Chennai Court January 2015 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Uma Maheswari Vs. The Chairman and Managing Director
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-06-2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED :30. 09.2009 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.CHOCKALINGAM AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUBBIAH O.S.A.Nos.264 &265 of 2004 Capt. K.P.Rajagopal, B-11, Fort Indraprastha, 18-A, Kalakshetra Road, Thiruvanmiyur, Chennai 600 041. .. Appellant in OSA.264/2004 Capt. S.Rajasekar, J-14, Plot No.1569, 13th Main Road, Anna Nagar, Chennai 600 040 ..Appellant in OSA.265/2004 Vs. M.Ravindran, Senior Advocate, Administrator, Anubhav Group Companies, (In Liquidation) .. Respondents These appeals have been preferred under Order XXXVI Rule 11 of O.S. Rules r/w Clause 15 of Letters Patent as against the order passed by the learned single Judge in C.A.Nos.1390 and 1391 of 2003 in C.P.No.13 of 2000 dated 28.11.2003. For Appellants : Mr.P.John for M/s.T.S.Gopalan & Co., For Respondents : Mr.K.Veerasik Kumaragiri for Administrator COMMON JUDGMENT (The judgment of the Court was delivered by M.CHOCKALINGAM, J.) These two appeals challenge a common order of ...
V.Jeevarathinam Vs. 1.Tmt.Sudha
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-06-2015
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 06.01.2015 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.SATHYANARAYANAN Crl.R.C.(MD).No.239 of 2014 V.Jeevarathinam . . petitioner versus 1.Tmt.Sudha 2.Minor J.Kavitha 3.Minor J.Pragatheeswaran (Minor respondents 2 & 3 represented by their mother, 1st respondent) . . Respondents Criminal Revision Case is filed under Sections 397 and 401 of Cr.P.C against the judgment passed in M.C.No.16 of 2011, dated 07.02.2014 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate, Arupukkottai. !For petitioner :Mr.K.N.Thambi ^For respondent :Mr.S.C.Chakkaravarthy for M/S.Eddy & Emboss Law Firms :ORDER The respondent/husband in M.C.No.16 of 2011 is the revision petitioner. 2.The respondents herein, who are the wife, minor daughter and minor son had filed M.C.No.16 of 2011 on the file of the Court of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Aruppukkottai, claiming maintenance at the rate of Rs.10,000/- each for them. The said case, after hot contest, was ordered on 07.12.2014 by dire...
Muthu Manickam Vs. The Sub Inspector
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-05-2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED :09. 10.2009 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE D.HARIPARANTHAMAN W.P.No.40600 of 2006 S. Subramanian ... Petitioner vs.1. State of Tamilnadu represented by its Secretary to Government, Revenue Department, Fort St. George, Chennai 600 009.2. The Principal Commissioner and Commissioner for Revenue Administration, Chepauk, Chennai 5.3. The District Collector, Villupuram District, Villupuram. ... Respondents PRAYER: This writ petition came to be numbered under Article 226 of the Constitution of India by way of transfer of Original Application in O.A.No.8699 of 2000 to call for the records relating to the order of the first respondent in G.O.(D) No.461 Revenue (Ser.4(1)) dated 09.09.1999 and quash the same. For Petitioner : Mr.M.Govindaraj For Respondents : Mr.P.Muthukumar Government Advocate ORDER The Original Application in O.A.No.8699 of 2000 before the Tamil Nadu Administrative Tribunal is the present writ petition. 2.The petitioner was a...
Abubakkar Vs. 1.The State Represented By2.Kaboorkhan
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-05-2015
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 05.01.2015 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.SATHYANARAYANAN Crl.R.C.(MD)No.561 of 2008 Abubakkar ..Petitioner versus 1.The State represented by The Inspector of Police, Kottaipattinam Police Station, Pudukottai District. 2.Kaboorkhan ..Respondents Petition filed under Section 397 r/w 401 of the Criminal Procedure Code, against the order of acquittal and judgment passed by the learned Principal District and Sessions Judge, Pudukottai, made in S.C.No.133 of 2007 dated 20.03.2008. !For Petitioner : Mr.S.Palanivelayutham ^For Respondents : Mr.P.Kandasamy, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) for R1 Mr.Mahadevan for Ms.AL.Gandhimathi for R2 :ORDER P.W.1, the father of the victim girl, viz. Roobia, aggrieved by the order of acquittal dated 20.03.2008 made in S.C.No.133 of 2007 passed by the learned Principal District and Sessions Judge, Pudukottai, has filed this revision. 2.A perusal of the materials available on record would disclose the fol...
The General Manager Technical Vs. Dr.Ambedkar Tahdco Contractors
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-05-2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:07. 10.2009 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.S.KARNAN C.M.A.NO.1066 of 2005 Metropolitan Transport Corporation Limited, Rep by its Managing Director Formally known as Dr.Ambedkar Transport Corporation Limited, No.4, Anderson Street, Ayyanavaram, Chennai-23. . . Appellant Vs. 1.Tamilselvi 2.Minor Gopi 3.Minor Bhuvaneswari 4.Sarojaamal 5.K.Natarajan 6.National Insurance Company Limited, Sowcarpet Branch, No.378, Mint Street, First Floor, Chennai. . . Respondents Minors are represented by their mother the first respondent. Prayer:The civil miscellaneous appeal is filed against the award and decree dated 22.09.2004 in M.C.O.P.No.1128 of 1997 on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (VI Small Causes Court), Chennai. For Appellant :Mr.P.Jagadeeswaram For Respondents:No appearance for R1 to R5 Mr.S.Vadivel for R6 JUDGMENT This civil miscellaneous appeal has been filed by the appellant/first respondent against the award and decree passe...
Vijaya Vedhaya Vs. The Government
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-05-2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:07. 10.2009 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.S.KARNAN C.M.A.NO.1165 of 2005 National Insurance Company Limited, by its Branch Manager, 4132, Kil Main Road, Pudukottai D.M.Ilaka & Town. . . Appellant Vs.1. Shanmugavel 2.V.Subbayyan . . . Respondents Prayer:The civil miscellaneous appeal is filed against the judgment and decree in MCOP NO.368 of 2003 dated 15.09.2004 on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Additional Subordinate Court, Nagapattinam. For Appellant :Mr.N.Vijayaraghavan For Respondents:No appearance JUDGMENT The appellant/second respondent has filed the above civil miscellaneous appeal No.1165 of 2005 against the judgment and decree dated 15.09.2004 made in MCOP No.368 of 2003 on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal/Additional Subordinate Court, Nagapattinam awarding a compensation of Rs.58,600/- with interest at 9% from the date of filing the petition till the date of deposit of compensation amount under...
Manokaran Vs. The Secretary to Government
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-05-2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:20. 10.2009 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.J.MUKHOPADHAYA AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.KIRUBAKARAN W.P.Nos.10911 and 13757 of 2009 & M.P.Nos.1 and 2 in W.P.No.10911 of 2009 & M.P.No.1 of 2009 in W.P.No.13757 of 2009 P.Someshkandar .. Petitioner in W.P.No.10911 of 2009 Vijayan .. Petitioner in W.P.No.13757 of 2009 vs.1. The District Collector, O/o The District Collector, Coimbatore.2. The Asst. Director, Town Panchayat, Coimbatore District.3. The Executive Officer, Chinnavedampatti Town Panchayat, Chinnavedampatti, Coimbatore.4. Vijayan .. Respondents in W.P.No.10911 of 2009 1. The Executive Officer, Chinnavedampatti Town Panchayat, Chinnavedampatti, Coimbatore.2. The District Collector/ The Inspector of Panchayat, Coimbatore District, Coimbatore-18. .. Respondents in W.P.No.13757 of 2009 Writ Petition No.10911 of 2009 filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the res...
Tamilnadu Annal Ambedkar Sugathara Vs. The District Collector
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-05-2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED :13. .07..2009 CORAM THE HON'BLE Mr. JUSTICE S.PALANIVELU C.M.A.No.2930 of 2004 Tamilnadu State Transport Corporation (Salem) Ltd., Salem rep.by its Managing Director ... Appellant Vs.1. Tmt. Sivakumari 2. Minor Sundarrajan 3. Minor Vimala 4. Tmt. Periya Thayee ... Respondents This civil miscellaneous appeal has been filed under Section 30 of the Workmen's Compensation Act 1923 against the Judgment and Decree dated 25.11.2002 made in W.C.No.284 of 2001 dated 29.7.2004 on the file of the Commissioner for Workmen's Compensation, Salem. For Appellant : M/s. Ravi Bharathi For Respondents : Mr.P. Ganesan JUDGMENT It is stated in the claim petition that one Govindaraj was working as a conductor in the respondent transport corporation in Omalur Branch. First claimant is his wife, 2nd and 3rd claimants are his children and 4th claimant is his mother. On 27.09.2000 at 6.00 p.m. while he was proceeding towards Omalur in his TVS50near Kaliyappan lan...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- Next ›