Chennai Court January 2015 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
S.M.Ramiah Vs. 1.The Assistant Superintendent of Police,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-20-2015
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 20.01.2015 CORAM THE HONOURBLE MR.JUSTICE B.RAJENDRAN W.P(MD).No.472 of 2015 S.M.Ramiah ..Petitioner versus 1.The Assistant Superintendent of police, Tenkasi Taluk Tirunelveli District. 2.The Inspector of Police, Achanpudur Police Station, Achanpudur Tenkasi Taluk Tirunelveli District..Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records relating to the impugned order dated 06.01.2015 passed by the 2nd respondent and quash the same as illegal and subsequently directing the 2nd respondent to grant permission and necessary protection to the Minnoli Kapadi Tournament to be held on 26.01.2015 and 27.01.2015 at Sundarapandiyapuram Village, Tenkasi, Tirunelveli District. !For petitioner : Mr.P.Subbaraj ^For Respondents : R.Karthikeyan Addl. Government Pleader :ORDER The petitioner sought for permission to conduct Kabadi Tournament o...
1.Thannasi Vs. 1.State Represented By
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-20-2015
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 20.01.2015 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.T.SELVAM CRL.O.P.(MD)No.21968 of 2014 and M.P.(Md.No.1 of 2015 1.Thannasi 2.Karthik .Petitioners/Accused Nos.1 & 2 .Vs .1.State Represented by The Inspector of Police, Palayamkottai Police Station, Tirunelveli District.1st Respondent/Complainant 2.T.Subramanian .2nd Respondent/Defacto Complainant Criminal Original Petition filed under section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, praying to call for the records pertaining to the FiRs.Information Report in Crime No.1056 of 2013 dated 19.11.2013 on the file of the Respondent No.1 and to quash the same as illegal. !For Petitioner : Mr.K.Sivabalan For 1st Respondent : Mr.K.Anbarasan Government Advocate (Crl. Side) - - - - - :ORDER The petitioner seeks to quash the FIR registered in Cr.No.1056 of 2013 on the file of the 1st respondent. 2.Perusal of the F.I.R in this case prima facie informs of the commission of offence by the petitioneRs.3.In the...
1.Rajathi Vs. 1.The State Rep. By
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-20-2015
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 20.01.2015 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.T.SELVAM CRL.O.P.(MD)No.21736 of 2013 and M.P.(MD).No.2 of 2013 1.Rajathi 2.Chinnaraj @ Rengasamy .PetitioneRs.Accused 1 & 6 .Vs .1.The State rep. by The Inspector of Police, Tirumangalam Taluk Police Station, Madurai District...Respondent/Complainant (Crime No.5 of 2014) 2.Nagarajan .Respondent/Defacto Complainant Criminal Original Petition filed under section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, to call for the records relating to the FIR in Cr.No.5 of 2013 on the file of the 1st respondent and quash the same. !For Petitioner : Mr.S.K.Patturaja ^For R-1 : Mr.K.Anbarasan Government Advocate(Crl. Side) :ORDER The petitioner seeks to quash the FIR registered in Cr.No.5 of 2013 on the file of the 1st respondent. 2.Perusal of the F.I.R in this case prima facie informs of the commission of offence also by the petitioner. 3.In the circumstances, truth or otherwise of the F.I.R allegations are th...
Karuppaiah Vs. 1) the Special Commissioner
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-20-2015
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:20. 01.2015 CORAM THE HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE K.RAVICHANDRABAABU W.P.(MD)No.428 of 2013 Karuppaiah ... Petitioner Vs. 1) The Special Commissioner Commissioner for Revenue Administration, Chepauk, Chennai. 2) The District Collector, Sivaganga District, Sivaganga. 3) The District Revenue Officer, Sivaganga Sivaganga District. 4) The Revenue Divisional Officer, Devakkottai, Sivaganga District. ... Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents herein to regularize the services of the petitioner pursuant to Government orders G.O.Ms.No.292 dated 31/03/1987 and G.O.Ms.No.128 dated 21/02/2006 and G.O.Ms.No.22 dated 28/02/2006 by revoking the suspension order of the 1st respondent in Roc.B2/250/2010 dated 13/01/2010 and treat the period of suspension as continuous period of service. !For Petitioner : Mr.R.Sundarsrinivasan ^For Respondents : Mr.D.Murug...
1.Chandru Vs. State Represented By
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-20-2015
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 20.01.2015 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.SATHYANARAYANAN Criminal Appeal Nos.1832 of 2003 Criminal Appeal Nos.280 of 2004 and 18 of 2006 1.Chandru 2.Murugan ..Appellants in Crl.A.No.1832 of 2003/Accused 2 and 4 3.Saravanan ..Appellant in Crl.A(MD)No.280 of 2004/A.1 4.M.Jeyapaul ..Appellant in Crl.A(MD)No.18 of 2006/A.3 versus State represented by The Inspector of Police, Avaniapuram Police Station, Madurai. (Crime No.535 of 1998)..Respondent in Crl.As./ Complainant Prayer Criminal Appeals filed under Section 374(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, against the judgment and conviction passed by the learned Additional District and Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court No.III, Madurai in S.C.No.297 of 2002, dated 24.11.2003. !For FiRs.Appellant in : Mr.M.Thirunavukkarasu Crl.A.No.1832 of 2003 For Second Appellant in : Mr.A.Jeyaram Crl.A(MD)No.1832 of 2003 ^For Appellant in : Mr.K.Sivabalan Crl.A(MD)No.280 of 2004 For Appellant in : Mr....
Sembu Harinath Vs. The Deputy General Manager,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-20-2015
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:20. 01.2015 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE V.M.VELUMANI W.P.(MD)No.8457 of 2012 & M.P.(MD) Nos.1 of 2012 & 1 of 2013 Sembu Harinath .. Petitioner Vs. The Deputy General Manager, Bank of Baroda, Third Floor, 82, Bank Road, Coimbatore. .. Respondent Prayer This Writ Petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, forbearing the respondent from proceeding with the departmental proceedings pursuant to charge sheet in No.RO:TN:VIG:48:5, dated 14.05.2012, during the pendency of parallel Criminal Case in C.C.No.234 of 2011 on the file of learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Madurai. !For Petitioner : Mr.Veera Kathiravan For Respondent : Mr.Pala.Ramasamy :ORDER This Writ Petition has been filed forbearing the respondent from proceeding with the departmental proceedings pursuant to charge sheet in No.RO:TN:VIG:48:5, dated 14.05.2012, during the pendency of parallel Criminal Case in C.C...
Sri Sathya Educational Cultural Vs. The Joint Commissioner
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-19-2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 14.10.2009 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.CHANDRU W.P.NO.36264 OF2006(O.A.NO.7557 OF1998 S.Retna Bai .Petitioner versus 1.The Government of Tamil Nadu, represented by the Secretary to Government, Social Welfare Department, Fort St. George, Chennai-600 005. 2.The Director of Social Welfare and Nutritious Meal Programme, Chennai-600 005.Respondents This writ petition has been preferred under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issue of a writ of certiorari to call for the records relating to the impugned order of the second respondent in Roc No.12527/C2/93, dated 30.04.1997 and to quash the same and to grant all consequential benefits to the applicant. For Petitioners : Mr.P.Mohanraj For Respondents : Mr.R.Neelakantan, GA - - - - ORDER The petitioner was working as a Rural Welfare Officer (Women) in Agastheeswaram Panchayat Union. After her retirement, she filed O.A.No.7557 of 1998, challenging the order passed by ...
Chendrayammal Vs. 1.The Revenue Divisional officer - Cum -
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-19-2015
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED :19. 01.2015 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.SATHYANARAYANAN Criminal Revision Case (MD)No.444 of 2014 and M.P(MD)No.1 of 2014 Chendrayammal ... Petitioner/ Respondent Vs. 1.The Revenue Divisional Officer - cum - Sub Divisional Magistrate, Periyakulam. ... 1st Respondent 2.Kasim Rowther ... 2nd Respondent/ Petitioner Prayer : Revision filed under Section 397 read with Section 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, to set aside the order passed by the first respondent in M.C.No.3216/2012/A4, dated 06.01.2014. !For Petitioner : Mr.K.Appadurai ^For Respondents : Mr.P.Kandasamy, Govt. Advocate (Crl.Side) for R.1 Mr.K.K.Samy for R.2 :ORDER The revision petitioner is the respondent in M.C.No.3216/2012/A4 on the file of the first respondent and aggrieved by the restraint order passed in the said proceedings dated 06.01.2014, she has filed this Criminal Revision Case.2. According to the second respondent, the lands admeasuring 3 acres and 1...
R.Bhuvaneswari Vs. 1.The Chairman,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-19-2015
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 19.01.2015 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAVICHANDRA BAABU W.P.(MD)No.180 of 2015 R.Bhuvaneswari ..Petitioner versus 1.The Chairman, Tamil Nadu Generation and Distribution Corporation Limited (TANGEDCO).Anna Salai, Chennai. 2.The Chief Engineer (Personnel).Tamil Nadu Generation and Distribution Corporation Limited (TANGEDCO).Anna Salai, Chennai. 3.The Superintending Engineer, Tamil Nadu Generation and Distribution Corporation Limited (TANGEDCO).Tirunelveli Distribution Circle, Tirunelveli..Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records of the impugned order passed by the 3rd respondent in his proceedings letter No.030396/421/c.ep.m/ep.gp.3/c.3/nfh.thhpR ntiy/ 2014 dated 20.11.2014 and quash the same as illegal and consequently direct the respondents to provide suitable appointment on compassionate ground to the petit...
Joseph Vs. State Represented By
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-19-2015
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:19. 01.2015 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.SATHYANARAYANAN Crl.R.C.(MD)NO.465 of 2014 and M.P.(MD)No.1 of 2014 Joseph .. Petitioner/Petitioner Vs. State represented by The Inspector of Police, Devadanapatti Police Station, Theni District. (Crime NO.48 of 2009) .. Respondent/Complainant Prayer: Criminal Revision Petition filed under Section 397 r/w 401 Cr.P.C., to call for the entire records relating to the order of the Additional District and Sessions Judge, Theni at Periyakulam dated 23.09.2014 in Crl.M.P.No.138 of 2014 in S.C.No.45 of 2012 dismissing the reinvestigation petition filed by the petitioner and set aside the same. !For Petitioner :: Mr.A.K.Azhagarsamy ^For Respondent :: Mr.P.Kandasamy Government Advocate (Crl.Side) :ORDER The revision petitioner claims to be the elder brother of the deceased viz., Albonse and he has filed a petition in Cr.M.P.No.138 of 2014 under Section 173(8) of the Code of Criminal Procedure for re...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »