Chennai Court May 2014 Judgments
The Executive Engineer, Vs. 1. the Inspector of Factories,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: May-22-2014
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATE:22. 05-2014 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE S.VAIDYANATHAN W.P.(MD) No.13038 of 2011 & W.P.(MD) No.9549 of 2012 and M.P.No.1 of 2011 in W.P(MD)No.13038 of 2011 The Executive Engineer, Tamil Nadu Water Supply and Drainage Board, Desalination plant, Narippayur, Kadaladi taluk, Ramnad District .. Petitioner in WP13038of 2011 & respondent in WP No.9549 of 2012 Versus 1. The Inspector of Factories, Sivagangai. .. Respondent No.1 in WP13038of 2011 2. M.Shanmuga Sundara Chockalingam 3. G.Venkatesh 4. R.Thangadurai 5. P.Christopher 6. D.Kasi Rajalingam 7. V.Dhanushkodi 8. A.Dhanasekara Packa Jebaraj 9. R.Sivamurugan 10. S.Balamurugan 11. P.Jeganadhamoorthy 12. D.David Dhanaraj 13. S.Ebenesar Anban 14. T.John Udhayasuriyan 15. P.David 16. S.Esakku 17. S.Kessingaraja 18. A.Lakshmanan 19. A.Kadharkani 20. P.George 21. S.Murugan .. Respondents 2 to 21 in WP13038of 2011 and Petitioners in WP9549of 2012 Prayer in WP13038of 2011 This Writ Petiti...
Tag this Judgment!Maheswari Vs. 1. the Secretary to Government,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: May-22-2014
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATE:22. 05-2014 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE S.VAIDYANATHAN W.P.(MD) NO.2114 OF2011AND M.P.NO.1 OF2011Maheswari .. Petitioner Versus 1. The Secretary to Government, Government of Tamilnadu, Home Department, Secretariat, Chennai.2. The Director General of Police, Office of the Director General of Police, Beach Road, Chennai.3. The Additional Director General of Police, Office of the Additional Director General of Police, CBCID, Chennai.4. The Inspector General of Police, South Zone, Madurai.5. The Superintendent of Police, Office of the Superintendent of Police, Dindigul District.6. The Inspector of Police, Vilampatti PoliceStation, Dindigul District. .. Respondents Prayer This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the respondent No.2 to withdraw the case in Crime No.193 of 2010 on the file of the respondent No.6 relating to the suicide of the petitio...
Tag this Judgment!D.Bhoobalasamy Vs. State of Tamil Nadu
Court: Chennai
Decided on: May-21-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED2105.2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.SATISH K. AGNIHOTRI, THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.SATHYANARAYANAN W.P.Nos.11429/2013, 28651/2012 and 15113/2013 and M.P.Nos.1/2012, 1,1 and 1/2013 W.P.No.11429/2013 D.Bhoobalasamy .. Petitioner vs. 1.The State of Tamil Nadu, Represented by its Secretary, Department of Higher Education, Fort St. George, Chennai-600 009. 2.The All India Council for Technical Education, New Delhi. 3.The Department of Technical Education, Guindy, Chennai-600 025. 4.Anna University, Represented by its Vice Chancellor, Guindy, Chennai-600 025. 5.The Secretary, Tamilnadu Engineering Admissions, Anna University, Guindy, Chennai-600 025. 6.Association of Self Financing Professional Engineering Colleges affiliated to Anna University, Rep by its President M.Subramanian. 7.Association of Management of Coimbatore, Anna University affiliated Colleges, (Registration No.140 of 2008) Rep by its President No.119...
Tag this Judgment!S.Kannan Vs. 1.The Commissioner of Police,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: May-21-2014
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED :21. 5.2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.KIRUBAKARAN AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.VAIDYANATHAN W.P.(MD)No.8040 of 2014 and M.P.(MD)No.1 of 2014 S.Kannan ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Commissioner of Police, Madurai City, Madurai. 2.The Inspector of Police, S.S.Colony Police Station, Madurai City, Madurai. 3.The State of Tamil Nadu rep. by its Secretary, Department of Animal Husbandry, Chennai. 4.The Director General of Police, Dr.Radhakrishnan Salai, Mylapore, Chennai. ... Respondents Prayer: Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent herein to grant permission to the petitioner to conduct ".Cock Fight". as per the schedule dated 31.5.2014 and 1.6.2014 during festival of Arulmigu Muniyandi Temple at Virattipathu 2nd stop, Theni Main Road, Madurai, by considering the petitioner's representation dated 5.4.2014. !For Petitioners : Mr.J.Lawrance ...
Tag this Judgment!P.Varadarajan Vs. Dr.A.Jawahar Palaniappan
Court: Chennai
Decided on: May-16-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 16.05.2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE K.B.K.VASUKI M.P.No.1 of 2014 in Crl.R.C.No.1483 of 2013 P.Varadarajan .Petitioner -versus DR.A.JAWAHAR PALANIAPPAN MAJORITY SHAREHOLDER & DIRECTOR KUMUDAM PUBLICATIOS PVT.LTD NO.306 OLD NO.151 PURASAWALKAM HIGH ROAD, CHENNAI. THE STATE BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, CENTRAL CRIME BRANCH (TEAM-1) EGMORE, CHENNAI .Respondents For Petitioner :: Mr.R.Amizhdhu For Respondents :: Public Prosecutor M.P.No.1 of 2014 in Crl.R.C.No.1483 of 2013 K.B.K.VASUKI, J. This criminal miscellaneous Petition No.1/2014 arises out of the order dated 21.4.2014 made in Crl.R.C.No.1483/2013. Originally, the petitioner herein has come forward with the application seeking to review the same order. When the maintainability of the same was questioned, the review petition was withdrawn and the present miscellaneous petition came to be filed. The relief sought for in this Crl.MP is to expunge the observations resulting in f...
Tag this Judgment!Mrs.G.Pravina Vs. Shri.Narendra Modi
Court: Chennai
Decided on: May-14-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATE:14. 05.2014 CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.MANIKUMAR AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.S.SIVAGNANAM W.P.No.13742 of 2014 Mrs.G.Pravina .. Petitioner versus 1.Shri.Narendra Modi, Chief Minister, Gujarat. Off:5. h Floor, New Sachivalaya, Gandhi Nagar, Gujarat, India. Res: Gujarat Chief Minister Niwas, Section 20, Gandhi Nagar, Gujarat, India.2. The Director General of Police, Gujarat Police Station, Section 18, Gandhi Nagar Head Office, Gandhi Nagar, Gujarat 382 010. .. Respondents Prayer: This Writ Petition has been filed, praying for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the Director General of Police, Gujarat to take action against Mr.Narendra Modi, to take back his wife, to provide dignified life to his wife, ensuring freedom of liberty, speech and expression and equal status, as the wife of Mr.Modi and direct Mr.Narendra Modi to take back his wife and provide her dignified life ensuring his wife, freedom of speech and expression, ...
Tag this Judgment!Kasi Vs. the State
Court: Chennai
Decided on: May-14-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:14. 05.2014 Coram The Hon'ble Mr. Justice T.S. SIVAGNANAM Crl.R.C.No.292 of 2009 Kasi ... Petitioner/Accused No.1 Vs The state rep. by The Inspector of Police, Mathur Police Station, Mathur, Krishnagiri District, (Crime No.625 of 2003) ...Respondent/Complainant Prayer:-Petition filed under Section 397(1) r/w 401 of Cr.P.C. against the judgment of Appellate Court passed by the learned First Additional Sessions Judge, Dharmapuri, at Krishnagiri in Criminal Appeal No.5 of 2005, dated 19.09.2007, modified the finding and sentence of the trial Court passed by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, No.2, Dharmapuri at Krishnagiri (Sub Court, Krishnagiri), dated 31.01.2005, the petitioner is preferring this revision to call for the records and revise the judgments. For petitioner .. Mr.V.Rajamohan For Respondents .. Mr.C.Iyyapparaj, G.A.(crl.side) ORDER This Criminal Revision Petition filed under Section 397 read with 407 Cr.P.C., is directed ag...
Tag this Judgment!P.Dhamayanthi Vs. Election Commission of India
Court: Chennai
Decided on: May-14-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 14.05.2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE S.MANIKUMAR and THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE T.S.SIVAGNANAM Writ Petition No.13665 of 2014 and M.P.No.1 of 2014 P.Dhamayanthi ..Petitioner vs 1.The Election Commission of India rep. by its Secretary, Nirvachan Sadan, Asoka Road, New Delhi-110 001. 2.Union of India rep. by its Secretary, Ministry of Home AffaiRs.North Block, Central Secretariat, New Delhi-110 001. 3.The State of Tamil Nadu rep. by Secretary, Home Department, Fort St. George, Chennai-600 009. 4.Tamil Nadu State Chief Electoral Officer, Secretariat, St. George Fort, Chennai-600 009. 5.All India Anna Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam rep. by General Secretary, 226, Avvai Shanmugam Salai, Royapettah, Chennai-600 014. 6.Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam rep. by General Secretary, Anna Arivalayam, Anna Salai, Chennai-600 018. 7.The Publisher, Junior Vikatan, No.757, Anna Salai, Chennai-600 002..Respondents Praryer:- Writ petition filed under Article 226 ...
Tag this Judgment!K.Veeraraghavan Vs. Secretary to Government
Court: Chennai
Decided on: May-14-2014
THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Dated:14.05.2014 Coram THE HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE M.VENUGOPAL W.P.No.35052 of 2012 K.Veeraraghavan ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Secretary to Government, School Education Department, Secretariat, Chennai 600 009. 2.The Principal Secretary to Government, Revenue (Disaster Management) Department, Secretariat, Chennai 600 009. 3.The District Collector, Kancheepuram District. 4.The Director of School Education, College Road, Chennai 600 006. 5.The District Elementary Education Officer, Kancheepuram. 6.The Assistant Elementary Education Officer, Kattangulathur. 7.The Head Master, Government Middle School, Karunilam Village, Chengalpattu Taluk, Kancheepuram District 603 204. 8.The Panchayat President, Karunilam Village, Chengalpattu Taluk, Kancheepuram District 603 204. ... Respondents PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of Writ of Mandamus directing the Respondents to grant compensation of Rs.5,00,0...
Tag this Judgment!Jaggaram Choudhary Vs. Commissioner of Customs, Chennai
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Chennai
Decided on: May-09-2014
Pradip Kumar Das, J. Both the appeals are arising out of a common order. None appears on behalf of the appellants. Ld. A.R on behalf of Revenue submits that the matter was adjourned on several occasions at the request of the appellants. On perusal of records, I find that the matter is adjourned on 1.11.2013, 20.12.2013, 7.2.2014. Today also, no body turned up on behalf of the appellants. It seems that the appellants are not interested to proceed in the matter. Accordingly, both the appeals are dismissed for non-prosecution....
Tag this Judgment!- ‹ Prev
- 2
- Next ›
- Last »