Chennai Court August 2014 Judgments
Selvendran Vs. 1.State of Tamil Nadu,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-27-2014
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:27. 08.2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.MANIKUMAR and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.S.RAVI H.C.P.(MD) No.636 of 2014 Selvendran ... Petitioner versus 1.State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. By the Secretary to Government, Home, Prohibition and Excise Department, Fort St. George, Chennai ?.9. 2.The District Magistrate and District Collector, O/o.The District Magistrate and District Collector, Sivagangai District, Sivagangai. 3.The Superintendent of Central Prison, Central Prison, Madurai. ... Respondents Prayer Habeas Corpus Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution for the issue of a Writ of Habeas Corpus, calling for the entire records connected in detention order passed in Cr.M.P.No.1/Goonda/2014, dated 04.06.2014 on the file of the second respondent herein and set aside the same as illegal and direct the respondents to produce the body and person of the petitioner's son, namely, Karthick @ Karthigaisamy, S/o.Selvendran, male, ag...
Tag this Judgment!A.Krishnamoorthy Vs. 1.Superintendent of Police,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-27-2014
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 27.08.2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.NAGAMUTHU Writ Petition(MD)No.9967 of 2007 M.P.(MD)No.3 of 2007 A.Krishnamoorthy ..Petitioner versus 1.Superintendent of Police, Pudukkottai, Pudukkottai District. 2.Principal Accountant General (Accounts & Entitlements).Tamil Nadu, Chennai-18..Respondents Writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of a writ of certiorariified mandamus, calling for the records pertaining to the order passed by the 1st respondent in his proceedings Na.Ka.No.F1Pen.22/05, dated 09.08.2007 and Na.Ka.No.F.1/Pen.22/05, dated 13.11.2007, insofar as the recovery in respect of 5% personal pay and market rate of rent free quarteRs.quashing the same and consequently directing the respondents to settle all the terminal benefits to the petitioner. !For Petitioner : Mr.V.Panneerselvam ^For Respondents : Mr.Aayiram K.Selvakumar, Government Advocate. For Respondent-2 : Mr.P.Guan...
Tag this Judgment!Muslim College of Education, Vs. 1.The Member Secretary,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-27-2014
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 27.08.2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.K.SASIDHARAN W.P.(MD)No.11495 of 2014 and M.P.(Md.No.1 and 2 of 2014 Muslim College of Education, Rep. by its Secretary Thiru H.Mohamed Ali, No.1, New Street, Thiruvithancode, Kanyakumari District - 629 174. : Petitioner versus 1.The Member Secretary, National Council for Teacher Education, Hans Bhavan II, No.1, Bahadur Shah Jaffar Marg, New Delhi - 110 002. 2.Regional Director, National Council for Teacher Education, Southern Regional Committee, Bangalore - 560 072. 3.The Registrar, Tamilnadu Teachers Education University, Lady Wellington College Campus, Kamarajar Salai, Chennai. : Respondents Prayer Writ Petitions are filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issue of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records relating to the order passed by the fiRs.respondent herein dated 02.07.2014 made in F.No.89-91/2014 Appeal/8th meeting 2014, and quash th...
Tag this Judgment!Ramasamy Nadar Vs. 1.Velayutha Nadar2.Duraipandi
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-27-2014
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 27.08.2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.SELVAM SECOND APPEAL(MD)No.620 of 2009 Ramasamy Nadar .Appellant/ Plaintiff versus 1.Velayutha Nadar 2.Duraipandi .Respondents/ Defendants Second Appeal is filed under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 against the Judgment and decree dated 01.04.2008 passed in Appeal Suit No.49 of 2007 by the Principal Sub Court, Tenkasi confirming the Judgment and decree dated 20.06.2007 passed in Original Suit No.95 of 2005 by the Principal District Munsif Court, Tenkasi. !For Appellant : Mr.M.P.Senthil ^For Respondents : Mr.D.Nallathambi :JUDGMENT The concurrent Judgments and decrees passed in Original Suit No.95 of 2005 by the Principal District Munsif Court, Tenkasi and in Appeal Suit No.49 of 2007 by the Principal Sub Court, Tenkasi are being challenged in the present second appeal. 2.The appellant herein as plaintiff has instituted Original Suit No.95 of 2005 on the file of the trial...
Tag this Judgment!N.Kailasam Vs. 1.The District Collector,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-27-2014
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 27.08.2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.JAICHANDREN AND THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE R.MAHADEVAN W.A.(MD)No.1016 of 2014 N.Kailasam : Appellant versus 1.The District Collector, Trichirappalli. 2.The Director of High School, DPI Compound, College Road, Nungambakkam, Chennai - 600 006. 3.The District Educational Officer, Madurai Road, Trichirappalli. : Respondents Common Prayer Appeals filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent, against the order, dated 23.08.2012, made in W.P.(MD)No.2033 of 2012. !For Appellant : Mr.P.Ganapathisubramanian ^For Respondents : Mr.VR.Shanmuganathan Special Government Pleader * * * * :JUDGMENT (Judgment of the Court was delivered by M.JAICHANDREN,J.) Heard the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant, as well as the learned Special Government Pleader appearing on behalf of the respondents. 2.This Writ Appeal has been filed against the order of the learned Single Judge, dated 23.08.2012, made...
Tag this Judgment!Sattur Yadhava Community Vs. Navaneethakrishnan @ Ambarisa
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-27-2014
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 27.08.2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE V.M.VELUMANI C.R.P.(MD)No.1542 of 2014 & M.P.(Md.No.1 of 2014 Sattur Yadhava Community Rep. through its Member, Chellaperumal S/o.U.Pitchaiah Konar, No.32, Sivananda Bajana Madam North Street, Sattur, Virudhunagar District.Petitioner versus Navaneethakrishnan @ Ambarisan .Respondent Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, to set aside the order, dated 30.06.2014, made in I.A.No.332 of 2014 in O.S.No.95 of 2009, on the file of Principal District Court, Virudhunagar District at Srivilliputhur. !For Petitioner : Mr.A.Sivaji ^For Respondent : Mr.A.Arumugam :ORDER This Civil Revision Petition has been filed to set aside the order, dated 30.06.2014, made in I.A.No.332 of 2014 in O.S.No.95 of 2009, on the file of Principal District Court, Virudhunagar District at Srivilliputhur. 2.The revision petitioner herein is the plaintiff, whereas the respondent here...
Tag this Judgment!Selvaraj, Vs. 1 the Secretary to Government,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-27-2014
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:27. 08.2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.MANIKUMAR and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.S.RAVI H.C.P.(MD) No.635 of 2014 SELVARAJ, S/O. BOSE, KATTAPPU STREET, THEVAR COLONY, AYYAPPA NAICKENPATTI, KURUVITHURAI, VADIPATTI TALUK, MADURAI DISTIRCT. (NOW CONFINED AT MADURAI CENTRAL PRISON) ... Petitioner versus 1 THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, HOME, PROHIBITION AND EXCISE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, CHENNAI-600 009 2 THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, OFFICE OF THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, MADURAI CITY, MADURAI DISTRICT. 3 THE SUPERINTENDENT OF PRISON, MADURAI CENTRAL PRISON, MADURAI DISTRICT. ... Respondents Prayer Habeas Corpus Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution for the issue of a Writ of Habeas Corpus, calling for the entire records connected with the detention order of the Respondent No.2 in No.29/BDFGISSV/2014 dated 02/06/2014 and quash the same and direct the respondents to produce the body and person of the detenu, by name Se...
Tag this Judgment!Alagarsamy Vs. 1.Ramamurthy
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-27-2014
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 27.08.2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.SELVAM SECOND APPEAL(MD)Nos.347 OF2009and 348 of 2009 Alagarsamy .Appellant in both Second Appeals versus 1.Ramamurthy 2.Minor Venkatesan rep. by Ramamurthy, fiRs.respondent. 3.Saroja 4.Anbarasi .Respondents in both Second Appeals Second Appeals filed under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 against the Judgments and decrees dated 10.01.2003 passed in Appeal Suit Nos.49 of 2001 and 48 of 2001 by the Sub Court, Sivagangai confirming the Judgments and decrees dated 26.04.2001 passed in Original Suit Nos.119 of 1997 and 120 of 1997 by the Principal District Munsif Court, Sivagangai. !For Appellant : Mr.S.Subbiah in both Second Appeals ^For Respondents : Mr.V.Kannan in both Second Appeals :COMMON JUDGMENT Challenge in these second appeals is to the concurrent Judgments and decrees passed in Original Suit Nos.119 and 120 of 1997 by the Principal District Munsif Court, Sivagangai ...
Tag this Judgment!B.Muthukumar Vs. 1.The State of Tamil Nadu,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-27-2014
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 27.08.2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.K.SASIDHARAN W.P.(MD)No.6799 of 2014 and M.P.(MD).Nos.2 & 4 of 2014 B.Muthukumar .Petitioner versus 1.The State of Tamil Nadu, rep. by its Secretary, Department of Higher Education, Fort St. George, Chennai - 600 009. 2.The Director of Collegiate Education, D.P.I.Compound, College Road, Chennai - 6. 3.Anna University, rep. by its Registrar, Guindy, Chennai -35. 4.The Principal, SACS M.A.V.M.M.Engineering College, Kidaripatty (P.O.).Alagarkoil (via).Madurai - 625 301. 5.G.M.Karthik 6.Prasanna Venkatesh 7.K.Ganesh .Respondents PRAYER Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records pertaining to the impugned order passed by the fourth respondent on 05.04.2014 and quash the same as illegal and consequently direct the fourth respondent to allow the petitioner to continue the study in the fourth ...
Tag this Judgment!1.V.Kamalam Vs. 1.The Chairman,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-27-2014
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 27.08.2014 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE V.M.VELUMANI C.R.P.(MD)No.1326 of 2011 & M.P.(Md.No.1 of 2011 1.V.Kamalam 2.V.Manjula Gandhi .Petitioners versus 1.The Chairman, Tamil Nadu Bhoomithana Board, Panagal Buildings, Chennai. 2.The District Collector, Dindigul District, Dindigul. 3.The Chairman, Tamil Nadu Slum Clearance Board, Chennai. 4.The Executive Engineer, Tamil Nadu Slum Clearance Board, Madurai Division, Madurai - 20.Respondents Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, to set aside the order, dated 15.03.2011, passed in I.A.No.99 of 2011 in O.S.No.95 of 2009 by the learned District Munsif, Oddanchatram. !For Petitioners : Mr.D.Venkatesh ^For Respondent Nos.1 &2: Mr.R.Anandraj Government Advocate For Respondent Nos.3 &4: Mr.P.Mahendran :ORDER This civil revision petition has been filed to set aside the order, dated 15.03.2011, passed in I.A.No.99 of 2011 in O.S.No.95 of 20...
Tag this Judgment!- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »