Chennai Court June 2014 Judgments
M.Vijayakumar Vs. 1.The Inspector of Police,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-30-2014
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:30. 06.2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE G.M.AKBAR ALI Crl.O.P.(MD)No.8420 of 2014 and M.P.(MD)No.1 of 2014 M.Vijayakumar ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Inspector of Police, Kombai Police Station, Theni. (In Cr.No.249 of 2010) 2.The Village Administrative Officer, Village Administrative Office, Kombai, Theni. ... Respondents PRAYER Petition is filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, praying to call for the records in C.C.No.32 of 2011 on the file of the learned District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Bodinayakanur, quash the same. For Petitioner : Mr.D.Anbarasu For Respondents : Mr.A.P.Balasubramanian Govt.Advocate (crl.side) :ORDER This Criminal Original Petition is filed praying to call for the records in C.C.No.32 of 2011 on the file of the learned District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Bodinayakanur, quash the same.2. The petitioner is charged for an alleged offence under Sec.3(1), 4(A), 5 of Tamil Nadu Open Pla...
Tag this Judgment!P.Parameswari Vs. Selvi Construction Company
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-30-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:30.06.2014 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE R.MALA CRP (PD) No.1675 of 2014 and M.P.No.1 of 2014 P.Parameswari .. Petitioner Vs. M/s.Selvi Construction Company, A partnership firm, Rep. by its Managing Partner S.Ravichandran, S/o.M.Subramaniam, 11/13, Sengani Amman Koil Street, Maduvinkarai, Guindy, Chennai 600 032. .. Respondent Prayer : Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, against the fair and decreetal order dated 10.03.2014 made in I.A.No.112 of 2014 in O.S.No.57 of 2013 on the file of the learned Principal District Munsif Court, Alandur. For Petitioner : Mr.N.Manokaran For Respondent : Mrs.Chitra Sampath, Senior Counter for Ms.V.Pushpa and Ms.T.Chandrakala ORDER The revision petitioner has come forward with this revision petition challenging the impugned order dated 10.03.2014 passed in I.A.No.112 of 2014 in O.S.No.57 of 2013 by the the learned Principal District Munsif Court, Alandur.2. The lea...
Tag this Judgment!Adis Hotel Consultants Vs. Rajendran
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-30-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:30. 06.2014 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.T. SELVAM CRL.O.P.No.313 of 2014 and M.P.No.1 of 2014 1.Adis Hotel Consultants represented by Mrs.Bama Baskaran 2.Bama Baskaran 3.Baskaran 4.Simbu .. Petitioners vs. Rajendran .. Respondent Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to call for the records in C.C.No.762 of 2009 on the file of learned Judicial Magistrate I, Villupuram and quash the same. For Petitioners : Mr.N.R.Elango, Senior counsel for Mr.N.Kumanan For Respondents : Mr.A.R.L.Sundaresan, Senior counsel for Mr.T.Sundarrajan ***** ORDER Petitioners, who are accused 1 to 4, in case pending trial in C.C.No.762 of 2009 on the file of learned Judicial Magistrate I, Villupuram, seek quash of proceedings therein.2. Heard Mr.N.R.Elango, learned senior counsel for petitioners and Mr.A.R.L.Sundaresan, learned senior counsel for respondent.3. The case stems from a private complaint preferred by the respondent. The compl...
Tag this Judgment!The Oriental Insurance Co.Ltd., Vs. 1)tmt.Zeenath Beebi
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-30-2014
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED :30. 06.2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.KALYANASUNDARAM C.M.A.No.1771 of 2003 The Oriental Insurance Co.Ltd., No.134, Katpadi Road, Gudiyatham. ... Appellant Vs. 1)Tmt.Zeenath Beebi 2)Selvi.Sabhana 3)Thiru.R.Samu 4)Manager, S.T.C. Tranery, Masha Leather Tanery, Ponnamadurai Main Road, Dindigul. ... Respondents Prayer Petition filed under Section 30 of the Workmen Compensation Act, against the award dated 10.02.2003 made in W.C.No.120 of 2002 on the file of the Commissioner for Workmen Compensation, Dindigul. For Appellant : Mr.K.Bhaskaran ^For R1 & R2 : Mr.P.Sathish Murugan for M/s.Hindu Associates For R4 : No appearance :JUDGMENT Being aggrieved by the award made in W.C.No.120 of 2002 dated 10.02.2003 by the Commissioner for Workmen Compensation, Dindigul, the insurance company has filed the appeal.2. Respondents 1 and 2 laid a petition before the Commissioner for Workmen Compensation, contending that the son of the 1st re...
Tag this Judgment!P.K.Ramakrishnan Vs. Narayana Nadar
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-30-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:30. 06.2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE M.DURAISWAMY Contempt Petition No.1003 of 2012 in Second Appeal No.330 of 2011 P.K.Ramakrishnan ... Petitioner v. Narayana Nadar ... Respondent Prayer: Petition under Sections 10 & 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, to punish the respondent for violating the undertaking given before this court in its judgment and decree dated 01.04.2011 made in S.A.No.330 of 2011. For Petitioner : Mr.T.V.Ramanujam, Sr. Counsel For Mr.C.Jagadish For Respondent : Mr.P.Vallinayagam, Sr. Counsel for Mr.B.Vijay ORDER Heard Mr.T.V.Ramanujam, learned Senior Counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr.P.Vallinayagam, learned Senior Counsel appearing for the respondent.2. Abuse of process of the Court is the attitude of the contemnor in this contempt petition.3. The petitioner has filed the above contempt petition to punish the respondent for violating the undertaking given by him before this court in the Second Appe...
Tag this Judgment!Lourdhu Mary Vs. B.Arokiya Mary
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-30-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 30.06.2014 CORAM : THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.S.RAMANATHAN A.S.No.22 of 2012 1.Lourdhu Mary (died) 2.Ratchagar 3.Mariyasoosai 4.V.Arokiya Mary 5.A.Arokiya Mary 6.Minor Edwina Sherly Felicita represented by next friend/ Guardian Arokiya Doss : Appellants/D2 to D7 [1st Appellant died and the Appellants 2 to 6 are recognized as Lrs of the deceased 1st appellant, vide order of the court, dated 19.07.2013].versus 1.B.Arokiya Mary : 1st respondent/plaintiff 2.Kuzhanthai Ammal : 2nd respondent/D1 Appeal Suits filed under Section 96 of CPC against the judgment and decree, dated 26.04.2011 passed in O.S.No.89 of 2005 by the Additional District Judge, (F.T.C.-II).Cuddalore. For Appellants : Mr.S.Parathasarathy Senior Counsel for Mr.T.S.Baskaran For 1st Respondent : Mr.R.Subramanian for Mr.D.Ravichandran For 2nd respondent : Notice dispensed with JUDGMENT The defendants 2 to 7 in O.S.No.89 of 2005 on the file of the Additional District Court/FTC-I...
Tag this Judgment!S.Natarajan Vs. 1.The Director of Fire and Rescue Service,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-30-2014
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:30. 06.2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.MAHADEVAN W.P.(MD)No.8200 of 2010 and M.P.No.1 of 2010 S.Natarajan : Petitioner Vs. 1.The Director of Fire and Rescue Service, No.12, Rukmani Lakshmipathi Road, Egmore, Chennai. 2.The Deputy Director, Fire & Rescue Service Department, Southern Region, Madurai 20. 3.The Divisional Fire Officer, Fire & Rescue Service Department, Theni Division, Theni District. 4.The Station Fire Officer, Periyakulam Fire & Rescue Service Station, Theni District. 5.R.Venkatesan 6.S.Radhakrishnan 7.M.Murugesan 8.C.Karamani 9.B.Manoharan 10.B.Alagarsamy : Respondents PRAYER Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issue of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 1 to 3 to promote the petitioner as Leading Fireman from the date on which the fifth respondent was promoted as Leading Fireman, i.e., 24.05.2009 and place the petitioner above the respondents 5 to ...
Tag this Judgment!Nila Engineering Contractors Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Central Exc ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-30-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED :30. 06.2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.RAJENDRAN W.P.No.15276 of 2014 and M.P.No.1 of 2014 M/s.Nila Engineering Contractors rep. by its Managing Partner Venkatesan, No.Y-210, Block No.29, Neyveli-607 807. ... Petitioner Vs.1. The Assistant Commissioner of Central Excise, 1, Vallalar Nagar, Manjakuppam, Cuddalore-607 00q.2. The Chief General Manager (Finance), Corporate Office, Neyveli Lignite Corporation, Neyveli. ... Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records relating to the Order in Original No.48/2010-ST dated 19.3.2010 passed by the 1st respondent and the consequential Notice of demand issued under Section 87(b)(i) of the Finance Act, 1994 in C.No.V/16/70/09-ST dated 27.9.2011 and quash the same as violative of principles of natural justice, illegal, arbitrary, unreasonable and without authority of law. For...
Tag this Judgment!A.Meena Vs. Secretary to Government
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-30-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:30. 06.2014 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.DHANAPALAN AND THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.CHOCKALINGAM H.C.P.No.3310 of 2013 A.Meena ... Petitioner -vs- 1. The Secretary to Government, Home, Prohibition and Excise Department, Secretariat, Chennai 600 009.2. The Commissioner of Police, Chennai. ... Respondents Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Habeas Corpus to call for the records in connection with the order of detention passed by the second respondent dated 17.09.2013 in Memo No.1020/BDFGISSV/2013 against the petitioner's husband Ansari, Male, aged 32 years, S/o.Jalaludeen, who is confined at Central Prison, Puzhal II, Chennai and set aside the same and direct the respondents to produce the detenu before this Court and set him at liberty. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Senthil Vel For Respondents : Mr.P.Govindarajan Addl. Public Prosecutor ORDER (Order of the Court was made by V.Dhan...
Tag this Judgment!T.Kuppusamy Vs. Thangavel
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-30-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED :30. 06.2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.S.SIVAGNANAM Criminal Revision No.286 of 2009 and M.P.No.1 of 2009 --- T.Kuppusamy ..Petitioner -Vs- Thangavel ..Respondent Petition filed to set aside the order dated 22.12.2008 passed by the learned 1st Additional District Judge, Salem dismissing the petition filed under Section 45 of the Evidence Act and under Section 391 Cr.P.C., pending Criminal Appeal No.161/2007. For petitioner: Mr.K.Selvakumaraswami For respondent : Mr.R.Nalliyappan ORDER This Revision filed under Section 397 read with 401 Cr.P.C., is directed against the order dated 22.12.2008 in C.M.P.No.5 of 2008 in C.A.No.161 of 2007 on the file of I Additional District Judge, Salem, dismissing the petition filed by the petitioner under Section 45 of the Evidence Act and Section 391 Cr.P.C., in the pending criminal appeal.2. The petitioner is the accused and as against the conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments...
Tag this Judgment!- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »