014 on the file of 1st respondent and to quash the same. !For Petitioner : Mr.S.Chellapandian For 1st Respondent : Mr.K.Anbarasan Government Advocate (Crl. Side) :ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this Criminal Original Petition. He has also made an endorsement to that effect. 2.In view of the same, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. However, the respondent police is to take note of the position that arrest of accused is not to be resorted to as a matter of course. Again in the ...


Jan 12 2015

Muthupandi Vs. The State Represented By

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Jan-12-2015

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED :12. 01.2015 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.SATHYANARAYANAN Criminal Appeal (MD)No.169 of 2007 Muthupandi ... Appellant/ Accused Vs. The State represented by The Inspector of Police, Jegathapattinam, Pudukkottai District. (Cr.No.1 of 2006) ... Respondent/ Complainant Prayer : Appeal filed under Section 374 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, against the judgment passed in S.C.No.97 of 2006, dated 26.02.2007, by the Principal District and Sessions Court, Pudukkottai. !For Appellant : Mr.K.Baalasundaram ^For Respondent : Mr.P.Kandasamy, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) :JUDGMENT The appellant is the sole accused in S.C.No.97 of 2006 on the file of the Court of Principal District and Sessions Judge, Pudukkottai and he was charged for the offence under Section 302 I.P.C. for having murdered one Kottaiyan. The trial Court, vide judgment dated 26.02.2007, has convicted him for the commission of the offence under Section 304(ii) I.P.C and se...


  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial