Chennai Court August 2014 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
R.Ponnuchamy Vs. 1.The District Collector,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-25-2014
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:25. 08.2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.NAGAMUTHU W.P.(MD)No.17133 of 2012 R.Ponnuchamy ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The District Collector, Trichy District, Trichy. 2.The Special Deputy Collector (Stamps), Trichy. 3.The District Revenue Officer, Trichy. 4.The Tahsildar, Manapparai, Trichy District. 5.The Sub Registrar, Sub Registrar Office, Manapparai, Trichy District. ... Respondents Prayer This Writ Petition is preferred under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the respondents to release the petitioner's sale deed dated 23.06.1993 bearing Document No.1205/1993 without insisting the petitioner to make further payment of stamp duty. !For Petitioner : Mr.R.Subramanian For Respondents : Mr.K.Chellapandian Additional Advocate General Assisted by K.P.Krishnadoss Government Advocate :ORDER Twenty-one long years, proceedings under Section 47-A of the Indian Stamp Act, 1899 has not been concluded a...
T.Boominathan Vs. 1.The District Collector,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-22-2014
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:22. 08.2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.JAICHANDREN AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.MAHADEVAN W.P.(MD).No.7035 of 2014 T.Boominathan : Petitioner Vs. 1.The District Collector, Ramanathapuram District, Ramanathapuram. 2.The Block Development Officer, [Panchayat]., Kadaladi Union, Ramanathapuram District. 3.The Assistant Director of Audit, Collector Office, Ramanathapuram. 4.The Assistant Director of Panchayat, Collector Office, Ramanathapuram. 5.A.Punavasal Village Panchayat,through its President, Maranthai Post, Kadaladi Taluk, Ramanathapuram District. 6.S.Muthumeenal, W/o.Subramanian, President, A.Punavasal Village Panchayat, Maranthai Post, Kadaladi Taluk, Ramanathapuram District. : Respondents PRAYER Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issue of a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents 1 to 4 to take action against the 6th respondent for the misappropriation of the 5th respondent p...
R.Vidhya Vs. the Secretary,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-22-2014
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:22.08.2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.NAGAMUTHU W.P.(md).No.16299 of 2012 R.VIDHYA ..Petitioner Vs THE SECRETARY, TAMILNADU PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION COMMERCIAL TAX ANNEXED BUILDING, NO.1 GREMS ROAD, CHENNAI - 06..Respondent Prayer This petition is preferred under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondent to consider and appoint the petitioner for the post as in Combined Subordinate Service Examination - 1 (examination/service code no.004) under the category of post graduate MBC/DC and Female. !For Petitioner :Mr.Rajaraman For respondents :Mr.K.P.Krishnadoss for TNPSC :ORDER The Tamil Nadu Public Service Commission issued advertisement No.258, calling for applications for direct recruitment to the posts included in combined subordinate services Examination-I (examination/service code No.004).The petitioner submitted her application. The selection process consisted of two succe...
S.Manimuthu Samuel Vs. 1.The Secretary to Government,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-22-2014
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:22.08.2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.NAGAMUTHU W.P.(md).No.11190 of 2009 S.Manimuthu Samuel ..Petitioner Vs 1.The Secretary to Government, School Education Department, State of Tamil Nadu, Fort St. George, Chennai-9. 2.The Accountant General, Chennai-18. 3.The Director, Directorate of Elementary Education, College Road, Chennai-6. 4.The Additional Assistant Elementary Educational Officer, Radhapuram, Tirunelveli District. 5.The Manager, TDTA Primary/Middle School, CSI Tirunelveli Diocese, Palayamkottai, Tirunelveli..Respondents Prayer This petition is preferred under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of certiorarified mandamus or any other order or direction in the nature of writ calling for the records pertaining to the impugned order of the fourth respondent in his proceedings in A.Thi.Mu.No.1055/A1/09 dated 10.09.2009 and quash the same and consequently direct the 4th respondent to send a proposal to ...
Vellaichamy Vs. 1.The State of Tamilnadu,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-22-2014
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:22. 08.2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.MAHADEVAN W.P(MD)No.10194 of 2009 AND W.P(MD)No.5629 of 2010 and M.P(MD)Nos.1 of 2010 & 1 of 2011 AND W.P(MD)No.6730 of 2011 and M.P(MD)Nos. 1 of 2011, 1 of 2012 & 1 of 2013 W.P(MD)No.10194 of 2009 Vellaichamy ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The State of Tamilnadu, represented by The Secretary to Government, Department of Electricity, Fort St. George, Chennai - 9. 2.The Tamilnadu Electricity Board, Anna Salai, Chennai, represented by its Chairman. 3.The Assistant Executive Engineer, High Tension Line Construction I, Tamilnadu Electricity Board, K.Pudur, Madurai - 7. 4.The District Collector, Virudhunagar District, Virudhunagar. ... Respondents (R4 impleaded as per order of this Court dated 07.02.2014 made in M.P(MD)No.1 of 2012 in W.P(MD)No.10194 of 2009.) Prayer Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records i...
Ganesan Vs. 1.The Commissioner
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-22-2014
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:22. 08.2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.S.SIVAGNANAM W.P.(MD) No.13804 of 2013 and M.P.(MD) Nos.1 & 2 of 2013 Ganesan rep.by his power agent Rukmani Ganesan ... Petitioner -vs- 1.The Commissioner The Tamilnadu Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Board No.119/3, Uthamar Gandhi Salai Nungambakkam, Chennai 2.The Joint Commissioner Hindu Religious and Charitable Department Sivagangai, Sivagangai District 3.P.R.Ramanathan ... Respondents PRAYER Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a writ of certiorari to call for the records relating to the impugned order of the first respondent in his proceedings in A.P.No.28 of 2013 (R.C.No.2007 of 2012 D2), dated 31.07.2013 and quash the same as illegal. !For Petitioner : Mr.M.Mahaboob Athiff for M/s.Ajmal Associates ^For Respondents : Mr.N.S.Karthikeyan Addl. Govt. Pleader for R1 & R2 Mr.Dr.D.Gnanasekaran for R3 :ORDER The petitioner seeks f...
S.Sankara Subramanian Vs. 1.Dr.S.Krishnaswamy
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-22-2014
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 22.08.2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE V.M.VELUMANI C.R.P.(MD)No.887 of 2014 & M.P.(Md.No.1 of 2014 S.Sankara Subramanian .Petitioner versus 1.Dr.S.Krishnaswamy 2.S.Ramaiah 3.S.Pitchaiah 4.S.Thirukooda Rajappan 5.S.Guhan .Respondents Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, to set aside the petition and order, dated 12.12.2013, made in I.A.No.149 of 2007 in O.S.No.31 of 1985, on the file of Sub-Court, Tenkasi. !For Petitioner :Mr.S.Palani Velayutham ^For Respondent No.1 :Mr.M.Ashok Kumar For Respondent Nos.2, 3 & 5 : Mr.N.Rajachandrasekaran For Respondent No.4 : Dispensed with :ORDER This Civil Revision Petition has been filed to set aside the petition and order, dated 12.12.2013, made in I.A.No.149 of 2007 in O.S.No.31 of 1985, on the file of Sub-Court, Tenkasi. 2.The revision petitioner herein is the third defendant, whereas the fiRs.respondent is the plaintiff and the respondents 2...
1.A.Raja Vs. 1.The State of Tamil Nadu,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-22-2014
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:22. 08.2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.MAHADEVAN W.P.(MD)No.1821 of 2009 1.A.Raja 2.G.Balasubramanian 3.I.Niamath Basha 4.K.Murugesan 5.T.Ramesh Babu 6.P.N.Kumar Babu 7.L.Murugesan 8.C.D.Rajaganesh 9.D.Irulappan 10.M.Noordeen Shajule 11.M.Syed Mohammed Shajule 12.V.Kannan : Petitioners Vs. 1.The State of Tamil Nadu, Represented by its Secretary, Municipal Administration and Water Supply Department, Fort.St.George, Chennai 600 009. 2.The Commissioner, Corporation of Madurai, Madurai. : Respondents PRAYER Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records relating to the impugned order passed by the first respondent in his proceedings letter [2pa]. No.153, dated 10.09.2007 and the consequential impugned order passed by the second respondent in his proceedings Ma.Ne.2/47282/95, dated 21.11.2007 and quash the same in respect of fixation of educational ...
R.Rajaram Vs. 1.The Presiding Officer
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-22-2014
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:22.08.2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.NAGAMUTHU W.P.(md).No.7704 of 2009 R.RAJARAM ..Petitioner Vs 1.THE PRESIDING OFFICER LABOUR COURT, TIRUCHIRAPPALLI(DINDIGUL CAMP).2.THE MANAGEMENT TAMIL NADU STATE TRANSPORT CORPORATION MADURAI DIVISION ?. 4. BYE PASS ROAD DINDIGUL -624 004..Respondents Prayer This petition is preferred under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of certiorarified mandamus or any other order or direction in the nature of writ calling for the records pertaining to the impugned order of the fiRs.respondent dt. 15.05.2009 in I.D.O.P.No.101 of 2002 and the order of the second respondent passed in Sa.Thu./A7/930 dt. 20.10.2001 and quash the same and consequently directing the second respondent to reinstate the petitioner into service with all monetary and attendant benefits. !For Petitioner :Mr.Veera.Kathiravan ^For respondents :Mr.S.C.Herold Singh :ORDER The petitioner was employed as conduct...
Rajendran Vs. 1.The Secretary to Government,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-22-2014
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:22. 08.2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.S.SIVAGNANAM W.P(MD)No.8433 of 2013 and W.P(MD)No.13968 of 2014 and M.P(MD)Nos.1 and 2 of 2013 and 1 of 2014 Rajendran ... Petitioner in both WPs Vs. 1.The Secretary to Government, Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowment Department, Government of Tamil Nadu, Secretariat, Fort St. George, Chennai 600 009. 2.The Commissioner, Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowment Department, Government of Tamil Nadu, Secretariat, Fort St. George, Chennai 600 009. 3.The Joint Commissioner, Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowment Department, Amma Mandabam, Srirangam, Trichy. 4.The Executive Officer, Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowment Department, Poologanathar Kovil, Trichy. 5.The Inspector of Police, Ponmalai Police Station, Trichy. ... Respondents in W.P(MD)No.8433 of 2013 1.The Secretary to Government, Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowment Department, Government of Tamil Nadu, Secretariat, Fort...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »