Chennai Court June 2014 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
N.Mahalakshmi Vs. 1.The State of Tamil Nadu
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-19-2014
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 19.06.2014 Coram THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAVICHANDRA BAABU W.P.(MD)No.9785 of 2014 and M.P.(md).No.1 of 2014 N.MAHALAKSHMI ASSISTANT DIRECTOR (EMPLOYMENT).COACHING CUM GUIDANCE CENTRE FOR SC/ST, TIRUNELVELI. : Petitioner versus 1.THE STATE OF TAMIL NADU REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, LABOUR AND EMPLOYMENT (NO.1) DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, ST. GEORGE FORT, CHENNAI - 600 009. 2.THE DIRECTOR OF EMPLOYMENT AND TRAINING, GUINDY, CHENNAI - 32. : Respondents PRAYER Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issue of a WRIT OF CERTIORARI or any other appropriate writ or order or direction in the nature of writ calling for the records relating to the impugned order passed by the 1st respondent in his proceedings in G.O.(D).No.188 Labour and Employment (N.1) Department dated 26.05.2014 confirming the order passed by the 2nd respondent in his proceedings in O.Na.2/26043/2012 dated 08.01.2013 and quash the same as ...
Palaniammal Vs. T.Shanmugasundaram
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-19-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED :19.06.2014 CORAM : THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE R.MALA C.R.P.(PD).No.872 of 2014 and M.P.No.1 of 2014 1.Palaniammal 2.T.Ramakrishnan 3.Rajeswari .Petitioners versus 1.T.Shanmugasundaram 2.Rashidabanu @ Banu .Respondents Prayer:- Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, praying against the fair and decreetal order dated 23.01.2014 made in I.A.No.704 of 2013 in O.S.No.718 of 2011, on the file of the I Additional District Court, Coimbatore. For Petitioners : Mr.N.Anand Venkatesh For Respondents : Mr.R.Chithiraputhiran ORDER The Civil Revision petition is filed against the fair and decreetal order dated 23.01.2014 made in I.A.No.704 of 2013 in O.S.No.718 of 2011, on the file of the I Additional District Court, Coimbatore. 2.The revision petitioners herein as the plaintiffs filed a suit in O.S.No.718 of 2011 for partition and separate possession of their 3/4th share in the suit property. The fiRs.plaintiff...
M/S.integrated Technologies Vs. the Commercial Tax Officer (Ct),
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-19-2014
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 19.06.2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUBBIAH W.P.(MD)Nos.9670 of 2014 And W.P.(MD)Nos.9673 of 2014 and M.P.(MD)Nos.1 and 2 of 2014 M/s.Integrated Technologies rep.by its Managing Partner J.Parthiban, No.66, West Bouleward Road, I Floor, Trichy-8, Trichy District..Petitioner in all the W.Ps. versus The Commercial Tax Officer (CT).Mailam I Assessment Circle, Trichy..Respondent in all the W.Ps. W.P.(MD)No.9670 of 2014 filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Certiorari calling for the records of the impugned proceedings of the respondent in TIN No.33343421822/ 2007-08 dated 22.12.2011 and quash the same as illegal and contrary to law. W.P.(MD)No.9671 of 2014 filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Certiorari calling for the records of the impugned proceedings of the respondent in TIN No.33343421822/ 2008-09 dated 22.12.2011 and quash th...
Velu Vs. State
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-19-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED :19. 06.2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE ARUNA JAGADEESAN CRL.A.No.722 of 2011 1. Velu 2. Kaliammal 3. Jaya 4. Kannan ..Appellants Vs State represented by Inspector of Police D3 Ice House Police Station Chennai. (Crime No.564/2006) ..Respondent Appeal filed under Section 374(2) Cr.P.C. against the judgment of the learned Sessions Judge (Mahalir Needhimanram) Chennai dated 21.10.2011 in S.C.No.358 of 2007. For Appellants : Mr.M.Rajavelu For Respondent : Mr.V.MR.Rajendran, Additional Public Prosecutor. JUDGMENT This appeal arising out of the judgment dated 21.10.2011 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Mahalir Neethimanram, Chennai, in S.C.No.358 of 2007, has been preferred by the appellants/A1 to A4 who were convicted for the offence under Section 4 of Tamil Nadu Prohibition of Harassment of Woman Act, 1998 and sentenced to undergo 1 year rigorous imprisonment each and to pay a fine of Rs.10,000/- each in default to undergo one mon...
Mariyados Vs. State By:
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-18-2014
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 18.06.2014 Coram THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.N.PRAKASH Criminal Revision Case (Md.No.718 of 2007 Mariyadoss : Petitioner/Sole Accused versus State by: Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station, Kumbakonam, Crime No.3 of 2003 : Respondent/Complainant PRAYER: Criminal Revision Petition filed under Section 397 r/w. 401 of Criminal Procedure Code, praying to call for the records of the learned Additional Sessions Judge-cum-Fast Track Court-I, Thanjavur in C.A.No.56 of 2007, dated 21.09.2007, set aside the conviction and sentence imposed by the learned Principal Assistant Sessions Judge, Kumbakonam in S.C.No.104 of 2005, dated 20.04.2007 and as confirmed the learned Additional Sessions Judge-cum- Fast Track Court-I, Thanjavur and acquit the revision petitioner. For Petitioner : Mr.M.Karunanithi For respondent : Mrs.P.Kannithevan Government Advocate (Crl. side) :ORDER This Criminal Revision Petition has been preferred by the accused ch...
Arasamma Vs. the Commissioner of Police
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-18-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED :18. 06.2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.DHANAPALAN and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.CHOCKALINGAM H.C.P.No.3158 of 2013 Arasamma .. Petitioner Vs. 1.The Commissioner of Police, Commissioner Office, Greater Chennai, Egmore, Chennai-8. 2.The Secretary to Government of Tamil Nadu, Prohibition and Excise Dept., (Home), Secretariat, Fort St. George, Chennai-9. .. Respondents Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for a writ of habeas corpus, to call for the records of the first respondent in connection with the order of the first respondent dated 15.11.2013 Memo No.1620/BDFGISSV/2013, Hariprasath son of Gajendran aged about 27 years as a Goonda under Tamil Nadu Act 14 of 1982 and set aside the same and direct the respondent to produce the body of the said detenu, the detenu now lodged in Central Prison, Puzhal, Chennai before this Court and set him at liberty. For Petitioner : Mr.T.V.Somasundaram For Respond...
Chakiat Agencies Vs. Union of India
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-18-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 18.06.2014 CORAM THE HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE B.RAJENDRAN W.P.No.8536 of 2014 and M.P.No.1 of 2014 M/s.Chakiat Agencies .Petitioner versus 1.Union of India, rep.by its Revenue Secretary, Ministry of Finance, New Delhi-110 004 2.The Commissioner of Central Excise and Customs (Appeals).6/7, A.T.D.Street, Race CouRs.Road, Coimbatore-641 018 3.The Assistant Commissioner of Central Excise and Service Tax, Coimbatore III Division, New No.1441, Elgi Building, Trichy Road, Coimbatore .Respondents Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a writ of certiorarified mandamus to call for the records of the 2nd respondent in Appeal No.58/13-ST dated 24.09.2013 in so far confirming the order in Original No.27/2011-(AC) dated 29.03.2011 of the 3rd respondent, and to quash the same and consequently direct the second respondent to consider and dispose of the appeal of the petitioner dated 04.07.2011 on merits...
C.Shanthi Vs. 1.The District Collector,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-18-2014
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:18. 06.2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.MAHADEVAN W.P.(MD).No.2882 of 2010 C.Shanthi : Petitioner Vs. 1.The District Collector, Kanyakumari District, Nagercoil. 2.Personal Assistant to the District Collector (General), Nagercoil, Kanyakumari District. 3.The District Employment Officer, Kanyakumari District, Nagercoil. : Respondents PRAYER Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issue of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records on the file of the second respondent in connection with the impugned order passed by him in his proceedings Na.Ka.A1/60911/2008, dated 03.02.2010 and quash the same as arbitrary and consequently, direct the first and second respondents to appoint the petitioner in the post of Junior Assistant by giving effect to the appointment order dated 07.07.2003, within the time limit that may be stipulated by this Court. !For Petitioner : Mr.G.Thalaimuth...
Pappaiah Vs. Venkatesh
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-18-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:18.06.2014 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE R.MALA CRP (PD) No.1304 of 2014 and M.P.No.1 of 2014 Pappaiah (died) 1. Venkataramanappa 2. Venkatesh 3. Lakkamma 4. Venkatalakshmi 5. Krishnamma 6. Venkatamma 7. Manjula .. Petitioners Vs. Venkatesh .. Respondent Prayer : Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, against the fair and final order dated 04.08.2011 made in I.A.No.347 of 2011 in O.S.No.2 of 2011 on the file of the Sub Court, Hosur. For Petitioners : Mr.R.Vasudevan ORDER The revision petitioners herein have come forward with this Civil Revision Petition challenging the impugned order dated 04.08.2011 passed in I.A.No.347 of 2011 in O.S.No.2 of 2011 by the Sub Court, Hosur.2. The respondent herein as plaintiff filed a suit for partition and separate possession of his share in the suit properties against defendants 1 to 12. The second defendant/first revision petitioner herein contested the suit on be...
Puthiya Polivudan Puthiya Idathil Vs. Vivekananda Coaching Centre
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-18-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED :18. 06 2014 CORAM: THE HONBLE TMT. JUSTICE PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA A.S. No.360 of 2013 and M.P. No.1 of 2013 Puthiya Polivudan Puthiya Idathil Vivekananda Coaching Centre By its Proprietor T.V. Muthusamy Sayapattarai Main Road Amaravathi Nagar Udumalpet TK Tiruppur District .. Appellant Vs. Vivekananda Coaching Centre By its Proprietor S. Radhakrishnan Door No.15/81 Near Forest Bungalow Amaravathi Nagar Udumalpet TK Tiruppur District ..Respondent Appeal under Section 96 of the Civil Procedure Code, against the judgment and decree dated 09.07.2013 passed by the Principal District Judge, Tiruppur, in O.S. No.33 of 2012. For Appellant : Mr. R. Subramanian For Respondent : Mr. T.S. Vijayakumar JUDGMENT The challenge by means of this Appeal by the defendant filed under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, is to the impugned judgment of the dated 09.07.2013 passed by the Principal District Judge, Tiruppur, in O.S. No.33 of 2012 dec...
- ‹ Prev
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 21
- 22
- 23
- 24
- 25
- Next ›
- Last »