Chennai Court August 2014 Judgments
V.Meenakshi Vs. 1.The State of Tamil Nadu,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-28-2014
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:28. 08.2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.JAICHANDREN AND THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.MAHADEVAN W.A.(MD)No.916 of 2014 and M.P(MD)No.1 of 2014 V.Meenakshi ... Appellant/Petitioner Vs. 1.The State of Tamil Nadu, represented by its Secretary to Government, School Education Department, Secretariat, Chennai ?.9. 2.The Director of Elementary Education, Chennai ?.6. 3.The District Elementary Educational Officer, Thanjavur, Thanjavur District. 4.The Secretary, R.Rajaraman Middle School, Narasinganpettai ?. 609 802. Thanjavur District. ... Respondents/Respondents Prayer Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of the Letter Patent Act, against the order dated 09.07.2014 passed in W.P(MD)No.15824 of 2012. !For Appellant ... Mr.V.Panneerselvam for M/s.C.S.Associates ^For Respondents ... Mr.A.K.Baskarapandian, Special Govt. Pleader for R.1 to R.3 Mr.S.N.Ravichandran for Mr.K.K.Kannan for R.4 :JUDGMENT R.MAHADEVAN,J.This writ appeal has been filed ...
Tag this Judgment!Chinnathambi Vs. 1.The State of Tamil Nadu,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-28-2014
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 28.08.2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.JAICHANDREN AND THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE R.MAHADEVAN W.P(MD)Nos.14338 of 2014 to 14342 of 2014 and M.P(MD)Nos.1 and 2 of 2014 (in all the petitions) and M.P(MD)No.3 of 2014 in W.P(MD)No.14342 of 2014 W.P(MD)No.14338 of 2014: Chinnathambi ..Petitioner versus 1.The State of Tamil Nadu, represented by its Chief Secretary, St. George Fort, Chennai - 9. 2.The Joint Commissioner, Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowment Department, Tirunelveli, Tirunelveli District. 3.The Joint Commissioner/Executive Officer, Incorporated and unincorporated Devosam, Suchindranm, Kanyakumari District. 4.The District Collector, Nagercoil, Kanyakumari District. 5.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Padmanabhapuram, Kanyakumari District. 6.The Tahsildar, Kalkulam Taluk, Thuckalay, Kanyakumari District. 7.The Executive Officer, Public Works Department, Thuckalay, Kanyakumari District. 8.The Block Development Officer, Th...
Tag this Judgment!A.S.EdwIn Suthan Vs. 1.The Chief Educational Officer,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-28-2014
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 28.08.2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.NAGAMUTHU W.P.(MD)No.1849 of 2009 and M.P.(MD)No.2 of 2009 A.S.Edwin Suthan ..Petitioner versus 1.The Chief Educational Officer, Tirunelveli, Tirunelveli District. 2.The District Elementary Educational Officer, Tirunelveli at Cheranmahadevi, Tirunelveli-627 001. 3.P.L.W.A.Higher Secondary School Committee, Vicramasingapuram-627 425, Tirunelveli District, rep.by its Secretary. 4.Thiru M.Panneerselvam, The Headmaster, P.L.W.A.Higher Secondary School, Vicramasingapuram-627 425, Tirunelveli District..Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records relating to the impugned order of termination issued by the third respondent Secretary dated 20.02.2009, quash the same and further direct the third respondent to reinstate the petitioner forthwith into service as Physical Education Teach...
Tag this Judgment!K.Sudhakaran Vs. R.S.Paramasivam
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-28-2014
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 28.08.2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.KARUPPIAH C.M.A(MD)No.800 OF2014and M.P(MD)No.2 of 2014 K.Sudhakaran ..Appellant .versus R.S.Paramasivam ..Respondent PRAYER Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Order 43 Rule 1(q) of the Civil Procedure Code against the fair and decretal order made in I.A.No.200 of 2013 in O.S.No.32 of 2013 dated 23.06.2014 on the file of the Principal District Judge,Karur. !For Appellant : M/s.S.Gokulraj ^For Respondent : M/s.E.K.Kumaresan :JUDGMENT The appellant, who is the defendant in the original suit filed the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal against the fair and decretal order passed in I.A.No.200 of 2013 in O.S.No.32 of 2013, dated 23.06.2014 on the file of the Principal District Judge,Karur. 2.Heard the submissions made by the learned counsel for the appellant as well as the learned counsel for the respondent and perused the materials available on record. 3.For the sake of convenience, the responden...
Tag this Judgment!Subramania Asari (Since Deceased) Vs. Kathan Asari (Since Deceased)
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-28-2014
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 28.08.2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.SELVAM SECOND APPEAL(MD)No.675 of 2009 Subramania Asari (since deceased) Thangammal (since deceased) 1.Baskaran 2.Vijayan 3.Pushpam 4.Rakkammal 4.Chinna Kathammal (Cause title accepted vide order dated 24.08.2009 made in M.P(MD)No.1 of 2009).Appellants/Defendants versus Kathan Asari (since deceased) 1.Muthukamatchi 2.Palanivel 3.Vijayarajan 4.Maheswari .Respondents/ Plaintiffs Second Appeal is filed under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 against the Judgment and decree dated 08.01.2007 passed in Appeal Suit No.43 of 1996 by the Sub Court, Periyakulam confirming the Judgment and decree dated 07.02.1996 passed in Original Suit No.421 of 1993 by the District Munsif Court, Periyakulam. !For Appellants : Mr.A.Arumugam for M/s.Ajmal Associates ^For Respondents : Mr.A.Shahul Hameed :JUDGMENT The concurrent Judgments and decrees passed in Original Suit No.421 of 1993 by the Distri...
Tag this Judgment!1.Muthu Virumaandi thevar Vs. 1.Kishore Banu
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-28-2014
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 28.08.2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.SELVAM S.A(MD)No.474 of 2011 and M.P(MD)Nos.1 of 2011 and 1 of 2014 1.Muthu Virumaandi Thevar 2.Mathialagan 3.Jeyapal .Appellants/ Defendants 1 to 3 versus 1.Kishore Banu 2.Samima Banu 3.S.M.Shahul Hameed (Respondents 1 to 3 are represented through their power of attorney) 4.Ajmal Khan .Respondents 1 to 4/Plaintiffs 5.The Commissioner, Cumbum Municipality, Cumbum Town, Theni District.Fourth Respondent/Fourth Defendant Second Appeal is filed under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 against the Judgment and decree dated 18.10.2010 passed in Appeal Suit No.3 of 2009 by the Sub Court, Uthamapalayam modifying the Judgment and decree dated 10.11.2008 passed in Original Suit No.18 of 2005 by the District Munsif Court, Uthamapalayam. !For Appellants : Mr.D.Malaichamy ^For Respondents : Mr.V.George Raja 1 to 4 for M/s.Ajmal Associates For Respondent No.5 : Mr.S.Kadarkarai :JUDGMENT T...
Tag this Judgment!B.StalIn Vs. 1.The Cabinet Secretary,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-28-2014
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:28. 08.2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.JAICHANDREN AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.MAHADEVAN W.P(MD)Nos.3730 of 2012 and M.P(MD)Nos.1 to 3 of 2012 and 2 of 2014 AND W.P(MD)No.4503 of 2012 and M.P(MD)Nos.1 and 2 of 2012 W.P(MD)No.3730 of 2012: B.Stalin ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Cabinet Secretary, Union of India, Cabinet Secretariat, Rashtrapathi Bhavan, New Delhi ?. 110 001. 2.The Principal Secretary to The Hon'ble Prime Minister, Union of India, Prime Minister's Secretariat, New Delhi ?. 110 001. 3.The Director, Power Grid Corporation of India Limited, B-9, Qutab Institutional Area, Katwaria Sarai, New Delhi ?. 110 016. 4.The Chief Secretary, Government of Tamil Nadu, Chief Secretariat, Chennai ?.2. 5.The Chairman, Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, Mount Road, Chennai ?.2. 6.R.Krishnamoorthy ... Respondents (R.6 impleaded as per order of this Court dated 03.07.2014 made in M.P(MD)No.1 of 2014 in W.P(MD)No.3730 of 2012.) Prayer Petit...
Tag this Judgment!Saravanan Vs. the District Manager,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-27-2014
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:27. 08.2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.K.SASIDHARAN W.P.(MD)No.14223 of 2014 and M.P.(MD)No.1 of 2014 Saravanan : Petitioner Vs. The District Manager, Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation Limited, (TASMAC), Thanjavur District, Thanjavur. : Respondent Prayer Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issue of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records of the impugned order passed by the respondent in Na.Ka.1271/RV- 2/2013, dated 16.12.2013 and quash the same and consequently, direct the Respondent to reinstate the Petitioner in service. !For Petitioner : Mr.S.Rajaprabu ^For Respondent : Mr.M.Muniyasamy, Standing Counsel ******** :ORDER ****** The petitioner was appointed as Salesman by the Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation Limited (hereinafter referred to as 'the TASMAC), in respect of Shop No.7849 at Papanasam, Thanjavur District. While so, the higher officials c...
Tag this Judgment!Jeyadeepa, Vs. 1.The Additional Secretary,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-27-2014
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:27. 08.2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.MANIKUMAR and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.S.RAVI H.C.P.(MD) No.733 of 2014 Jeyadeepa, W/o.Saravanan, 123, Sundar Nagar, Near Arivuthirukovil, Chinnaiapuram, Dindigul. ... Petitioner versus 1.The Additional Secretary, Government of India, Ministry of Consumer Affairs, Food and Public Distribution (Department of consumer affairs), Room No.270 Krishi Bhavan, New Delhi ?. 110 001. 2.The Secretary, Government of Tamil Nadu, Co-operation, Food and Consumer Protection Department, Secretariat, Fort St. George, Chennai ?. 600 009. 3.The District Collector and District Magistrate, Dindigul District, Dindigul. 4.The Inspector of Police, CSCID, Dindigul. ... Respondents Prayer Habeas Corpus Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution for the issue of a Writ of Habeas Corpus, calling for the records pertaining to the order of detention passed by the third respondent in his proceedings detentio...
Tag this Judgment!J.Padmanaban Vs. the District Manager,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-27-2014
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:27. 08.2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.K.SASIDHARAN W.P.(MD)No.13947 of 2014 and M.P.(MD)No.1 of 2014 J.Padmanaban .. Petitioner Vs. The District Manager, TASMAC, Trichy. .. Respondent Prayer Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issue of a Writ of Certiorari, to call for the records in connection with the impugned order, dated 09.08.2014 in Na.Ka.No.372(235)/2014/A, on the file of the respondent and quash the same. !For Petitioner : Mr.R.Satish ^For Respondent : Mr.M.Muniyasamy, Standing Counsel :ORDER The petitioner was appointed as Salesman by the Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation Limited (hereinafter referred to as 'the TASMAC), in respect of Shop No.10235 at V.O.C. Street, Trichy. While so, the Vigilance Committee conducted a surprise inspection on 26 March, 2014 and found that the petitioner was collecting excess amount than prescribed price for liquor. The respondent, ...
Tag this Judgment!- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »