Chennai Court July 2014 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Kamatchiammal, Vs. 1.The Additional Secretary,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-10-2014
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:10. 07.2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.MANIKUMAR and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.S.RAVI H.C.P.(MD) No.442 of 2014 Kamatchiammal, W/o.Ramaraj, Vazhaikumbu Nagore, Ambarampalayam, Pollachi Taluk, Coimbatore District. .. Petitioner versus 1.The Additional Secretary, Government of India, Ministry of Consumer Affairs, Food and Public Distribution (Department of Consumer Affairs), Room No.270, Krishi Bhavan, New Delhi - 110 001. 2.The Secretary, Government of Tamil Nadu, Co-operation, Food and Consumer Protection Department, Secretariat, Fort St. George, Chennai - 600 009. 3.The District Collector and District Magistrate, Dindigul District, Dindigul. 4.The Inspector of Police, CSCID, Dindigul. .. Respondents Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution for the issue of a Writ of Habeas Corpus calling for the records pertaining to the order of detention passed by the third respondent in his proceedings Detention Order No.10 of...
G.Srinivasan Vs. G.Boopalan
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-10-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 10.07.2014 CORAM : THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE R.MALA C.R.P(PD).No.2013 of 2014 and M.P.No.1 of 2014 1.G.Srinivasan 2.Kalavathiammal 3.N.Usharani 4.G.S.Madhankumar 5.S.Nirmaladevi 6.V.Narmada .Petitioners versus G.Boopalan (died) 1.Vijayalakshmi 2.Monisha .Respondents Prayer:- Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of Constitution of India, against the fair and decreetal order dated 17.02.2014 made in I.A.No.40 of 2013 in O.S.No.15 of 2012 on the file of the II Additional District and Sessions Court, Vellore at Ranipet, Vellore District. For Petitioners : Mr.T.P.Prabakaran ORDER The Civil Revision Petition is filed against the fair and decreetal order dated 17.02.2014 made in I.A.No.40 of 2013 in O.S.No.15 of 2012 on the file of the II Additional District and Sessions Court, Vellore at Ranipet, Vellore District. 2.At the time of admission, argument of the learned counsel for the revision petitioners is heard in length. 3.The p...
S.Kannan Vs. the Commissioner
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-10-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATE:10. 07.2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.SATHYANARAYANAN W.P.No.18344 of 2014 and M.P.No.1 of 2014 S.Kannan .. Petitioner Versus 1.The Commissioner, Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowment (HR&CE) Department, Nungambakkam, Chennai -34. 2.The Joint Commissioner, Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowment (HR&CE) Department, Kottai Mariamman Temple Complex, Salem-1. 3.Fit Person / Asst.Commissioner (Admn.) Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowment (HR&CE) Department, Kottai Mariamman Temple Complex, Salem-1. 4.The Executive Officer, Arulmigu Vinayagar and Mariamman Vagaiyaraa Temples, Suramangalam Salem 5. 5.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Salem. 6.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Suramangalam, Salem. 7.The Tahsildar, Salem West, Pallapatti, Salem. .. Respondents Prayer: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking for a writ of Mandamus, directing the 1st respondent to consider and ...
T.M.Muthukrishan Vs. K.Susila
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-10-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED1007.2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.KARUPPIAH C.R.P(PD)No.268 OF2006T.M.Muthukrishan ..Petitioner Vs 1.K.Susila 2.K.Kesavan 3.The Sub-Registrar, Pallavaram ..Respondents Prayer: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, against the draft(docket) order, dated 13.09.2005 made in O.S.S.R.No.334 of 2005 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Alandur. For Petitioners :Mr.P.Srinivasan For Respondents :Mr.M.Mahendra Kumar 1 and 2 For Respondent-3:Mr.T.Jayaramaraj ORDER The revision Petitioner/Plaintiff filed this revision Petition against the order, dated 13.09.2005 made in unnumbered O.S.S.R.No.334 of 2005 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Alandur. 2.For the sake of convenience, the Plaintiff in the original suit is referred as the revision Petitioner and the defendants in the original suit are referred as respondents hereafter. 3.The revision Petitioner has filed a suit and in the plaint, t...
V.Chandra Vs. State
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-10-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 10.07.2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE K.B.K.VASUKI Crl.O.P.No.17696 of 2014 V.Chandra ..Petitioner versus State rep. By The Inspector of Police, P-6, Kodungaiyur Police Station, Kodungaiyur, Chennai 600 118..Respondent Prayer : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure praying to direct the respondent to register a FIR against the petitioner's complaint dated 07.04.2014 on the file of the respondent police C.S.R.No.220 of 2014. For Petitioner : Mr.C.Venkatesan For Respondent : Mr.C.Emalias, Additional Public Prosecutor ORDER Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent. 2.This Criminal Original Petition is filed to direct the respondent to register a FIR against the petitioner's complaint dated 07.04.2014 on the file of the respondent police C.S.R.No.220 of 2014. 3.The perusal of the records made available...
M.Murugesan Vs. the Managing Director
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-10-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED :10.7.2014 Coram The Honourable Mr.Justice B.RAJENDRAN W.P. No.18167 of 2014 M.Murugesan ...Petitioner Vs.1. The Managing Director Coimbatore District Central Coop.Bank State Bank Road, Coimbatore 2. The General Manager Coimbatore District Central Coop.Bank State Bank Road, Coimbatore ...Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of mandamus directing the respondents to pay the difference amount of gratuity together with interest at the rate of 10% per annum to the petitioner as per order passed by the Assistant Commissioner (Gratuity) of Labour, Coimbatore made in No.GA/217/2000 dated 25.6.2001. For Petitioner : Mr.C.Prakasam For respondents : Mr. Bala Ramesh Additional Government Pleader ORDER By consent, the Writ Petition is taken up for final disposal at the time of admission itself. 2.Heard, Mr.C.Prakasam, learned counsel for the petitioner and also Mr.Bala Ramesh...
P.Usha Rani Vs. Secretary to the Government
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-10-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:10. 07-2014 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.VAIDYANATHAN W.P.No.33305 of 2013 and M.P.No.1 of 2013 P.Usha Rani .. Petitioner vs. 1.The Secretary to the Government, The Government of Tamil Nadu, Labour and Employment (Q1) Dept., Fort St. George, Chennai. 2.The District Collector, Ariyalur District, Ariyalur. 3.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Udaiyar Palayam, Ariyalur District. 4.The Tahsildar, Jayankondam Taluk, Jayankondam, Ariyalur District. .. Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issue of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records of the impugned Government Order in G.O.(MS) No.96, dated 18.6.2012 (Labour and Employment (Q1) Department) and consequential rejection order of the second respondent herein relating to employment for the petitioner herein on the ground of Compassionate Ground dated 3.10.2013 proceedings in Na.Ka.No.A3/4287/2013 and to quash the sam...
The Divisional Manager, Vs. 1.M.Vijayakumar2.G.Kandaswamy
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-10-2014
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 10.07.2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.KARUPPIAH C.M.A(MD)No.2234 OF2004and C.M.P.No.13225 of 2004 The Divisional Manager, New India Assurance Company Limited, 34, Alagar Koil Road, Tallakulam, Madurai 625 002...Appellants .versus 1.M.Vijayakumar 2.G.Kandaswamy ...Respondents. PRAYER Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Order 43 r/w Section 30 of Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923 against the order dated 29.9.2003 made in W.C.No.181 of 2002 on the file of the Commissioner of Workmen Compensation, Dindigul. !For Appellant : M/s.J.S.Murali ^For Respondent-1 : M/s.P.Muthuvijayapandian For Respondent-2 : M/s.D.Venkatesh :JUDGMENT The appellant-second respondent had filed this Civil Miscellaneous Appeal against the order, dated 29.09.2003 made in W.C.No.181 of 2002. 2.Heard the learned counsel for the appellant and the learned counsel for the fiRs.and second respondents and perused the materials available on record. 3.For the sake o...
C.Baboo Joseph Vs. State
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-10-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 10.07.2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE K.B.K.VASUKI Crl.O.P.No.17723 of 2014 C.Baboo Joseph ..Petitioner versus 1.The State rep. By The Commissioner of Police, Vepery, Chennai. 2.The Sub-Inspector of Police, G-7, Chetpet Police Station, Chennai 600 031..Respondents Prayer : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure praying to direct the respondents to register a case on the complaint given by the petitioner dated 31.03.2014 and to proceed with the investigation according to law. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Doraisamy For Respondents : Mr.C.Emalias, Additional Public Prosecutor ORDER Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondents. 2.This Criminal Original Petition is filed to direct the respondents to register a case on the complaint given by the petitioner dated 31.03.2014 and to proceed with the investigation acco...
Rajalakshmi V.Nesaraj Vs. State
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-10-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 10.07.2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE K.B.K.VASUKI Crl.O.P.No.17643 of 2014 Ms.Rajalakshmi V.Nesaraj ..Petitioner versus State rep. By Sub Inspector of Police, Guindy, Chennai..Respondent Prayer : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure praying to direct the respondent police to register the F.I.R in respect of CSR No.440 of 2014 dated 30.06.2014, against the accused under Sections 294(b).506(ii) I.P.C., and Section 4 of Women Harassment Act, without any further delay. For Petitioner : Ms.Rajalakshmi For Respondent : Mr.C.Emalias, Additional Public Prosecutor ORDER Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent. 2.This Criminal Original Petition is filed to to direct the respondent to register the F.I.R in respect of CSR No.440 of 2014 dated 30.06.2014, against the accused under Sections 294(b).506(ii) I.P....
- ‹ Prev
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- Next ›
- Last »