Chennai Court June 2014 Judgments
Urbanedge Hotels Vs. Siraj
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-27-2014
THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Dated:27.06.2014 Coram THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE M.JAICHANDREN AND THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE M.VENUGOPAL O.S.A.No.158 of 2014 *** M/s.Urbanedge Hotels (P) Ltd., Represented by its Director Mr.Kumar Sitaraman, No.9, CIR Colony, 1st Main Road, Mylapore, Chennai 600 004..Appellant/Applicant/Respondent V. Siraj & Renu Rep. By its, Proprietor Mr.Siraj Hasan, Having office at No.16, Rhenius Street, Richmond Town, Bangalore 560 025..Respondent/Respondent/Applicant Prayer: Appeal filed under Order XXXVI Rule 9 of the Original Side Rules read with Clause 15 of the Letters Patent as against the Fair and Decretal order dated 30.04.2014 in A.No.3086 of 2014 in A.No.391 of 2014 passed by the learned Single Judge. For Appellant : Mrs.Chitra Sampath For M/s.T.S.Baskaran For Respondent : Mr.Abudukumar Rajaratinam For M/s.G.Krishnakumar & Mrs.Vijayalakshmi K.Rajaratinam JUDGMENT (Judgment of the Court was delivered by M.VENUGOPAL,J.) The Appellant/Applic...
Tag this Judgment!Durairaj Vs. Koyilmani
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-27-2014
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:27. 6/2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE Mrs.JUSTICE PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA Second Appeal (MD) No.628 of 2013 Durairaj ... Appellant Vs Koyilmani ... Respondent PRAYER Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of Civil Procedure Code against the judgment and decree of the lower Appellate Court dated 28/4/2006 made in A.S.No.138 of 2005 on the file of the Subordinate Judge, Ambasamudram, confirming the judgment and decree of the trial Court dated 28/1/2005 made in O.S.No.147 of 2004 on the file of the Additional District Munsif, Ambasamudram. !For Appellant ... Mr.R.Subramanian ^For Respondents ... Mr.H.Arumugam :JUDGMENT The defendant, who has lost before the Courts below has filed the above Second Appeal.2. The respondent herein had filed a suit for recovery of money for a sum of Rs.40,000/- based on a promissory note.3. The case of the plaintiff before the trial Court was that the defendant on 8/12/1999, borrowed a sum of Rs.40,000/- for his fami...
Tag this Judgment!S.Hariprakash Vs. the Examiner Ae Section
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-27-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:27.06.2014 CORAM The Hon'ble Mr.SATISH K.AGNIHOTRI, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE and The Hon'ble Mr.Justice M.M.SUNDRESH W.P.SR.No.60236 of 2014 S.Hariprakash .Petitioner versus The Examiner Appeal Examiner Section Writs Section High Court of Madras Chennai 600 104.Respondent Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking for the relief of issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the Central Bureau of Investigation to conduct an enquiry for relief of again and again same return and inordinate delay in Public Interest Litigation case at High Court of Madras, Chennai-104. For petitioner : Party in person. ORDER This petition has been posted at the instance of the Registry for maintainability. After papers were returned for maintainability, the petitioner wrote the following letters on 9.6.2014, 17.6.2014 and 24.6.2014 respectively, which are re-produced hereunder: To The Registrar General Madras High Court Chennai 104...
Tag this Judgment!Mappllai Mohideen Vs. Khaja Mohideen
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-27-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 27.06.2014 CORAM : THE HONOURABLE Ms.JUSTICE R.MALA C.R.P.(PD) No.1999 of 2014 and M.P.No.1 of 2014 Mappllai Mohideen ..Petitioner versus Khaja Mohideen ..Respondent Prayer:- Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of Constitution of India, against the fair and decreetal order dated 12.11.2013 made in I.A.No.624 of 2012 in O.S.No.412 of 2010 on the file of the Additional District Munsif Court, Villupuram. For Petitioner : Mr.M.V.Seshachari ORDER The Civil Revision Petition is filed against the fair and decreetal order dated 12.11.2013 made in I.A.No.624 of 2012 in O.S.No.412 of 2010 on the file of the Additional District Munsif Court, Villupuram. 2.The revision petitioner herein as a fiRs.plaintiff and his brother as a second plaintiff filed a suit in O.S.No.412 of 2010 for permanent injunction in respect of the suit property. The defendant/respondent herein has filed a written statement and contested the suit. During the pen...
Tag this Judgment!G.Renukadevi Vs. Superintendent of Police
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-27-2014
In the High Court of Judicature at Madras Dated:27. 06.2014 Coram :- THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE V.DHANAPALAN and THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE G.CHOCKALINGAM Habeas Corpus Petition No.1355 of 2014 G.Renukadevi ... Petitioner/Mother of detenu -vs- 1. The Superintendent of Police, Tirupur (Rural), Tirupur District.2. The Inspector of Police, Uthiyur Police Station, Tirupur District. Crime No.56 of 2014 3. K.S.M.Karthikeya 4. K.S.Aravind ... Respondents Prayer: Habeas Corpus Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, seeking a direction to the respondents to produce the body of the detenu by name Kundavi, aged 3= years before this Court, set her at liberty and entrust her to the lawful custody of the petitioner, who is the mother of the detenu. For petitioner : Mrs.Nalini Chidambaram, Senior Counsel For Mrs.C.Uma For R1 & R2 : Mr.M.Maharaja Addl. Public Prosecutor For R3 : Mr.N.Natarajan, Senior Counsel For Mr.R.Vivekanandan For R4 : Mr.N.R.Elango, Senior Counsel For Mr.Krishn...
Tag this Judgment!P.Saravanan Vs. K.Murali
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-26-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:26.06.2014 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE R.MALA CRP (PD) No.667 of 2014 and M.P.No.1 of 2014 P.Saravanan .. Petitioner Vs. K.Murali .. Respondent Prayer : Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, against the order dated 13.02.2014 made in I.A.No.90 of 2014 in O.S.No.64 of 2014 pending on the file of the Sub Court, Ranipet. For Petitioner : Mr.M.Ganeshan For Respondent : Mr.R.N.Amarnath ORDER The revision petitioner herein, who is the respondent in I.A.No.90 of 2014 in O.S.No.64 of 2014, has come forward with this Civil Revision Petition, challenging the Ad-interim injunction granted by the Sub Court, Ranipet on 13.02.2014.2. The learned counsel appearing for the revision petitioner submitted that the trial Court, without assigning any reasons, has passed the Ad-interim injunction order, so there is an error in exercising the jurisdiction. Hence, the petitioner is entitled to file the revision petition ...
Tag this Judgment!S.Kanagam Achi Vs. the Director
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-26-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:26. 06.2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.RAJA W.P.No.4671 of 2010 1.S.Kanagam Achi 2.K.Visalakshi 3.S.Vallikannu 4.Narayanan ... Petitioners Vs. 1.The Director, Town & Country Planning, 807, Annasalai, Chennai. 2.The Joint Director, Town & Country Planning, Dr.Nanjappa Road, Chennai 641 018. 3.The Commissioner, Pollachi Municipality, Pollachi, Coimbatore District. ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India praying to issue Writ of certiorarified mandamus to call for the records of the second respondent in No.1040/2005 Ko.Ma.3, dated 25.11.2005 and quash the same and also direct the respondents to declare that the properties of the petitioners in Old Town S.No.724/2, New Town S.Nos.1641/1 to 5, Ward B, Block No.32, Survey Ward No.2, Pollachi Town, Coimbatore District, reserved as park in the detailed Town Development Plan No.11 of Pollachi Town Development Scheme is deemed to have ...
Tag this Judgment!Sri Veknataramanaswamy Blue Metals Vs. District Collector
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-26-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED :26. .06..2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.HARIPARANTHAMAN W.P.Nos.30131 to 30135 of 2012, 30617 and 33332 of 2012 M.P.Nos.1 of 2013 in each W.P. W.P.No.30131 of 2012 M/s.Sri Veknataramanaswamy Blue Metals, Rep. by its Managing Partner M.Sivanandam, No.128, Bye Pass Road, Karur 639 002. ... Petitioner Vs.1. The District Collector, Coimbatore District, Coimbatore.2. The Superintendent of Police (Rural), Coimbatore District, Coimbatore. ... Respondents * * * Prayer in W.P.No.30131 of 2012 : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus forbearing the respondents from interfering with the petitioner's and their customers'right to transport the crusher material, i.e., M.Sand from the crushing unit of the petitioner at S.F.No.155, Thennilai (East) Village, Aravakurichi Taluk, Karur District, to the place of the petitioner's purchasers destination in the neighbouring Sta...
Tag this Judgment!Dhanabalan Vs. 1.Akkammal
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-26-2014
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:26. 06.2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.KALYANASUNDARAM C.R.P.No.281 of 2008 and M.P(MD)No.2 of 2008 Dhanabalan .. Petitioner/Petitioner/Plaintiff Vs. 1.Akkammal 2.S.Savithri 3.Jeyapaul 4.Sanjeevee 5.Gunasekaran 6.Siranjeevee 7.Dhanasekaran .. Respondents/Respondents/ Defendants 2 to 8 Prayer Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India to set aside the order, dated 05.12.2007 passed in I.A.No.113 of 2007 in O.S.No.46 of 2005 on the file of the Additional District Judge/Fast Track Court No.1, Tuticorin. !For Petitioner : Mr.S.Subbiah ^For RR1 2, 4, 6 & 7 : Mr.S.S.Sundar For RR3& 5 : No appearance :ORDER This Civil Revision Petition is filed against the order passed in I.A.No.113 of 2007 in O.S.No.46 of 2005 by the Additional District Court cum Fast Track Court No.1, Tuticorin.2. The petitioner as plaintiff has instituted a suit in O.S.No.67 of 2002 for partition and separate possession ...
Tag this Judgment!N.Shanmuga Sundaram Vs. 1.The District Crime Branch,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-26-2014
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 26.06.2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE G.M.AKBAR ALI Crl.O.P.(MD)No.14766 of 2010 And Crl.O.P.(MD)No.14770 of 2010 and M.P.(MD)Nos.2,2,3 and 3 of 2010 Crl.O.P.(MD)No.14766 of 2010: N.Shanmuga Sundaram ..Petitioner versus 1.The District Crime Branch, The District Crime Branch, Tirunelveli District. 2.P.Ramasamy ..Respondents PRAYER IN Crl.O.P.(MD)No.14766 of 2010: Petition is filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, to call for the entire records in C.C.No.51 of 2004 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate No.I, Tirunelveli District and quash the same. Crl.O.P.(MD)No.14770 of 2010: N.Shanmuga Sundaram ..Petitioner versus 1.The District Crime Branch, The District Crime Branch, Tirunelveli District. 2.P.Ramasamy ..Respondents PRAYER IN Crl.O.P.(MD)No.14770 of 2010: Petition is filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, to call for the entire records in C.C.No.52 of 2004 on the file of the Judicial Ma...
Tag this Judgment!- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »