Skip to content

Chennai Court September 2014 Judgments

Browse smarter

Open an 18-section brief on any judgment

Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.

  • AI Brief & Ask
  • Semantic AI Search
  • Devil's Bench

Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.

Sep 17 2014

Natarajan Vs. Jacob Manohar

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Sep-17-2014

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED :17. 09.2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE V.M.VELUMANI C.R.P.(MD)No.330 of 2008 Natarajan .. Petitioner Vs. Jacob Manohar .. Respondent Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, praying to set aside the order passed in I.A.No.96 of 2006 in O.S.No.86 of 2006 on the file of the I Additional Subordinate Judge, Tirunelveli dated 19.07.2006. !For Petitioner : Mr.S.Kadarkarai ^For Respondent : Mr.T.S.R.Venkatramana :ORDER This civil revision petition has been filed to set aside the order passed in I.A.No.96 of 2006 in O.S.No.86 of 2006 on the file of the I Additional Subordinate Judge, Tirunelveli dated 19.07.2006.2. The revision petitioner is the plaintiff, whereas the respondent is the defendant in the suit in O.S.No.86 of 2006 on the file of I Additional Subordinate Judge, Tirunelveli.3. The respondent has filed I.A.No.96 of 2006 under Order 7 Rule 11(c) C.P.C. to reject the plaint. According to the...


Sep 17 2014

J.Daniel Vs. 1.The Director of Most Backward and

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Sep-17-2014

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 17.09.2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.NAGAMUTHU W.P.(MD)No.13072 of 2009 J.Daniel ..Petitioner versus 1.The Director of Most Backward and De-Notified Community, Chepauk, Chennai-600 005. 2.The District Revenue Officer (Kallar Reclamation).District Collector Compound, Madurai. 3.V.Raju ..Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records pertaining to the impugned order of the 1st respondent passed in Pro.No.B1/9933/07-1 dated 09.01.2008 and the impugned order of the 1st respondent passed Proc.No.B1/9933/07 dated 22.02.2008 and to quash the same in so far as the 3rd respondent alone and consequently directing the respondents to consider the promotion of the petitioner as Headmaster in the Government Kallar Higher Secondary School under the control of the respondents 1 and 2 and to promote him from the date of promotion...


Sep 17 2014

Ramar Vs. 1.Union of India,

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Sep-17-2014

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 17.09.2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.NAGAMUTHU W.P(MD)Nos.8028 of 2007 W.P(MD)Nos.8281 to 8286 of 2007 Ramar .Petitioner in W.P.(MD).No.8082/2007 Raju .Petitioner in W.P.(MD).No.8281/2007 Rajendran .Petitioner in W.P.(MD).No.8282/2007 Ragavan .Petitioner in W.P.(MD).No.8283/2007 P.Ramar .Petitioner in W.P.(MD).No.8284/2007 Seenivasa Naidu .Petitioner in W.P.(MD).No.8285/2007 K.Nallu .Petitioner in W.P.(MD).No.8286/2007 versus 1.Union of India, represented by its Secretary, Ministry of Tribal Welfare, New Delhi. 2.The State of Tamil Nadu, rep. by its Secretary to Government, Forest Department, Fort St. George, Chennai -9. 3.The District Collector, Theni District, Theni. 4.The District Forest Officer, Theni District, Theni. 5.The Forest Ranger, Gudalur Range, Lower Camp, Uthamapalyam Talum, Theni District.Respondents in all the Writ petitions COMMON PRAYER Writ Petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for ...


Sep 17 2014

1.The Bishop of Kottar, Vs. Oor Committee Melaperuvillai Punitha

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Sep-17-2014

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 17.09.2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE V.M.VELUMANI C.R.P.(MD)Nos.1649 of 2014 & 1650 of 2014 & M.P.(Md.No.1 of 2014 1.The Bishop of Kottar, R.C.Diocese of Kottar, Nagercoil, Vadasery Village, Agasteeswaram Taluk, Kanyakumari District. 2.The Parish Priest, St. Jebamalai Matha Church, Mela Peruvilai, Catholic Bishop House Nagercoil, Agasteeswaram Taluk, Kanyakumari District.Petitionersin both the C.R.Ps. versus Oor Committee Melaperuvillai Punitha Jebamalai Matha Church and its MembeRs.Rep. by its President V.Rose Darvin, S/o/Vargese Mela Peruvilai, Asaripallam Post, Alloor Village, Kalkulam Taluk, Kanyakumari District.Respondent in both the C.R.Ps. Civil Revision Petitions filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, to set aside the fair and decretal ordeRs.dated 23.04.2014, passed in I.A.Nos.26 and 27 of 2014 in O.S.No.193 of 2010 by the learned Additional District Munsif, Eraniel. !For Petitioners : Mr.S.Meen...


Sep 17 2014

Syed Ali Fathima Vs. 1.The District Collector

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Sep-17-2014

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:17. 09.2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.S.SIVAGNANAM W.P.(MD) No.14906 of 2014 & W.P.(MD) No.14949 of 2014 and M.P.(MD) Nos.1 & 2 of 2014 Syed Ali Fathima ... Petitioner in both W.Ps -vs- 1.The District Collector Tirunelveli District Tirunelveli 2.The Returning Officer and Commissioner Tirunelveli District, Tirunelveli ... Respondents 1 & 2 in both W.Ps 3.Bhuvaneshwari ... 3rd Respondent in W.P.(MD) No.14949 of 2014 PRAYER (in W.P.(MD) No.14906 of 2014) Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a writ of certiorarified mandamus calling for the records of the impugned order passed by the second respondent in her proceedings vide Na.Ka.No.C1/6447/2014, dated 05.09.2014, and quash the same and consequently direct the second respondent to consider the nomination application submitted by the petitioner on 04.09.2014 for contesting as independent candidate with regard to the election to...


Sep 16 2014

A.Ganesan Vs. 1.The Secretary to the State Government,

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Sep-16-2014

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:16. 09.2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.JAICHANDREN AND THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.MAHADEVAN W.P(MD)No.9685 of 2014 and M.P(MD)No.1 of 2014 A.Ganesan ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Secretary to the State Government, Health Department, Secretariat, Chennai. 2.The Director, Directorate of Medical Education, Chennai. 3.The Dean, Government Rajaji Hospital, Madurai. ... Respondents Prayer Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a writ of Mandamus to direct the respondents 1 to 3 to consider the petitioner's representation dated 11.02.2014 and take appropriate steps by conducting a detailed enquiry and conduct an Auditing for the salary given to all the Nursing Staffs working in the Government Rajaji Hospital and regularise the Nursing Service. !For Petitioner ... Mr.K.Sudalaiyandi ^For Respondents ... Mr.M.Govindan, Special Govt.Pleader * * * * * :ORDER (Order of the Court was made by R.MAHADEVAN, J) This...


Sep 16 2014

Suthakar Vs. the Inspector of Police

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Sep-16-2014

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 16.09.2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.R.SHIVAKUMARM Crl.R.C.(md).No.360 of 2014 SUTHAKAR . . Petitioner/Accused versus THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE MUTHIAHPURAM POLICE STATION, THOOTHUKUDI CR.NO.204/2009 . . Respondent/Complainant Prayer Criminal Revision Case is filed under Section 397 and 401 of Cr.P.C against the judgment passed by the learned II Additional Sessions Judge, Thoothukudi on 01.07.2014 in C.A.No.25 of 2014, confirming the conviction and sentence passed by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Thoothukudi in C.C.No.26 of 2011 on 03.04.2014. !For petitioner:Mr.A.J.Mohamed Kassim for Mr.Antony S.Prabhakar ^For respondent:Mrs.S.Prabha Government Advocate (Crl.Side) :ORDER The sole accused, who was prosecuted for an offence punishable under Section 304(A) of the Indian Penal Code before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Thoothukudi in C.C.No.26 of 2011 has preferred the present revision against the judgment of the lo...


Sep 16 2014

immanuel Arasar International Institute Vs. the Director / Commissione ...

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Sep-16-2014

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 16.09.2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.NAGAMUTHU W.P(MD)No.14417 of 2012 & W.P(MD)No.16698 of 2012 and Cont.P.(MD).No.798 of 2012 and M.P.(MD).Nos.1 of 2012 & 1 & 2 of 2013 in W.P.(MD).No.14417 of 2012 and M.P.(MD).No.1 of 2012 in W.P.(MD).No.16698 of 2012 Immanuel Arasar International Institute of Science and Technology Educational and Charitable Trust, rep. by its Managing Trustee, Dr.Sam G.Jeba Joselin, S.G.Hospital Campus, Old Theatre Junction, Pammam, Marthandam, Kanyakumari District.Petitioner in both the writ petitions versus The Director / Commissioner of Technical Education, Sardar Patel Road, Guindy, Chennai - 600 025.Respondent in both the writ petitions PRAYER in W.P.(MD).No.14417/2012 Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the respondent to permit the 51 students (list of students annexed) of the petitioner college to pursue the...


Sep 16 2014

C.Ganesan Vs. 1.The Superintendent of Police,

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Sep-16-2014

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:16. 09.2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.KIRUBAKARAN CRL.O.P.(MD)No.6782 of 2013 C.Ganesan : Petitioner Vs. 1.The Superintendent of Police, Ramnad District. 2.The Inspector of Police, Kenikkarai Police Station, Ramnad District. 3.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, CBCID, Ramnad District, Ramnad. : Respondents PRAYER Petition is filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure to withdraw the investigation in connection with Crime No.132 of 2013 from the file of the Inspector of Police, Kenikkarai Police Station, Ramnad District and entrust the same to any other competent agency more particularly the Deputy Superintendent of Police, CBCID at Ramnad, for further investigation and lay the final report before the concern court forthwith within the time framed as stipulated by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr.A.Uthayakumar For Respondents : Mr.A.P.Balasubramani Government Advocate (Crl.side) :ORDER Petitioner's son, namely, ...


Sep 16 2014

S.Kumariah Nadar Vs. 1.The District Collector,

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Sep-16-2014

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 16.09.2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.NAGAMUTHU W.P(MD)No.15757 of 2012 and M.P.(MD).Nos.1 & 2 of 2012 S.Kumariah Nadar .Petitioner versus 1.The District Collector, Tirunelveli District, Tirunelveli. 2.The District Adi Dravidar Welfare Officer, Tirunelveli District, Tirunelveli. 3.The Special Tahsildar, Adi-Dravidar Welfare Department, Nanguneri Taluk, Tirunelveli District. 4.The Inspector of Police, Panagudi Police Station, Tirunelveli District.Respondents PRAYER Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the entire records pertaining to the order passed by the third respondent, vide his proceedings in Na.Ka.No.A.707/91, dated 06.03.1992 and quash the same and consequently direct the respondent Nos.1 and 2 to drop all the proceedings initiated under the provisions of Land Acquisition Act, 1894, in respect of the petitioner's property si...


  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial