Chennai Court August 2014 Judgments
G.Kumar Vs. the District Manager,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-26-2014
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:26. 08.2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.K.SASIDHARAN W.P.(MD)No.14065 of 2014 and M.P.(MD)Nos.1 and 2 of 2014 G.Kumar : Petitioner Vs. The District Manager, Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation, (TASMAC), Thanjur District. : Respondent Prayer Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issue of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records relating to the impugned order passed by the respondent vide his proceedings in Na.Ka.No.7816/RV-2/2014, dated 08.07.2014 and quash the same as illegal and consequently, to direct the respondent to reinstate the petitioner into service with continuity of service and all other monetary benefits. !For Petitioner : Mr.P.R.Prithiviraj ^For Respondent : Mr.M.Muniyasamy, Standing Counsel ******** :ORDER ****** The petitioner was appointed as Salesman by the Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation Limited (hereinafter referred to as 'the TASMAC)...
Tag this Judgment!P.Raja Vs. K.C.Sudha
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-25-2014
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 25.08.2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.R.SHIVAKUMAR Criminal Revision Case (Md.No.555 of 2012 P.Raja ..Petitioner versus K.C.Sudha ..Respondent Petition filed under Section 397 read with 401 Cr.P.C., against the order passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Karur in Crl.R.C.No.5 of 2011 dated 17.12.2011 setting aside the order of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Karur in M.C.No.11 of 2009 dated 08.11.2010. !For Petitioner : Mr.M.Ajmal Khan, Sr., Counsel ^For Respondent : Mr.P.Muthuvijayapandian :ORDER The arguments advanced by Mr.M.Ajmal Khan, learned Senior Counsel on behalf of the learned counsel on record appearing for the revision petitioner and Mr.P.Muthuvijayapandian, learned counsel for the respondent are heard. Copies of the orders of the Courts below and the materials available on record are also perused. This Court paid its consideration to the same. 2.The revision petitioner was the husband of the respondent here...
Tag this Judgment!K.Amutha, Vs. 1.The State of Tamil Nadu,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-25-2014
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:25. 08.2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.MANIKUMAR and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.S.RAVI H.C.P.(MD) No.696 of 2014 K.Amutha, W/o.Kani @ Kaniraj, Pillaiyarkovil Street, Vannikonenthal, Sankarankovil Taluk, Tirunelveli District. .. Petitioner versus 1.The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by its Secretary to Government, Home Prohibition and Excise Department, Fort St. George, Chennai - 600 009. 2.The District Collector - Cum - District Magistrate, Collector's Office, Tirunelveli District. .. Respondents Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution for the issue of a Writ of Habeas Corpus, praying to call for the records relating to the detention order passed by the 2nd respondent in M.H.S. Confidl. No.11/2014 dated 14.02.2014 and to quash the same and direct the respondents to produce the detenue Kani @ Kaniraj, Son of Karuppasamy, Male aged 26 years who is detained at Central Prison, Palayamkottai before this Hon'ble Court and se...
Tag this Judgment!E.Jaisankar Vs. 1.The Director General of Police,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-25-2014
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:25.08.2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.NAGAMUTHU W.P.(MD)No.534 of 2011 E.Jaisankar ..Petitioner versus 1.The Director General of Police, Mylapore, Chennai-600 004. 2.The Deputy Inspector General of Police, Tirunelveli Range, Tirunelveli. 3.The Superintendent of Police, Tirunelveli District, Tirunelveli. Writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of a writ of certiorarified mandamus, calling for the records on the file of the 3rd respondent in connection with the impugned order of dismissal passed by him in P.R.No.39/2007, dated 25.02.2009 and the appellate order on appeal passed by the 2nd respondent in C.No.C4/AP92/2009, dated 04.07.2009, quashing both the orders as illegal and arbitrary and consequently directing the respondents to reinstate the petitioner in service with all monetary and service benefits, within the time limit that may be stipulated by this Court. !For Petitioner : Mr....
Tag this Judgment!N.S.Ganesan Vs. 1.The Chief Engineer,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-25-2014
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 25.08.2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.S.SIVAGNANAM W.P(MD)No.6388 of 2014 and M.P(MD)Nos.1 and 2 of 2014 N.S.Ganesan : Petitioner versus 1.The Chief Engineer, State Highways Department (Construction and Maintenance).Chennai. 2.The Superintending Engineer, State Highways Department (Construction and Maintenance).Tirunelveli & District. 3.The Divisional Engineer, State Highways Department (Construction and Maintenance).Tirunelveli & District. : Respondents PRAYER Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorari calling for the records relating to the proceedings in che/Ma/Tho/E/ Land/2014 of the third respondent in pursuance of impugned notice published in the 'Dinamani', dated 25.2.2014, and quash the same and pass such further or other ordeRs.!For Petitioner : Mr.B.Rajesh Saravanan ^For Respondents : Mr.R.Karthikeyan, Additional Government Pleader :ORDER The p...
Tag this Judgment!Raja Vs. the Secretary to Government
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-25-2014
In the High Court of Judicature at Madras Dated:26. 08.2009 Coram: The Honourable Mr.Justice M.CHOCKALINGAM and The Honourable Mr.Justice R.SUBBIAH Original Side Appeal Nos.297 and 298 of 2008 and M.P.Nos.1 and 2 of 2009 Kalash Properties Pvt.Ltd., represented by its Chairman and Managing Director G.Kaliasundaram, having Office at J75Anna Nagar East, Chennai-600 102. ..Appellant in both OSAs. ..vs..1. Lilly Pushpam 2. Sheela 3. K.K.Ravi ..R1 to R3 in OSA2972008 and Respondents in OSA2982008 4. S.Sasikala ..R4 in OSA2972008 (R4 impleaded as party respondent vide Order of Court dated 20.10.2008 made in M.P.No.2 of 2008) Original Side Appeals filed under XXXVI Rule 1 of Original Side Rules read with Clause 15 of Letters Patent, against the common judgment and decrees dated 08.04.2008 passed by a learned single Judge of this Court in C.S.Nos.13 of 1997 and 559 of 1996 respectively. For Appellant : Mr.T.V.Ramanujam, Senior Counsel for Mr.T.V.Krishnamachari For Respondents : Mr.R.Krishnamoor...
Tag this Judgment!The Branch Manager, Vs. 1. G.Aarana Valli
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-25-2014
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED :25. 08.2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.KARUPPIAH C.M.A.No.2425 of 2003 and C.M.P.No.14636 of 2003 The Branch Manager, National Insurance Company Ltd., 2-A, Thirumaakulam North Street, Tallakulam, Madurai-2. : Appellant -Vs- 1. G.Aarana Valli 2. Minor S.Anitha 3. Minor S.Anandh 4. Minor S.Sathiskumar 5. A.Neuthan Ambalam (died) 6. M/s Mercury Mercersing Company, represented by its Management, 11-A, M.K.Lane, Mahaal III Street, Madurai-625 001. : Respondents (R.1 to R.4 are recorded as L.Rs. of the deceased R.5 vide order dated 31.07.2014) PRAYER: Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed under Section Section 30 of Workmen's Compensation Act 1923, against the judgment and decree dated 25.01.2002 (served on 01.04.2002) in W.C.NO.66 of 2001, on the file of the Commissioner for Workmen's Compensation, Deputy Commissioner of Labour, Madurai. !For Appellant : Mr.J.S.Murali ^For Respondents : Mr.Mr.K.Mahandran for R.1 to R.4 : No Appearanc...
Tag this Judgment!Murugan, Vs. 1.The Secretary to Government,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-25-2014
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:25. 08.2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.MANIKUMAR and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.S.RAVI H.C.P.(MD) No.647 of 2014 Murugan, S/o.Vellaiyathevar, 1E, Bodi Line, Ellis Nagar, Madurai District. .. Petitioner versus 1.The Secretary to Government, Home, Prohibition and Excise Department, Fort St.George, Chennai - 600 009. 2.The Commissioner of Police, Office of the Commissioner of Police, Madurai District. 3.The Superintendent of Central Prison, Madurai Central Prison, Madurai District. .. Respondents Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution for the issue of a Writ of Habeas Corpus, praying to call for the entire records, connected with the detention order of the Respondent No.2 in Order No.28/BDFGISSV/2014 dated 29.05.2014 and to quash the same and to direct the Respondents to produce the detenu namely Murugan, son of Vellaiyathevar, aged about 37 years detained in Madurai Central Prison before this Honourable Court and s...
Tag this Judgment!Vijayalakshmi (F/Aged 48 Years) Vs. 1.State of Tamil Nadu, Rep.by
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-25-2014
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:25. 08.2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.MANIKUMAR and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.S.RAVI H.C.P.(MD) No.606 of 2014 Vijayalakshmi (f/aged 48 years) W/o.Kannan, Middle Street, Vilvadi Village, Orathanadu Taluk, Thanjavur District. .. Petitioner versus 1.State of Tamil Nadu, rep.by The Secretary to Government, Home, Prohibition and Excise Department, Fort St.George, Chennai-9. 2.The District Collector and District Magistrate, O/o. The District Collector and District Magistrate, Thanjavur District, Thanjavur 3.The Superintendent of Central Prison, Central Prison, Tiruhirappalli. .. Respondents Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution for the issue of a Writ of Habeas Corpus calling for the entire records in detention order passed in P.D.No.40/2014 dated 28.05.2014 on the file of the 2nd respondent herein and set aside the same as illegal and direct the respondents to produce the body and person of the petitioner's son na...
Tag this Judgment!The Managing Director, Vs. 1.JosaphIn Mary
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-25-2014
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 25.08.2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.KARUPPIAH C.M.A(MD)No.1103 OF2006C.M.A(MD)No.1103 OF2006and CROSS-OBJ(MD)No.58 OF2007The Managing Director, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation, (Madurai Division-V Limited, Virudhunagar...Appellant .versus 1.Josaphin Mary 2.Loyola Mary 3.Cencijuliet 4.Vimalan 5.John Britto 6.Sria Pushpam ..Respondents CROSS-OBJECTION(MD)NO.58 OF20071.Josaphin Mary 2.Loyola Mary 3.Cencijuliet 4.Vimalan 5.John Britto 6.Sria Pushpam .....Cross-Objectors .versus The Managing Director, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation, (Madurai Division V Limited, Virudhunagar ...Respondents PRAYER in C.M.A(MD)No.1103 of 2006: Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act against the judgement and award made in M.C.O.P.No.220 of 2004, dated 2.9.2005, on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal(Sub-Court),Virudhunagar. PRAYER in CROSS-OBJECTION(MD)No.58 of 2007: Cross objection is ...
Tag this Judgment!- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »