Chennai Court September 2014 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
K.Mookkandi Vs. 1.The Superintending Engineer,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Sep-10-2014
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 10.09.2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.NAGAMUTHU W.P.(MD)No.7368 of 2006 and M.P.(MD)No.1 of 2006 K.Mookkandi ..Petitioner versus 1.The Superintending Engineer, Tamil Nadu Electricity Board,, Ramanathapuram Distribution Circle, Ramanathapuram. 2.The Executive Engineer (Distribution).Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, Paramakudi, Ramanathapuram District..Respondents Writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of a writ of certiorari, calling for the records relating to the impugned order passed by the 1st respondent in his proceedings Ku.Aa.No.0543/765/U Ni A/Nipi 2/U Tha 1/ Ko.Masdoor II Grade (Trainee) 06, dated 05.07.2006 and the consequential order of the 2nd respondent in Ku.No.1101/561/Se.Po/Para/Nipi/U1/Ko.Masdoor/06, dated 13.07.2006 and quashing the same. !For Petitioner : Mr.L.Shaji Chellan ^For Respondents : Mr.S.Dhayalan :ORDER The petitioner claims that he was engaged as a Contract ...
D.Swornapushpam Vs. A.Rajkumar
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Sep-10-2014
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 10.09.2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.R.SHIVAKUMAR Crl.R.C.(MD)No.587 of 2013 and M.P.(MD)No.1 of 2013 D.Swornapushpam ..Petitioner versus A.Rajkumar ..Respondent Petition filed under Section 397 r/w 401 of Criminal Procedure Code, against the order passed in Crl.M.P.No.1825 of 2013 in C.C.No.193 of 2012 dated 16.05.2013 on the file of the Fast Track, Karaikudi (Fast Track Court at Magisterial Level).!For Petitioner : Mr.V.Illanchezian ^For Respondent : Mr.I.Suthakaran :ORDER Heard. 2.This revision has been filed against the order dated 16.05.2013 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate, Fast Track Court at Magisterial Level, Karaikudi dealing with a case instituted by the respondent herein on a complaint, as C.C.No.193 of 2012 for an alleged offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. 3.The revision petitioner / accused seems to have denied the existence of a debt for the discharge of which the dishonoured...
P.Murugavel Vs. 1.The State of Tamil Nadu,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Sep-10-2014
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:10. 09.2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.JAICHANDREN AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.MAHADEVAN W.P.(MD).No.14255 of 2014 P.Murugavel : Petitioner Vs. 1.The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep by the Home Secretary, Secretariat, Fort.St.George, Chennai. 2.The Director General of Police, Office of the Director General of Police, Beach Road, Chennai. 3.The District Collector, Office of the District Collector, Trichy District. 4.The Commissioner of Police, Office of the Commissioner of Police, Trichy City, Trichy. 5.The Superintendent of Police, Office of the Superintendent of Police, Trichy District. : Respondents PRAYER Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to grant permission and provide adequate police protection to Thiyagi Immanuvel Sekaranar death anniversary celebration scheduled for 11.09.2014 at Ulavar Santhai Ground, Trichy, by considering th...
R.Rajendran Vs. 1.Bagavar Singh
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Sep-10-2014
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 10.09.2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.SELVAM SECOND APPEAL(MD)No.779 of 2009 R.Rajendran .Appellant/ Plaintiff versus 1.Bagavar Singh 2.Chandrasekar 3.Venkatachalam .Respondents/ Defendants Second Appeal is filed under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 against the Judgment and decree dated 12.02.2009 passed in Appeal Suit No.95 of 2006 by the Principal Sub Court, Kumbakonam confirming the Judgment and decree dated 20.03.2006 passed in Original Suit No.229 of 2002 by the Principal District Munsif Court, Valangaiman at Kumbakonam. !For Appellant : Mr.M.R.S.Prabhu ^For Respondents : Mr.R.Vijayakumar :JUDGMENT The concurrent Judgments and decrees passed in Original Suit No.229 of 2002 by the Principal District Munsif Court, Valangaiman at Kumbakonam and in Appeal Suit No.95 of 2006 by the Principal Sub Court, Kumbakonam are being challenged in the present second appeal. 2.The appellant herein as plaintiff has insti...
N.R.Krishnamoorthy Raja Vs. 1.The Special Commissioner and
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Sep-10-2014
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 10.09.2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.NAGAMUTHU W.P.(MD)No.8370 of 2007 N.R.Krishnamoorthy Raja ..Petitioner versus 1.The Special Commissioner and Commissioner for Land Administration, Chepauk, Chennai-5. 2.The District Collector, Theni District, Theni-626 531. 3.The Municipal Commissioner, Theni ?. Allinagaram Municipality, Theni-626 531..Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to pay the due compensation with interest for taking over the petitioner's land in Survey No.514/1C2 (149' x 13') and T.S.No.130/2 of Block No.19 of D Ward of Theni ?. Allinagaram Municipality. !For Petitioner : Mr.S.Natarajan For Respondents : Mr.Aayiram K.Selvakumar, Government Advocate for R1 and R2 Mr.M.Saravanakumar for R3 :ORDER The petitioner claims to be the owner of the land measuring 13 ft. x 149 ft. comprised in S.No.514/1C2 in Theni ...
K.Venkatachalam Vs. the Executive Officer
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Sep-09-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED2508.2009 CORAM THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE M.M.SUNDRESH W.P.No.14325 of 2008 S.R.Velusamy .Petitioner versus 1.The District Collector Coimbatore & District. 2.The State Election Commission 6, Revathy Street Jawaharlal Nehru Road Vadapalani Chennai 600 026. 3.The Managing Director The Coimbatore District Co-operative Milk ProduceRs.Union Limited New Dairy Complex, Pachapalayam Kalampalayam Post Perur (Via).Coimbatore 641 010. 4.R.Saminathan .Respondents Writ petition has been filed under Article 226 of The Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Quo Warranto, to call upon the 4th respondent herein to show under what authority of law he is holding the public office of the President of Gubbepalayam Village Panchayat in Annur Taluk of Coimbatore District and consequently declare the post of President of Gubbepalayam Village Panchayat in Annur Taluk of Coimbatore District as vacant. For Petitioner : M/s.S.Sathia Chandran For R-1 & 2 :...
V.Uma (F/30), Vs. 1.The Superintendent of Police,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Sep-09-2014
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:09. 09.2014 Coram THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.MANIKUMAR AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.S.RAVI H.C.P.(MD) No.1003 of 2014 V.Uma (F/30), W/o.Velmurugan, Vallanthapuram, Anjaneyar Kovil Backside, Avaniyapuram, Madurai District. . . Petitioner Vs. 1.The Superintendent of Police, Madurai District. 2.The Inspector of Police, Avaniyapuram Police Station, Madurai District. 3.The Government Vidiyal Children's Home, Muthupatti, Madurai District. 4.The Child Welfare Committee, Government Children's Home, Kakkanad, Ernakulam District, Kerala State. . . Respondents Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India directing the respondents 1 and 2 to produce her children namely Abinaya D/o.Velmurugan (Detnue 1) is aged about 9 years and Rithika D/o. Velmurugan (Detenu 2) is aged about 2 years, either in person or body before this Court from the illegal detention of the 3rd and 4th respondents and hand over the custody to the petitione...
Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Kikani Exports Pvt. Ltd.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Sep-09-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:11. 9.2009 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.JYOTHIMANI W.P.No.851 of 2009 N.Meenakshi .. Petitioner Vs. The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Business Circle III121 Mahatma Gandhi Road Chennai 600 034. .. Respondent PRAYER: Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issue of a writ of Certiorari as stated herein. For Petitioner : Mr.V.Ramachandran, Sr.Counsel for Dr.Anita Sumanth For Respondent : Mr.Patti B.Jaganathan SCGSC ORDER The writ petition is directed against the assessment order of the respondent dated 31.12.2008 by which the respondent, having referred the matter to the Valuation Cell on 17.12.2008 as per Section 50C(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for brevity, ".the Act".), completed the assessment by invoking Section 50C of the Act by taking the value of land as determined for stamp duty purpose as the sale value, as no valuation report was received from the Valuation Cell till the said date. ...
Tmt.M.Vasanthi Vs. B.Selvam
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Sep-09-2014
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 09.09.2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.R.SHIVAKUMARM Crl.R.C.(md).No.862 of 2007 Tmt.M.Vasanthi . . Petitioner/Accused versus B.Selvam . . Respondent/Complainant Prayer Criminal Revision Case is filed under Section 397 (1) and 401 of Cr.P.C to call for the records and set aside the order of conviction and sentence passed in C.A.No.33 of 2007 dated 29.08.2007 on the file of the learned Additional District and Sessions Judge cum Fast Track Court No.III, Madurai in C.C.No.1654 of 2005 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Madurai dated 19.02.2007. !For petitioner :No appearance ^For respondent :No appearance :ORDER This Criminal Revision Case has been preferred by the sole accused in S.T.C.No.1654 of 2005, decided by the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Madurai. The said case was instituted on a complaint preferred by the respondent herein for prosecuting and punishing the petitioner herein for an alleged offence u...
The Director Vs. N.Karpagavalli
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Sep-09-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:03. 09.2009 CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P.JYOTHIMANI WRIT PETITION NO.11101 OF2009and M.P.Nos.1 to 3 of 2009 .. Minor B.Praveena Devi rep. By her father and guardian Mr.P.Boopathy Raj .. Petitioner vs. 1.The State of Tamil Nadu rep. By Secretary to Government Health Department Fort St.George, Chennai 600 009. 2.The Director of Medical Education Teynampet, Chennai 600 018. 3.Selection Committee rep. By its Secretary Directorate of Medical Education No.163 Periyar E.V.R.Road Kilpauk, Chennai 600 010. 4.The Common Committee constituted for the Selection of Eminent Sports Persons at Anna University Chennai. (R.4 impleaded as per order dt.14.7.2009 in M.P.No.4/09) 5.S.Padmaja D/o.S.H.Srikumar (R.5 impleaded as per order dt.30.7.2009 in M.P.No.5/09) .. Respondents Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus as stated therein. For petitioner : Mr.R.Muthukumarasamy,S...
- ‹ Prev
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- Next ›
- Last »