Skip to content

Chennai Court June 2014 Judgments

Browse smarter

Open an 18-section brief on any judgment

Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.

  • AI Brief & Ask
  • Semantic AI Search
  • Devil's Bench

Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.

Jun 26 2014

Ramesh Vs. U.Chitra

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Jun-26-2014

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 26.06.2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.RAJESWARAN and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.VAIDYANATHAN W.P.Nos.27807/2012 and 31185/2013 and M.P.Nos.1/2012 and 1/2013 W.P.No.27807/2012 Ramesh C.Soningara .Petitioner versus 1.U.Chitra 2.Indian Bank, Nandanam Branch, Rep. By its Branch Manager, Nandanam, Chennai 600 035. 3.M/s.S.B.G.Dresses, Rep. By its Proprietrix, B.Suseela, No.120, Sannadhi Street, Kundrathur, Kancheepuram District. 4.K.N.Bhaskar 5.B.Suseela .Respondents Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records relating to the impugned order dated 30.08.2012 passed by the Hon'ble Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal, Chennai in M.A.No.609 of 2010 Appeal No.21/2009 in DRC No.44/2007 in O.A.No.494/2007 on the file of Drt-II, Chennai and quash the same as illegal and unconstitutional. For petitioner : Mr.Kalyan Jabhak for M/s.Surana & Surana For respondents :...


Jun 26 2014

V.S.Kalivarathan Vs. 1.The Director General of Police,

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Jun-26-2014

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:26. 06.2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.MAHADEVAN W.P(MD)No.8288 of 2008 V.S.Kalivarathan ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Director General of Police, Chennai - 600 004. 2.The Additional Director General of Police, (Law and Order), Chennai - 600 004. 3.The Deputy Inspector General of Police, Trichy Range, Trichy. ... Respondents Prayer Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records relating to the impugned order of the first respondent passed in R.C.No.061198/AP IV(1)/2008 dated 02.07.2008 confirming the impugned order of the second respondent passed in R.C.No.AP IV(1)/027420/2008 dated 03.02.2008 modifying the impugned order of the third respondent in R.C.Na.Ka.No.B1/PR372007 dated 21.11.2007 and quash the same and consequently, direct the respondents herein to consider the promotion of the petitioner as Deputy Superintendent of Police on par with his ju...


Jun 26 2014

Senthil Kumar Vs. N.Bharathi Mohan

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Jun-26-2014

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED :26. 06.2014 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.S.SIVAGNANAM CRL.O.P.No.15366 of 2013 1.Senthil Kumar 2.Murthy 3.John Basha @ Basha 4.Venkatesan ... Petitioners Vs. N.Bharathi Mohan ... Respondent/Defacto Complainant Prayer : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code, praying to call for the records relating to in P.R.C.No.136 of 2010 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate Court, Tambaram and quash the same. For Petitioner : Mr.V.R.Appaswamee For Respondent : Mr.R.Vijayakumar for Mr.K.G.Senthil Kumar ORDER This petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C., is to quash P.R.C.No.136 of 2010, on the file of the Judicial Magistrate Court, Tambaram. The said case was taken on file based upon a complaint filed by the respondent herein under Section 200 Cr.P.C. for offences under Section 341, 324, 326 & 307 IPC read with Sections 34 and 109 IPC.2. The petitioners are the accused 1 to 4 in the said case. Ac...


Jun 26 2014

S.K.Ameer Vs. the Deputy Inspector General of Police

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Jun-26-2014

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 26.06.2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE D.HARIPARANTHAMAN W.P.NO.10666 OF2012AND M.P.NO.1 OF2012S.K.Ameer .Petitioner Versus 1.The Deputy Inspector General of Police Salem Range, Salem, Salem District. 2.The Superintendent of Police Salem Rural, Salem, Salem District.Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the entire records relating to the impugned order passed by the 2nd respondent in his proceedings Na.Ka.No.A-1/46770/2011 dated 28.12.2011 and quash the same and consequently direct the respondents to give effect the promotions to the post of Grade I and Special Sub Inspector of Police by taking note of length of petitioner service by way of giving monetary benefits to the petitioner. For Petitioner : Mr.C.Prakasam For Respondents : Mr.I.Arockiasamy Government Advocate ORDER The petitioner joined service as Grade ...


Jun 25 2014

Puducherry Housing Board Engineering Vs. Union of India

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Jun-25-2014

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:25. 06-2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.JAICHANDREN AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.VENUGOPAL W.P.No.3934 of 2010 and M.P.No.1 of 2010 Puducherry Housing Board Engineering Ministerial and Technical Employees Integrated Welfare Union Represented by its General Secretary Mr.Rathina Subramanian, Puducherry Housing Board Complex, Anna Nagar, Nellithoppe, Puducherry-5. .. Petitioner. Versus 1. Union of India, Represented by the Secretary to Government, Department of Housing, Government of Union Territory of Puducherry, Puducherry.2. The Chief Secretary-cum-Chief Vigilance Officer, Government of Union Territory of Puducherry Puducherry.3. The Puducherry Housing Board, Represented by its Chairman, Anna Nagar, Nellighoppe, Puducherry.4. The Secretary, Puducherry Housing Board, Anna Nagar, Nellithoppe, Puducherry.5. P.Angalan 6. S.Kuppusamy 7. S.Sarala.8. R.Lakshmi 9. P.Usha .. Respondents. Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of th...


Jun 25 2014

Sathish Vs. State of Tamil Nadu

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Jun-25-2014

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 25.06.2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.DHANAPALAN and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.CHOCKALINGAM H.C.P.No.3095 of 2013 Sathish @ Sathish Kumar .Petitioner versus 1.State of Tamil Nadu, rep. by its Secretary to Government, Home, Prohibition and Excise Department, Fort St. George, Chennai 9. 2.The Commissioner of Police, O/o. Commissioner of Police, Veperry, Chennai. 3.The Inspector of Police, T.4 Maduravoyal Police Station, Chennai.Respondents Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for a writ of habeas corpus, to call for the records of the petitioner's detention made in Memo No.1460/2013 dated 28.10.2013 passed by the Commissioner of Police, O/o. Commissioner of Police, Egmore, Chennai-8, the second respondent herein and set aside the same directing the respondents concerned to produce the detenu before this Court and set him at liberty from now confined at Central Prison, Puzhal, Chennai-66. For Peti...


Jun 25 2014

Sakretish Vs. State Rep.by Police

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Jun-25-2014

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED :25. 06.2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE ARUNA JAGADEESAN CRL.A.No.509 of 2007 Sakretish ..Appellant Vs State rep. by Inspector of Police, Kitchipalayam Police Station, Salem District. (Crime No.3626 of 2004) ..Respondent Appeal under Section 374(2) Cr.P.C. against the judgment of conviction and sentence passed in S.C.No.112 of 2006 on the file of the learned Sessions Judge, Mahila Court, Salem, dated 08.06.2007. For Appellant : Mr.B.Vasudevan For Respondent : Mr.V.MR.Rajendran, Additional Public Prosecutor. JUDGMENT Challenge in this appeal is to the judgment of conviction and order of sentence passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Mahila Court, Salem, dated 08.06.2007 in S.C.No.112 of 2006 whereby convicting the appellant under section 326 IPC and sentenced to undergo 3 years rigorous imprisonment and to pay a fine of Rs.500/-, in default, to undergo 3 months rigorous imprisonment.2. The gist of the case in a nutshell is as follow...


Jun 25 2014

P.Srinivasan Vs. the Senior Engineer

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Jun-25-2014

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:25. 06.2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.S.KARNAN W.P.No.10781 of 2014 & M.P.Nos.1 and 2 of 2014 1.P.Srinivasan 2.P.Ravi 3.P.Indira 4.P.Ellammal 5.P.Jaya 6.P.Saraswathi 7.Babu ... Petitioners Vs. 1.The Senior Engineer, Tamil Nadu Transmission Corporation Ltd., Transmission Wing, Salem, Salem District. 2.The Superintendent Engineer, General Construction Circle, Tamil Nadu Transmission Corporation Ltd., (Transmission Wing), Salem, Salem District. 3.The Executive Engineer, Tamil Nadu Transmission Corporation Ltd., Transmission Wing (Tower Line Construction), Vengalapuram, Tiruppattur, Vellore District. 4.The Assistant Executive Engineer, Tamil Nadu Transmission Corporation Ltd., Transmission Wing (Tower Line Construction), Bhramapuram, Katpadi, Vellore District. ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for a Writ of Mandamus, direction or order, forbearing the respondents, their men,...


Jun 25 2014

K.R.Rajeesh Kumar Vs. K.Nalini Raghavan

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Jun-25-2014

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:25. 06.2014 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE ARUNA JAGADEESAN CS.Nos.469/2008 and 847/2009 CS.No.469/2008:- K.R.Rajeesh Kumar Plaintiff Vs 1.K.Nalini Raghavan 2.K.R.Reshma Sawini 3.K.R.Ranjiv Ragav Defendants CS.No.847/2009:- K.R.Reshma Sawini Plaintiff Vs. 1.K.R.Rajeesh Kumar 2.K.R.Ranjiv Ragav 3.Simi 4.Shika Defendants Prayer:- These Civil Suits are filed under Order IV Rule 1 of Original Side Rules and Order VII Rule 1 of CPC. For Plaintiff : Mr.V.M.G.Ramakannan-CS.469/2008 Mr.S.R.Raghunathan-CS.847/2009 For Defendants : Mr.S.R.Rajagopal for Mr.V.Anilkumar-D1-CS.469/2008 Mr.S.R.Raghunathan-D2-CS.469/2008 Mr.M.Kamalanathan-D3-CS.469/2008 V.M.G.Ramakannan-D1 to D3-CS.847/2009 COMMON JUDGEMENT CS.No.469/2008 has been filed to pass a judgement and decree in favour of the plaintiff as follows:- (a) to pass a preliminary decree, declaring that the plaintiff is entitled to 1/4th undivided share in the plaint schedule property and to effect a...


Jun 25 2014

S.Muniyasamynadar Vs. 1.The Superintendent of Police

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Jun-25-2014

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:25. 06.2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUBBIAH W.P.(MD)No.10185 of 2014 S.MUNIYASAMYNADAR ... Petitioner Vs. 1.THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE THOOTHUKUDI DISTRICT. 2.THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE VILATHIKULAM POLICE STATION, VILATHIKULAM THOOTHUKUDI DISTRICT. ... Respondents Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to give permission to the dance programme in the event of Festival of Verusampatti Sree Pathirakaliamman Kovil at Nadar theru Verusampatti V.Veadapatti Post, Vilathikulam Taluk, Thoothukudi District on 09.07.2014 and pass such further or other orders. !For Petitioner ... Mr.K.Veilmuthu ^For Respondent ... Mr.N.S.Karthikeyan Addl. Government Pleader :ORDER The writ petition has been filed praying this Court for issuance of a writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to give permission to the dance programme in the event of Festival ...


  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial