Chennai Court July 2014 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Jeyakumar Vs. 1.The Director of Elementary Education,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-02-2014
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:02. 07.2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.MAHADEVAN W.P(MD)No.1161 of 2010 Jeyakumar ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Director of Elementary Education, College Road, Chennai - 6. 2.The District Elementary Education Officer, Virudhunagar District. 3.The Additional Assistant Elementary Education Officer, Sivakasi, Virudhunagar District. 4.The Head Master, Middle School, Gangakulam, Sivakasi Panchayat Union, Virudhunagar District. ... Respondents (Cause title amended as per the order of this Court dated 20.04.2011 passed in M.P(MD)No.1 of 2011 in W.P(MD)No.1161 of 2010) Prayer Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records pertaining to the proceedings of the first respondent in Na.Ka.No.20516/E4/2006, dated 19.07.2006 and quash the same as illegal and direct the first respondent to promote the petitioner for the post of Headmaster of Primary School by calcula...
P.Mahaveerchand Vs. S.Hemalatha
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-02-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:2. 07-2014 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.JAICHANDREN Contempt Appeal Nos.2 and 3 of 2014 1. P.Mahaveerchand 2. P.Mahaveer Chand Director M/s.Sponcer Comotrade Private Limited., No.34, Ganesh Chandra Avenue, Kolkata-700 013. .. Appellants in both the Contempt Appeals Versus 1. S.Hemalatha 2. Murali Vittal .. Respondents in both the Contempt Appeals Prayer in Contempt Appeal No.2 of 2014: Appeal filed under Rule 10 of the Contempt of Court Rules of High Court, Madras, read with Section 19 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, against the order dated 11.4.2014 made in Sub Application No.79 of 2013 in Contempt Petition No.333 of 2013. Prayer in Contempt Appeal No.3 of 2014: Appeal filed under Rule 10 of the Contempt of Court Rules of High Court, Madras, read with Section 19 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, against the order dated 11.4.2014 made in Contempt Petition No.333 of 2013. For Appellants : Mr.R.Thiagarajan For Respondent : Mr.P.Su...
J.Angeline Jeeva Sundari Vs. Principal Secretary
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-02-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Dated ::02. 07.2014 CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T. RAJA W.P. No.18408 of 2011 and M.P. No.1 of 2014 1. J.Angeline Jeeva Sundari 2. K. Basker 3. S. Ramesh ..Petitioners Vs. The Principal Secretary/ Commissioner of Commercial Taxes Chepauk, Chennai. .. Respondent PRAYER: The Writ Petition has been filed under Section 226 of the Constitution of India to issue an order of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the proceedings of the respondent in its Proc. No.Y1/24013/09 dated 28.06.2011 and quash the same and consequently direct the respondent to fix their seniority by counting their past service as Assistant in the District Establishment in terms of the rules for all purposes including promotion and pass such further orders. For petitioners : Mr. V. Vijay Shankar For respondents : Mr. V. Haribabu. A.G.P (Taxes) ORDER There is one Writ Petition filed by three petitioners commonly seeking for a relief, to quash the impugned proceedings iss...
V.Renganathan Vs. Indian Oil Corporation Limited,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-02-2014
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:02. 07.2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUBBIAH W.P.(MD)No.10434 of 2014 and M.P.(MD) Nos.1 and 2 of 2014 V.Renganathan ... Petitioner Vs. Indian Oil Corporation Limited, Rep. by its Chief Divisional Retail Sales Manager, No.2 Race Course Road, Chokkikulam, Madurai - 625 002. ... Respondent Prayer Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records on the files of the respondent pertaining to its order therein ref.No.TNSO/Law/1, dated 11.06.2014 and to quash the same and consequently to direct the respondent to supply the Petroleum products to the petitioner concerned namely Parvatham Agencies as per the agreement dated 23.11.2010. !For Petitioner ... Mr.S.C.Herold Singh ^For Respondent ... Mr.K.Muraleedharan Standing Counsel :ORDER The writ petition has been filed seeking for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call ...
K.Thilagavathi Vs. 1.The Union of India Rep. by
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-02-2014
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:02. 07.2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.SELVAM and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.S.RAVI H.C.P.(MD) No.215 of 2014 H.C.P.(MD) Nos.216 to 217 of 2014 K.Thilagavathi ... Petitioner in H.C.P.(MD).No.215 of 2014 R.Rajendran ... Petitioner in H.C.P.(MD).No.216 of 2014 G.Meenachi ... Petitioner in H.C.P.(MD).No.217 of 2014 Vs. 1.The Union of India rep. by The Secretary to the Government Ministry of finance, Department of Revenue New Delhi. 2.The Union of India represented by The Joint Secretary to the Government, Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue, Central Economic Intelligence Bureau, COFEPOSA Unit, New Delhi. 3.The Superintendent of Central Prison, Central Prison, Trichy. ... Respondents in all the petitions Petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Habeas Corpus calling for the records relating to the detention order in F.No.673/24/2013-Cus VIII with regard to detenue, namely, R.Kanthasa...
K.Sreenivasa Rao Vs. the Chairman
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-02-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:02. / 07 /2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.S.KARNAN W.P.No.11968 of 2014 K.Sreenivasa Rao ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Chairman, Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, No.800, Anna Salai, Chennai - 600 002. 2.The Superintendent Engineer, Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, Anna Salai, K.K.Nagar, Chennai -600 078. 3.The Assistant Engineer (Operation & Maintenance), Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, K.K.Nagar,Chennai - 600 078. 4.The Member Secretary, Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority, No.1, Gandhi Irwin Road, Chennai-600 008. ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the first to third respondents to receive the petitioner's application, process and effect electricity service connection to the petitioner's residential building at Block No.76, P.T.Rajan Salai, K.K.Nagar, Chennai - 600 078, Old Survey No.52/1A Part, T.S.No.240/6, Kodambakkam Village, without insis...
C.Ponnusamy Vs. 1.The District Collector,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-02-2014
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:02. 07.2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.MAHADEVAN W.P(MD)No.2782 of 2013 C.Ponnusamy ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The District Collector, Office of the District Collector, Ramanathapuram, Ramanathapuram District. 2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Paramakudi, Ramanathapuram District. 3.The Tahsildar, Kamuthi, Ramanathapuram District. 4.The Superintendent of Police, Ramanathapuram, Ramanathapuram District. 5.The Inspector of Police, Kamuthi Taluk, Ramanathapuram District. 6.The President, Kezhamavillangai Panchayat, Kamuthi Taluk, Ramanathapuram District. ... Respondents Prayer Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records relating to the order of the first respondent's communication No.Na.Ka.Oo.Ne.2/1742/2012(1), dated 26.10.2012 and quash the same and consequently, direct the first respondent to grant permission for erecting a bronze statue of Thiru Pasu...
S.Jeyakumar Vs. 1.The District Magistrate Cum
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-02-2014
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 02.07.2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.RAMASUBRAMANIAN AND THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE V.M.VELUMANI W.P.(MD)No.10505 of 2014 and M.P.(MD)No.1 of 2014 S.Jeyakumar ...Petitioner versus 1.The District Magistrate Cum District Collector, Thoothukudi, Thoothukudi District. 2.The Authorised Officer, Central Bank of India, Regional Office, Madurai-625 020. 3.The Sub-Collector cum Sub Divisional Magistrate, Kovilpatti, Thoothukudi District. 4.The Superintendent of Police, Thoothukudi, Thoothukudi District. 5.J.Jegadeesh ...Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records pertaining to the impugned notice vide Na.Ka.C4/40663/2013 dated 08.05.2014 on the file of the fiRs.respondent and quash the same as illegal and consequently direct the second respondent to redeem the petitioner's property. !For Petitioner : Mr.P.Rathinam for Mr.R.Venk...
M.Ananda Raj Vs. the Central Public Information Officer
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-02-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED :02. 07.2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.RAJA W.P.No.3855 of 2013 M.Ananda Raj .. Petitioner -vs- 1. The Central Public Information Officer RTI Act 2005 Regional Meteorological Centre, I.M.D., No.50, College Road Chennai 600 006 2. The Appellate Authority, RTI Act India Meteorological Department Lodhi Road New Delhi 110 003 .. Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issue of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent No.1, the Central Public Information Officer, Regional Meteorological Centre, India Meteorological Department No.50, College Road, Chennai-6 representing the India Meteorological Department to pay compensation, as per Sec.19(8)(b) of the RTI Act, 2005, in lieu of reinstatement the loss and other detriments suffered by him to equate the retrospective reinstatement benefits with 12% interest till the date of settlement and the subsequent pension and other benefits calculated ...
Pugalendi Vs. State
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-02-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:02. 07.2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.S.SIVAGNANAM Crl.R.C.No.312 of 2013 and M.P.No.1 of 2013 Pugalendi ...Petitioner vs. State rep. By its Inspector of Police District Crime Branch Krishnagiri ...Respondent Criminal R.C., filed under Section 397 read with 401 Cr.P.C., to set aside the judgment dated 15.10.2012 made in Cr.M.P.No.2703 of 2012 in C.C.No.123/2012 on the file of Judicial Magistrate I, Krishnagiri and call for the records and discharge the petitioner from all the charges. For Petitioner : Mr.Mukund R.Pandiyan For Respondent : Mr.C.Iyyapparaj Govt.Advocate ORDER This Revision is directed against the order dated 15.10.2012 made in Cr.M.P.No.2703 of 2012 in C.C.No.123/2012 on the file of Judicial Magistrate I, Krishnagiri.2. The petitioner is the accused in the said case, against whom, charge sheet has been laid for offence under Section 420 IPC. The defacto complainant is the Divisional Manager of Shriram Transport Fin...
- ‹ Prev
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 22
- 23
- 24
- 25
- Next ›
- Last »