Chennai Court April 2014 Judgments
Arokiasamy Vs. State Represented by
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-25-2014
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 25.04.2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE P.N.PRAKASH Criminal Appeal (Md.No.615 of 2005 Arokiasamy ..Appellant -versus State represented by Inspector of Police Tuticorin South Cr.No.808/2002 Tirunelveli District..Respondent This Criminal Appeal has been preferred as against the judgment passed by the Assistant Sessions Judge-cum-Chief Judicial Magistrate, Tuticorin, Tuticorin District in his S.C.No.57/2005 dated 29.11.2005, wherein he found the appellant guilty convicted and sentenced to suffer Rigorous Imprisonment for a period of 10 years for each count [3 counts].and also imposed a fine of Rs.1000/- for each count [3 counts].in default to suffer simple imprisonment for a period of 1 month for an offence under Section 306 IPC. !For Appellant : Mr.V.Kathirvelu Senior Counsel for Mr.K.Prabhu ^For Respondent: Ms.S.Prabha Govt.Advocate [Crl.side].*** :JUDGMENT This Criminal Appeal has been filed against the judgment dated 29.11.2005 ...
Tag this Judgment!N.Bhuvaneswari Vs. State of Tamil Nadu
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-25-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 25.04.2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.RAJ.W.P.No.25525 of 2009 N.Bhuvaneswari .Petitioner -versus 1. State of Tamil Nadu rep.by its Home Secretary Fort St.George Chennai 600 009 2. The Director General of Police Chennai 600 004 3. Inspector General of Police (Operation) Chennai 600 028 .Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issue of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, by calling for the records relating to the proceedings of the 2nd respondent dated 12.11.2009 made in Rc.No.127428/TNPBF(2)/2008 and also the 2nd respondent's proceedings dated 25.9.2009 made in Rc.No.127428/TNPBF(2)/2008, quash the same and direct the respondents 1 and 2 to sanction a sum of Rs.10,00,000/- as financial assistance to the petitioner as per the Tamil Nadu Police Insurance Scheme Rules for police officers and personnel. For Petitioner :: Mr.S.R.Raghunathan For Respondents :: Mr.R.Ravichandran Additional Gov...
Tag this Judgment!Syed NizamuddIn Vs. Shaik Akbar
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-25-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATE: 25.04.2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.S.RAMANATHAN A.S.No.874 of 2001 and Transfer Appeal No.919 of 2009 and C.M.P.Nos.1934 of 2009 and 254 of 2011 and 205 of 2013 In A.S.No.874 of 2001: 1.Syed Nizamuddin 2.Syed Nazeeruddin 3.Syed Rafiuddin 4.Hidayathunissa 5.Syed Tamimuddin 6.Mukthiar Begum 7.Syed Thamizuddin 8.Farath Fathima :Appellants 1 to 8/ D1,D2,D4,D5,D7 to D10 versus 1. Shaik Akbar 2.Sait Akhtar 3.A.Shaik Ameery 4.Shaik Afsar :R1 to R4/Plaintiffs 1 to 4 5.Alayadia Begum (Deceased) 6.Begum Jan (Deceased) 7.Mallika Begum 8.A.S.Anwar @ Shaik Anwar 9.Shaik Azeen 10.M.V.Muthappan 11.Seth Sheo Narain & Sons 12.State Bank of India, Head Office, Rajaji Salai, Chennai 1. 13.Industries Department, Government of Tamil Nadu, through its Secretary, Secretariat, Fort St. George, Chennai -9. 14.Insyathunnissa Begum 15.Lubran Afreen (Minor).S/o Syed Alimuddin rep by Inayathunisa Begum 16.A.Adhil Ahmed 17.A.Arif Ahmed 18.A.Asif Ahmed 1...
Tag this Judgment!M.Radheshyamlal Vs. Vasantha Kumar
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-25-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 25.04.2014 CORAM : THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.S.RAMANATHAN A.S.Nos.566 & 567 of 2011 and S.A.No.54 of 2008 and M.P.Nos.1 of 2011 and 1 & 2 of 2012 M.Radheshyamlal : Appellant/Defendant versus Vasantha Kumar (Deceased) 1.Mrs.V.Sandhya 2.V.Anand Kumar [Amended as per order, dated 08.12.2008 in Appln. No.5486/2008].: Respondents/Plaintiffs Prayer in A.S.No.566 of 2011: Appeal Suit filed under Section 96 of CPC against the Judgment and decree, dated 26.09.2011 made in O.S.No.12092 of 2010, on the file of the Additional District Court, Chennai/Fast Track Court No.1, Chennai. M.Radheshyamlal : Appellant/Plaintiff versus 1.R.K.Joshi 2.Shailesh Vasantha Kumar (Deceased) 3.Mrs.V.Sandhya [Defendants 3 and 4 have been impleaded as per order in Appln.No.7129/07 dated 10.03.2008 (Amended as per order, dated 21.04.2009].4.V.Anand Kumar [5th Defendant impleaded as per order dated 13.07.2009 in Appln.No.2992/2009].[Amended as per orders dated 0...
Tag this Judgment!National Insurance Company Limited Vs. Rajamma
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-25-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 25.04.2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.MANIKUMAR C.M.A.No.1415 of 2014 and M.P.No.1 of 2014 M/s.National Insurance Company Limited, branch Office Bangalore Road, Krishnagiri..Appellant versus 1.Rajamma 2.Minor Senthamarai 3.Minor Rajukumar @ Thimmarayan 4.Sakkammal 5.Ramamurthy 6.Balu ..Respondents Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, against the Award and Decree, dated 25.04.2004 made in M.C.O.P.No.136 of 2002 on the file of Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal (I Additional District Judge).Dharmapuri at Krishnagiri. For Appellant : Ms.Sreevidhya JUDGMENT In the accident, which occurred on 31.08.2001, involving a Tractor, bearing Registration No.TN-29X-3024, insured with National Insurance Company Limited, Krishnagiri, one Krishnan, stated to be aged 35 yeaRs.at the time of accident, died. A case in Crime No.381 of 2001 has been registered against the driver of the Tractor under Sections ...
Tag this Judgment!Three Star Poultry Farm Vs. Governmnent of Tamil Nadu
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-25-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 25.04.2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.PAUL VASANTHAKUMAR AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.SATHYANARAYANAN WRIT APPEAL Nos.574 and 776 of 2013 and WRIT PETITION No.13320 of 2013 and M.P.Nos.1, 2, 4, 6 and 7 of 2013 and 1 and 2 of 2014 in W.A.No.574 of 2013 and M.P.Nos.1, 2, 4 and 5 of 2013 and 1 and 2 of 2014 in W.A.No.776 of 2013 and M.P.Nos.1 and 4 of 2013 in W.P.No.13320 of 2013 Three Star Poultry Farm represented by its Managing Director P.Veera Pillai 7/107-1, N.Pudupatti Trichy Main Road Namakkal Taluk 637 020.Appellant in WA5742013 1.S.N.N.Poultry Farm represented by its Proprietor S.N.Nityanandan 5/3 Sanampalayam Annur 641 653 Coimbatore North Taluk 2.S.S.Poultry Farm represented by its Managing Partner S.Puvanendran Kuppitchipalayam Maraparai Post via. Vaiyappamalai Thiruchengodu Taluk Namakkal District 637 410 3.Mother Poultry Farm represented by its Proprietor V.Vijayalakshmi 6/2F, Kummampatti Road Valayapatti Post Namak...
Tag this Judgment!K. Poruthammal Vs. the Sub Registrar
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-25-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:25. 04.2014 CORAM THE HON'BLE MS.JUSTICE K.B.K.VASUKI W.P.Nos.682 and 686 of 2005 and W.P.M.P.Nos.765 to 769 of 2005 K. Poruthammal .... Petitioner in W.P.No.682 / 2005 E. Duraisamy ... Petitioner in W.P.No.683 / 2005 E. Thamayandhi ... Petitioner in W.P.No.684 / 2005 L. Jaya ... Petitioner in W.P.No.685 / 2005 1. E. Saroja (died) 2. Duraisamy 3. Poruthammal 4. Mohan 5. Raju 6. Raghu 7. Jaya ... Petitioners in W.P.No.686 / 2005 (P2 to P7 substituted as LRs in the place of deceased petitioner as per order dt. 14.03.2014) ..Vs.. 1.The Sub Registrar, Tambaram 2.Suganthi Arputhanathan 3.A. Ronald Shantakumar alias A.R. Shanthakumar .. Respondents in W.P.Nos. 682, 684 and 685 of 2005 1. The Sub Registrar, Tambaram 2. A. Ronald Shantakumar alias A.R. Shanthakumar .. Respondents in W.P.No.683/ 2005 1. The Sub Registrar, Tambaram 2. Suganthi Arputhanathan (died) 3. A. Ronald Shantakumar alias A.R. Shanthakumar 4. A. Arputhanathan 5. A. Stephen Pr...
Tag this Judgment!The Management Vs. D.Jeevanesan
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-25-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:25. / 04 /2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.S.KARNAN W.P.No.46404 of 2002 & W.P.M.P.Nos.67509 of 2002 & 1953 of 2006 The Management, Christian Medical College and Hospital, Ida Scudder Road, Vellore - 632 004. ... Petitioner Vs. 1.D.Jeevanesan 2.The Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Vellore. ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records connected with the Award dated 07.10.2002 made in I.D.No.1133 of 1993, on the file of the second respondent Labour Court and quash the same. For Petitioner : Mr.Sanjai Mohan For M/s.S.Ramasubramaniam For Respondents : Mr.S.T.Varadarajulu for R-1 R-2 (Labour Court) - - - ORDER The petitioner submits that the first respondent herein was employed as an attender Grade-II with effect from 01.07.1990. While so, the first respondent was issued charge sheets for various acts of misconduct vide pe...
Tag this Judgment!Muthabaranam Vs. 1.The District Collector,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-25-2014
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:25. 04.2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.MAHADEVAN W.P(MD)No.15677 of 2012 and M.P(MD)No.1 of 2012 Muthabaranam ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The District Collector, Madurai District, Madurai - 20. 2.The District Revenue Officer, Madurai District, Madurai. 3.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Madurai District, Madurai. 4.The Tahsildar, Melur Taluk, Melur, Madurai District. 5.Shanthi 6.Karuppiah ... Respondents Prayer Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a writ of Certiorari to call for the records relating to the impugned order made in Na.Ka.No.3624/12/G5 dated 26.11.2012 on the file of the second respondent and quash the same. For Petitioners ... Mr.M.Thirunavukarasu For Respondents ... Mr.R.Velmurugan, Govt. Advocate for R.1 to R.4 Mr.S.Subbiah for R.5 and R.6 * * * * ORDER This writ petition has been filed seeking a writ of Certiorari to call for the records relating to the impugned order made in Na.Ka.N...
Tag this Judgment!Sparebanken Sogn Og Fjordane Vs. Spence and Co.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-25-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:25. 04/2014 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.S.RAMANATHAN APPLICATION No.3101 of 2013 in C.S.No.387 of 2011 SPAREBANKEN SOGN OG FJORDANE6800FORDE NORWAY REP BY ITS POWER OF ATTORNEY AGENT JAYVANT BAILE VS R-1 SPENCE AND CO., REP.BY ITS PARTNER MR.R.RAJAMANICKAM, NEW NO.30, OLD NO.220, N.S.C.BOSE ROAD, PARRYS, CHENNAI1R-2 ONWERS AND PERSONS INTERESTED IN THE VESSEL M.V. BOS ANGLER ORDER APPLICATION No.3101 of 2013 in C.S.No.387 of 2011 R.S.RAMANATHAN, J The applicant in Application No.3101 of 2013 is a third party and he filed the said Application under Order XIV, Rule 8 of O.S.Rules read with Section 10 and 151 of C.P.C., praying to pass an order directing the first respondent herein to pursue their claim against the second respondent and/or against the sale proceeds of M.V.BOS ANGLER only in the Hon'ble Bombay High Court in Admiralty Suit No.24 of 2011 and consequently, stay all further proceedings in C.S.No.387 of 2011 on the file of this...
Tag this Judgment!- ‹ Prev
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- Next ›
- Last »