Chennai Court June 2014 Judgments
Murugesan Vs. 1.The Managing Director,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-27-2014
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 27.06.2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUBBIAH W.P.(MD)No.14173 of 2014 and M.P.(MD).Nos.1 to 3 of 2013 Murugesan ..Petitioner versus 1.The Managing Director, Tamil Nadu Civil Supplies Corporation Limited, 12, Thambusamy Road, Kilpauk, Chennai-10. 2.The Senior Regional Manager, Tamil Nadu Civil Supplies Corporation, Thoothukudi. 3.The District Collector, Thoothukudi District, Thoothukudi. 4.The Inspector of Police, Civil Supplies Crime Investigation Department, Thoothukudi..Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records pertaining to the impugned orders passed by the 2nd respondent vide his proceedings in Na.Ka.No.B2/1844/12, dated 06.06.2012 and the same was confirmed by the 1st respondent by his proceedings in Na.Ka.No.MH5/ 60868/2012, dated 12.07.2013 and quash the same as illegal and consequently, direct the 2...
Tag this Judgment!T.Venkatesan Vs. the Deputy Director
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-27-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:27. 06-2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.JAICHANDREN AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.VENUGOPAL W.A.No.2467 of 2013 and M.P.No.1 of 2013 T.Venkatesan .. Appellant. Versus 1. The Deputy Director (Medical) E.S.I.Hospital, K.K.Nagar, Unit of E.S.I.Corporation, Ashok Pillar Road, Chennai-78.2. The Director-General, E.S.I.C. Panchadeep Bhavan, Kotta Road, New Delhi.3. The Deputy General Manager West, (O&M.K.K. Nagar) Chennai Telephone, 99, Jawaharlal Nehru Salai, K.K.Nagar, Chennai-600 078. .. Respondents. Prayer: Appeal filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the order passed in W.P.No.22148 of 2006, dated 30.10.2013. For Appellant : Mr.R.Singaravelan For Respondents : Mr.K.M.Venugopal (R1) No Appearance (R2 & R3) JUDGMENT (Judgment of the Court was made by M.JAICHANDREN,J) Heard the learned counsels appearing on behalf of the parties concerned.2. This Writ Appeal has been filed against the order passed by the learned ...
Tag this Judgment!1.Mr.W.Jaihar William Vs. 1.The State of Tamil Nadu
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-27-2014
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 27.06.2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE R.SUBBIAH W.P.(MD).Nos.8343 of 2014 to W.P.(MD).Nos.8350 of 2014 and M.P.Nos.1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1 & 1 of 2014 1.Mr.W.Jaihar William ..Petitioner in WP(MD).8343/2014 2.Mr.Silambarasan Murali ..Petitioner in WP(MD).8344/2014 3.Mr.Vinoth Antony Pichai ..Petitioner in WP(MD).8345/2014 4.Mr.Nirmal Joy Bisher Rayappan ..Petitioner in WP(MD).8346/2014 5.Mr.Infant Selvan ..Petitioner in WP(MD).8347/2014 6.Maria Limarvin George ..Petitioner in WP(MD).8348/2014 7.Antony Micheal Partheeban Martin ..Petitioner in WP(MD).8349/2014 8.Mr.Viknesh Rayappan ..Petitioner in WP(MD).8350/2014 versus 1.The State of Tamil Nadu rep. By its Secretary to Government, Home Department, Fort St. George, Chennai-600 009. 2.The Superintendent of Police, Thirunelveli District. 3.Regional Passport Officer, Madurai Bharathi Ula Veethi, Race CouRs.Road, Madurai-625 002, Tamil Nadu...Respondents in all the above WPs Prayer P...
Tag this Judgment!The Junior Engineer Vs. the Jayamoorthy
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-27-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED :27. 06.2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.S.SIVAGNANAM Crl.R.C.No.347 of 2008 The Junior Engineer/O&M, Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, Mannur Section, Mannur 604 002. Tindivanam Division .. Petitioner Vs.1. The Jayamoorthy 2. The Inspector of Police, Kiliyanur Police Station, Kiliyanur. .. Respondents Criminal Revision Case filed under Section 397 and 401 Cr.P.C. against the judgment dated 01.04.2008 made in Crl.Appeal No.9 of 2008 on the file of the Additional District Sessions Court, FTC II at Tindivanam, reversing the judgment dated 07.01.208 made in C.C.No.194 of 2005 on the file of Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court at Vannur. For Petitioner : Mr.N.Muthuswaami For Respondents : Mr.M.Murugan for R1 Mr.C.Iyyaparaj, Govt. Advocate for R2 ORDER This revision has been filed u/s 397 and 401, Cr.P.C. as against the judgment dated 01.04.2008 made in Crl.Appeal No.9 of 2008 on the file of the Additional District Sessions Court, FTC ...
Tag this Judgment!G.Palanidurai Vs. Chandra
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-27-2014
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:27. 06.2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.MATHIVANAN C.R.P.(NPD) (MD) No.804 of 2014 & C.R.P.(NPD) (MD) No.917 of 2014 and M.P.(MD) Nos.1 & 2 of 2014 G.Palanidurai ... Petitioner/Respondent/Respondent / Petitioner in both C.R.Ps -vs- Chandra ... Respondent/Petitioner/Petitioner / Respondent in both C.R.Ps PRAYER (in C.R.P.(NPD) (MD) No.804 of 2014) Civil Revision Petition is filed, under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, to set aside the order dated 24.09.2013 and made in E.A.No.47 of 2010 in E.P.No.5 of 2010 in R.C.O.P.No.2 of 2006, on the file of the learned District Munsif-cum-Judicial Magistrate, Papanasam. PRAYER (in C.R.P.(NPD) (MD) No.804 of 2014) Civil Revision Petition is filed, under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, to set aside the order dated 24.09.2013 and made in E.A.No.46 of 2010 in E.P.No.4 of 2010 in R.C.O.P.No.1 of 2006, on the file of the learned District Munsif-cum-Judicial Magistra...
Tag this Judgment!Muthukumar Vs. Viswanathan
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-27-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 27.06.2014 CORAM : THE HONOURABLE Ms.JUSTICE R.MALA C.R.P.(PD) No.2140 of 2014 and M.P.No.1 of 2014 Muthukumar ..Petitioner versus Viswanathan ..Respondent Prayer:- Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of Constitution of India, against the fair and decreetal order dated 05.08.2013 in I.A.No.490 of 2013 in O.S.No.1 of 2011 on the file of the Principal District Munsif Court, Virudhachalam. For Petitioners : Mr.A.S.Narasimhan ORDER The Civil Revision Petition is filed against the fair and decreetal order dated 05.08.2013 in I.A.No.490 of 2013 in O.S.No.1 of 2011 on the file of the Principal District Munsif Court, Virudhachalam. 2.The respondent herein as a plaintiff filed a suit for declaration of title and also injunction restraining the defendant to interfere with the possession and alienate the suit property and also for other reliefs. The revision petitioner/defendant has filed a written statement and contested the suit. ...
Tag this Judgment!D.Baskaran Vs. 1.State of Tamil Nadu,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-27-2014
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:27. 06.2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.MAHADEVAN W.P.(MD)No.16238 of 2012 and M.P.(MD)No.1 of 2013 D.Baskaran : Petitioner Vs. 1.State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by its Secretary to Government, School Education Department, Secretariat, Chennai. 2.The Director, Teacher Education Research & Training, Chennai-6. 3.The Chairman, Teachers Recruitment Board, Chennai-6. : Respondents PRAYER Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issue of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records relating to the impugned order dated 15.11.2011 in Lr.No.3537/U2/2008-9, passed by the first respondent and quash the same and consequently, direct the respondents to appoint the petitioner as Senior Lecturer in DIET with effect from November, 2007 with all consequential and monetary benefits. !For Petitioner : Mr.G.R.Swaminathan ^For Respondents : Mr.J.Gunaseelan Muthiah, Government Advocate :ORDER Seeking ...
Tag this Judgment!Ramasamy Vs. District Collector
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-27-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 27.06.2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.NAGAMUTHU W.P.No.16794 of 2014 and M.P.No.1 of 2014 RAMASAMY ..Petitioner versus 1 THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR KRISHNAGIRI2THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER KRISHNAGIRI3THE TAHSILDAR POCHAMPALLI TALUK KRISHNAGIRI DISTRICT4INSPECTOR OF POLICE MATHUR POLICE STATION POCHAMPALLI TALUK KRISHNAGIRI DISTRICT5GOVINDASAMY SANTHAMPATTI VILLAGE KULLAMPATTI POST POCHAMPALLI TALUK KRISHNAGIRI DISTRICT ..Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a writ of certiorarified mandamus to call for the records pertaining to the proceedings of the 2nd respondent dated 23.5.2014 and to quash the same as illegal and unconstitutional and to consequentially forbear the respondents 2 & 5 from interfering with the JATHRA Festival of Arulmigu Selliyamman Temple to be performed in the Temple Land abutting the temple comprised in Sy. No.825 and 826 situated at Sai...
Tag this Judgment!A.Gurusamy Vs. M.Singamuthu
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-27-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED :27. 06.2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.S.SIVAGNANAM Crl.R.C.No.380 of 2009 A.Gurusamy ..Petitioner -Vs- 1.M.Singamuthu 2.S.Sundarambal 3.S.Dineshkumar 4.S.Muthukumar ..Respondents Petition filed under Sections 397 and 401 of Cr.P.C., to set aside the order dated 08.04.2008 passed by the Court of XXIII Metropolitan Magistrate, Saidapet, Chennai-600 015, in M.P.No.1853 of 2008. For petitioner : Mr.S.Baskaran For respondent : Mr.P.Sesubalan Raja for R1 to R3 No apperaance for R4 ORDER The complainant in a private complaint is the petitioner. In this Revision Petition filed under Section 397 and 401 Cr.P.C., challenge is made to the order dated 08.04.2008 in M.P.No.1853 of 2008 passed by the XXIII Metropolitan Magistrate, Saidapet, Chennai-15 dismissing the private complaint filed by the petitioner. The respondents were shown as the accused in the private complaint, wherein, the petitioner made a prayer to take the complaint on the fi...
Tag this Judgment!A.Mathiarasi Vs. State of Tamil Nadu
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-27-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Dated:27.06.2014 Coram The Honourable Mr.Justice S.NAGAMUTHU W.P.Nos.14410 & 14411 of 2014 And 8069 of 2014 and M.P.No.1 of 2014(in all the WPs) A.Mathiarasi Petitioner in W.P.No.14410 of 2014 K.Geethalakshmi Petitioner in W.P.No.14411 of 2014 K.Munirathinam Petitioner in W.P.No.8069 of 2014 Vs. 1.State of Tamil Nadu, Rep.by its Secretary to Government, Personnel and Administrative Reforms Department, Fort St.George, Chennai-600 0091. 2.The Secretary, The Tamil Nadu Public Service Commission, Frazer Bridge Road, Esplanade, George Town, Chennai-600 003 .. Respondents in all the W.Ps. W.P.No.14410 of 2014:Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issuance of a writ of mandamus to the second respondent Commission to select and appoint the petitioner in any of the posts in the Combined Subordinate Services Examination-I, notified by the advertisement No.258 in the GT Women category or Scheduled Caste...
Tag this Judgment!- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »