Chennai Court April 2014 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
A.Shankar Vs. Deputy Superintendent of Police
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-04-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Dated: 04.04.2014 Coram THE HONOURABLE Ms.JUSTICE K.B.K.VASUKI Crl.R.C.No.1190 of 2012 and M.P.No.1 of 2012 A.Shankar .Petitioner versus The Deputy Superintendent of Police Cyber Crime Cell, Crime Branch CID Guindy, Chennai 600 032.Respondent Prayer:- Criminal Revision filed under Section 397 r/w 401 Cr.P.C.to call for the records pertaining to the impugned order dated 17.8.2012 made in Crl.M.P.No.157/2012 in SC.No.192/2009 passed by the XV Additional Sessions Judge in-charge of XIX Additional Sessions Judge, Chennai-1 and to quash the same. For Petitioner : Mr.P.Vijendran For Respondent : Mr.C.Iyyapparaj, GA(Crl.Side) ORDER This criminal revision is filed against the order made in Crl.MP.157/2012 in SC.No.192/2009, in and under which, the petition filed by the petitioner/accused for altering the charges framed by the respondent in accordance with the provisions of the Information Technology Act, 2008 was dismissed. 2.Few facts, which are relev...
Amsaveni Vs. 1.The District Revenue Officer,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-04-2014
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:04. 04/2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.MAHADEVAN W.P.(MD)No.16294 of 2012 and M.P.No.1 of 2012 and 1 of 2013 Amsaveni ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The District Revenue Officer, Madurai. 2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Madurai. 3.The Tahsildar, Madurai North Taluk, Madurai District. 4.K.Gomathi ... Respondents PRAYER Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issue of a Writ of Certiorari to call for the records of the first respondent relating to his order passed in his proceedings in Na.Ka.No.85796/2009/G2, dated 25.06.2012, and quash the same. !For Petitioner ... Mr.R.Janakiramulu ^For Respondent Nos.1to3 ... Mr.S.Sadheeshkumar Additional Government Pleader For Respondent No.4 ... Mr.K.Gnanasambandan :ORDER *********** Challenge in this Writ Petition is to the order, dated 25.06.2012, passed by the first respondent herein, in and by which the order, dated 12.10.2009, passed by the second responden...
Mr.R.Riyaz Ahmed Vs. J.G.Glass Industries Pvt.Ltd
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-04-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Dated : 04.04.2014 CORAM: THE HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE M.DURAISWAMY S.A.No.655 of 2011 1.Mr.R.Riyaz Ahmed 2.R.Rafi Ahmed 3.R.Mustaq Ahmed 4.R.Shafeeq Ahmed ..Appellants versus 1.J.G.Glass Industries PVT.Ltd., No.105/A, Old GST Road, Pallavaram, Chennai 600 043. 2.D.Nandakumar 3.Tmt.Sujatha Nandha Kumar ..Respondents Second Appeal has been filed under Section 100 of the Civil Procedure Code against the judgment and decree in A.S.No.11 of 2008 dated 25.10.2010 on the file of the Principle District Judge, Chengalpet, confirming the judgment and decree in I.A.No.696 of 2006 in O.S.No.73 of 2006 on the file of the Principle Sub Judge, Chengalpet, dated 12.10.2007. For Appellants : Mr.V.Raghavachari For Respondents : Mr.V.Ramesh JUDGMENT The above appeal arises against the judgment and decree passed in A.S.No.11 of 2008 on the file of the Principle District Court, Chengalpet, confirming the judgment and decree passed in I.A.No.696 of 2006 in O.S.No.73 of ...
1.Nallathai Vs. 1.S.Ramakrishnan
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-04-2014
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 04.04.2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.CHOCKALINGAM S.A.(MD)No.138 of 2006 1.Nallathai 2.Chella Gomathy 3.Balambika 4.Usharani 5.C.Venkateshwari 6.C.Mahalakshmi 7.C.Viayalakshmi 8.C.Kannan : Appellants/Plaintiffs versus 1.S.Ramakrishnan 2.S.Arumugam : Respondents/Defendants Prayer This second appeal filed under Section 100 of CPC against the judgment and decree of the II Additional Sub Court, Tirunelveli, in A.S.No.189 of 2005, dated 17.11.2005 reversing the decree and judgment of the I Additional District Munsif, Tirunelveli, in O.S.No.1102 of 2004, dated 21.04.2005. !For Appellants : Mr.S.Meenakshi Sundaram ^For Respondents : Mr.S.Kumar :JUDGMENT Challenge in this second appeal is to the judgment and decree, dated 17.11.2005 passed in A.S.No.189 of 2005, by the II Additional Sub-Judge, Tirunelveli, reversing the judgment and decree passed in O.S.No.1102 of 2004, dated 21.04.2005, on the file of the II Additional District Mun...
Manickam Vs. Respondent
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-04-2014
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 04.04.2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.CHOCKALINGAM S.A.(MD)No.1135 of 2009 Manickam : Appellant/Plaintiff versus 1.C.Suthandiram 2.Sudhaman 3.Kaja @ Kajendran : Respondents/Defendants Prayer This second appeal filed under Section 100 of CPC against the judgment and decree in A.S.No.87 of 2008, dated 18.04.2009 on the file of the II Additional Sub Court, Madurai, confirming the judgment and decree, dated 15.02.2008 in O.S.No.350 of 2002 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Madurai, Taluk, Madurai. !For Appellant : Mr.S.Ramachandran ^For Respondents : Mr.M.Sadiq Raja for M/s.K.Muthu Ganesa Pandian :JUDGMENT Challenge in this second appeal is to the judgment and decree, dated 18.04.2009 passed in A.S.No.87 of 2008 by the II Additional Subordinate Judge, Madurai thereby, confirming the judgment and decree, dated 15.02.2008 passed by the District Munsif, Madurai in O.S.No.350 of 2003. 2.The appellant herein as plaintiff has in...
1.R.Ramuththevar (Died) Vs. Selvi
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-04-2014
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 04.04.2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.CHOCKALINGAM S.A.(MD)No.27 of 2006 and S.A.(MD)No.918 of 2006 S.A(MD)No.27 of 2006 1.R.Ramuththevar (died) :1st Appellant/plaintiff 2.Eswaran 3.R.Rajaji 4.Rajapandi 5.Panjavarnam [Appellants 2 to 5 brought on record as LRs of the deceased 1st appellant as per order of this court made in M.P(MD)No.1 of 2009 in S.A.No.27/2006, dated 06.01.2010].: Appellants 2 to 5 /LRs.of the plaintiff versus Selvi :Respondent/Defendant S.A(MD)No.918 of 2006: 1.R.Ramuththevar (died) :1st Appellant/plaintiff 2.Eswaran 3.R.Rajaji 4.Rajapandi 5.Panjavarnam [Appellants 2 to 5 brought on record as LRs of the deceased 1st appellant as per order of this court made in M.P(MD)No.1 of 2009 in S.A.No.918/2006, dated 06.01.2010].: Appellants 2 to 5 /LRs.of the plaintiff versus Selvi :Respondent/Defendant Prayer in S.A(MD)No.27 of 2006 This second appeal filed under Section 100 of CPC against the judgment and decree pass...
Arulmighu Aathimooleswarar Thirukoil Vs. Gurumoorthy
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-04-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Dated: 04.04.2014 CORAM: The Hon'ble Mr.Justice R.KARUPPIAH Civil Revision Petition No.411 of 2007 Arulmighu Aathimooleswarar Thirukoil, Agaram, Represented by its Executive Officer, Having office at Arulmighu Muthukumrasamy Thirukoil, Big Bazaar Street, Protonovo & Post, Chidambaram Taluk.Petitioner/defendant vs Gurumoorthy .Respondent/plaintiff The Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the fair order and decretal order dated 20.12.2006 passed in I.A.No.391 of 2006 in O.S.No.11 of 2006 on the file of the District Munsif-cum-Judicial Magistrate, Portonovo. For Petitioner ..Mr.R.Sunil Kumar For Respondent ..No Appearance (Notice served) ORDER The civil revision petition has been filed against the fair order and decretal order dated 20.12.2006 passed in I.A.No.391 of 2006 in O.S.No.11 of 2006 on the file of the District Munsif-cum-Judicial Magistrate Court, Portonovo. 2.The revision petitioner he...
S.Balakrishnan Vs. S.Ayyammal
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-04-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATE:4. 4.2014. CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P.R.SHIVAKUMAR A.S.No.689 of 2004, C.M.P.No.10667 of 2004 and C.M.P.No.47 of 2014 1. S.Balakrishnan 2. S.Marudhachalam 3. S.Suseela Appellants vs.1. S.Ayyammal (Deceased) 2. S.Natarajan 3. S.Jayaprakash 4. S.Nagarajan 5. N.Kanagarathinam (Appellants 1 to 3 and RR2to 5 are recorded as L.Rs. of the deceased R1 vide order dated 13.12.2013 in A.S.No.689 of 2004-vide memo dated 13.12.2013 in S.R.No.8919 of 2013) Respondents The Appeal is filed against the judgment and decree dated 30.9.2003 in O.S.No.198 of 2003 on the file of the Additional District Judge (Fast Track Court No.1), Coimbatore. For appellants : Mr.V.Nicholas For respondents : Mr.CH.Pandian JUDGMENT The unsuccessful plaintiffs in O.S.No.198 of 2003, which was dismissed by the Trial Judge viz., learned Additional District Judge/Fast Track Court I, Coimbatore by his judgment and decree dated 30.9.2003, are the appellants in the appeal. Initial...
Indian Bank Employees Union Vs. Union of India
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-04-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 04.04.2014 CORAM THE HON'BLE Ms.JUSTICE K.B.K.VASUKI Writ Petition No.32994 of 2002 Indian Bank Employees Union rep. by its Assistant Secretary, No.25, Second Line Beach, Chennai 600 001..Petitioner versus 1.Union of India rep. by its Secretary Ministry of Labour, Sham Mantralaya, New Delhi 110 001. 2.The Presiding Officer, Central Government Industrial Tribunal cum Labour Court, Shastri Bhavan, Sterling Road, Chennai -6. 3.Indian Bank rep. by its Chairman, and Managing Director, 31, Rajaji Salai, Chennai -1..Respondents Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for issuance of a writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, after calling for the records relating to the Award dated 2.8.2002 of the 2nd respondent in I.D.No.556 of 2001, quash the same as being illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional and consequently direct the 2nd respondent to decide I.D.No.556/2001 on merits, after affording due opportunity of hearing to...
Dr.P.Kamalakannan Vs. the Government of Tamil Nadu
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-04-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:04. 04.2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.RAJA W.P.Nos.18604 and 25957 of 2013 1.Dr.P.Kamalakannan 2.Dr.M.Shabbir Ahamed 3.Dr.P.S.Kavitha 4.Dr.S.Sivasakthi Kumar 5.Dr.K.Baskaran 6.Dr.R.Rameswari 7.Dr.N.Smitha 8.Dr.T.Kavitha 9.Dr.A.Senthi Kumar 10.Dr.T.Mariasingam 11.Dr.V.Akalya Subramanian 12.Dr.M.Suresh Kumar 13.Dr.A.Pravin Kumar 14.Dr.S.Ramya Devi ... Petitioners in W.P.No.18604/13 Dr.A.Pravin Kumar ... Petitioner in W.P.No.25957/13 Vs. 1.The Government of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by Secretary to Government, Department of Health and Family Welfare, Fort St. George, Chennai 9. 2.The Special Secretary to Government/Member Secretary, Department of Health and Family Welfare, Medical Services Recruitment Board, Fort St. George, Chennai 9. 3.The Director, Medical Services Recruitment Board, 7th Floor, DMS Building, 359, Anna Salai, Teynampet, Chennai 6. 4.The Director, Directorate of Medical Education, Kilpauk, Chennai. ... Respondents in bot...
- ‹ Prev
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 23
- 24
- 25
- 26
- Next ›
- Last »