Chennai Court July 2014 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
The Management Vs. V.Rajendran
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-10-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 10.07.2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE D.HARIPARANTHAMAN W.P.NO.27296 OF2013AND M.P.NOS.1 AND2OF2013The Management S.439, Salem Agricultural ProduceRs.Co-operative Marketing Society Ltd., 305, Suramangalam Main Road, Salem 636 005.Petitioner Versus 1.V.Rajendran 2.The Joint Commissioner of Labour (Appellate Authority under Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972) Coimbatore. 3.The Assistant Commissioner of Labour (The Controlling Authority under Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972) Salem 636 001.Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records relating to the order dated 21.07.2013 passed by the Appellate Authority of Payment of Gratuity Act, The Joint Commissioner of Labour, Coimbatore in P.G.A.No.39 of 2012 confirming the order dated 09.05.2011 passed in PG.No.72 of 2008 on the file of the Controllilng Authority under Paymen...
M.Veeramani Vs. the Collector
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-10-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED :10.7.2014 Coram The Honourable Mr.Justice B.RAJENDRAN W.P. No.18156 of 2014 M.Veeramani ...Petitioner Vs.1. The Collector Perambalur, Perambalur District 2. The Personal Assistant (Dev.) to Collector Perambalur, Perambalur District ...Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of certiorarified mandamus to call for the records relating to the impugned order of the second respondent in Rc.No.3934/2013/PA5 dated 19.7.2013 and quash the same and direct the respondents to reinstate the petitioner in service with all attendant benefits. For Petitioner : Mr.P.Rajendran For respondents : Mr. A.Kumar Special Government Pleader ORDER By consent, the Writ Petition is taken up for final disposal at the time of admission itself. 2.Heard, Mr.P.Rajendran, learned counsel for the petitioner and also Mr. A.Kumar, learned Special Government Pleader, who has taken notice on behalf of t...
S.Kuppan Vs. Superintendent of Police of Villupuram District
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-10-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 10.07.2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE K.B.K.VASUKI Crl.O.P.No.17725 of 2014 S.Kuppan ..Petitioner versus 1.The Superintendent of Police, Villupuram District, Villupuram. 2.The Sub Inspector of Police, Ananthapuram Police Station, Ananthapuram..Respondents Prayer : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure praying to direct the respondents to register F.I.R., against the said Ramalingam on the complaint made by the petitioner on 07.05.2014. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Mazhaimeni Pandiyan For Respondents : Mr.C.Emalias, Additional Public Prosecutor ORDER Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondents. 2.This Criminal Original Petition is filed to direct the respondents to register a case on the complaint given by the petitioner dated 07.05.2014 and to proceed with the investigation according to law. 3.In the recent ...
Perfect Vending India Pvt. Ltd. Vs. the Customs Excise
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-10-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATE :10. 07.2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.SUDHAKAR AND THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.M.AKBAR ALI C.M.A. NOS. 1868 TO1870OF2014AND M.P. NOS. 1 OF2014M/s.Perfect Vending India Pvt. Ltd. 1/46, Pandurangapuram, Padi Chennai 600 050, rep. By its Managing Director Mr.Sanjeev Mohan .. Appellant - Vs - 1. The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, Haddows Road Shastri Bhawan Annexe 1st Floor Chennai 600 006, rep. By its Assistant Registrar.2. The Commissioner of Service Tax Newry Towers, No.2054, Block-I2d Avenue, 12th Main Road Anna Nagar Chennai 600 040. .. Respondents C.M.A. No.1868 of 2014 filed to set aside the Misc. Order No.40326/2014 dated 16.01.2014 in ST/Stay/41045/2013 in ST/41416/2013 DB passed by the 1st respondent. C.M.A. No.1869 of 2014 filed to set aside the Misc. Order No.40325/2014 dated 16.01.2014 in ST/Stay/41044/2013 in ST/41415/2013 DB passed by the 1st respondent. C.M.A. No.1870 of 2014 filed to set aside t...
Core Minerals Vs. the Commissioner of Service Tax
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-10-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:10. 7.2014 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUDHAKAR AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE G.M.AKBAR ALI C.M.A.Nos.285 and 1320 of 2014 Core Minerals TVH Belica Towers, 5th Floor Tower 2, No.94, MRC Nagar Chennai 600 028. .. Appellant in CMA.285/2014 Core Minerals TVH Belica Towers, 5th Floor Tower 2, No.94, MRC Nagar Chennai 600 028 rep. by its Deputy General Manager-Taxation .. Appellant in CMA.1320/2014 Vs.1. The Commissioner of Service Tax Newry Towers, 2054-1, II Avenue Anna Nagar, Chennai 600 040.2. The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, South Zonal Bench First Floor, No.27, Haddows Road Chennai 600 006. .. Respondents in both appeals Prayer in C.M.A.No.285 of 2014: Appeal against the Misc. Order No.42617 of 2013, dated 4.11.2013 passed by the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, Chennai. Prayer in C.M.A.No.1320 of 2014: Appeal against the Final Order No.40191 of 2014, dated 21.3.2014 passed by the Customs, Ex...
Mariya Anton Vijay Vs. the State Represented By,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-10-2014
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:10. 07.2014 Coram THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.N.PRAKASH Crl.R.C.(MD) No.204 of 2014 and M.P.(MD) Nos.1 and 2 of 2014 and Crl.O.P.(MD)No.6719 of 2014 and M.P.(MD)Nos.1,2,3 and 4 of 2014 Crl.R.C.(MD) No.204 of 2014 Mariya Anton Vijay : Petitioner/Accused No.38 Vs. The State represented by, The Inspector of Police, Q Branch C.I.D., Thoothukudi. (Crime No.18 of 2013) : Respondent/Complainant (Originally registered at Tharuvaikulam Marine Police Station, Thoothukudi District) PRAYER Criminal Revision Petition filed under Section 397 Cr.P.C r/w. 401 of Criminal Procedure Code, praying to call for the entire records pertaining to the order taking cognizance passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Thoothukudi, Thoothukudi District in P.R.C.No.1 of 2014 vide his order dated 02.01.2014 and set aside the said order as well as the charges referred to therein in respect of the petitioner. !For Petitioner : Mr.R.Anand $For Respondent : Mr.K...
S.Saravanan Vs. Mahalakshmi @ G.Rohini
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-10-2014
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 10.07.2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE V.M.VELUMANI C.R.P.(MD)No.1265 of 2014 & M.P.(Md.No.1 of 2014 S.Saravanan .Petitioner versus Mahalakshmi @ G.Rohini .Respondent Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, to set aside the order dated 08.03.2014 passed in I.A.No.2078 of 2013 in O.S.No.405 of 2011, by the learned Principal District Munsif, Thoothukudi. !For Petitioner : Mr.K.Chengizkhan ^For Respondent : Mr.B.Rajesh Saravanan :ORDER This Civil Revision Petition has been filed to set aside the order dated 08.03.2014 passed in I.A.No.2078 of 2013 in O.S.No.405 of 2011, by the learned Principal District Munsif, Thoothukudi. 2.The petitioner is the plaintiff, whereas the respondent is the defendant in the suit in O.S.No.405 of 2011 on the file of Principal District Munsif Court, Thoothukudi. 3.The petitioner filed the suit in O.S.No.405 of 2011 before the Principal District Munsif Court, Tho...
P.Vasantha Vs. 1.The State of Tamil Nadu,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-10-2014
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 10.07.2014 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.K.SASIDHARAN WRIT PETITION (MD)No.469 of 2013 & M.P.(Md.No.1 of 2013 P.Vasantha .Petitioner versus 1.The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by the Secretary, Education Department, Fort St. George, Secretariat, Chennai 600 009. 2.The Director of School Education, DPI Campus, Chennai. 3.The Joint Director of School Education, DPI Campus, Chennai. 4.The Chief Education Officer, District Parent Teachers Association Building, Madurai Road, Trichy 8. 5.The District Educational Officer, Collectorate Compound, Trichy 1. 6.The Assistant Elementary Educational Officer, Trichy Urban Range, Nandhi Kovil Street, Trichy 2. 7.The Director of Pensions Tamil Nadu, 259, Anna Salai, 3rd Block, 2nd Floor, Teynampet, Chennai 600 006. 8.The Correspondent, All Saints Girls High School, Puthur, Trichy 600 017.Respondents Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Mandamus to di...
P.Muthusamy Vs. the Sub Collector
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-10-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATE:10. 07.2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.SATHYANARAYANAN W.P.No.28724 of 2013 and M.P.Nos.1 to 3 of 2013 and 2 of 2014 P.Muthusamy .. Petitioner Versus 1.The Sub Collector / Revenue Divisional Officer, Mettur Revenue Division, Mettur Dam 1, Salem District. 2.Dhanapal @ Pachaimuthu 3.A.Muthuswamy 4.Kamala .. Respondents Prayer: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking for a writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the impugned proceeding in Na.Ka.No.257/2013/D, dated 04.10.2013, issued by the 1st respondent herein and quash the same, consequently forbearing the 1st respondent to proceed further in any manner with regard to temple dispute of Arulmigu Kallanaiyar Temple, Kuppanoor, Chikkampatti Village, Omalur Taluk, Salem District. For Petitioner : Mr.M.R.Jothimanian For Respondents : Mr.R.Vijaya Kumar Additional Govt. Pleader (for R1) Mrs.Geetha Ramaseshan (For R2 to R4) ORDER By consent,...
S.Thangaraj Vs. the Commissioner
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-10-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATE:10. 07.2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.SATHYANARAYANAN W.P.No.18346 of 2014 and M.P.No.1 of 2014 S.Thangaraj .. Petitioner Versus 1.The Commissioner, Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowment (HR&CE) Department, Nungambakkam, Chennai -34. 2.The Joint Commissioner, Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowment (HR&CE) Department, Kottai Mariamman Temple Complex, Salem-1. 3.Fit Person / Asst.Commissioner (Admn.) Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowment (HR&CE) Department, Kottai Mariamman Temple Complex, Salem-1. 4.The Executive Officer, Arulmigu Vinayagar and Mariamman Vagaiyaraa Temples, Suramangalam Salem 5. 5.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Salem. 6.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Suramangalam, Salem. 7.The Tahsildar, Salem West, Pallapatti, Salem. .. Respondents Prayer: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking for a writ of Mandamus, directing the 1st respondent to consider a...
- ‹ Prev
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- Next ›
- Last »